Interventional Imaging Systems in Radiology, Cardiology, and Urology: Energy Consumption, Carbon Emissions, and Electricity Costs.

BACKGROUND. The energy demand of interventional imaging systems has historically been estimated using manufacturer-provided specifications rather than directly measured. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to investigate the energy consumption of interventional imaging systems and estimate potential savings in the carbon emissions and electricity costs of such systems through hypothetical operational adjustments. METHODS. An interventional radiology suite, neurointerventional suite, radiology fluoroscopy unit, two cardiology laboratories, and two urology fluoroscopy units were equipped with power sensors. Power measurement logs were extracted for a single 4-week period for each radiology and cardiology system (all between June 1, 2022, and November 28, 2022) and for the 2-week period from July 31, 2023, to August 13, 2023, for each urology system. Power statuses, procedure time stamps, and fluoroscopy times were extracted from various sources. System activity was divided into off, idle (no patient in room), active (patient in room for procedure), and net-imaging (active fluoroscopic image acquisition) states. Projected annual energy consumption was calculated. Potential annual savings in carbon emissions and electricity costs through hypothetical operational adjustments were estimated using published values for Switzerland. RESULTS. Across the seven systems, the mean power draw was 0.3-1.1, 0.7-7.4, 0.9-7.6, and 1.9-12.5 kW in the off, idle, active, and net-imaging states, respectively. Across systems, the off state, in comparison with the idle state, showed a decrease in the mean power draw of 0.2-6.9 kW (relative decrease, 22.2-93.2%). The systems had a combined projected annual energy consumption of 115,684 kWh (range, 3646-26,576 kWh per system). The systems' combined projected energy consumption occurring outside the net-imaging state accounted for 93.3% (107,978/115,684 kWh) of projected total energy consumption (range, 89.2-99.4% per system). A hypothetical operational adjustment whereby all systems would be switched from the idle state to the off state overnight and on weekends (versus being operated in idle mode 24 hours a day, 7 days a week) would yield the following potential annual savings: for energy consumption, 144,640 kWh; for carbon emissions, 18.6 metric tons of CO2 equivalent; and for electricity costs, US$37,896. CONCLUSION. Interventional imaging systems are energy intensive, having high consumption outside of image acquisition periods. CLINICAL IMPACT. Strategic operational adjustments (e.g., powering down idle systems) can substantially decrease the carbon emissions and electricity costs of interventional imaging systems.

[Economic aspects of low-field magnetic resonance imaging : Acquisition, installation, and maintenance costs of 0.55 T systems]. / Ökonomische Aspekte der Niederfeld-Magnetresonanztomographie : Anschaffung, Installation und Unterhaltskosten von 0,55 T-Geräten.

BACKGROUND: Low-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners offer an opportunity for cost reduction in the healthcare system. This is due to lower manufacturing costs and reduced construction requirements for installation and operation. OBJECTIVES: To discuss potential cost reductions in acquisition, installation, and maintenance by using new low-field MRI systems. METHODS: We provide an overview of key cost drivers and an evaluation of the potential savings of a recent generation 0.55T low-field MRI compared to conventional 1.5T and 3T MRI systems in routine clinical practice. RESULTS: In terms of purchase price, the savings potential of a 0.55T MRI compared to a 1.5T MRI system is about 40-50%. The 25% lower weight of the system reduces the transportation costs incurred, and the smaller size of the unit allows for installation by a remotely controlled mobile robotic system without opening the exterior façade, if the operating site is at ground level. Together with the lack of need to install a quench pipe, this reduces the total cost of installation by up to 70%. The maintenance cost of a 0.55T MRI is approximately 45% less than that of a 1.5T unit with a comparable service contract. Further cost reductions result from the smaller room size and potentially lower energy consumption for examinations and cooling. CONCLUSION: The use of lower field strength MRI systems offers enormous economic and environmental potential for both hospitals and practice operators, as well as for the healthcare system as a whole.

[New clinical applications for low-field magnetic resonance imaging : Technical and physical aspects]. / Neue klinische Anwendungsbereiche der Niederfeld-Magnetresonanztomographie : Technische und physikalische Aspekte.

BACKGROUND: Low-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is experiencing a renaissance due to technical innovations. The new-generation devices offer new applications for imaging and a possible solution to increasing cost pressures in the healthcare system. OBJECTIVES: Effects of field strength on technique, physics, image acquisition, and diagnostic quality of examinations are presented. METHODS: Important basic physical parameters for image acquisition and quality are summarized. Initial clinical experience with a new 0.55 T low-field scanner is presented. RESULTS: Field strengths that are lower than the currently used 1.5 T and 3 T field strengths are characterized by an expected lower signal-to-noise ratio in image acquisition. Whether this is a diagnostic limitation needs to be evaluated in studies, as there are several options to offset this perceived drawback, including increasing measurement time or artificial intelligence (AI) postprocessing techniques. In addition, it is necessary to meticulously investigate whether low-field systems allow diagnostically adequate image quality to be achieved in different body regions and different disease entities. Initial studies in our clinic are promising and show, for example, diagnostic quality without relevant loss of time for examinations of the lumbar spine. Advantages of low-field MRI include reduced susceptibility artifacts when imaging the lungs and in patients with metallic implants. CONCLUSION: Low-field scanners offer a variety of new fields of application with field strength-related advantages. In most other clinical examination fields, at least diagnostic quality can be expected.

Quantifying Radiology Resident Fatigue: Analysis of Preliminary Reports.

Background Workloads in radiology departments have constantly increased over the past decades. The resulting radiologist fatigue is considered a rising problem that affects diagnostic accuracy. Purpose To investigate whether data mining of quantitative parameters from the report proofreading process can reveal daytime and shift-dependent trends in report similarity as a surrogate marker for resident fatigue. Materials and Methods Data from 117 402 radiology reports written by residents between September 2017 and March 2020 were extracted from a report comparison tool and retrospectively analyzed. Through calculation of the Jaccard similarity coefficient between residents' preliminary and staff-reviewed final reports, the amount of edits performed by staff radiologists during proofreading was quantified on a scale of 0 to 1 (1: perfect similarity, no edits). Following aggregation per weekday and shift, data were statistically analyzed by using simple linear regression or one-way analysis of variance (significance level, P < .05) to determine relationships between report similarity and time of day and/or weekday reports were dictated. Results Decreasing report similarity with increasing work hours was observed for day shifts (r = -0.93 [95% CI: -0.73, -0.98]; P < .001) and weekend shifts (r = -0.72 [95% CI: -0.31, -0.91]; P = .004). For day shifts, negative linear correlation was strongest on Fridays (r = -0.95 [95% CI: -0.80, -0.99]; P < .001), with a 16% lower mean report similarity at the end of shifts (0.85 ± 0.24 at 8 am vs 0.69 ± 0.32 at 5 pm). Furthermore, mean similarity of reports dictated on Fridays (0.79 ± 0.35) was lower than that on all other weekdays (range, 0.84 ± 0.30 to 0.86 ± 0.27; P < .001). For late shifts, report similarity showed a negative correlation with the course of workweeks, showing a continuous decrease from Monday to Friday (r = -0.98 [95% CI: -0.70, -0.99]; P = .007). Temporary increases in report similarity were observed after lunch breaks (day and weekend shifts) and with the arrival of a rested resident during overlapping on-call shifts. Conclusion Decreases in report similarity over the course of workdays and workweeks suggest aggravating effects of fatigue on residents' report writing performances. Periodic breaks within shifts potentially foster recovery. © RSNA, 2021.

Revealing the most common reporting errors through data mining of the report proofreading process.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the most common errors in residents' preliminary reports, if structured reporting impacts error types and frequencies, and to identify possible implications for resident education and patient safety. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Changes in report content were tracked by a report comparison tool on a word level and extracted for 78,625 radiology reports dictated from September 2017 to December 2018 in our department. Following data aggregation according to word stems and stratification by subspecialty (e.g., neuroradiology) and imaging modality, frequencies of additions/deletions were analyzed for findings and impression report section separately and compared between subgroups. RESULTS: Overall modifications per report averaged 4.1 words, with demonstrably higher amounts of changes for cross-sectional imaging (CT: 6.4; MRI: 6.7) than non-cross-sectional imaging (radiographs: 0.2; ultrasound: 2.8). The four most frequently changed words (right, left, one, and none) remained almost similar among all subgroups (range: 0.072-0.117 per report; once every 9-14 reports). Albeit representing only 0.02% of analyzed words, they accounted for up to 9.7% of all observed changes. Subspecialties solely using structured reporting had substantially lower change ratios in the findings report section (mean: 0.2 per report) compared with prose-style reporting subspecialties (mean: 2.0). Relative frequencies of the most changed words remained unchanged. CONCLUSION: Residents' most common reporting errors in all subspecialties and modalities are laterality discriminator confusions (left/right) and unnoticed descriptor misregistration by speech recognition (one/none). Structured reporting reduces overall error rates, but does not affect occurrence of the most common errors. Increased error awareness and measures improving report correctness and ensuring patient safety are required. KEY POINTS: • The two most common reporting errors in residents' preliminary reports are laterality discriminator confusions (left/right) and unnoticed descriptor misregistration by speech recognition (one/none). • Structured reporting reduces the overall the error frequency in the findings report section by a factor of 10 (structured reporting: mean 0.2 per report; prose-style reporting: 2.0) but does not affect the occurrence of the two major errors. • Staff radiologist review behavior noticeably differs between radiology subspecialties.

Consensus report from the 8th International Forum for Liver Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

OBJECTIVES: The 8th International Forum for Liver Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), held in Basel, Switzerland, in October 2017, brought together clinical and academic radiologists from around the world to discuss developments in and reach consensus on key issues in the field of gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI since the previous Forum held in 2013. METHODS: Two main themes in liver MRI were considered in detail at the Forum: the use of gadoxetic acid for contrast-enhanced MRI in patients with liver cirrhosis and the technical performance of gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI, both opportunities and challenges. This article summarises the expert presentations and the delegate voting on consensus statements discussed at the Forum. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI has higher sensitivity for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), when compared with multidetector CT, by utilising features of hyperenhancement in the arterial phase and hypointensity in the hepatobiliary phase (HBP). Recent HCC management guidelines recognise an increasing role for gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI in early diagnosis and monitoring post-resection. Additional research is needed to define the role of HBP in predicting microvascular invasion, to better define washout during the transitional phase in gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for HCC diagnosis, and to reduce the artefacts encountered in the arterial phase. Technical developments are being directed to shortening the MRI protocol for reducing time and patient discomfort and toward utilising faster imaging and non-Cartesian free-breathing approaches that have the potential to improve multiphasic dynamic imaging. KEY POINTS: • Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI provides higher diagnostic sensitivity than CT for diagnosing HCC. • Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI has roles in early-HCC diagnosis and monitoring post-resection response. • Faster imaging and free-breathing approaches have potential to improve multiphasic dynamic imaging.

Gadoxetate Disodium versus Gadoterate Meglumine: Quantitative Respiratory and Hemodynamic Metrics by Using Compressed-Sensing MRI.

Background Gadoxetate disodium has been associated with various respiratory irregularities at arterial imaging MRI. Purpose To measure the relationship between gadolinium-based contrast agent administration and irregularities by comparing gadoxetate disodium and gadoterate meglumine at free breathing. Materials and Methods This prospective observational cohort study (January 2015 to May 2017) included consecutive abdominal MRI performed with either gadoxetate disodium or gadoterate meglumine enhancement. Participants underwent dynamic imaging by using the golden-angle radial sparse parallel sequence at free breathing. The quantitative assessment evaluated the aortic contrast enhancement, the respiratory hepatic translation, and the k-space-derived respiratory pattern. Analyses of variance compared hemodynamic metrics, respiratory-induced hepatic motion, and respiratory parameters before and after respiratory gating. Results A total of 497 abdominal MRI examinations were included. Of these, 338 participants were administered gadoxetate disodium (mean age, 59 years ± 15; 153 women) and 159 participants were administered gadoterate meglumine (mean age, 59 years ± 17; 85 women). The arterial bolus of gadoxetate disodium arrived later than gadoterate meglumine (19.7 vs 16.3 seconds, respectively; P < .001). Evaluation of the hepatic respiratory translation showed respiratory motion occurring in 70.7% (239 of 338) of participants who underwent gadoxetate-enhanced examinations and in 28.9% (46 of 159) of participants who underwent gadoterate-enhanced examinations (P < .001). The duration of motion irregularities was longer for gadoxetate than for gadoterate (19.2 seconds vs 17.2 seconds, respectively) and the motion irregularities were more severe (P < .001). Both the respiratory frequency and amplitude were shorter for participants administered gadoxetate from the prebolus phase to the late arterial phase compared with gadoterate (P < .001). Conclusion The administration of two different gadolinium-based contrast agents, gadoxetate and gadoterate, at free-breathing conditions potentially leads to respiratory irregularities with differing intensity and onset. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

JOURNAL CLUB: Structured Reporting: The Voice of the Customer in an Ongoing Debate About the Future of Radiology Reporting.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this survey was to assess the perception, preferences, and expectations of recipients of radiology reports in terms of style and content. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 2016, 3610 general practitioners and hospital-based physicians in northwestern Switzerland were invited to participate in a survey. The questionnaire consisted of a demographics section, a current satisfaction section, and a section addressing expectations and preferences concerning content and structure. The participants were asked to rate (range of scores, 1-10) four different layouts of radiology reports (text, structured text, tables, images) in terms of comprehensibility and efficiency. RESULTS: A total of 570 participants (132 general practitioners, 438 hospital physicians at five hospitals) completed the survey. Regarding layout preferences, structured text (median, 8) and images (median, 7) rated highest in terms of readability, time saving, and helpfulness in communication with patients compared with tables (median, 5) and unstructured text (median, 4). The participants responded that reports should give normal values as references (60% [344/570] positive), mention normal structures (50% [286/570] positive), and list additional findings in the summary (89% [507/570] positive). Positive ratings for a confidence statement (54% [308/570]), a list of differential diagnoses (89% [507/570]), and a recommendation (66% [377/570]) indicated an active radiologist's role is appreciated. Eighty percent (459/570) of respondents stated a report should allow fast and efficient reading. CONCLUSION: The voice of the customer approach shows referring physicians have distinct expectations and specific but predominantly coherent preferences with regard to radiology reporting. The survey results offer valuable specific feedback and a strong argument in favor of structured reporting.

Consensus report from the 7th International Forum for Liver Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

OBJECTIVES: Liver-specific MRI is a fast-growing field, with technological and protocol advancements providing more robust imaging and allowing a greater depth of information per examination. This article reports the evidence for, and expert thinking on, current challenges in liver-specific MRI, as discussed at the 7th International Forum for Liver MRI, which was held in Shanghai, China, in October 2013. METHODS: Topics discussed included the role of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI in the differentiation of focal nodular hyperplasia from hepatocellular adenoma and small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from small intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (in patients with chronic liver disease), the differentiation of low-grade dysplastic nodule (DN) from pre-malignant high-grade DN and early HCC, and treatment planning and assessment of treatment response for patients with HCC and colorectal liver metastasis. Optimization of the gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI protocol to gain robust arterial and hepatobiliary phase images was also discussed. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI demonstrates added value for the detection and characterization of focal liver lesions and shows promise in a number of new indications, including regional liver functional assessment and patient monitoring after therapy; however, more data are needed in some areas, and further developments are needed to translate cutting-edge techniques into clinical practice. KEY POINTS: Liver-specific MRI is a fast-growing field, with many technological and protocol advancements. Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI demonstrates value for detecting and characterizing focal liver lesions. Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI shows promise in regional functional assessment and patient monitoring. Further developments are needed to translate cutting-edge techniques into clinical practice.

Respiratory-gated noncontrast SPACE MR angiography sequence at 3T for evaluation of the central veins of the chest: a feasibility study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of a respiratory-gated noncontrast magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) sequence for imaging the central veins of the chest. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven healthy subjects underwent MRA of the central veins of the chest with a respiratory-gated noncontrast (SPACE) sequence. Qualitative visualization and signal homogeneity of each central venous segment were scored by two radiologists on a scale of 1-4. Signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios (SNR and CNR) were also calculated. Retrospective review of our imaging database revealed 13 patients with suspected pathology of the central veins who underwent a clinical MRA examination using the SPACE sequence as well as reference standard central venous imaging with contrast-enhanced MRA or conventional venography. RESULTS: In healthy subjects, all central venous segments demonstrated good to excellent venous visualization and homogeneity scores with the noncontrast SPACE sequence. The mean SNR and CNR of the central venous system were 192.7 and 175.0, respectively. In the 13 clinical examinations, the sensitivity and specificity for detection of stenosis or occlusions was 100% and 100% for reader 1 and 95% and 91% for reader 2, respectively. CONCLUSION: The respiratory-gated noncontrast SPACE sequence provided excellent imaging characteristics of the central veins in healthy subjects with promising diagnostic accuracy in patients with central venous pathology.

Impact of precontrast T10 relaxation times on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI pharmacokinetic parameters: T10 mapping versus a fixed T10 reference value.

PURPOSE: To investigate variation in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) pharmacokinetic parameter measurements between different methods of precontrast tissue relaxation (T10) estimation: pixel-based mapping versus a fixed reference value. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 15 DCE-MRI studies the female pelvis, uterine fibroids, the left psoas muscle, and the fifth lumbar vertebral body were chosen to represent tissues with varying perfusion characteristics. All DCEMRI studies were processed using a variable flip angle T10 map and a fixed T10 reference value of 1000 msec. A subset of five DCE-MRI studies were each processed multiple times using the fixed T10 method with the reference T10 ranging from 0­2000 msec in 100-msec increments. Pharmacokinetic measurements of Ktrans, kep, ve, and initial area under the gadolinium curve (iAUGC) were performed maintaining the identical position for region of interest placement on each structure. RESULTS: The mean difference in pharmacokinetic output between the pixel-based T10 map and the fixed T10 reference value ranged from 6.6% for kep in the muscle to 54.9% for iAUGC in the vertebral body. At lower T10 (<1000 msec) aberrations in T10 estimation resulted in a larger error. Accurate measurement of T10 for each structure subsequently incorporated as a fixed T10 reference value yielded relative differences from 41.8% to 22.3% compared to the pixel-based T10 map. CONCLUSION: Direct comparison of pharmacokinetic parameters derived from a pixel-based approach versus a reference value uniformly applied to all pixels for T10 estimation is impeded by the inherent spatial heterogeneity of T10 within tissues.

Gadoxetate disodium in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis: an analysis of hepatobiliary contrast excretion.

PURPOSE: To assess hepatobiliary excretion of gadoxetate disodium in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) over time and to determine a possible correlation with severity of the disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 111 patients (36 females, 75 males, mean age 41.5 yr) with confirmed diagnosis of PSC who underwent gadoxetate disodium enhanced hepatic MRI were included in this retrospective institutional review board-approved study. Hepatocyte phase images (10-493 min post injection [p.i.]) were evaluated by one radiologist for the presence of contrast agent in the intrahepatic bile ducts (IBD), common bile duct (CBD), gallbladder (GB), and duodenum. In 54 patients, in whom hepatocyte phase scans were acquired within 10-20 min p.i., hepatobiliary excretion was compared with data collected in a previous study from patients without liver disease (controls; Mann-Whitney U-test). Excretion was further correlated with liver function tests (Kruskal-Wallis test). RESULTS: Compared with controls, excretion was significantly delayed in patients with PSC: 20 min p.i. gadoxetate disodium could be detected in the IBD in 55.6% (controls:100%), CBD 53.7% (controls:100%), GB 39.6% (controls:87%), duodenum 13% (controls:66%), respectively. Contrast appearance in different bile duct sections increased over time and correlated significantly with serum bilirubin and AP levels (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Hepatobiliary excretion of gadoxetate disodium in PSC patients is significantly delayed. Excretion correlates with bilirubin levels, and thus indirectly with severity of disease.

Consensus report from the 6th International forum for liver MRI using gadoxetic acid.

As the utility of liver-specific magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) increases, it is pertinent to optimize and expand protocols to improve accuracy and foster evolution of techniques; in turn, positive impacts should be seen in patient management. This article reports on the latest expert thinking and current evidence in the field of liver-specific MRI, as discussed at the 6(th) International Forum for Liver MRI, which was held in Vancouver, Canada in September 2012. Topics discussed at this forum described the use of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for the assessment of liver function at the segmental level; to increase accuracy in the diagnosis of liver metastases; to overcome current challenges in patients with cirrhosis, including management of arterial hypo-/isovascular, hepatobiliary phase hypointense nodules; and the data which would be required in order to recommend the use of this modality in hepatocellular carcinoma management guidelines. Growing evidence suggests that gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI can help to improve the management of patients with a number of different liver disorders; however, more data are needed in some areas, and there may be a case for developing an interpretation guideline for gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI findings to aid standardization.

Reproducibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Part I. Perfusion characteristics in the female pelvis by using multiple computer-aided diagnosis perfusion analysis solutions.

PURPOSE: To test the reproducibility of model-derived quantitative and semiquantitative pharmacokinetic parameters among various commercially available perfusion analysis solutions for dynamic contrast material-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was institutional review board approved and HIPAA compliant, with waiver of informed consent granted. The study group consisted of 15 patients (mean age, 44 years; range, 28-60 years), with 15 consecutive 1.5-T DCE MR imaging studies performed between October 1, 2010, and December 27, 2010, prior to uterine fibroid embolization. Studies were conducted by using variable-flip-angle T1 mapping and four-dimensional, time-resolved MR angiography with interleaved stochastic trajectories. Images from all DCE MR imaging studies were postprocessed with four commercially available perfusion analysis solutions by using a Tofts and Kermode model paradigm. Five observers measured pharmacokinetic parameters (volume transfer constant [K(trans)], v(e) [extracellular extravascular volume fraction], k(ep)[K(trans)/v(e)], and initial area under the gadolinium curve [iAUGC]) three times for each imaging study with each perfusion analysis solution (between March 13, 2011, and September 8, 2011) by using two different region-of-interest methods, resulting in 1800 data points. RESULTS: After normalization of data output, significant differences in mean values were found for the majority of perfusion analysis solution combinations. The within-subject coefficient of variation among perfusion analysis solutions was 48.3%-68.8% for K(trans), 37.2%-60.3% for k(ep), 27.7%-74.1% for v(e), and 25.1%-61.2% for iAUGC. The intraclass correlation coefficient revealed only poor to moderate consistency among pairwise perfusion analysis solution comparisons (K(trans), 0.33-0.65; k(ep), 0.02-0.81; v(e), -0.03 to 0.72; and iAUGC, 0.47-0.78). CONCLUSION: A considerable variability for DCE MR imaging pharmacokinetic parameters (K(trans), k(ep), v(e), iAUGC) was found among commercially available perfusion analysis solutions. Therefore, clinical comparability across perfusion analysis solutions is currently not warranted. Agreement on a postprocessing standard is paramount prior to establishing DCE MR imaging as a widely incorporated biomarker.

Reproducibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Part II. Comparison of intra- and interobserver variability with manual region of interest placement versus semiautomatic lesion segmentation and histogram analysis.

PURPOSE: To compare the inter- and intraobserver variability with manual region of interest (ROI) placement versus that with software-assisted semiautomatic lesion segmentation and histogram analysis with respect to quantitative dynamic contrast material-enhanced (DCE) MR imaging determinations of the volume transfer constant (K(trans)). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the institutional review board and compliant with HIPAA. The requirement to obtain informed consent was waived. Fifteen DCE MR imaging studies of the female pelvis defined the study group. Uterine fibroids were used as a perfusion model. Three varying types of lesion measurements were performed by five readers on each study by using DCE MR imaging perfusion analysis software with manual ROI placement and a semiautomatic lesion segmentation and histogram analysis solution. Intra- and interreader variability of measurements of K(trans) with the different measurement types was calculated. RESULTS: The overall interobserver variability of K(trans) with manual ROI placement (mean, 28.5% ± 9.3) was reduced by 42.5% when the semiautomatic, software-assisted lesion measurement method was used (16.4% ± 6.2). Whole-lesion measurement showed the lowest interobserver variability with both measurement methods (20.1% ± 4.3 with the manual method vs 10.8% ± 2.6 with the semiautomatic method). The overall intrareader variability with the manual ROI method (7.6% ± 10.6) was not significantly different from that with the semiautomatic method (7.3% ± 10.8), but the intraclass correlation coefficient for intrareader reproducibility improved from 0.86 overall with the manual method to 0.99 with the semiautomatic method. CONCLUSION: A semiautomatic lesion segmentation and histogram analysis approach can provide a significant reduction in interobserver variability for DCE MR imaging measurements of K(trans) when compared with manual ROI methods, whereas intraobserver reproducibility is improved to some extent.

Hepatocellular carcinoma in a North American population: does hepatobiliary MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA improve sensitivity and confidence for diagnosis?

PURPOSE: To evaluate the value of hepatobiliary phase imaging for detection and characterization of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in liver MRI with Gd-EOB-DTPA, in a North American population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred MRI examinations performed with the intravenous injection of Gd-EOB-DTPA in patients with cirrhosis were reviewed retrospectively. Nodules were classified as HCC (n = 70), indeterminate (n = 33), or benign (n = 22). Five readers independently reviewed each examination with and without hepatobiliary phase images (HBP). Lesion conspicuity scores were compared between the two readings. Lesion detection, confidence scores, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were compared. RESULTS: Lesion detection was slightly improved for all lesion types with the inclusion of the HBP, and was substantially higher for small HCCs (96.0% versus 85.3%). Mean confidence scores for the diagnosis of HCC increased for HCCs overall and each size category (P < 0.001). Diagnostic performance improved with the addition of the HBP (aggregate AROC 87.7% versus 80.0%, P < 0.01), and sensitivity for characterization improved (90.9% versus 78.3%, P < 0.01) while specificity was unchanged. CONCLUSION: Hepatobiliary phase imaging may improve small lesion detection (<1 cm) and characterization of lesions in general, in MRI of the cirrhotic liver with Gd-EOB-DTPA.

Inter- and intra-rater reproducibility of quantitative dynamic contrast enhanced MRI using TWIST perfusion data in a uterine fibroid model.

PURPOSE: To determine the reproducibility of TWIST-derived (Time-Resolved Angiography with Interleaved Stochastic Trajectories) quantitative dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI in a uterine fibroid model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board approved this retrospective study. Dynamic contrast-enhanced TWIST datasets from 15 randomly selected 1.5 Tesla pelvic MR studies were postprocessed. Five readers recorded kinetic parameters (K(trans) [volume transfer constant], ve [extracellular extravascular space volume], kep [flux rate constant], iAUC [initial area under the gadolinium-time curve]) of the largest uterine fibroid using three region-of-interest (ROI) selection methods. Measurements were randomized and repeated three times, and measures of reproducibility were calculated. RESULTS: The intra-rater coefficients of variation (CVs, brackets indicate 95% confidence intervals) varied from 4.6% to 7.6% (K(trans) 7.6% [6.1%, 9.1%], kep 7.2% [5.9%, 8.5%], ve 4.6% [3.8%, 5.4%], and iAUC 7.2% [6.1%, 8.3%]). ve was the most reproducible (P < 0.05). Inter-rater reproducibility was significantly (P < 0.05) greater for the large ROI method (range of intraclass correlation coefficients [ICCs] = 0.80-0.98 versus 0.48-0.63 [user-defined ROI] versus 0.41-0.69 [targeted ROI]). The uterine fibroid accounted for the greatest fraction of variance for the large ROI method (range across kinetic parameters: 83-98% versus 56-69% [user-defined ROI] versus 47-74% [targeted ROI]). The reader accounted for the greatest fraction of variance for the user-defined ROI method (0.4-14.1% versus 0.1-3.0% [large ROI] versus <0.1-1.5% [targeted ROI]). CONCLUSION: Changes in TWIST-derived DCE-MRI kinetic parameters of up to 9-15% may be attributable to measurement error. Large DCE-MRI regions of interest are the most reproducible across multiple readers.

Automated patient-tailored screening of the liver for diffuse steatosis and iron overload using MRI.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to validate an automated screening method for evaluation of hepatic steatosis or siderosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a two-part study, with retrospective and prospective portions. First, 130 consecutive abdominal MRI examinations, including both the automated algorithm and reference standard fat and iron quantification, were retrospectively identified. The algorithm's performance was validated against the reference standard and was compared with the performance of three expert readers. Subsequently, 39 subjects undergoing liver MRI were prospectively identified and enrolled. These subjects were scanned with a protocol where quantification sequences were either performed or not performed on the basis of the recommendation of the algorithm. Total examination time in these subjects was compared with examination times in the 90 subjects from the retrospective cohort who had undergone a similar liver MRI protocol with complete quantification. RESULTS: The automated algorithm was accurate in determining the presence of deposition disease (93.1%), with no significant difference between its conclusions and those of any of the readers (p=0.48-1.0). Use of the algorithm resulted in a small but statistically significant time savings compared with performing quantification in all subjects (28 minutes 56 seconds vs 31 minutes 20 seconds; p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Automated screening for hepatic steatosis and siderosis can be performed in real time during abdominal MRI examinations, can save total scan time compared with always performing quantification, and could serve as a gatekeeper for dedicated quantification sequences.