Analysis of prostate-specific antigen bounce after I(125) permanent seed implant for localised prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To report on the incidence of benign prostate-specific antigen bounce following permanent I(125) prostate brachytherapy, to describe the associations in our population and review the relationship of bounce to subsequent biochemical failure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From February 2000 to May 2005, 374 patients with localised prostate cancer were treated with I(125) permanent prostate brachytherapy at a single institution. A prospectively collected database was used to identify cases of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) bounce, defined as a rise of 0.2 ng/ml above an initial PSA nadir with subsequent decline to or below that nadir without treatment. The patients who received neo-adjuvant or adjuvant hormone manipulation were excluded. Biochemical failure was determined using the both the ASTRO consensus definition and Phoenix (nadir +2 ng/mL) definition. RESULTS: Two hundred and five patients were identified with a median follow-up of 45 months (24-85). PSA bounce was noted in 79 (37%) men, occurring at a median of 14.8 months (1.7-40.6) following implant. The median peak PSA was 1.8 ng/ml (0.4-7.4) with a bounce magnitude of 0.91 ng/ml (0.2-5.8). When pre- and post-implant factors were assessed for association to bounce, only younger age was statistically significant (p=0.002). The threshold for biochemical failure as defined by the ASTRO consensus definition (1997) was met in 4 (5%) patients after experiencing bounce as opposed to 19 (15%) non-bounce patients (p=0.01). The threshold for Phoenix (nadir +2 ng/mL) was met in 6 (7.5%) patients following bounce versus 22 (17%) of non-bounce patients (p=0.003). Both definitions are prone to false positive calls during bounce. Median PSA velocity during the bounce was 0.08 ng/mL/month (0.02-0.98) and was statistically significantly lower than the median velocity prior to the Phoenix biochemical failure at 0.28 ng/mL/month (0.07-2.04) (p=0.0005). CONCLUSION: PSA bounce is a common finding in our population and is associated with a lower rate of subsequent biochemical failure. The noted differences in PSA velocity will require verification in a future analysis to reduce the influence of median follow-up on this finding. Patients should be advised of the potential of bounce in PSA follow-up after permanent I(125) prostate brachytherapy and physicians involved in follow-up of prostate brachytherapy patients should be aware of this phenomenon, allowing them to commit to appropriate PSA surveillance, avoiding the premature and inappropriate initiation of salvage therapy during PSA bounce.

UK & Ireland Prostate Brachytherapy Practice Survey 2014-2016.

PURPOSE: To document the current prostate brachytherapy practice across the UK and Ireland and compare with previously published audit results. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Participants from 25 centers attending the annual UK & Ireland Prostate Brachytherapy Conference were invited to complete an online survey. Sixty-three questions assessed the center's experience and staffing, clinician's experience, clinical selection criteria and scheduling, number of cases per modality in the preceding three years, low-dose-rate (LDR) pre- and post-implant technique and high-dose-rate (HDR) implant technique. Responses were collated, and descriptive statistical analysis performed. RESULTS: Eighteen (72%) centers responded with 17 performing LDR only, 1 performing HDR only, and 6 performing both LDR and HDR. Seventy-one percent of centers have > 10 years of LDR brachytherapy experience, whereas 71% centers that perform HDR brachytherapy have > 5 years of experience. Thirteen centers have 2 or more clinicians performing brachytherapy with 61% of lead consultants performing > 25 cases (LDR + HDR) in 2016. The number of implants (range), that includes LDR and HDR, performed by individual practitioners in 2016 was > 50 by 21%, 25-50 by 38%, and < 25 by 41%. Eight centers reported a decline in LDR monotherapy case numbers in 2016. Number of center's performing HDR brachytherapy increased in last five years. Relative uniformity in patient selection is noted, and LDR pre- and post-implant dosimetry adheres to published quality guidelines, with an average post-implant D90 of > 145 Gy in 69% of centers in 2014 and 2015 compared to 63% in 2016. The median CT/US volume ratios were > 0.9 ≤ 1.0 (n = 4), > 1.0 ≤ 1.1 (n = 7), and > 1.1 (n = 2). CONCLUSION: There is considerable prostate brachytherapy experience in the UK and Ireland. An apparent fall in LDR case numbers is noted. Maintenance of case numbers and ongoing compliance with published quality guidelines is important to sustain high quality outcomes.

Efficacy of a rectal spacer with prostate SABR-first UK experience.

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the use of implanted hydrogel rectal spacers for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy-volumetric modulated arc therapy (SABR-VMAT) patients, investigating practicality, dosimetric impact, normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) and early toxicity. METHODS: Data from the first 6 patients treated within a prostate SABR and rectal spacer trial were examined to determine spacer insertion tolerability, resultant changes in treatment planning and dosimetry and early toxicity effects. CT scans acquired prior to spacer insertion were used to generate SABR plans which were compared to post-insertion plans. Plans were evaluated for target coverage, conformity, and organs at risk doses with NTCPs also determined from resultant dose fluences. Early toxicity data were also collected. RESULTS: All patients had successful spacer insertion under local anaesthetic with maximal Grade 1 toxicity. All plans were highly conformal, with no significant differences in clinical target volume dose coverage between pre- and post-spacer plans. Substantial improvements in rectal dose metrics were observed in post-spacer plans, e.g. rectal volume receiving 36 Gy reduced by ≥42% for all patients. Median NTCP for Grade 2 + rectal bleeding significantly decreased from 4.9 to 0.8% with the use of a rectal spacer (p = 0.031). To date, two episodes of acute Grade 1 proctitis have been reported following treatment. CONCLUSION: The spacer resulted in clinically and statistically significant reduction in rectal doses for all patients. Advances in knowledge: This is one of the first studies to investigate the efficacy of a hydrogel spacer in prostate SABR treatments. Observed dose sparing of the rectum is predicted to result in meaningful clinical benefit.

Failure to achieve a PSA level

PURPOSE: To investigate whether failure to suppress the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level to or=2 months of neoadjuvant luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist therapy in patients scheduled to undergo external beam radiotherapy for localized prostate carcinoma is associated with reduced biochemical failure-free survival. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective case note review of consecutive patients with intermediate- or high-risk localized prostate cancer treated between January 2001 and December 2002 with neoadjuvant hormonal deprivation therapy, followed by concurrent hormonal therapy and radiotherapy was performed. Patient data were divided for analysis according to whether the PSA level in Week 1 of radiotherapy was 1 ng/mL in 52. At a median follow-up of 49 months, the 4-year actuarial biochemical failure-free survival rate was 84% vs. 60% (p = 0.0016) in favor of the patients with a PSA level after neoadjuvant hormonal deprivation therapy of 1 ng/mL at the beginning of external beam radiotherapy after >or=2 months of neoadjuvant luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist therapy have a significantly greater rate of biochemical failure and lower survival rate compared with those with a PSA level of

Sector analysis provides additional spatial information on the permanent prostate brachytherapy learning curve.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the permanent prostate brachytherapy (PPB) learning curve using postimplant multisector dosimetric analysis and to assess the correlation between sector -specific dosimetry and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). METHODS AND METHODS: First 200 patients treated with (125)I PPB monotherapy (145 Gy) at a single institution were assessed. Postimplant dosimetry (PID) using CT was evaluated for whole prostate (global) and 12 sectors, assessing minimum dose to 90% of prostate (D90) and dose to 0.1 cm(3) of rectum (D0.1cc). Global and sector PID results were evaluated to investigate changes in D90 with case number. Urinary and bowel PROMs were assessed using the International Prostate Symptom Score and the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite questionnaire. The correlation between global and individual sector PID and urinary/bowel PROMs was also evaluated. RESULTS: Linear regression confirmed a significant improvement in global D90 with case number (r(2) = 0.20; p = 0.001) at a rate of 0.11 Gy/case. Postimplant D90 of base sectors increased at a rate of 0.11-0.15 Gy/case (p = 0.0001) and matched global improvement. The regression lines of midgland and apex sectors were significantly different from global D90 (p = 0.01). Posterior midgland sectors showed a significant reduction in D90 with case number at a rate of 0.13-0.19 Gy/case (p = 0.01). Dose to posterior midgland sectors correlated with rectal D0.1cc dose but not bowel PROMs. Dose to posterior midgland sectors correlated with urinary International Prostate Symptom Score change, which was not apparent when global D90 alone was considered. CONCLUSIONS: Sector analysis provided increased spatial information regarding the PPB learning curve. Furthermore, sector analysis correlated with urinary PROMs and rectal dose.

Sector analysis of 125I permanent prostate brachytherapy provides a rapid and effective method of evaluating and comparing pre- and post-implant dosimetry.

PURPOSE: To evaluate a sector analysis program in the assessment and comparison of pre- and post-implant dosimetric parameters during the development of an (125)I permanent prostate brachytherapy service. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 50 consecutive men being treated with permanent prostate brachytherapy had dose-volume analysis in 12 sectors of their pre-implant ultrasound (USpre) and post-implant CT (CTpost) studies. Individual sectors were created by dividing prostate into three equal lengths, namely base, midgland, and apex. Each of these volumes was then divided into four axial sectors. Dosimetric parameters were compared in adjoining sectors within each study and between studies. RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences between individual sectors on USpre and CTpost volumes with CTpost higher than USpre (p=0.001). Statistically significant differences were found in corresponding sectors on USpre and CTpost for all dosimetric parameters. The dosimetric parameters were significantly lower on CTpost in the anterior base and midgland (p=0.001) and significantly higher at the posterior apex and midgland (p=0.05). Dose homogeneity was demonstrated in adjoining sectors in all USpre and most adjoining sectors on CTpost. CONCLUSIONS: Sector analysis allows rapid assessment of USpre and CTpost dosimetry. It offers a scientific method of identifying areas of increased and reduced dosing on CTpost when compared with USpre, providing a learning tool to refine dosimetric analysis and highlight sectors where implant quality could be improved.

Neoadjuvant hormone therapy for radical prostate radiotherapy: bicalutamide monotherapy vs. luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist monotherapy: a single-institution matched-pair analysis.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response to either neoadjuvant bicalutamide (BC) monotherapy or neoadjuvant luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist (LHRHa) monotherapy and the subsequent effect on biochemical failure-free survival (BFFS) in men receiving radical radiotherapy (RT) for localized prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective review of consecutive men treated with BC monotherapy before radical prostate RT who were individually case-matched to men treated with neoadjuvant LHRHa monotherapy. PSA kinetics and absolute pre-RT posthormone PSA (PRPH-PSA) level and subsequent BFFS were analyzed. RESULTS: Sixty-five men treated with BC monotherapy with a median follow-up of 44 months were individually matched with 65 men treated with LHRHa with a median follow-up of 54 months. Statistically significant differences were noted between groups in the PRPH-PSA, with a mean of 2.9 ng/mL (0.1-11.2 ng/mL) for patients receiving BC treatment and 1.8 ng/mL (0.1-11.1 ng/mL) for patients receiving LHRHa treatment (P < .001). A PRPH-PSA of < 1.0 and < 0.1 ng/mL was seen in 16 (24.6%) and 2 (3%) of the patients receiving BC and 34 (52.3%) and 3 (4.6%) patients receiving LHRHa, respectively. There were no significant differences between groups in either PSA halving time or velocity. Phoenix biochemical failure occurred in 10 (15.4%) and 8 (12.3%) patients receiving BC and patients receiving LHRHa, respectively. Neither PRPH-PSA level nor PSA kinetics during the neoadjuvant period predict for subsequent BFFS at this duration of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Although neoadjuvant BC therapy did not result in equivalent PRPH-PSA suppression when compared with neoadjuvant LHRHa alone, there was no difference in biochemical failure rates between cohorts at 50 months' median follow-up. Longer follow-up is required.

Assessing the effect of a contouring protocol on postprostatectomy radiotherapy clinical target volumes and interphysician variation.

PURPOSE: To compare postprostatectomy clinical target volume (CTV) delineation before and after the introduction of a contouring protocol and to investigate its effect on interphysician variability METHODS AND MATERIALS: Six site-specialized radiation oncologists independently delineated a CTV on the computed tomography (CT) scans of 3 patients who had received postprostatectomy radiotherapy. At least 3 weeks later this was repeated, but with the physicians adhering to the contouring protocol from the Medical Research Council's Radiotherapy and Androgen Deprivation In Combination After Local Surgery (RADICALS) trial. The volumes obtained before and after the protocol were compared and the effect of the protocol on interphysician variability assessed. RESULTS: An increase in mean CTV for all patients of 40.7 to 53.9 cm(3) was noted as a result of observing the protocol, with individual increases in the mean CTV of 65%, 15%, and 24% for Patients 1, 2, and 3 respectively. A reduction in interphysician variability was noted when the protocol was used. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial interphysician variation in target volume delineation for postprostatectomy radiotherapy exists, which can be reduced by the use of a contouring protocol. The RADICALS contouring protocol increases the target volumes when compared with those volumes typically applied at our center. The effect of treating larger volumes on the therapeutic ratio and resultant toxicity should be carefully monitored, particularly if the same dose-response as documented in radical prostate radiotherapy applies to the adjuvant and salvage setting. Prostate cancer, Postprostatectomy, Radiotherapy, Target volume.