Attention Deficits in Healthcare Workers with Non-Clinical Burnout: An Exploratory Investigation.

Burnout syndrome is characterized by exhaustion, cynicism, and reduced effectiveness. Workers with high burnout scores who continue their professional activities are identified as experiencing non-clinical burnout (NCB), which includes early stages where burnout symptoms (BNS) are present but not yet severe enough to necessitate work leave. This study aimed to investigate the impact of BNS on attention performance among healthcare workers (HCWs) at a COVID-19 reference hospital during the pandemic. The Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) was applied to assess the three burnout dimensions. The Continuous Visual Attention Test (CVAT) evaluated four different attention subdomains. Participants were divided into two groups based on their scores on the MBI: controls and NCB. Thirteen controls were matched with 13 NCB subjects based on age, sex, and HCW category. This sample (n = 26, 65% male) consisted of 11 physicians and 15 nursing professionals with a mean age of 35.3 years (standard deviation = 5.47). NCB subjects had higher impulsivity than controls. There were not any significant group differences in the other attention subdomains. We found significant correlations between impulsivity and all burnout dimensions: higher absolute scores in BNS are associated with higher impulsivity. We concluded that NCB leads to executive attention deficits.

Outcomes of dexmedetomidine as adjuvant drug in patients undergoing videolaparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized and prospective clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: The repercussions of ischemia-reperfusion and inflammatory response to surgical injury may compromise the return of physiologic processes in video-laparoscopic surgeries. Dexmedetomidine, as an adjuvant drug in general anesthesia, alters the neuroinflammatory reaction, provides better clinical outcomes in the perioperative period, and may reduce the excessive use of chronic medication in patients with a history of addiction. This study evaluated the immunomodulatory potential of dexmedetomidine on perioperative organ function in video-laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients. METHODS: There were two groups: Sevoflurane and Dexmedetomidine A (26 patients) vs. Sevoflurane and Saline 0.9% B (26 patients). Three blood samples were collected three times: 1) before surgery, 2) 4-6h after surgery, and 3) 24h postoperatively. Inflammatory and endocrine mediators were protocolized for analysis. Finally, hemodynamic outcomes, quality upon awakening, pain, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and opioid use were compared between groups. RESULTS: We have demonstrated a reduction of Interleukin 6 six hours after surgery in group A: 34.10 (IQR 13.88-56.15) vs. 65.79 (IQR 23.13-104.97; p = 0.0425) in group B. Systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and mean arterial pressure was attenuated in group A in their measurement intervals (p < 0.0001). There was a lower incidence of pain and opioid consumption in the first postoperative hour favoring this group (p < 0.0001). We noticed better quality upon awakening after the intervention when comparing the values of peripheral oxygen saturation and respiratory rate. CONCLUSIONS: Dexmedetomidine provided anti-inflammatory benefits and contributed to postoperative analgesia without the depressive side effects on the respiratory and cardiovascular systems commonly observed with opioids. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Immunomodulatory Effect of Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant Drug in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomies, NCT05489900, Registered 5 August 2022-Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05489900?term=NCT05489900&draw=2&rank=1.

Spirituality as a protective factor for chronic and acute anxiety in Brazilian healthcare workers during the COVID-19 outbreak.

BACKGROUND: Anxiety symptoms (AS) are exacerbated in healthcare workers (HCWs) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Spirituality is known to protect against AS in the general population and it is a construct that differs from religion. It can be assessed using structured questionnaires. A validated questionnaire disclosed three spirituality dimensions: peace, meaning, and faith. In HCWs we investigated the predictors of chronic anxiety (pre-COVID-19 and during the pandemic) and acute anxiety (only during the pandemic), including spirituality in the model. Then, we verified which spirituality dimensions predicted chronic and acute anxiety. Lastly, we studied group differences between the mean scores of these spirituality dimensions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was carried out in a Brazilian Hospital. HCWs (n = 118) were assessed for spirituality at a single time-point. They were also asked about AS that had started pre-COVID-19 and persisted during the pandemic (chronic anxiety), and AS that had started only during the pandemic (acute anxiety). The subjects without chronic anxiety were subdivided into two other groups: acute anxiety and without chronic and acute anxiety. Forward stepwise logistic regressions were used to find the significant AS predictors. First, the model considered sex, age, religious affiliation, and spirituality. Then, the analysis were performed considering only the three spirituality dimensions. Group means differences in the spirituality dimensions were compared using univariate ANCOVAS followed by T-tests. RESULTS: Spirituality was the most realible predictor of chronic (OR = 0.818; 95%CI:0.752-0.890; p<0.001) and acute anxiety (OR = 0.727; 95%CI:0.601-0.881; p = 0.001). Peace alone predicted chronic anxiety (OR = 0.619; 95%CI:0.516-0.744; p<0.001) while for acute anxiety both peace (OR:0.517; 95%CI:0.340-0.787; p = 0.002), and faith (OR:0.674; 95%CI:0.509-0.892; p = 0.006) significantly contributed to the model. Faith was significantly higher in subjects without AS. CONCLUSION: Higher spirituality protected against chronic and acute anxiety. Faith and peace spirituality dimensions conferred protection against acute anxiety during the pandemic.

Assessment of Attentional Functioning in Health Professionals of a Brazilian Tertiary Referral Hospital for COVID-19.

This study is aimed at assessing differences in basic attentional functioning between substantial and minimal work-related exposure to COVID-19 patients in professionals working in a tertiary referral hospital in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Therefore, hospital employees performed a Continuous Visual Attention Test. This test consisted of a 90-second Go/No-Go task with 72 (80%) targets and 18 (20%) nontargets. For each participant, reaction time and intraindividual variability of reaction times of all correct target responses, as well as the number of omission and commission errors, were evaluated. Participants were divided into 2 groups based on their exposure to COVID-19 patients (substantial versus minimal exposure). The substantial exposure group consisted of participants with 24 hours/week or more direct contact with COVID-19 patients. This cut-off was based on the clear division between professionals working and not working with COVID-19 patients and considered that 12-hour and 24-hour daily shifts are common for hospital employees in Brazil. A MANCOVA was performed to examine between-group differences, using age, sleep quality, sex, education level, previous COVID-19 infection, and profession as covariates. Of 124 participants, 80 had substantial exposure and 44 had minimal exposure to COVID-19. The overall MANCOVA reached statistical significance (P = 0.048). Post hoc ANCOVA analysis showed that the substantial exposure group had a statistically significantly higher intraindividual variability of reaction time of all correct target responses (P = 0.017, Cohen's δ = -0.55). This result remained after removing those with a previous COVID-19 infection (P = 0.010, Cohen's δ = -0.64) and after matching groups for sample size (P = 0.004, Cohen's δ = -0.81). No other variables reached statistical significance. Concluding, hospital professionals with a substantial level of exposure to patients with COVID-19 show a significant attention decrement and, thus, may be at a higher risk of accidental SARS-CoV-2 infection.

EVALUATION OF THE SATISFACTION OF REMOTE TEACHING IN POSTGRADUATE COURSES IN HEALTH: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW / EVALUACIÓN DE LA SATISFACCIÓN CON LA ENSEÑANZA A DISTANCIA EN CURSOS DE POSTGRADO EN SALUD: REVISIÓN SISTEMÁTICA / AVALIAÇÃO DA SATISFAÇÃO DO ENSINO REMOTO EM CURSOS DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM SAÚDE: REVISÃO SISTEMÁTICA

Objective: To analyze and identify in the scientific literature how remote teaching is being used and how it was evaluated in postgraduate health courses. Methods: Systematic review with a search in the Virtual Health Library (VHL), with the descriptors distance education, remote learning, residency, graduate studies and health in Portuguese and English, between 2017 and 2021, in Portuguese, English and Spanish. Results: From 750 initial results, 19 articles were included. The United States leads with the largest number of publications on the subject. The evaluation of students who studied through remote teaching is positive. Conclusion: Remote teaching was introduced very quickly for a large number of specialties in the world, with this, even showing positive aspects in this type of teaching, some negative points were evident and that future improvements must be made

Objetivo: Analizar e identificar en la literatura científica el uso de la enseñanza a distancia y su evaluación en los cursos de posgrado en salud. Métodos: Revisión sistemática en las bases de datos Medline, Lilacs, BDEnf, IBECS, BBO y BDENF con los descriptores educación a distancia, aprendizaje a distancia, residencia, estudios de posgrado y salud entre 2017 y 2021, en portugués, inglés y español. Resultados: La búsqueda inicial identificó 750 resultados. En la fase de análisis de títulos y resúmenes quedaron 66 estudios. Finalmente, se incluyeron 19 artículos. Estados Unidos lidera con el mayor número de publicaciones sobre el tema. La valoración de los alumnos que estudiaron a través de la docencia a distancia es positiva. Conclusión: La enseñanza a distancia se implementó muy rápidamente para una gran cantidad de especialidades en el mundo, con lo que, aun mostrando aspectos positivos en este tipo de enseñanza, se evidenciaron algunos puntos negativos y que se deben realizar mejoras futuras

Objetivo: Analisar e identificar na literatura científica a utilização do ensino remoto e sua avaliação em cursos de pós-graduação em saúde. Métodos: Revisão sistemática nas bases de dados Medline, Lilacs, BDEnf, IBECS, BBO e BDENF com os descritores educação a distância, ensino remoto, residência, pós-graduação e saúde entre 2017 a 2021, nos idiomas português, inglês e espanhol. Resultados: A busca inicial identificou 750 resultados. Na fase de análise dos títulos e resumos sobraram 66 estudos. Por fim foram incluídos 19 artigos. Os Estados Unidos lideram com o maior número de publicações acerca do tema. A avaliação dos discentes que estudaram através do ensino remoto é positiva. Conclusão: O ensino remoto foi colocado de forma muito rápida para uma grande quantidade de especialidades no mundo, com isso, mesmo evidenciando-se aspectos positivos nesse tipo de ensino, ficou evidente alguns pontos negativos e que se deve fazer melhorias futuras.