Improving Work-life Balance and Satisfaction to Improve Patient Care.

How to cite this article: Mitra LG, Sharma J, Walia HS. Improving Work-life Balance and Satisfaction to Improve Patient Care. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(4):326-328.

Thromboelastography-Guided Blood Component Use in Patients With Cirrhosis With Nonvariceal Bleeding: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Thromboelastography (TEG) provides a more comprehensive global coagulation assessment than routine tests (international normalized ratio [INR] and platelet [PLT] count), and its use may avoid unnecessary blood component transfusion in patients with advanced cirrhosis and significant coagulopathy who have nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. A total of 96 patients with significant coagulopathy (defined in this study as INR >1.8 and/or PLT count < 50 × 109 /L) and nonvariceal upper GI bleed (diagnosed after doing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, which showed ongoing bleed from a nonvariceal source) were randomly allocated to TEG-guided transfusion strategy (TEG group; n = 49) or standard-of-care (SOC) group (n = 47). In the TEG group, only 26.5% patients were transfused with all three blood components (fresh frozen plasma [FFP], PLTs, and cryoprecipitate) versus 87.2% in the SOC group (P < 0.001). Although 7 (14.3%) patients in the TEG group received no blood component transfusion, there were no such patients in the SOC group (P = 0.012). Also, there was a significantly lower use of blood components (FFP, PLTs, and cryoprecipitate) in the TEG group compared with the SOC group. Failure to control bleed, failure to prevent rebleeds, and mortality between the two groups were similar. Conclusion: In patients with advanced cirrhosis with coagulopathy and nonvariceal upper GI bleeding, TEG-guided transfusion strategy leads to a significantly lower use of blood components compared with SOC (transfusion guided by INR and PLT count), without an increase in failure to control bleed, failure to prevent rebleed, and mortality.

Comparison of Prognostic Models in Acute Liver Failure: Decision is to be Dynamic.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Acute liver failure (ALF) is a rare disease entity with a high mortality. Management is dependent on accurate prognostication. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred consecutive patients presenting with ALF were prospectively evaluated. The King's college criteria (KCC), ALF early dynamic model (ALFED), sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, and acute physiology and health evaluation II (APACHE II) scores were compared to predict mortality. RESULTS: There were significant differences in means of all the scores between survivors and nonsurvivors. The SOFA 48 hours had the highest area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) (0.857) closely followed by the ALFED score (0.844). The optimal cutoff for the SOFA score at 48 hours to predict subsequent survival outcome is ≥10 and for the ALFED score is ≥5. Sequential organ failure assessment 48 hours had a good sensitivity of 87%, and the ALFED score showed a good specificity of 84%. The decision curve analysis showed that between a threshold probability of 0.13 and 0.6, use of the SOFA score provided the maximum net benefit and at threshold probabilities of >0.6, the use of ALFED score provided the maximum clinical benefit. CONCLUSION: Dynamic scoring results in better prognostication in ALF. The SOFA 48 hours and ALFED score have good prognostication value in nonacetaminophen-induced liver failure. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Saluja V, Sharma A, Pasupuleti SSR, Mitra LG, Kumar G, Agarwal PM. Comparison of Prognostic Models in Acute Liver Failure: Decision is to be Dynamic. Indian J Crit Care Med 2019;23(12):574-581.

Pain Management Following Intracavitary Brachytherapy Procedures: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study.

Background and objectives Intracavitary applicators are a source of significant discomfort after brachytherapy procedures while undergoing subsequent radiation treatment. With strides towards opioid-sparing anesthesia and analgesia, it's essential to find appropriate substitutes. This procedure requires adequate relaxation of pelvic muscles during the procedure and proper analgesia after the procedure, with the presence of intracavitary applicators, needed for radiation treatment. We studied the day-case safety and analgesic efficacy of adjuvants dexmedetomidine 3 µg and fentanyl 15 µg intrathecally to low-dose 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine. Methods Seventy females scheduled for brachytherapy procedures were randomly allocated to receive either Group I (0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (1.8 ml) plus 3µg dexmedetomidine (0.3ml)) or Group II (0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (1.8 ml) plus 15µg fentanyl (0.3ml)). The primary outcome was to assess and compare the brachytherapy (day-case) feasibility with 3µg dexmedetomidine and 15µg fentanyl (time taken to meet hospital discharge criteria). The secondary outcomes were the absolute duration of spinal analgesia, pain scores, patient satisfaction scores, and any associated adverse events. Data analysis was done using IBM SPSS software for Windows, version 21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Results All patients in Group I were discharged on the same day without any adverse effects. They underwent an intracavitary brachytherapy procedure under spinal anesthesia with stable hemodynamics successfully. The mean time taken to meet hospital discharge criteria in Group II was shorter than in Group I (258.43 ± 27.460 vs. 335.71 ± 21.114). The mean absolute duration of spinal analgesia was significantly longer in Group I as compared to Group II (406.82 ± 51.78 mins vs. 267 ± 16.23 mins) (p<.001). Seventeen patients required rescue analgesia in Group II versus eight in Group I (p<0.025). Conclusion Patients in both groups received excellent analgesia with enhanced patient satisfaction. Three µg intrathecal dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to low-dose hyperbaric bupivacaine can be used safely in day-case brachytherapy procedures. It provides adequate anesthesia and prolonged spinal analgesia as compared to 15 µg fentanyl.

Treatment with carvedilol improves survival of patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In addition to the portal pressure reducing effect, non-selective beta blockers (NSBBs) have possible immunomodulatory and effect in reducing bacterial translocation. Recently, it has been shown that patients who are already on NSBBs should be continued on them (if feasible), if acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) develops. It, however, remains unknown if patients with ACLF and no or small esophageal varices at presentation will benefit from the use of NSBBs. We studied the efficacy and safety of carvedilol in patients with ACLF in reducing mortality, variceal bleeding and non-bleeding complications. METHODS: 136 patients with ACLF (with no or small esophageal varices and HVPG ≥ 12 mmHg) were randomized to either carvedilol (n = 66) or placebo arms (n = 70). RESULTS: Within 28 days, 7 (10.6%) of 66 patients in the carvedilol group and 17 (24.3%) of 70 in the placebo group died (p= 0.044). Fewer patients in the carvedilol compared to placebo group developed acute kidney injury (AKI) (13.6% vs 35.7%, p = 0.003 and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) (6.1% vs 21.4%, p= 0.013). Significantly, more patients in the placebo group had increase in APASL ACLF Research Consortium-ACLF grade (22.9% vs 6.1%, p= 0.007). There was no significant difference in the 90-day transplant-free survival rate and development of AKI, SBP, non-SBP infections (including pneumonia) and variceal bleed within 90 days, between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In ACLF patients with either no or small esophageal varices and HVPG ≥ 12 mmHg, carvedilol leads to improved survival and fewer AKI and SBP events up to 28 days. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER NUMBER: NCT02583698.