Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
G Ital Nefrol ; 40(3)2023 Jun 29.
Artigo em Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37427906

RESUMO

Among the various problems associated with peritoneal dialysis, besides infectious causes, the risk of catheter malfunction plays a significant role in conditioning the continuation of the method, accounting for up to 15-18% of the total causes of dialysis drop-out. When non-invasive maneuvers, such as the use of laxatives to stimulate intestinal peristalsis or heparin and/or urokinase have no effect, videolaparoscopy is the only method that directly detects the precise causes of peritoneal catheter malfunction. Those found are, with decreasing frequency, the winding of the catheter between the intestinal loops and the omentum (wrapping), the dislocation of the catheter, the combination of wrapping and dislocation, the occlusion of the catheter by a fibrin plug, the adhesions between the intestine and abdominal wall, the occlusion of the catheter by epiploic appendages or adnexal tissue and, occasionally, the presence of a new formation of endoperitoneal tissue enveloping and obstructing the peritoneal catheter. We report the case of a young patient of African ethnicity who, only five days after catheter placement, experienced malfunction. A videolaparoscopy revealed wrapping with invagination of omental tissue inside the catheter. After omental debridement, a proper peritoneal cavity washout with heparin was resumed, and after a couple of weeks, APD was initiated. About a month later, a new malfunction without signs of coprostasis or problems with the abdominal radiogram was observed. However, a subsequent catheterography confirmed the blockage of drainage. This was followed by another catheterography and omentopexy, with definitive solution of the Tenckhoff malfunction.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Cavidade Peritoneal , Humanos , Cateterismo/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Cateteres de Demora/efeitos adversos , Heparina
2.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol ; 6(4): 819-26, 2011 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21454718

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Guidelines recommend systematically screening for stenosis using various methods, but no studies so far have compared all of the options. A prospective blinded study was performed to compare the performance of several bedside tests performed during dialysis in diagnosing angiographically proven >50% fistula stenosis. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: In an unselected population of 119 hemodialysis patients with mature fistulas, physical examination (PE) was conducted; dynamic and derived static venous pressure (VAPR), blood pump flow/arterial pressure (Qb/AP) ratio, recirculation (R), and access blood flow (Qa) were measured; and angiography was performed. RESULTS: Angiography identified 59 stenotic fistulas: 43 stenoses were located upstream from the venous needle (inflow stenosis), 12 were located downstream (outflow stenosis), and 4 were located at both sites. The optimal tests for identifying an inflow stenosis were Qa < 650 ml/min and the combination of a positive PE "or" Qa < 650 ml/min (accuracy 80% and 81%, respectively), the latter being preferable because it was more sensitive (85% versus 65%, respectively) for a comparable specificity (79% versus 89%, respectively). The best tests for identifying outflow stenosis were PE and VAPR, with no difference between the two (accuracy 91% and 85%, sensitivity 75% and 81%, specificity 93% and 86%, respectively), the former being preferable because it was more reproducible, easier to perform, and applicable to all fistulas. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that fistula stenosis can be detected and located during dialysis with a moderate-to-excellent accuracy using PE and Qa measurement as screening procedures.


Assuntos
Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , Grau de Desobstrução Vascular , Adulto , Idoso , Constrição Patológica , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Exame Físico , Estudos Prospectivos
3.
Nat Rev Nephrol ; 5(6): 349-54, 2009 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19399018

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A 29-year-old white woman with a family history of Fabry disease was referred to a nephrology clinic with hypertension and nephropathy. Her renal function was below normal (serum creatinine level 141 micromol/l; estimated glomerular filtration rate 41 ml/min/1.73 m2) with no proteinuria or albuminuria. INVESTIGATIONS: Medical history, physical examination, leukocyte alpha-galactosidase A assay, laboratory tests (for antinuclear antibodies, antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies, lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibodies, complement and cryoglobulin), ophthalmological examination, echocardiography, brain magnetic resonance angiography, renal ultrasonography, renal color echo-Doppler scan, renal magnetic resonance angiography, renal angiography and renal biopsy. DIAGNOSIS: Diffuse sclero-atrophic renal tissue changes and widespread renal arterio-arteriolosclerotic changes secondary to Fabry disease. TREATMENT: Angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors and maintenance treatment with agalsidase-beta, 1 mg/kg body weight, every 2 weeks.


Assuntos
Doença de Fabry/patologia , Rim/patologia , Adulto , Biópsia , Educação Médica Continuada , Doença de Fabry/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença de Fabry/genética , Feminino , Humanos , Rim/irrigação sanguínea , Rim/diagnóstico por imagem , Angiografia por Ressonância Magnética , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa