Clinical Impact of Conversion Surgery After Induction Therapy for Esophageal Cancer with Synchronous Distant Metastasis: A Multi-institutional Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: The standard treatment for advanced esophageal cancer with synchronous distant metastasis is systemic chemotherapy or immunotherapy. Conversion surgery is not established for esophageal cancer with synchronous distant metastasis. This study aimed to investigate the clinical impact of conversion surgery for esophageal cancer with synchronous distant metastasis after induction therapy. METHODS: This multi-institutional retrospective study enrolled 66 patients with advanced esophageal cancer, including synchronous distant metastasis, who underwent induction chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy followed by conversion surgery between 2005 and 2021. Short- and long-term outcomes were investigated. RESULTS: Distant lymph node (LN) metastasis occurred in 51 patients (77%). Distant organ metastasis occurred in 15 (23%) patients. There were 41 patients with metastatic para-aortic LNs, and 10 patients with other metastatic LNs. Organs with distant metastasis included the lung in seven patients, liver in seven patients, and liver and lung in one patient. For 61 patients (92%), R0 resection was achieved. The postoperative complication rate was 47%. The in-hospital mortality rate was 1%, and the 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates for all the patients were 32.4% and 24.4%, respectively. The OS rates were similar between the patients with distant LN metastasis and the patients with distant organ metastasis (3-year OS: 34.9% vs. 26.7%; P = 0.435). Multivariate analysis showed that pathologic nodal status is independently associated with a poor prognosis (hazard ratio, 2.43; P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Conversion surgery after chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer with synchronous distant metastasis is feasible and promising. It might be effective for improving the long-term prognosis for patients with controlled nodal status.

Recurrence-free survival as a surrogate endpoint for overall survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Overall survival is considered as one of the most important endpoints of treatment efficacy but often requires long follow-up. This study aimed to determine the validity of recurrence-free survival as a surrogate endpoint for overall survival in patients with surgically resectable advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). METHODS: Patients with OSCC who received neoadjuvant cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil, or docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil, at 58 Japanese oesophageal centres certified by the Japan Esophageal Society were reviewed retrospectively. The correlation between recurrence-free and overall survival was assessed using Kendall's τ. RESULTS: The study included 3154 patients. The 5-year overall and recurrence-free survival rates were 56.6 and 47.7% respectively. The primary analysis revealed a strong correlation between recurrence-free and overall survival (Kendall's τ 0.797, 95% c.i. 0.782 to 0.812) at the individual level. Subgroup analysis showed a positive relationship between a more favourable pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and a higher τ value. In the meta-regression model, the adjusted R2 value at the institutional level was 100 (95% c.i. 40.2 to 100)%. The surrogate threshold effect was 0.703. CONCLUSION: There was a strong correlation between recurrence-free and overall survival in patients with surgically resectable OSCC who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and this was more pronounced in patients with a better response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Prognostic impact of nodal status and lymphovascular invasion in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Nodal status is well known to be the most important prognostic factor for esophageal cancer patients, even if they are treated with neoadjuvant therapy. To establish an optimal postoperative adjuvant strategy for patients, we aimed to more accurately predict the prognosis of patients and systemic recurrence by using clinicopathological factors, including nodal status, in patients with esophageal cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The clinicopathological factors associated with survival and systemic recurrence were investigated in 488 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Overall survival differed according to tumor depth, nodal status, tumor regression, and lymphovascular (LV) invasion. In the multivariate analysis, nodal status and LV invasion were identified as independent prognostic factors (P < 0.0001, P = 0.0008). Nodal status was also identified as an independent factor associated with systemic recurrence, although LV invasion was a borderline factor (P = 0.066). In each pN stage, patients with LV invasion showed significantly worse overall survival than those without LV invasion (pN0: P = 0.036, pN1: P = 0.0044, pN2: P = 0.0194, pN3: P = 0.0054). Patients with LV invasion were also more likely to have systemic, and any recurrence than those without LV invasion in each pN stage. Pathological nodal status and LV invasion were the most important predictors of survival and systemic recurrence in patients with esophageal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery. This finding could provide useful information about selecting candidates for adjuvant therapy among these patients. Our analysis showed that LV invasion was an independent prognostic factor in patients with esophageal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and that combining LV invasion with pathological nodal status makes it possible to stratify the prognosis in those patients.

The preliminary analysis of lymphatic flow around the connective tissues surrounding SMA and SpA elucidates patients' oncological condition in borderline-resectable pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: In pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), invasion of connective tissues surrounding major arteries is a crucial prognostic factor after radical resection. However, why the connective tissues invasion is associated with poor prognosis is not well understood. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2018 to 2020, 25 patients receiving radical surgery for PDAC in our institute were enrolled. HyperEye Medical System (HEMS) was used to examine lymphatic flow from the connective tissues surrounding SMA and SpA and which lymph nodes ICG accumulated in was examined. RESULTS: HEMS imaging revealed ICG was transported down to the paraaortic area of the abdominal aorta along SMA. In pancreatic head cancer, 9 paraaortic lymph nodes among 14 (64.3%) were ICG positive, higher positivity than LN#15 (25.0%) or LN#18 (50.0%), indicating lymphatic flow around the SMA was leading directly to the paraaortic lymph nodes. Similarly, in pancreatic body and tail cancer, the percentage of ICG-positive LN #16a2 was very high, as was that of #8a, although that of #7 was only 42.9%. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary result indicated that the lymphatic flow along the connective tissues surrounding major arteries could be helpful in understanding metastasis and improving prognosis in BR-A pancreatic cancer.

Efficacy and survival of nivolumab treatment for recurrent/unresectable esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma: real-world clinical data from a large multi-institutional cohort.

BACKGROUND: Real-world clinical outcomes of and prognostic factors for nivolumab treatment for esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma (ESCC) remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate real-world outcomes of nivolumab monotherapy in association with relevant clinical parameters in recurrent/unresectable advanced ESCC patients. METHODS: This population-based multicenter cohort study included a total of 282 patients from 15 institutions with recurrent/unresectable advanced ESCC who received nivolumab as a second-line or later therapy between 2014 and 2022. Data, including the best overall response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), were retrospectively collected from these patients. RESULTS: Objective response and disease control rates were 17.0% and 47.9%, respectively. The clinical response to nivolumab treatment significantly correlated with development of overall immune-related adverse events (P < .0001), including rash (P < .0001), hypothyroidism (P = .03), and interstitial pneumonia (P = .004). Organ-specific best response rates were 20.6% in lymph nodes, 17.4% in lungs, 15.4% in pleural dissemination, and 13.6% in primary lesions. In terms of patient survival, the median OS and PFS was 10.9 and 2.4 months, respectively. Univariate analysis of OS revealed that performance status (PS; P < .0001), number of metastatic organs (P = .019), C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR; P < .0001), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (P = .001), and PMI (P = .024) were significant. Multivariate analysis further identified CAR [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15-2.25, P = .0053)] in addition to PS (HR = 1.65, 95% CI 1.23-2.22, P = .0008) as independent prognostic parameters. CONCLUSIONS: CAR and PS before nivolumab treatment are useful in predicting long-term survival in recurrent/unresectable advanced ESCC patients with second-line or later nivolumab treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000040462.

A phase 3, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled study of S-588410, a five-peptide cancer vaccine as an adjuvant therapy after curative resection in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: S-588410, a cancer peptide vaccine (CPV), comprises five HLA-A*24:02-restricted peptides from five cancer-testis antigens. In a phase 2 study, S-588410 was well-tolerated and exhibited antitumor efficacy in patients with urothelial cancer. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy, immune response, and safety of S-588410 in patients with completely resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). METHODS: This phase 3 study involved patients with HLA-A*24:02-positive and lymph node metastasis-positive ESCC who received neoadjuvant therapy followed by curative resection. After randomization, patients were administered S-588410 and placebo (both emulsified with Montanide™ ISA 51VG) subcutaneously. The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival (RFS). The secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) induction, and safety. Statistical significance was tested using the one-sided weighted log-rank test with the Fleming-Harrington class of weights. RESULTS: A total of 276 patients were randomized (N = 138/group). The median RFS was 84.3 and 84.1 weeks in the S-588410 and placebo groups, respectively (P = 0.8156), whereas the median OS was 236.3 weeks and not reached, respectively (P = 0.6533). CTL induction was observed in 132/134 (98.5%) patients who received S-588410 within 12 weeks. Injection site reactions (137/140 patients [97.9%]) were the most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events in the S-588410 group. Prolonged survival was observed in S-588410-treated patients with upper thoracic ESCC, grade 3 injection-site reactions, or high CTL intensity. CONCLUSIONS: S-588410 induced immune response and had acceptable safety but failed to reach the primary endpoint. A high CTL induction rate and intensity may be critical for prolonging survival during future CPV development.

The impact of time to postoperative recurrence on the prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer post recurrence: exploratory analysis of OGSG 1003.

BACKGROUND: The association between recurrence timing and prognosis in patients with locally advanced resectable esophageal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by esophagectomy remains unclear. This study aimed to clarify this association using multicenter prospective clinical trial data. METHODS: Among 162 patients enrolled in a NAC phase II study comparing the efficacy of cisplatin and fluorouracil plus docetaxel with cisplatin and fluorouracil plus adriamycin, 64 patients with recurrence after R0 resection were included in this study. We evaluated the association between recurrence timing and overall survival after recurrence (OSr), along with clinicopathological factors associated with recurrence timing and OSr. RESULTS: Among 64 patients, 46 (71.9%) and 59 (92.2%) experienced recurrence within 1 and 2 years after surgery, respectively. Groups based on recurrence timing, including ≤ 6, 6-12, and > 12 months, had median OSr of 3.6, 13.9, and 13.4 months, respectively. The prognosis was significantly poorer for patients with recurrence ≤ 6 months after surgery than for other patients (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed pathological lymph node staging as an independent factor associated with early recurrence (odds ratio: 3.46, 95% confidence interval: 1.47-8.02, P = 0.0045). On the other hand, multivariate analysis for factors associated with OSr revealed pT (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.91, 95%CI 1.26-2.88, P = 0.0022), early recurrence (HR: 6.88, 95%CI 2.68-17.6, P < 0.001), and treatment after recurrence, with both local treatment (HR: 0.47, 95%CI 0.22-0.98, P = 0.043) and chemotherapy (HR: 0.25, 95%CI 0.11-0.58, P = 0.0011) as independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: Patients with advanced esophageal cancer experiencing recurrence within 6 months after esophagectomy following NAC have an extremely poor prognosis, suggesting that an advanced pN stage is associated with early recurrence.

Esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in patients with a history of total pharyngolaryngectomy: a Japanese nationwide retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Second primary esophageal cancer often develops in patients with head and neck cancer, and esophagectomy in patients with a history of total pharyngolaryngectomy (TPL) is challenging. However, the clinical outcomes of these patients have yet to be examined in a multicenter setting. METHODS: We evaluated the surgical outcomes of a nationwide cohort of 62 patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with a history of TPL. RESULTS: Ivor-Lewis and McKeown esophagectomies were performed in 32 (51.6%) and 30 (48.4%) patients, respectively. Postoperatively, 23 patients (37.1%) developed severe complications, and 7 patients (11.3%) required reoperation within 30 days. Pneumonia and anastomotic leakage occurred in 13 (21.0%) and 16 (25.8%) patients, respectively. Anastomotic leakage occurred more frequently in the McKeown group than in the Ivor-Lewis group (46.7% vs. 6.2%, P < 0.001). The adjusted odds ratio for anastomotic leakage in the McKeown group was 9.64 (95% confidence intervals (CI), 2.11-70.82, P = 0.008). Meanwhile, the 5-year overall survival rates were comparable between the groups (41.8% for Ivor-Lewis and 42.7% for McKeown), and the adjusted hazard ratio of overall survival was 1.44 (95% CI, 0.64-3.29; P = 0.381; Ivor-Lewis as the reference). CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, anastomotic leakage occurred more frequently after McKeown than Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy, and almost half of patients in the McKeown group experienced leakage. Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy is preferred for decreasing anastomotic leakage when oncologically and technically feasible.

Prognostic value of a novel index combining the prognostic nutritional index and D-dimer levels for gastric cancer after gastrectomy.

INTRODUCTION: The prognostic nutritional index and D-dimer level are two useful measures for gastric cancer prognosis. Since they each comprise different factors, it is possible to employ a more useful combined indicator. This study therefore aimed to establish a prognostic nutritional index-D score-which combines the prognostic nutritional index and D-dimer level-and validate its usefulness as a prognostic marker. METHODS: We collected data from 1,218 patients with gastric cancer who had undergone radical gastrectomy (R0) between January 2004 and December 2015. Patients were divided into three prognostic nutritional index-D score groups based on the following criteria: score 2, low prognostic nutritional index (≤46) and high D-dimer levels (>1.0 µg/ml); score 1, either a low prognostic nutritional index or high D-dimer levels; and score 0, no abnormality. We then defined the PNI-D score as low (score 0 or 1) and high (score 2). RESULTS: The prognostic nutritional index-D score was significantly associated with overall, recurrence-free, and disease-specific survival (all log-rank P<0.0001). The 5-year overall survival rates of the patients with prognostic nutritional index-D scores of low and high were 88.1% and 64.7%, respectively; their 5-year recurrence-free survival rates were 86.7% and 61.3%, respectively; and their 5-year disease-specific survival rates were 99.3% and 76.5%, respectively. Cox multivariate analysis revealed that a high prognostic nutritional index-D score was an independent, statistically significant prognostic factor for poor overall (P=0.01) survival in the patients with gastric cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The prognostic nutritional index-D is an independent prognostic factor for patients with gastric cancer.

Novel ability of diflubenzuron as an inhibitor of mitochondrial function.

Compounds classified as benzoylphenylurea (BPU), such as diflubenzuron (DFB), are used as insecticides. Although BPU disrupts molting by inhibiting chitin biosynthesis and exhibits insecticidal activity, their exact mode of action remains unknown. Since epidermal cells proliferate and morphologically change from squamous to columnar cells during the early stages of insect molting, we speculate that a transition similar to that from epithelium to mesenchyme occurs and that BPU may inhibit this transition. Here, we addressed this possibility. We found that DFB decreases actin expression in insect cells (the tissue cultures of insect integument). Detailed analysis in Schneider S2 cells reveals that DFB inhibits the expression of actin isoforms (Act5C and Act42A) and the Drosophila ortholog of myocardin-related transcription factor (Mrtf), leading to cell growth suppression. Proteomics identified the Drosophila ortholog of prohibitin (Phb1D and Phb2E) as one of the DFB-binding proteins. DFB inhibits the interaction between Phb1D and Phb2E and induces mitochondrial dysfunction. The knock-down of Phb2E suppresses the expression of Act5C, Act42A, and Mrtf, leading to cell growth inhibition. Thus, the disruption of Phb function is a possible novel target of DFB.

Assessing Intra-abdominal status for clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula based on postoperative fluid collection and drain amylase levels after distal pancreatectomy.

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the intra-abdominal status related to postoperative pancreatic fistula by combining postoperative fluid collection and drain amylase levels. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 203 patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy and classified their postoperative abdominal status into four groups based on postoperative fluid collection size and drain amylase levels. We also evaluated the incidence of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula in each group according to C-reactive protein values. Results: The incidence of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula in the entire cohort (n = 203) was 28.1%. Multivariate analysis revealed that postoperative fluid collection, drain amylase levels, and C-reactive protein levels are considerable risk factors for clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula. In the subgroup with large postoperative fluid collection and high drain amylase levels, 65.9% of patients developed clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula. However, no significant difference was observed in C-reactive protein levels between patients with clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula and those without it. In contrast, in the subgroup with a large postoperative fluid collection size or a high amylase level alone, a significant difference was observed in C-reactive protein values between the patients with clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula and those without it. Conclusion: Postoperative fluid collection status and the C-reactive protein value provide a more precise assessment of intra=abdominal status related to postoperative pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy. This detailed analysis may be a clinically reasonable approach to individual drain management.

Clinical impact of postoperative changes in body composition on long-term outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: This study aimed to investigate the temporal changes in body composition following esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer using bioelectrical impedance analysis and to assess the prognostic implications of these changes. METHODS: Our study included 528 patients who underwent esophagectomy and preoperative body composition measurements between January 2013 and June 2020. Postoperative body composition was measured in 493 patients at discharge as follows: 184 at 1 month, 144 at 2 months, 143 at 3 months, 103 at 6 months, 58 at 9 months, and 78 at 12 months. RESULTS: Body weight (BW) continuously decreased until the 6 postoperative months (POMs), reaching -11.5% compared with preoperative levels. Subsequently, almost no change was observed at 12 POMs. Skeletal muscle mass (SMM) decreased until 3 POMs but gradually recovered after 3 POMs. Conversely, body fat mass (BFM) consistently decreased over time post-esophagectomy. The patients were categorized into moderate (>-10%) and severe (≤-10%) groups based on % BW, % SMM, and % BFM losses at 3 POMs. Severe SMM loss at 3 POMs correlated with reduced overall survival (OS) (3-year OS: 85.9% in moderate vs. 75.1% in severe, p = 0.035). BFM loss was associated with reduced recurrence-free survival (3-year RFS: 83.3% in moderate vs. 62.0% in severe, p = 0.011). Multivariate analysis identified pStages Ⅲ and Ⅳ, % SMM loss ≤ -10%, and % BFM loss ≤ -10% as independent factors for worse OS. CONCLUSION: Post-esophagectomy, distinct temporal changes in BW, SMM, and BFM are observed. Significant reductions in SMM and BFM 3 POMs indicate a poor long-term prognosis.

Survival Impact of Inflammation-based Prognostic Scores in Metastatic or Unresectable Esophageal Cancer Treated With Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy.

Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy has been indicated as the first-line treatment for metastatic or unresectable locally advanced esophageal cancer. However, pretreatment biomarkers for predicting clinical outcomes remain unclear. We investigated the predictive value of inflammation-based prognostic scores in patients treated with pembrolizumab and chemotherapy. The Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were calculated before initial treatment in 65 eligible patients with metastatic or unresectable locally advanced esophageal cancer receiving pembrolizumab plus CF therapy, and the relationship between these biomarkers and clinical outcomes was analyzed. The objective response rate (ORR) and progression disease (PD) were observed in 51% and 21% of all patients. Patients with PNI<39 have significantly worse treatment responses than those with PNI≥39 (ORR; 28% vs. 60%, PD; 44% vs. 13%, P =0.020). Progression-free survival (PFS) is significantly associated with the PNI and CAR ( P <0.001 and P =0.004, respectively). Overall survival (OS) is associated with PNI, CAR, and PLR ( P <0.001, P =0.008, and P =0.018, respectively). The PNI cutoff value of 39 is identified as an independent factor for PFS (odds ratio=0.27, 95% CI: 0.18-0.81, P =0.012) and OS (odds ratio=0.22, 95% CI: 0.08-0.59, P =0.003). Patients with PNI<39 have significantly worse 6-month PFS and 1-year OS than those with PNI≥39 (27.8% vs. 66.7%, 27.2% vs. 81.1%, respectively). In conclusion, inflammation-based prognostic scores are associated with survival in patients treated with pembrolizumab plus CF therapy. Pretreatment PNI is a promising candidate for predicting treatment response and survival.

Short-term Outcomes of Adjuvant Nivolumab After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Resected Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIM: CheckMate 577 evaluated adjuvant nivolumab therapy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery for esophageal cancers. However, the efficacy of this treatment in patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy remains unknown. This study investigated the short-term outcomes of adjuvant nivolumab therapy in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Out of 956 patients with thoracic esophageal cancer who underwent radical esophagectomy, 227 who exhibited ypN1-3 after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery were included in this study. RESULTS: Among 227 patients, 30 received adjuvant nivolumab and 197 received non-nivolumab adjuvant therapy. The nivolumab group displayed a higher number of lymph node metastases compared to the control group. Patients with ypN1-2 tended to have longer recurrence-free survival (RFS) in the nivolumab group than in the non-nivolumab group (p=0.095). In the propensity score-matched cohort, no differences in patient characteristics were observed. Adjuvant nivolumab therapy significantly prolonged RFS in patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p=0.013). Patients with ypN1-2 in the nivolumab group had significantly longer RFS than their counterparts in the non-nivolumab group (p=0.001), but not in ypN3 (p=0.784). The 1-year postoperative recurrence rates were 59% for the non-nivolumab group and 24% for the nivolumab group (p=0.007). Nivolumab-related adverse events in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy were mostly consistent across all grades, while the frequency of increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels was relatively higher compared to CheckMate577. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant nivolumab was more likely to prolong 1-year RFS in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, especially in those with ypN1-2, and had acceptable adverse events.

A striking elevation of CA19-9 after preoperative therapy negates prognostic benefit from radical surgery in resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Identifying patients who can be spared nonbeneficial surgery is crucial, as pancreatic cancer surgery is highly invasive, with substantial negative effects on quality of life. The study objective was to investigate a useful indicator of patients who do not gain prognostic benefit from radical surgery after neoadjuvant therapy for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. METHOD: We compared factors among 609 patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer receiving neoadjuvant therapy during 2005-2019. Patients were divided into a poor-prognosis group (no surgery or postresection recurrence within a year) and a good-prognosis group (no recurrence or recurrence >1 year after resection). RESULTS: Patients who experience a recurrence within a year of resection (poor-prognosis group) did no better than patients who received neoadjuvant therapy and progressed but never made it to surgery. The value of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 after neoadjuvant therapy was the most significant indicator to predict the poor prognosis group and the elevation of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (>200 U/mL) identified only poor prognosis group with high specificity of 96.6%. The overall survival of patients with more than 200 of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 after neoadjuvant therapy was significantly very poor and their 2-year survival rate was only 41.4%. CONCLUSION: A striking elevation of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 after neoadjuvant therapy for resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer is a good indicator of poor prognosis. Patients with carbohydrate antigen 19-9 >200 U/mL after neoadjuvant therapy should not undergo radical surgery.