Model-based cueing-as-needed for walking in Parkinson's disease: A randomized cross-over study.

BACKGROUND: Correcting of the lack of regularity in steps is a key component of gait rehabilitation in Parkinson's disease. We proposed to introduce adaptive spatial auditory cueing (ASAC) based on verbal instruction "lengthen the step" automatically delivered when the stride length decreased below a predetermined threshold. OBJECTIVES: The present study compared the effect of usual rhythmic auditory cueing versus ASAC used during a walking training in Parkinson's disease. METHODS: Fifteen patients with Parkinson's disease performed both interventions in randomized order, one week apart: a 20-minute walking training with rhythmic auditory cueing, in form of a metronome adjusted on 110% of the patient's own cadence, or ASAC delivered when the stride length is less than 110% of the patient's own stride length. Assessment criteria were walking distance covered during the intervention, speed, step length, cadence, coefficients of variation of step length and step duration, and indexes of spatial and temporal asymmetry during a walking test before and just after the intervention. RESULTS: The walking distance is higher with ASAC compared with rhythmic auditory cueing (rhythmic auditory cueing, 905 (203) m, mean (standard deviation); ASAC, 1043 (212) m; P=0.002). Between-intervention comparison showed some similar effects on walking after the intervention including free speed and step length increases (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: The distance covered during 20-minute walking with ASAC increases by 15% compared to the use of classical rhythmic auditory cueing, while the immediate therapeutic effects show similar spatial-temporal benefits on short-distance walking. Auditory biofeedback cueing promoting the increase in step length might improve gait relearning in Parkinson's disease.

[Intensity in the neurorehabilitation of spastic paresis]. / Intensité et rééducation motrice dans la parésie spastique.

Neurorestoration of motor command in spastic paresis requires a double action of stimulation and guidance of central nervous system plasticity. Beyond drug therapies, electrical stimulation and cell therapies, which may stimulate plasticity without precisely guiding it, two interventions seem capable of driving plasticity with a double stimulation and guidance component: the lesion itself (lesion-induced plasticity) and durable behavior modifications (behavior-induced plasticity). Modern literature makes it clear that the intensity of the neuronal and physical training is a primary condition to foster behavior-induced plasticity. When it comes to working on movement, intensity can be achieved by the combination of two key components, one is the difficulty of the trained movement, the other is the number of repetitions or the daily duration of the practice. A number of recent studies shed light on promising recovery prospects, particularly using the emergence of new technologies such as robot-assisted therapy and concepts such as guided self-rehabilitation contracts.