Pain in relationship to Tinnitus and Hearing Loss.

INTRODUCTION: Cervical and lower back pain are noteworthy in the manner of development of tinnitus. OBJECTIVES: The focus of this research was to indicate the consequence of the severity of neck pain and pain of the lower back and/or lower limbs in tinnitus patients. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of 61 patients with tinnitus as main complaint during a three month period. RESULTS: In this study, we found two groups of tinnitus patients defined by the existence of postural instability. Patients with tinnitus and postural unsteadiness were characterized by predominant female, self-perceived hearing loss, a higher intensity of tinnitus, cervical pain, and pain of the lower back and/or of the lower limbs, and more hearing deficit from 250 Hz to 4 kHz. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with tinnitus one should be aware that hearing loss can be a consequence of high intensity cervical pain. Stimulation of the proprioceptive input pathways due to cervical pain can result in a higher intensity of tinnitus and a hearing loss in the range of 250 Hz to 4 kHz.

Is Pain Harder To Withstand Than Tinnitus?

OBJECTIVES: The object of the study was to compare the perception of tinnitus with the perception of pain and to find specific factors that could influence the perception of both pain and tinnitus. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of 124 patients with tinnitus as main complaint and 300 patients with cervical pain as main complaint who visited our clinic in a two-year period. RESULTS: This study indicates that it is harder to withstand cervical pain than tinnitus with a higher prevalence of fatigue and impaired work performance in cervical pain patients. Our analyses highlight the importance of fatigue as a potential mediator of the deleterious effects of pain and tinnitus on individual functioning. Female gender and the presence of cervical pain makes patients more accessible for fatigue. Tolerance against tinnitus depends on the perceived maximal intensity of tinnitus, but also of the presence of cervical pain. Cervical pain may reinforce the irritating awareness of tinnitus. CONCLUSION: Tinnitus and chronic pain are related to structural and functional brain changes that show a striking overlap between both conditions. The tolerance, the ability to withstand the "unpleasantness" of the percept, for tinnitus and pain depends on the perceived intensity of the sensation. However, the perceived intensity of pain provoked annoyance earlier compared to the perceived intensity of tinnitus. Cervical pain may reinforce and maintain the negative awareness of tinnitus. For a better withstanding of tinnitus, we advise to reduce the perceived maximal intensity of tinnitus and to treat cervical pain and fatigue.

Amplifiers in Tinnitus Patients.

INTRODUCTION: High tinnitus loudness can be provoked by peripheral disorders of the somatosensory and/or auditory system. OBJECTIVES: The object of our study was to compare high tinnitus loudness patients with low tinnitus loudness patients and to find specific factors associated with high tinnitus loudness. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort analysis of 234 patients with tinnitus as main complaint who visited our clinic in a four-year period. METHODS: Data obtained from the subjects were age, sex, the loudness of tinnitus estimated by the VAS, and the outcomes of the audiogram and the cervical spine radiograph. RESULTS: High tinnitus loudness was associated with a higher prevalence of females, more dizziness, less self-perceived hearing loss, more cervical disc degeneration at C3 to C6, and a larger anterior spur of cervical vertebrae C3 to C6. Females had a lower prevalence of tinnitus but a higher chance on high tinnitus loudness. Gender, the size of the largest anterior spur from C3 to C6, and the ratio of hearing loss at 8 kHz and hearing loss at 2 kHz are involved in the amplification of tinnitus loudness. CONCLUSIONS: High tinnitus loudness can be provoked by peripheral disorders of the somatosensory and/or auditory system. A steep audiometric edge between hearing at 2 kHz and hearing at 8 kHz and/or cervical spine pathology with sympathetic nervous system irritation can amplify tinnitus loudness causing high tinnitus loudness.

The eight cervical nerve and its role in tinnitus.

INTRODUCTION: The eight cervical nerve might be a source of input to the auditory system. OBJECTIVES: The object was to assess the efficacy of infiltration of the eight cervical nerve root for treating tinnitus patients and to find indicators for a successful result. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. Subjects were 79 tinnitus patients visiting our clinic in a three-year period and who were treated with infiltration of the eight cervical nerve root. RESULTS: Twenty-six percent of the tinnitus patients had a reduction of their tinnitus following an infiltration of the eight cervical nerve root. Most of the successfully treated patients rated the effect of therapy as a moderate reduction of 25% to 50%. Fifty percent of the successful treated patients still had benefit at 6.6 months. In 5% of the patients, their tinnitus was aggravated after the infiltration of the eight cervical nerve roots. Patients with a hearing loss at 500 Hz that exceed the hearing loss at 2 kHZ responded the most to infiltration of the eight cervical nerve. CONCLUSION: Infiltration of the eight cervical nerve root reduced the intensity of tinnitus in 26% of the cohort of 79 tinnitus patients with a moderate to good effect. This therapy for tinnitus patients' needs to be considered, especially in those with a hearing loss at 500 Hz that exceed the hearing loss at 2 kHZ.

Pulsed radiofrequency of C2 dorsal root ganglion in patients with tinnitus.

INTRODUCTION: The second cervical nerve ganglion bar appears to be beneficial in patients with treatment safe tinnitus. As far as anyone is concerned, the viability of this methodology in patients with tinnitus has never been evaluated. OBJECTIVES: The point of this investigation was to decide the adequacy of beat radiofrequency of C2 dorsal root ganglion for treating patients with tinnitus, and all the more explicitly, to survey the parameters related with a long haul advantage so as to improve understanding determination. DESIGN: Subjects were 61 back to back patients who went to our facility from October 2016 to October 2018 for discussions on their tinnitus that endured for one month or more and were treated with beat radiofrequency of C2 dorsal root ganglion. Clinical information structure these patients were explored reflectively. An autonomous spectator assesses the long haul impact of the treatment by phone meet. RESULTS: In a partner of patients with tinnitus that persevered for one month or more, 25% of the patients reacted with a decrease of their tinnitus after a beat radiofrequency of C2 dorsal root ganglion. The vast majority of the patients with a positive reaction appraised the impact of treatment as a decrease of half or more. At 13.5 months, half of at first effective treated patients still encountered an advantage. Unfavorable occasions of the beat radiofrequency of C2 dorsal root ganglion at 7 weeks of follow-up were an expansion of the force of the tinnitus in 7% of the patients. In patients with an age under 43 years at the time tinnitus began, 45% of them had a decrease of their tinnitus at 7 weeks following treatment with beat radiofrequency of C2 dorsal root ganglion. CONCLUSION: Pulsed radiofrequency of C2 dorsal root ganglion can lessen the power of tinnitus extensively and for the long haul in 25% of the patients with tinnitus without genuine antagonistic impacts. We prescribe this treatment in patients with an age under 43 years at the time tinnitus began.