Multi-institutional comparison of secondary check of treatment planning using computer-based independent dose calculation for non-C-arm linear accelerators.

PURPOSE: This report covers the first multi-institutional study of independent monitor unit (MU)/dose calculation verification for the CyberKnife, Vero4DRT, and TomoTherapy radiotherapy delivery systems. METHODS: A total of 973 clinical treatment plans were collected from 12 institutions. Commercial software employing the Clarkson algorithm was used for verification after a measurement validation study, and the doses from the treatment planning systems (TPSs) and verification programs were compared on the basis of the mean value ±â€¯two standard deviations. The impact of heterogeneous conditions was assessed in two types of sites: non-lung and lung. RESULTS: The dose difference for all locations was 0.5 ±â€¯7.2%. There was a statistically significant difference (P < 0.01) in dose difference between non-lung (-0.3 ±â€¯4.4%) and lung sites (3.5 ±â€¯6.7%). Inter-institutional comparisons showed that various systematic differences were associated with the proportion of different treatment sites and heterogeneity correction. CONCLUSIONS: This multi-institutional comparison should help to determine the departmental action levels for CyberKnife, Vero4DRT, and TomoTherapy, as patient populations and treatment sites may vary between the modalities. An action level of ±5% could be considered for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), non-IMRT, and volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy using these modalities in homogenous and heterogeneous conditions with a large treatment field applied to a large region of homogeneous media. There were larger systematic differences in heterogeneous conditions with a small treatment field because of differences in heterogeneity correction with the different dose calculation algorithms of the primary TPS and verification program.