Maintaining Control of Chronic Obstructive Airway Disease: Adherence to Inhaled Therapy and Risks and Benefits of Switching Devices.

Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are major obstructive airway diseases that involve underlying airway inflammation. The most widely used pharmacotherapies for asthma and COPD are inhaled agents that have been shown to be effective and safe in these patients. However, despite the availability of effective pharmacologic treatment and comprehensive treatment guidelines, the prevalence of inadequately controlled asthma and COPD is high. A main reason for this is poor adherence. Adherence is a big problem for all chronic diseases, but in asthma and COPD patients there are some additional difficulties because of poor inhalation technique and inhaler choice. Easier-to-use devices and educational strategies on proper inhaler use from health caregivers can improve inhaler technique. The type of device used and the concordance between patient and physician in the choice of inhaler can also improve adherence and are as important as the drug. Adherence to inhaled therapy is absolutely necessary for optimizing patient control. If disease control is not adequate despite good adherence, switching to a more appropriate inhaled therapy is recommended. By contrast, uninformed switching or switching to less user-friendly inhaler may impact disease control negatively. This critical review of the available literature is aimed to provide a guidance protocol on when a switch may be recommended in individual patients.

[Tuberculosis in the districts of Kamez and Vlore (Albania) in the early 2000s]. / Analisi dei casi di tubercolosi nei distretti albanesi di Valona e di Kamza nei primi anni Duemila.

OBJECTIVES: evaluation of tuberculosis (TB) rates and treatment outcomes in two Albanian districts of similar population, but different disease diffusion: Kamez and Vlore. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: retrospective observational study of all the medical charts of not-HIV+ TB patients in Vlore from 2002 to 2011, and in Kamez from 2004 to 2011. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTS: at Vlore the cases observed were 120 cases (mean age: 43 years, 68% males); the incidence rate was substantially stable in the study period, with 8 cases/100,000 inhabitants/year, and, overall, lower (p <0.001) than at Kamez. The TB cases founded were 160 (mean age: 45 years, 61% males) at Kamez, with decreasing incidence rate (Annual Percent Change - APC: -12%; p =0.00022), from 30-42/100,000 inhabitants/year in 2004- 2005 to 16.4/100,000 in 2011. New and retreated cases were, respectively, 96.7% and 3.3% at Vlore, and 96.25% and 3.75% at Kamez. Pulmonary TB was 75% at Vlore and 65% at Kamez. Most cases with pulmonary TB (79%) were microbiologically confirmed. Overall, successful treatments and relapses were respectively observed in 89% and 3% of cases with no drug resistance CONCLUSIONS: in the first years of the third millennium, TB rates remain different between the two studied Albanian districts, but with a significant reduction in the area with greater baseline incidence (Kamez); overall disease control seems to be good.

Untreated Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Interstitial Lung Disease and Impact on Interstitial Lung Disease Outcomes.

Subjects with interstitial lung disease (ILD) often suffer from nocturnal cough, insomnia, and poor sleep quality. Subjects with ILD and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) seem to have relatively mild symptoms from sleep fragmentation compared to subjects with only ILD. The overlap of ILD, OSA, and sleeping hypoxemia may be associated with poor outcome, even though there is no agreement on which sleep parameter is mostly associated with worsening ILD prognosis. Randomized controlled trials are needed to understand when positive airway pressure (PAP) treatment is required in subjects with ILD and OSA and the impact of PAP treatment on ILD progression.

Inhaled Corticosteroids in Subjects with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: An Old, Unfinished History.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the major causes of disability and death. Maintenance use of inhaled bronchodilator(s) is the cornerstone of COPD pharmacological therapy, but inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are also commonly used. This narrative paper reviews the role of ICSs as maintenance treatment in combination with bronchodilators, usually in a single inhaler, in stable COPD subjects. The guidelines strongly recommend the addition of an ICS in COPD subjects with a history of concomitant asthma or as a step-up on the top of dual bronchodilators in the presence of hospitalization for exacerbation or at least two moderate exacerbations per year plus high blood eosinophil counts (≥300/mcl). This indication would only involve some COPD subjects. In contrast, in real life, triple inhaled therapy is largely used in COPD, independently of symptoms and in the presence of exacerbations. We will discuss the results of recent randomized controlled trials that found reduced all-cause mortality with triple inhaled therapy compared with dual inhaled long-acting bronchodilator therapy. ICS use is frequently associated with common local adverse events, such as dysphonia, oral candidiasis, and increased risk of pneumonia. Other side effects, such as systemic toxicity and unfavorable changes in the lung microbiome, are suspected mainly at higher doses of ICS in elderly COPD subjects with comorbidities, even if not fully demonstrated. We conclude that, contrary to real life, the use of ICS should be carefully evaluated in stable COPD patients.

Prognostic Significance of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in a Population of Subjects with Interstitial Lung Diseases.

INTRODUCTION: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is often observed in subjects with interstitial lung disease (ILD). It may have a negative impact on the course of ILD, but its prognostic significance in relation to other known indicators of poor outcome is unclear. METHODS: After a detailed work-up, including overnight unattended type III polygraphy, all subjects newly diagnosed with ILDs referred to our clinics were followed-up for at least 1.5 years or until death or progression of disease [> 10% decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) below baseline]. We analyzed relationships between some prespecified variables of interest, including sleeping results, to establish parameters predictive of progressive course. RESULTS: Our population consisted of 46 subjects (mean age 59.6 years; males 61%); 23.9% and 41% had idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and ILD associated with systemic diseases, respectively. Mean baseline forced vital capacity and diffusion capacity of carbon monoxide were 83% and 57% of predicted, respectively. Mean (± SE) Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) was 17 (± 3) events/h. AHI in the ranges 5-14.9, 15-29.9, and ≥ 30 was recorded in 14 (31%), 6 (13%), and 9 (20%) subjects, respectively. Mean distance covered in the 6-MWG walk test (6MWT) was 302 (± 19) m and 26 subjects (57%) showed exertional oxyhemoglobin desaturation. The median follow-up was about 18 months. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that exertional desaturation (HR 8.2; 1.8-36.5 95% CI; p = 0.006) and AHI ≥ 30, namely the threshold of severe OSA (HR 7.5; 1.8-30.6; p = 0.005), were the only independent variables related to progressive disease course. CONCLUSION: We conclude that exertional desaturation and elevated AHI had independent negative prognostic significance in our ILD population.

No-shaking and shake-fire delays affect respirable dose for suspension but not solution pMDIs.

It has long been accepted that suspension pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs) must be shaken if a correct dose is to be delivered, if not, it will usually be higher than the label claim. The purpose of this work was to investigate the influence of the device being unshaken, shaken and after a period of delay in pMDI actuation on the Fine Particle Mass (<5 µm), Extra Fine Particle Mass (<2 µm) and MMAD. Solution and suspension commercial pMDIs containing one, two or three components were used in the study. Most of the suspension pMDIs produced variable amounts of respirable size drug following the shake-fire delays tested in terms of the label claim dose. The effect was even more critical if the inhaler was not shaken and the FPM was found to be between -82 % for Symbicort and 363 % for Ventolin compared with the control values. In the case of MMAD measurements, Seretide and Serzyl inhalers showed the largest change from around 3 µm to 4.2-5.1 µm when not shaken. Conversely, the FPM and MMAD for the solution aerosols remained unchanged whether or not they were shaken or when a progressive increase in the delay in actuation after shaking was employed.

Systemic Corticosteroids for Treating Respiratory Diseases: Less Is Better, but When and How Is It Possible in Real Life?

Systemic corticosteroids (CSs), a keystone in pulmonology, are drugs with strong antiinflammatory activity. They are cheap, easily available, and accessible, but with common and serious side effects. Moreover, the use of exogenous CSs may suppress the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, predisposing to adrenal insufficiency. Safe CS treatment is a challenge of pharmacological research. This narrative review examined the indications of CSs in some respiratory diseases, analyzing what types, dosages, and length of treatment are required as the dosage and duration of CS treatments need to be minimized. Chronic maintenance treatments with CSs are associated with poor prognosis, but they are still prescribed in patients with severe asthma, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and interstitial lung diseases. When CS discontinuation is not possible, all efforts should be made to achieve clinically meaningful reductions. Guidelines suggest the use of methylprednisolone at a dose of 20-40 mg/day or equivalent for up to 10 days in subjects with COVID-19 pneumonia (but not other respiratory viral diseases) and respiratory failure, exacerbations of asthma, and COPD. Some guidelines suggest that CS treatment shorter than 10-14 days can be abruptly stopped, strictly monitoring subjects with unexplained symptoms after CS withdrawal, who should promptly be tested for adrenal insufficiency (AI) and eventually treated. CSs are often used in severe community-acquired pneumonia associated with markedly increased serum inflammation markers, in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), in septic shock unresponsive to hydro-saline replenishment and vasopressors, and acute exacerbations of interstitial lung diseases. As these cases often require higher doses and longer duration of CS treatment, CS tapering should be gradual and, when useful, supported by an evaluation of HPA axis function.

Nebulized corticosteroids in asthma and COPD. An Italian appraisal.

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are the mainstay of anti-inflammatory treatment in subjects with asthma and COPD. This review evaluates the role of nebulizers as an alternative to inhalers for delivering ICSs in asthma and COPD. I selected 16 randomized, placebo-controlled, blinded, long-term studies, mostly carried out in asthma (n = 14) and COPD. Nebulized budesonide has been demonstrated to be effective and safe in children ages 1-8 years, and, with less evidence, in infants and adults with asthma. Other investigations, with the addition of in vitro and in vivo comparison studies, have shown that nebulized beclomethasone, fluticasone, and flunisolide are effective alternatives to nebulized budesonide in asthma and COPD. Efficient delivery of nebulized ICSs requires that the nebulizer system, the nebulized drug formulation, and the inhaling subject interact properly. The practices of mixing nebulized ICSs with bronchodilators and using nebulized ICSs in acute settings are promising, but require further confirmations, and at present cannot be recommended. I conclude that nebulizers may be considered as an effective alternative to inhalers for delivering ICSs and can be recommended to asthmatic and COPD subjects who are unwilling or unable to use inhalers. Newer formulations could possibly offer a relevant advance for a more efficient nebulization of ICSs.

Effects on aerosol performance of mixing of either budesonide or beclomethasone dipropionate with albuterol and ipratropium bromide.

BACKGROUND: Mixing of nebulized drugs is common in real life, but its consequences on aerosol output and granulometry are poorly known. METHODS: In an in vitro study I evaluated the effects on aerosol output, drug output, and aerosol particle size characteristics of mixing either beclomethasone dipropionate or budesonide with albuterol and ipratropium bromide. I tested the SideStream and VentStream-Pro nebulizers, run with the AirClinic compressor. Using the same fill volume in all experiments, I nebulized and evaluated each studied drug alone, and 2 drug mixtures: beclomethasone plus albuterol plus ipratropium; and budesonide plus albuterol plus ipratropium. I measured aerosol output via gravimetrics. I measured drug delivery by collecting the aerosol on a filter in the inspiratory limb, and the residual solution in the reservoir and the circuit after nebulization, and assayed those liquids with chromatography. I measured particle size distribution via cascade impaction. RESULTS: Mixing tended to reduce drug output and to increase mass median aerodynamic diameter with the SideStream, but not always with the VentStream-Pro. However, the drug output always remained satisfactory and the mass median aerodynamic diameters were within the respirable range. When nebulized alone, the respirable mass of bronchodilators ranged from 18% to 40% of the nominal dose; when mixed, it ranged from 13% to 37%. When nebulized alone, the respirable mass of corticosteroids ranged from 10% to 24% of the nominal dose; when mixed, it ranged from 10% to 17%. CONCLUSIONS: Both the SideStream and VentStream-Pro have good aerosol performance in nebulizing budesonide or beclomethasone dipropionate alone, and when mixed with albuterol and ipratropium bromide.

Inhaler technique in asthma and COPD: challenges and unmet knowledge that can contribute to suboptimal use in real life.

Introduction: Inhalers are the most commonly used devices for lung drug delivery in asthma and COPD. Inhaler use offers several advantages but requires the user's proper mastery. The issue of inhaler technique is very important as inhaler misuse remains common in real life regardless of the inhaler used and is associated with poor disease control.Areas covered:This narrative review analyses the key-steps of inhaler mastery and the significance of the errors of use for the main devices. There are uncertainties on many tasks of inhaler use and on those variations from recommended steps that are considered as critical errors.Expert opinion: Despite technological advancements, an easy-to-use device is not yet available. Whatever the chosen inhaler, health care givers' proper practical education with the opportunity of feedback learning has a key-role for improving inhaler technique, but is time-consuming, and remains limited to few successful experiences. Newer digital technologies will be applied to the field of inhaler education, but the lack of knowledge on many practical aspects of inhaler technique might be a limit for its extensive implementation. Possibly digital innovation might substantially contribute to reduce inhaler misuse only if clinicians, manufacturers, and subjects will cooperate together on this issue.

A Comprehensive Review of Sarcoidosis Diagnosis and Monitoring for the Pulmonologist.

Sarcoidosis is a systemic granulomatous disease with heterogenous clinical manifestations. Here we review the diagnosis of sarcoidosis and propose a clinically feasible diagnostic work-up and monitoring protocol. As sarcoidosis is a systemic disease, a multidisciplinary approach is recommended for best outcomes. However, since the lungs are frequently involved, the pulmonologist is often the referral physician for diagnosis and management. When sarcoidosis is suspected, diagnosis needs to be confirmed and organ involvement/impairment assessed. This process is also required to establish whether the patient is likely to benefit from treatment, as many cases of sarcoidosis are self-limited and remit spontaneously. Whether or not treatment is started, effective regular follow-up is necessary to monitor changes in the disease, including extension, progression, remissions, flare-ups, and complications.

A Comprehensive Review of Sarcoidosis Treatment for Pulmonologists.

Due to frequent lung involvement, the pulmonologist is often the reference physician for management of sarcoidosis, a systemic granulomatous disease with a heterogeneous course. Treatment of sarcoidosis raises some issues. The first challenge is to select patients who are likely to benefit from treatment, as sarcoidosis may be self-limiting and remit spontaneously, in which case treatment can be postponed and possibly avoided without any significant impact on quality of life, organ damage or prognosis. Systemic glucocorticosteroids (GCs) are the drug of first choice for sarcoidosis. When GCs are started, there is a > 50% chance of long-term treatment. Prolonged use of prednisone at > 10 mg/day or equivalent is often associated with severe side effects. In these and refractory cases, steroid-sparing options are advised. Antimetabolites, such as methotrexate, are the second-choice therapy. Biologics, such as anti-TNF and especially infliximab, are third-choice drugs. The three treatments can be used concomitantly. Regardless of whether treatment is started, the clinician needs to organize regular follow-up to monitor remissions, flares, progression, complications, toxicity and relapses in order to promptly adjust the drugs used.

Inhaled corticosteroid therapy with nebulized beclometasone dipropionate.

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the most effective anti-inflammatory agents for the management of chronic persistent asthma and are therefore recommended as first-line antiasthmatic therapy in children and adults. In various settings, the administration of ICS via nebulizer rather than hand-held inhaler (HHI) may have certain advantages, as many patients with HHI fail to use these devices properly or efficiently. In particular, young children, the elderly, the acutely ill, and those with restricted dexterity may be unable to coordinate inhalation with actuation of the device or to generate sufficient inspiratory flow to operate breath-actuated devices effectively. Compliance with nebulized therapy may also be better than that with a pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) plus spacer. Systematic reviews conclude that there is no significant difference in clinical effects between nebulizers and HHI. Performance and clinical effect of nebulization are influenced by several technical aspects such as the nebulizer-drug combination, nebulizer type, output and lung deposition. Among the currently available ICS, nebulized beclometasone dipropionate (BDP) has been in clinical use for more than 35 years, and has demonstrated marked clinical efficacy and a favorable tolerability profile in children and adults with chronic persistent asthma. The clinical efficacy of nebulized beclometasone is discussed in the present review using data from 13 published studies, which included a total of 1250 patients. Three multicenter, randomized, double-blind studies showed that nebulized BDP is as effective as BDP via pMDI plus spacer in a 2:1 dose ratio. Controlled trials involving 497 adults and children demonstrated similar clinical efficacy between nebulized BDP and either nebulized fluticasone propionate or nebulized budesonide. In all these trials, treatment-related adverse effects were generally uncommon, most were mild-to-moderate in severity, and most were associated with the respiratory system. Meta-analyses show that BDP, like other inhaled corticosteroids, has no major influence on patient height, urinary cortisol concentration, or bone metabolism, thus suggesting the absence of growth retardation or any marked effect on adrenal function or the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis when used in the approved dose range. Overall, nebulized BDP appears to have a particularly important place in asthma therapy: as a general alternative to HHIs (e.g. in patients with poor HHI compliance); when patients such as children or the elderly are unable to operate HHIs because of poor hand-lung coordination, lack of cooperation, or low inspiratory flow rate; and when high dosages of ICS are required, such as in adults with severe, corticosteroid-dependent asthma.

Consequences of not-shaking and shake-fire delays on the emitted dose of some commercial solution and suspension pressurized metered dose inhalers.

BACKGROUND: Pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs) include hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) propellant to generate a drug aerosol upon actuation and drugs can be formulated as solution or suspension. Suspended particles can cream or sediment depending on density differences between drug and propellant and shaking the pMDI is an essential step to ensure a uniform drug dose release. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The effect of the delay (0, 10, 30, 60 seconds) in pMDI actuation after shaking and the effect of no-shaking during the canister life on the emitted dose (ED) for commercial solution and suspension pMDIs was investigated. RESULTS: The ED for solutions was unaffected by no-shaking or by the progressive increasing delay in actuation after shaking (between 77% and 97%). For all the suspension products, shaking was demonstrated to be critical to assure the close to nominal drug delivery. In detail, the actuation delay after shaking led to an increase up to 380% or a drop to 32% of ED in relation to the label claim with high variability. CONCLUSION: The drug delivered can vary widely for no-shaking and over different shake-fire delays with suspension pMDIs while solution formulations appear to remain stable.

Olodaterol for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a narrative review.

INTRODUCTION: Inhaled bronchodilators are the key-stone of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management. Olodaterol 5 µg, a long-acting ß2-adrenoceptor agonist (LABA) is one such bronchodilator indicated as a once-daily maintenance therapy. Areas covered: This article reviews the several trials that have assessed olodaterol as a COPD therapy. It covers safety and tolerability data and provides the reader with an expert opinion on its use as a treatment for COPD. Expert opinion: Olodaterol improves lung function for 24 h and reduces rescue medication use. It may also improve dyspnea, exercise tolerance, and health-related quality of life. It is well tolerated with an acceptable cardiovascular and respiratory adverse event profile. There is some evidence that olodaterol, as well as other LABAs, can reduce exacerbation frequency, but not FEV1 decline and death. LABAs alone are indicated in group A/B COPD subjects. Olodaterol and indacaterol are administered once-daily and may offer an adherence advantage over other LABAs with more frequent dosing schedules. Co-administration of an olodaterol/tiotropium fixed dose combination in a single inhaler device is recommended as step-up in group A/B COPD subjects not sufficiently treated by olodaterol alone or as initial therapy in those with severe exertional dyspnea.

The pharmacological treatment of bronchiectasis.

INTRODUCTION: Until recently considered as a minor health problem, the role of bronchiectasis is now increasingly recognized. New specific drugs are being approved for treatment of bronchiectasis. Possibly they will offer better perspectives to bronchiectatic subjects with evolving course. Areas covered: We provide an overview of aetiopathogenesis, clinics and non-pharmacological management, extending the topic of pharmacological treatment. Present therapies were extrapolated from other chronic lung diseases, but newer promising specific drugs are being awaited. Therapy aims at improving mobilisation of bronchial secretions and, if any, reversing airflow obstruction. Antibiotics are indicated to treat exacerbations, eradicate or reduce sputum bacterial load. Expert commentary: Over the last years evidence is mounted that bronchiectatic subjects with accelerated course of disease should be referred to secondary and tertiary centres. This requires increased awareness on the role and the frequency of bronchiectasis in primary care. Long-term continuous or cyclical use of antibiotics is recommended to stabilize or improve the course of evolving disease. Macrolides are a currently preferred option. Inhaled antibiotics are gaining importance and are the object of ongoing research interest. Practical challenges of inhaled antibiotic treatment remain the need of defining the best therapeutic regimen and optimizing true adherence.

Home oxygen therapy: re-thinking the role of devices.

INTRODUCTION: A range of devices are available for delivering and monitoring home oxygen therapy (HOT). Guidelines do not give indications for the choice of the delivery device but recommend the use of an ambulatory system in subjects on HOT whilst walking. Areas covered: We provide a clinical overview of HOT and review traditional and newer delivery and monitoring devices for HOT. Despite relevant technology advancements, clinicians, faced with many challenges when they prescribe oxygen therapy, often remain familiar to traditional devices and continuous flow delivery of oxygen. Some self-filling delivery-less devices could increase the users' level of independence with ecological advantage and, perhaps, reduced cost. Some newer portable oxygen concentrators are being available, but more work is needed to understand their performances in different diseases and clinical settings. Pulse oximetry has gained large diffusion worldwide and some models permit long-term monitoring. Some closed-loop portable monitoring devices are also able to adjust oxygen flow automatically in accordance with the different needs of everyday life. This might help to improve adherence and the practice of proper oxygen titration that has often been omitted because difficult to perform and time-consuming. Expert commentary: The prescribing physicians should know the characteristics of newer devices and use technological advancements to improve the practice of HOT.

Inhalatory therapy training: a priority challenge for the physician.

Patients with asthma and COPD commonly use inhaled drugs. The 3 types of currently available devices for inhaled therapy (Metered-dose inhaler, dry powder inhaler, and nebulizer) are clinically equivalent. However, since many different inhalers are available for inhaled therapy, the choice of the delivery device is important for optimizing the results of aerosol therapy. Traditional press-and-breathe Metered Dose Inhalers (pMDIs) have recently improved their ecological appeal, can be used in every clinical and environmental situation, their dosing is convenient and highly reproducible, but their efficient delivery remains highly technique dependent. Poor inhalation technique can be minimised by the use of add-on valved holding chambers, which are seldom used in the clinical practice possibly because they are cumbersome. Breath Actuated devices (BAIs), such as Dry Powder Inhalers (DPIs), which are environmental-friendly, safe, effective, reliable, portable and self-contained, overcome problems of handbreath co-ordination associated with pMDIs usage, but their use is also undermined by common errors of inhalation technique in real life. Nebulizers are cumbersome and time-comsuming for use and maintenance, but their use needs less cooperation than inhalers. Although nebulizer practice is not always evidence-based, some patients, mainly elderly prefer nebulizers for regular long-term usage. Despite the introduction of newer devices, clear advantages of a particular delivery system over other inhalers in terms of compliance, preference, and cost-effectiveness are not currently available. The objective of an ideal and easy-to use inhaler is far from reality. Patient education is the critical factor in the use and misuse of delivery devices and effectiveness of aerosol therapy. The choice of the device has to be tailored according to the patient's needs, situation, and preference. Whatever the chosen inhaler, education from health caregivers has a key-role for improving inhaler technique and compliance. Differences among delivery devices represent another challenge to patient use and caregiver instruction.