Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 29
Filtrar
1.
Surg Endosc ; 31(2): 917-921, 2017 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27351659

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: As the effort to reduce postoperative morbidity and mortality continues, the search for modifiable patient risk factors to reduce complications is ongoing. Tobacco use is associated with impaired wound healing, but its effect on inguinal hernia repair has not been studied in a large population. An ACS-NSQIP dataset was used to evaluate the effect of tobacco use on outcomes of inguinal hernia repairs. METHODS: The ACS-NSQIP dataset was queried for patients who underwent open or laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs, by primary procedure CPT codes, between years 2009-2012. Tobacco use was registered, as defined by the ACS-NSQIP, in two ways: current smoking (within the past 12 months), or history of smoking (having ever smoked). Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to investigate outcome variables for 30-day morbidity by type of smoking status, while adjusting for preoperative risk factors. RESULTS: During the study period, 90,162 patients underwent inguinal hernia repair. 76 % of the cases were open compared to 24 % laparoscopic. The population was overwhelmingly male, 91 %, compared to 9 % female. The average age of patients was 42.5 years. Of the available data (69 % of patients), 38.5 % had a history of smoking. 18 % had smoked within the 12 months prior to surgery (current smokers). Their average number of pack years was 27.2 (SD 24.0) compared to 4.5 pack years (SD 14.7) for those who had not smoked 12 months prior to surgery (historical smokers). Using Fisher's exact test, having ever smoked was found to be significantly associated with pneumonia (p = 0.0008) and return to the operating room (p = 0.010). This relationship held when preoperative variables were controlled for using logistic regression (pneumonia, p = 0.002; return to the operating room, p = 0.002). When preoperative variables were controlled for and logistic regression was performed for current smokers, there was also a significant association with pneumonia (p = 0.005) and return to the operating room (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Current smoking status is a modifiable risk of patients undergoing laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repair. Failure to quit smoking prior to surgical repair is associated with complications like pneumonia and return to the operating room.


Assuntos
Hérnia Inguinal/cirurgia , Herniorrafia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Fumar , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Herniorrafia/métodos , Humanos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pneumonia/epidemiologia , Reoperação , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
2.
Surg Endosc ; 31(6): 2661-2666, 2017 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27752819

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Tobacco smoking is a known risk factor for complications after major surgical procedures. The full effect of tobacco use on these complications has not been studied over large populations for ventral hernia repairs. This effect is more important as the preoperative conditioning, and optimization of patients is adopted. We sought to use the prospectively collected ACS-NSQIP dataset to evaluate respiratory and infectious complications for patients undergoing both laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repairs. METHODS: The ACS-NSQIP dataset was queried for patients who underwent open or laparoscopic ventral hernia repairs, by primary procedure CPT codes, between years 2009-2012. Smoking use was registered as defined by the ACS-NSQIP, as both a current smoker (within the prior 12 months) or as a history of smoking (having ever smoked). Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to investigate postoperative complications for 30-day morbidity and mortality by smoking status while adjusting for preoperative risk factors. RESULTS: The majority of cases were open, 82 %, compared to laparoscopic 18 %. Sex was evenly distributed with 58 % female and 42 % male; however, there was a difference in the distribution of current smokers (p = 0.03). On analysis there were significantly more respiratory complications (p = 0.0003) and infectious complications (p < 0.0001). When controlling for sex, age, and type of surgery, using logistic regression, there were associations between smoking in the prior 12 months and respiratory complications, including pneumonia (p < 0.0001), and re-intubation (p < 0.0001). Similar associations were seen on logistic regression if a patient ever smoked; including pneumonia (p < 0.0001), re-intubation (p < 0.0001), and failure to wean (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Smoking tobacco, both current and historical use, leads to an increase in both respiratory and infectious complications. As more centers try to preoperatively condition patients for elective hernia repairs, it is important to note that patients may never return to the baseline outcomes of patients who never smoked.


Assuntos
Hérnia Ventral/cirurgia , Herniorrafia/métodos , Pneumonia/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Fumar/epidemiologia , Adulto , Angina Pectoris/epidemiologia , Comorbidade , Bases de Dados Factuais , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Feminino , Hérnia Ventral/epidemiologia , Humanos , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Doenças Vasculares Periféricas/epidemiologia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Fumar Tabaco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
3.
Surg Endosc ; 30(8): 3345-50, 2016 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26541721

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Since the widespread adoption of laparoscopic techniques in biliary surgery, the incidence of bile duct injures (BDI) has not significantly declined despite increased operative experience and recognition of the critical view of safety (CVS) method for anatomic identification. We hypothesized that operative approaches in clinical practice may vary from well-described technical recommendations. The objective of this study was to access how practicing surgeons commonly identify anatomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). METHODS: We performed a cohort study assessing practices in biliary surgery among current practicing surgeons. Surgeons belonging to the Midwest Surgical Association and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons were surveyed. Items surveyed include preferred methods for cystic duct identification, recognition of the CVS, and use of intraoperative imaging. RESULTS: In total, 374 of 849 surgeons responded. The CVS was not correctly identified by 75 % of surgeons descriptively and by 21 % of surgeons visually. 56 % of surgeons practiced the infundibular method for identification of the cystic duct; 27 % practiced the CVS method. Intraoperative cholangiography was used by 16 % and laparoscopic ultrasound by <1 %. CONCLUSION: A majority of surgeons preferably do not use the CVS method of identification during LC. A large percentage of practicing surgeons are unable to describe or visually identify the CVS. These results suggest an urgent need to reexamine the tenets of how LC is being taught and disseminated and present a clear target for improvement to reduce BDI.


Assuntos
Colecistectomia Laparoscópica/métodos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Colangiografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos e Questionários , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos
4.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 22(9): 2846-52, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26018727

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Curative intent management of retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) requires gross total resection. Preoperative radiotherapy (RT) often is used as an adjuvant to surgery, but recurrence rates remain high. To enhance RT efficacy with acceptable tolerance, there is interest in delivering "boost doses" of RT to high-risk areas of gross tumor volume (HR GTV) judged to be at risk for positive resection margins. We sought to evaluate variability in HR GTV boost target volume delineation among collaborating sarcoma radiation and surgical oncologist teams. METHODS: Radiation planning CT scans for three cases of RPS were distributed to seven paired radiation and surgical oncologist teams at six institutions. Teams contoured HR GTV boost volumes for each case. Analysis of contour agreement was performed using the simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE) algorithm and kappa statistics. RESULTS: HRGTV boost volume contour agreement between the seven teams was "substantial" or "moderate" for all cases. Agreement was best on the torso wall posteriorly (abutting posterior chest abdominal wall) and medially (abutting ipsilateral para-vertebral space and great vessels). Contours varied more significantly abutting visceral organs due to differing surgical opinions regarding planned partial organ resection. CONCLUSIONS: Agreement of RPS HRGTV boost volumes between sarcoma radiation and surgical oncologist teams was substantial to moderate. Differences were most striking in regions abutting visceral organs, highlighting the importance of collaboration between the radiation and surgical oncologist for "individualized" target delineation on the basis of areas deemed at risk and planned resection.


Assuntos
Órgãos em Risco , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Radioterapia (Especialidade) , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Neoplasias Retroperitoneais/diagnóstico por imagem , Sarcoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Carga Tumoral , Algoritmos , Consenso , Humanos , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Prognóstico , Neoplasias Retroperitoneais/patologia , Neoplasias Retroperitoneais/radioterapia , Fatores de Risco , Sarcoma/patologia , Sarcoma/radioterapia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos
5.
Surg Endosc ; 29(5): 1099-104, 2015 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25249146

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Numerous prospective studies and randomized controlled trials have demonstrated shorter length of stay, lower morbidity rates, and similar recurrence rates with laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (VHR) when compared to open VHR. Despite these promising results, previous data showed low utilization of laparoscopic VHR. The aim of our study was to evaluate the utilization of laparoscopic VHR using the most updated information from the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP) dataset. The secondary aim was to evaluate the outcomes from NSQIP for patients undergoing open versus laparoscopic VHR for the outcome of 30-day mortality and the peri-operative morbidities listed in the NSQIP dataset. METHODS: We performed this study using 2009-2012 data from the ACS-NSQIP database. The study population included patients who had undergone an open or laparoscopic ventral hernia repair as their primary procedure based on CPT codes. Demographic characteristics, overall morbidity, and complications were compared using Chi-square tests for categorical variables and two-sided t tests for continuous variables. Secondary outcomes (mortality and any complications) were further analyzed using logistic regression. RESULTS: Utilization of laparoscopic VHR was 22%. While adjusted mortality was similar, overall morbidity was increased in the open VHR group (OR 1.63; CI 95% 1.38-1.92). The open group had a higher rate of return to the OR, pneumonia, re-intubation, ventilator requirement, renal failure/insufficiency, transfusion, DVT, sepsis, and superficial and deep incisional wound infections. CONCLUSIONS: The utilization of laparoscopic VHR remained low from 2009 to 2012 and continued to lag behind the use of laparoscopy in other complex surgical procedures. The mortality rate between laparoscopic and open VHR was similar, but laparoscopic repair was associated with lower overall complication rates.


Assuntos
Hérnia Ventral/cirurgia , Herniorrafia/métodos , Laparoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Melhoria de Qualidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Recidiva , Cicatrização
6.
Surg Endosc ; 29(9): 2496-9, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25492451

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: To date, no study has compared laparoscopy (LB) to percutaneous (PB) biopsy for the diagnosis of abdominal lymphoma. The objective of this study is to compare the success rate and safety profile of laparoscopic lymph node biopsy to the percutaneous approach in patients with intra-abdominal lymphadenopathy concerning for lymphoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a multi-institution, retrospective review of patients undergoing lymph node biopsy for suspected intra-abdominal lymphoma between 2005 and 2013. Our primary outcome was adequate tissue yield between the two techniques, both for histologic diagnosis and for ancillary studies such as flow cytometry. Secondary outcomes included 30-day morbidity, 30-day readmission rates, the need for additional lymph node biopsy procedures, and length of stay. RESULTS: All 34 of the LB patients had adequate specimen for histologic diagnosis compared to 92.3% of patients with a PB (p = 0.18). Significantly more patients in the LB group had sufficient tissue for ancillary studies when needed than in the PB group, 95.5 and 68.2%, respectively (p = 0.04). A second biopsy was pursued in 23.1% of failed PB patients, 0% with success on second attempt. DISCUSSION: When index of suspicion is high or when biopsy is performed for patient previously diagnosed with lymphoma and recurrence/transformation is suspected, LB safely and consistently provides adequate tissue for initial diagnosis and for ancillary studies. In contrast, image-guided PB may be more appropriate for patients for whom ancillary studies are unlikely to add to planned treatments or when there is a high risk of complications from either general anesthesia or patient comorbidities.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Abdominais/diagnóstico , Biópsia Guiada por Imagem/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Linfoma/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos
7.
Am Surg ; 86(9): 1205-1207, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32683911

RESUMO

Mesenteric cysts are benign congenital cysts typically discovered incidentally during abdominal explorations for other reasons. When feasible, they should be excised to prevent recurrence, bowel obstruction or volvulus, and resulting complications. We present a unique case of an infant, diagnosed prenatally by ultrasound with possible bowel obstruction, found to have micro and macro chylous mesenteric cysts. Although initially asymptomatic with normal abdominal x-ray and discharged on day of life 2, the parents were taught how to recognize symptoms of bowel obstruction. He presented at 1 month with obstructive symptoms, was confirmed to have large mesenteric cystic structures on ultrasound, and was immediately taken to the operating room. Due to the extensive number of cysts and intimate involvement of the largest cyst with the superior mesenteric artery, he was treated with partial excision and observation since resection may have resulted in short gut syndrome. Given a prenatal ultrasound suggestive of mesenteric cysts, we recommend abdominal imaging at birth with close follow-up until the appropriate time for elective resection. When disease is extensive precluding full enucleation and resection, we advocate for enucleation in combination with unroofing of as many cysts as possible followed by postoperative surveillance ultrasounds and family counseling.


Assuntos
Diagnóstico Precoce , Laparotomia/métodos , Cisto Mesentérico/diagnóstico , Ultrassonografia/métodos , Bile , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Cisto Mesentérico/cirurgia
8.
Surg Endosc ; 22(3): 798-801, 2008 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18274823

RESUMO

During laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR), it is not always possible to reduce incarcerated omentum through a tight defect and it may tear or require transection within the abdomen. This leaves an ischemic mass of tissue within the hernia sac which can cause pain, infection, or the appearance of hernia recurrence postoperatively. We describe a technique which allows extraction of any retained omentum within the hernia sac, mesh insertion, and laparoscopic completion of the procedure using only 5 mm trocars. After obtaining access to the abdomen with a 5 mm optical trocar in select patients, lysis of adhesions is performed as needed. When incarcerated omentum that cannot be safely reduced is discovered, it is transected at the level of the abdominal wall using electrocoagulation or ultrasonic dissection. At this point, we make a 2-3 cm skin incision overlying the retained omentum, open the hernia sac, and remove the amputated omentum. The rolled up piece of mesh utilized for the repair is then inserted through this opening. The hernia sac is closed with absorbable suture, allowing reinsufflation of the abdomen and completion of the laparoscopic repair. This method enables us to safely remove any retained omentum from the hernia sac and utilize the same incision for mesh insertion. We utilize only 5 mm trocars without the need for a larger port through which to place the mesh into the abdomen. This reduces the risk of postoperative trocar site hernias as the opening for mesh insertion is covered by the mesh after it is fixed in place. This technique may also decrease the need for conversion to open hernia repair by allowing an alternative approach to reduce incarcerated omentum.


Assuntos
Hérnia Ventral/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Omento/cirurgia , Telas Cirúrgicas , Humanos , Isquemia/fisiopatologia , Isquemia/cirurgia , Omento/irrigação sanguínea , Medição de Risco , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Instrumentos Cirúrgicos
9.
Am J Surg ; 215(3): 458-461, 2018 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29397898

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Consensus guidelines recommend against elective ventral hernia repair (VHR) in patients with BMI >30 kg/m2 without preoperative weight loss intervention. We aim to compare hernia recurrence and perioperative complications in VHR utilizing anterior component separation (CS) in patients with class III obesity (BMI >40 kg/m2). METHODS: A retrospective review of patients undergoing VHR with CS was performed. The primary endpoint was hernia recurrence; secondary endpoints were wound complications, postoperative medical complications, mortality and length of stay. RESULTS: 185 consecutive patients were identified from 2008 to 2016. There were no significant differences between groups: hernia recurrence (6.9% BMI >40 kg/m2, 2.4% BMI <39.9 kg/m2, p = 0.21), wound complications (58.6% BMI >40 kg/m2, 47.2% BMI <39.9 kg/m2, p = 0.16), postoperative complications (39.7% BMI >40 kg/m2, 26% BMI <39.9 kg/m2, p = 0.08), mortality (1.6% BMI >40 kg/m2, 3.4% BMI <39.9 kg/m2, p = 0.59), and length of stay (10.6 days BMI >40 kg/m2, 11.2 days BMI <39.9 kg/m2, p = 0.5). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates similar outcomes in class III obesity patients undergoing elective VHR compared to patients with BMI <39.9 kg/m2.


Assuntos
Hérnia Ventral/cirurgia , Herniorrafia/métodos , Obesidade Mórbida/complicações , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Índice de Massa Corporal , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/métodos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade Mórbida/diagnóstico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento
10.
Am Surg ; 82(4): 302-7, 2016 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27097621

RESUMO

Ovarian carcinomatosis poses a dilemma for the surgeon. When resecting colon for tumor invasion, one must decide between diversion and primary anastomosis (PA). We examined the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program to determine whether PA associated with more complications than ostomy. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program dataset was queried for patients with ovarian carcinomatosis between 2007 and 2012. Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to further identify patients undergoing colectomy with PA or ostomy. Logistic regression was used to evaluate 30-day morbidity and mortality. The 1013 ovarian carcinomatosis patients who underwent elective colon surgery were divided into primary repair (n = 453, 43.5%) or ostomy (n = 586, 56.5%) groups. Preoperative demographics were similar; however, ostomy patients had more severe preoperative laboratory derangements. The 30-day mortality and postoperative transfusion requirements were higher in the ostomy group. On multivariate analysis controlling for confounders, the differences were no longer significant. In conclusion, 30-day mortality and postoperative complications were increased in the ostomy group. Given the laboratory derangements in this group, this may reflect tendency to allocate ostomies to more ill patients. Primary repair in a selected population does not worsen outcomes. Prospective evaluation would help determine the impact of PA in the ovarian carcinomatosis population.


Assuntos
Carcinoma/secundário , Colectomia , Neoplasias do Colo/secundário , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução , Enterostomia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Anastomose Cirúrgica , Carcinoma/mortalidade , Carcinoma/cirurgia , Neoplasias do Colo/mortalidade , Neoplasias do Colo/cirurgia , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Intestinos/cirurgia , Modelos Logísticos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Ovarianas/mortalidade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
11.
Am J Surg ; 211(2): 416-20, 2016 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26686905

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Determine the utility of mock oral examinations in preparation for the American Board of Surgery certifying examination (ABS CE). METHODS: Between 2002 and 2012, blinded data were collected on 63 general surgery residents: 4th and 5th-year mock oral examination scores, first-time pass rates on ABS CE, and an online survey. RESULTS: Fifty-seven residents took the 4th-year mock oral examination: 30 (52.6%) passed and 27 (47.4%) failed, with first-time ABS CE pass rates 93.3% and 81.5% (P = .238). Fifty-nine residents took the 5th-year mock oral examination: 28 (47.5%) passed and 31 (52.5%) failed, with first-time ABS CE pass rates 82.1% and 93.5% (P = .240). Thirty-eight responded to the online survey, 77.1% ranked mock oral examinations as very or extremely helpful with ABS CE preparation. CONCLUSIONS: Although mock oral examinations and ABS CE passing rates do not directly correlate, residents perceive the mock oral examinations to be helpful.


Assuntos
Certificação , Avaliação Educacional , Cirurgia Geral/educação , Internato e Residência , Prática Psicológica , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos
12.
JSLS ; 19(4)2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26941544

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The advantages of laparoscopy over open surgery are well established. Laparoscopic resection for gastric cancer is safe and results in equivalent oncologic outcomes when compared with open resection. The purpose of this study was to assess the use of laparoscopy to treat gastric cancer and the associated outcomes. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP) dataset was queried for patients with gastric cancer (ICD-9 Code 151.0-151.9) from January 2005 through December 2012. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the 30-day morbidity and mortality of open gastrectomy (CPT code 43620-2, 43631-4) versus that of the laparoscopic procedure on the stomach (CPT code 43650), while adjusting for preoperative risk factors. RESULTS: A total of 4116 patients with gastric cancer were identified and divided by surgical approach into 2 groups: open gastrectomy (n = 3725; 90.5%) and laparoscopic procedure on the stomach (n = 391; 9.5%). After adjustment for preoperative risk factors, complications were significantly fewer in laparoscopic versus open gastric resection (odds ratio [OR] 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.45-0.82; P = .001). After adjusting for preoperative risk factors, there was no statistically significant difference in mortality with laparoscopic compared to open gastric resection (OR 0.74; 95% CI = 0.32-1.72; P = .481). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy is underused in the treatment of gastric cancer. Given that laparoscopic gastric resection has a lower morbidity in comparison to open resection, steps should be made toward advancing the use of laparoscopy for gastric cancer.


Assuntos
Gastrectomia/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Gastrectomia/mortalidade , Humanos , Laparoscopia/mortalidade , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidade , Análise de Sobrevida
13.
Am J Surg ; 209(3): 498-502, 2015 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25557970

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Surgery is indicated for acute uncomplicated appendicitis but the optimal timing is controversial. Recent literature is conflicting on the effect of time to intervention. METHODS: We queried the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project dataset for patients undergoing laparoscopic and open appendectomy between 2007 and 2012. Logistic regression was used to evaluate 30-day morbidity and mortality of intervention at different time periods, adjusting for preoperative risk factors. RESULTS: A total of 69,926 patients undergoing appendectomy were identified. Groups were divided by time to intervention: group 1, less than 24 hours (n = 55,839; 79.9%); group 2, 24 to 48 hours (n = 13,409; 18.6%); and group 3, greater than 48 hours (n = 1,038; 1.5%). After adjustment, the risk of complication remained increased for group 3 versus group 1 or 2 (odds ratio 1.66, 95% confidence interval 1.34 to 2.07). CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate equivalent outcomes between time to appendectomy of less than 24 and 24 to 48 hours. There was a 2-fold increase in complication rate for patients delayed longer than 48 hours.


Assuntos
Apendicectomia/métodos , Apendicite/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Melhoria de Qualidade/organização & administração , Adulto , Idoso , Apendicite/mortalidade , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Illinois/epidemiologia , Laparoscopia , Tempo de Internação/tendências , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Morbidade/tendências , Duração da Cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Taxa de Sobrevida/tendências , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
14.
Surgery ; 132(4): 738-44; discussion 744-7, 2002 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12407360

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Early survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy has improved, but its morbidity remains high. The purpose of this study is to determine how the intra-operative (OR) occurrence of major vascular complications affects the outcome of pancreaticoduodenectomy. METHODS: The medical records of 180 consecutive patients having pancreaticoduodenectomy from 1991 to 2001 were reviewed. Vascular complications were defined as "an unanticipated injury or thrombosis of a major vessel necessitating intervention." Age, sex, type of pancreaticoduodenectomy, tumor size, estimated blood loss, OR time, time in intensive care, post-OR hospitalization, and survival were compared. RESULTS: Eighteen vascular complications were identified. Differences in age, sex, and type of resection between patients with or without vascular complications were not significant. OR time, estimated blood loss, blood transfusions, tumor size, time in intensive care, and post-OR hospitalization were all significantly greater in patients with vascular complications. Median survival for patients with vascular complications was significantly shorter than for patients without vascular complications. Thirty-day mortality was greater in patients with vascular complications. CONCLUSION: Vascular complications significantly affect the outcome of pancreaticoduodenectomy increasing OR time, estimated blood loss, blood transfusion requirements, time in intensive care, post-OR hospitalization, and mortality.


Assuntos
Pancreaticoduodenectomia/efeitos adversos , Doenças Vasculares/etiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Doença Crônica , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Prontuários Médicos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Pancreaticoduodenectomia/mortalidade , Pancreatite/cirurgia , Reoperação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Análise de Sobrevida , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Doenças Vasculares/mortalidade , Doenças Vasculares/terapia
15.
Arch Surg ; 138(5): 525-9; discussion 529-30, 2003 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12742957

RESUMO

HYPOTHESIS: A modified technique for mesh-plug hernioplasty is a safe and efficacious option for primary unilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy. DESIGN: Prospective analysis of 1056 patients who underwent primary unilateral inguinal hernioplasty. SETTING: A private university medical center. PATIENTS: One thousand twenty-five men and 31 women (mean age, 49 years) with primary unilateral inguinal hernias that were surgically repaired between May 1, 1997, and November 1, 2001. INTERVENTION: We performed a modified technique using a mesh plug and local anesthesia with intravenous sedation. The modified technique consisted of placing the mesh plug into the preperitoneal space and suture fixation of the plug using the inner petals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Surgical morbidity, hernia recurrence, postoperative pain medication used, and return to normal activities. RESULTS: We included 642 indirect and 414 direct hernias. Mean operative time was 25 minutes; mean recovery room time, 45 minutes. All procedures were performed as outpatient surgery. One thousand thirteen patients (95.9%) returned to normal activities within 3 days. All manual laborers returned to work on postoperative day 14. Only 169 patients (16.0%) required prescription pain medication. At 1-year follow-up, 1045 patients (99.0%) have been examined, and 1 recurrence (0.1%) has been detected. No mesh infection has occurred, and 19 hematomas spontaneously resolved. Five patients (0.5%) required treatment for persistent postoperative pain. CONCLUSIONS: The modified mesh-plug hernioplasty uses a minimum of medical resources and is associated with a small amount of postoperative pain and an early return to normal activities and manual labor with a minimal documented early recurrence rate. The Millikan modified mesh-plug hernioplasty should be adopted as the gold standard for unilateral primary inguinal hernioplasty.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/métodos , Hérnia Inguinal/cirurgia , Telas Cirúrgicas , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Morbidade , Estudos Prospectivos , Recidiva , Técnicas de Sutura , Resultado do Tratamento
16.
Surg Clin North Am ; 83(5): 1223-34, 2003 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14533912

RESUMO

Incisional ventral hernias are a common problem encountered by surgeons, with over 100,000 repairs being performed annually in the United States. Although many predisposing factors for incisional ventral hernia are patient-related, some factors such as type of primary closure and materials used may reduce the overall incidence of incisional ventral hernia. With the advent of prosthetic meshes being used for incisional ventral hernia repair, the recurrence rate has dropped to approximately 10%. More recently, with the development of prosthetic mesh that is now safe to place intraperitoneally, the recurrence rate has dropped to under 5%. The current controversies that exist for incisional ventral hernia repair are which approach to use (open versus laparoscopic) and what type of fixation (partial- versus full-thickness abdominal muscular/fascial wall) is necessary to stabilize the position of the mesh while tissue ingrowth occurs. During the next decade the answers to these controversies should be available in the surgical literature.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório , Hérnia Ventral/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/métodos , Humanos , Fatores de Risco , Telas Cirúrgicas , Suturas
17.
Am Surg ; 68(3): 258-62; discussion 262-3, 2002 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11893104

RESUMO

A retrospective review of esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma between 1982 and 1999 was performed. Two hundred twenty-two patients (mean age 61.7 years) underwent esophagectomy: 128 transhiatal, 74 Ivor Lewis, and 20 abdominal. Most tumors were adenocarcinoma (65%); the majority were in the lower third or cardia (78%). Excluding operative mortality the one-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 67, 39, and 31 per cent (median survival, 16.3 months) respectively. The hospital mortality rate was 6.8 per cent. Through univariate analysis race other than white, history of weight loss, poor or moderate differentiation (P = 0.05), full-thickness invasion (P = 0.02), positive lymph nodes (P < 0.01), Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (P = 0.02), intraoperative blood transfusion (P = 0.01), and tumor location in the upper or middle third in node-positive patients (P = 0.02) were associated with a poorer survival. Adjuvant therapy improved survival for patients with positive lymph nodes (P < 0.01). In multivariate analysis positive lymph nodes, tumor location, intraoperative blood transfusion, and adjuvant therapy were independent predictors of survival. To optimize survival esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma should be performed without blood transfusion, and node-positive patients should receive multimodal therapy.


Assuntos
Carcinoma/mortalidade , Carcinoma/cirurgia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Esofagectomia/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Análise de Variância , Carcinoma/patologia , Intervalos de Confiança , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Esofagectomia/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Probabilidade , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
18.
Am Surg ; 69(4): 280-6; discussion 286, 2003 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12716084

RESUMO

Phase I of this study compared students' experiences regarding patient demographics, surgical content, and clinical skill practice in three different hospital settings: university, community, and public. Phase II examines the aspects of clerkship performance that contribute to students' final grades. An instrument to track the experiences of students on their surgical clerkship was developed and piloted. Data were analyzed to compare the frequency of common surgical tasks performed and exposure to various surgical topics and patient demographics as well as to identify factors that explain variance on student grades. Students performed an average of 33 clinical tasks per week and were exposed to a broad range of surgical topics. Analysis of variance results demonstrated no significant differences between public, private, or university settings with respect to students' clinical practice opportunities or content exposure. Clinical evaluations and National Board of Medical Examiners scores account for 75.5 per cent of the variance in students' final grades. There was no significant correlation between patient load and clinical task load with final clerkship grades. The common clinical and didactic components of a surgical clerkship can balance a student's experience with surgical topics and tasks performed. It is important to utilize this information in program review of multisite clerkships to ascertain and enhance the validity of student performance measures.


Assuntos
Estágio Clínico , Currículo , Avaliação Educacional , Cirurgia Geral/educação , Análise de Variância , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Estados Unidos
19.
Am Surg ; 69(4): 287-91; discussion 291-2, 2003 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12716085

RESUMO

A prospective study of patients with ventral hernias was undertaken to study the experience with an open intraperitoneal underlay technique utilizing a bilayer prosthetic mesh. From September 1998 to March 2001, 102 patients underwent repair with a bilayer expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) and polypropylene mesh placed intraperitoneally and fixed in place with full-thickness abdominal muscle wall sutures to achieve a 5-cm underlay of the fascial defect circumferentially. There were 67 females and 35 males ranging in age from 29 to 76 years (mean 53 years). Average patient weight was 207 lb with 64 patients in the obese category. Forty patients presented with recurrent hernias. Mean operative time was 103 minutes with an average diameter hernia defect size of 15 cm. Median hospital stay was 3 days. There was no surgical mortality, and major morbidity occurred in six patients (2 wound infections, one deep vein thrombosis, one myocardial infarction, one pneumonia, and one pulmonary embolus). Mean follow-up is 28 months (range 12-42 months). No recurrence has been found with 100 per cent follow-up to date. No bowel obstruction or enteric fistulas have occurred during the follow-up period. The open intraperitoneal underlay mesh technique can be performed with a zero per cent early recurrence rate. Bilayer prosthetic mesh composed of ePTFE and polypropylene can be safely placed intraperitoneally without causing intestinal obstruction or enteric fistula.


Assuntos
Hérnia Ventral/cirurgia , Polipropilenos , Politetrafluoretileno , Telas Cirúrgicas , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Peritônio , Estudos Prospectivos
20.
Am Surg ; 80(9): 884-9, 2014 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25197875

RESUMO

A consensus on the optimal surgical approach for repair of a paraesophageal hernia has not been reached. The aim of this study was to examine the outcomes of open and laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repairs (PHR), both with and without mesh. A review of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database from 2007 to 2011 was conducted. Patients who underwent an open or laparoscopic PHR were included. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included infections, respiratory and cardiac complications, intraoperative or perioperative transfusions, sepsis, and septic shock. Statistical analyses using odds ratios were performed comparing the open and laparoscopic approaches. A total of 4470 patients were identified using NSQIP; 2834 patients had a laparoscopic repair and the remaining 1636 patients underwent an open PHR. Compared with the laparoscopic approach, the open repair group had significantly higher 30-day mortality (odds ratio, 4.75; 95% confidence interval, 2.67 to 8.47; P < 0.0001). The laparoscopic approach had a statistically significant decrease in infections, respiratory and cardiac events/complications, transfusion requirements, episodes of sepsis, and septic shock (P < 0.05). Our data suggest increased perioperative morbidity associated with an open PHR compared with laparoscopic. There was no statistically significant difference in any of the primary or secondary outcomes in patients repaired with mesh compared with those without. The overall use of mesh in paraesophageal hernia repairs has increased. The NSQIP data show significantly increased 30-day mortality in open repair compared with laparoscopic as well as a significantly higher perioperative complication rate.


Assuntos
Hérnia Hiatal/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Laparoscopia/normas , Melhoria de Qualidade , Telas Cirúrgicas , Idoso , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Hérnia Hiatal/mortalidade , Herniorrafia , Humanos , Laparoscopia/mortalidade , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa