SARS-CoV-2 infection and return to play in junior competitive athletes: is systematic cardiac screening needed?

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 infection might be associated with cardiac complications in low-risk populations, such as in competitive athletes. However, data obtained in adults cannot be directly transferred to preadolescents and adolescents who are less susceptible to adverse clinical outcomes and are often asymptomatic. OBJECTIVES: We conducted this prospective multicentre study to describe the incidence of cardiovascular complications following SARS-CoV-2 infection in a large cohort of junior athletes and to examine the effectiveness of a screening protocol for a safe return to play. METHODS: Junior competitive athletes suffering from asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection underwent cardiac screening, including physical examination, 12-lead resting ECG, echocardiogram and exercise ECG testing. Further investigations were performed in cases of abnormal findings. RESULTS: A total of 571 competitive junior athletes (14.3±2.5 years) were evaluated. About half of the population (50.3%) was mildly symptomatic during SARS-CoV-2 infection, and the average duration of symptoms was 4±1 days. Pericardial involvement was found in 3.2% of junior athletes: small pericardial effusion (2.6%), moderate pericardial effusion (0.2%) and pericarditis (0.4%). No relevant arrhythmias or myocardial inflammation was found in subjects with pericardial involvement. Athletes with pericarditis or moderate pericardial effusion were temporarily disqualified, and a gradual return to play was achieved after complete clinical resolution. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of cardiac involvement was low in junior athletes after asymptomatic or mild SARS-CoV-2 infection. A screening strategy primarily driven by cardiac symptoms should detect cardiac involvement from SARS-CoV-2 infection in most junior athletes. Systematic echocardiographic screening is not recommended in junior athletes.

The importance of ventilatory thresholds to define aerobic exercise intensity in cardiac patients and healthy subjects.

BACKGROUND: Although structured exercise training is strongly recommended in cardiac patients, uncertainties exist about the methods for determining exercise intensity (EI) and their correspondence with effective EI obtained by ventilatory thresholds. We aimed to determine the first (VT1 ) and second ventilatory thresholds (VT2 ) in cardiac patients, sedentary subjects, and athletes comparing VT1 and VT2 with EI defined by recommendations. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 350 subjects (mean age: 50.7±12.9 years; 167 cardiac patients, 150 healthy sedentary subjects, and 33 competitive endurance athletes). Each subject underwent ECG, echocardiography, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing. The percentages of peak VO2 , peak heart rate (HR), and HR reserve were obtained at VT1 and VT2 and compared with the EI definition proposed by the recommendations. RESULTS: VO2 at VT1 corresponded to high rather than moderate EI in 67.1% and 79.6% of cardiac patients, applying the definition of moderate exercise by the previous recommendations and the 2020 guidelines, respectively. Most cardiac patients had VO2  values at VT2 corresponding to very-high rather than high EI (59.9% and 50.3%, by previous recommendations and 2020 guidelines, respectively). A better correspondence between ventilatory thresholds and recommended EI domains was observed in healthy subjects and athletes (90% and 93.9%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: EI definition based on percentages of peak HR and peak VO2  may misclassify the effective EI, and the discrepancy between the individually determined and the recommended EI is particularly relevant in cardiac patients. A ventilatory threshold-based rather than a range-based approach is advisable to define an appropriate level of EI.

Prescribing, dosing and titrating exercise in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy for prevention of comorbidities: Ready for prime time.

The benefits of physical activity are well established, leading to both cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular benefits, improving quality of life and reducing mortality. Despite such striking body of evidence, patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy are often discouraged by health professionals to practice physical activity and personalised exercise prescription is an exception rather than the rule. As a result, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients are on average less active and spend significantly less time at work or recreational physical activity than the general population. Exercise restriction derives from the evidence that vigorous exercise may occasionally trigger life-threatening arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. However, while participation in competitive sports should be prudentially denied, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients can benefit from the positive effects of regular physical activity, aimed to reduce the risk of comorbidities and improve the quality of life. Based on this rationale, exercise should be prescribed and titrated just like a drug in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients, considering individual characteristics, symptoms, past medical history, objective individual response to exercise, previous training experience and stage of disease. Type, frequency, duration, and intensity should be defined on a personal basis. Yet exercise prescription in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and its long-term effects represent major gaps in our current knowledge and require extensive research. We here review existing evidence regarding benefits and hazards of physical activity, with specific focus on viable modalities for tailored and safe exercise prescription in these patients, highlighting future developments and relevant research targets.

Age-dependent diagnostic yield of echocardiography as a second-line diagnostic investigation in athletes with abnormalities at preparticipation screening.

AIMS: Systematic pre-participation screening of subjects practicing sports activity has the potential to identify athletes at risk of sudden cardiac death. However, limited evidence are present concerning the yield of echocardiography as a second-line exam in athletes with abnormal pre-participation screening. METHODS: Consecutive athletes were screened (2011-2017) in a community-based sports medicine center in Tuscany, with familial history, physical examination and ECG. Patients with abnormal/>1 borderline ECG findings, symptoms/signs of cardiovascular diseases, cardiovascular risk factors or family history of juvenile/genetic cardiac disease underwent echocardiography. RESULTS: A total of 30109 athletes (age 21 [15;31]) were evaluated. Of these, 6234 (21%) were aged 8-11 years, 18309 (61%) 12-18 years, 4442 (15%) 19-35 years, 1124 (4%) >35 years. A total of 2569 (9%) athletes were addressed to echocardiography. Referral rates increased significantly with age (5% in preadolescents to 38% in master athletes, P< 0.01). Subclinical heart diseases were found in 290/30109 (0.8%) and were common >35 years (135/1124, 11%), but rare at 19-35 years (91/4442, 2%), very rare <18 years (64/24 543, 0.2%; P< 0.01). Seventy-four (0.3%) athletes were disqualified because of the structural alterations identified, 29 (0.1%) with cardiac structural diseases at risk for sudden death. CONCLUSIONS: Italian community-based pre-participation screening showed an age-dependent yield, with a three-fold increase in referral in athletes >35 years. Subclinical structural abnormalities potentially predisposing to sudden death were rare (0.01%), mostly in post-pubertal and senior athletes. Age-specific pre-participation screening protocols may help optimize resources and improve specificity.

A prospective study on the consequences of SARS-CoV-2 infection on the heart of young adult competitive athletes: Implications for a safe return-to-play.

OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic has shocked the sports world because of the suspension of competitions and the spread of SARS-CoV-2 among athletes. After SARS-CoV-2 infection, cardio-pulmonary complications can occur and, before the resumption of sports competitions, a screening has been recommended. However, few data are available and discrepancies exist in the screening modalities. We conducted this prospective study to investigate the incidence of cardiovascular consequences following SARS-CoV-2 infection in young adult competitive athletes and the appropriate screening strategies for a safe return-to-play. METHODS: Ninety competitive athletes (24 ± 10 years) after asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection were screened by physical examination, blood testing, spirometry, 12­lead resting ECG, 24-h ambulatory ECG monitoring, echocardiogram, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). RESULTS: Sixty-four athletes (71.1%) were male, and most (76.7%) were mildly symptomatic. After SARS-CoV-2 infection, spirometry and resting ECG were normal in all athletes. Ambulatory ECG monitoring demonstrated <50/24 h supraventricular and ventricular premature beats in 53.3% and 52.2% of athletes, respectively, in the absence of malignant arrhythmias. CPET did not demonstrate cardiopulmonary limitations. Echocardiography showed pericardial effusion in 3 athletes (all females) with symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection (3.3%; 4.4% in the symptomatic group) with a definitive diagnosis of myopericarditis in 1 athlete (1.1%) and pericarditis in 2 athletes (2.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac consequences of SARS-CoV-2 infection were found in 3.3% of competitive athletes. An appropriate screening primarily based on the detection of uncommon arrhythmias and cardiac symptoms should be recommended in competitive athletes after SARS-CoV-2 infection to detect a cardiac involvement and guarantee a safe return-to-play.

Effects of exercise training on exercise aerobic capacity and quality of life in hemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Physical and aerobic capacity are extremely limited in dialysis patients, but it is uncertain whether or not exercise training is safe or has beneficial effects. This study aimed to assess the effects of exercise training on functional capacity and quality of life of hemodialysis patients. METHODS: Ten hemodialysis patients (7 men, 3 women, aged 37 +/- 7 years) free from severe comorbidities were recruited. They underwent training sessions (up to 90 minutes of submaximal exercise) twice a week, on nondialysis days, for 12 months. At baseline and after the physical training program, all patients underwent biochemistry, cardiopulmonary exercise test, echocardiography and a self-rated health test (SF-36). RESULTS: At baseline, dialysis patients showed impaired VO2 uptake (20.6 +/- 5.0 ml/kg/min vs. 34.2 +/- 6.0 ml/kg/min, p<0.001) and peak working capacity (115 +/- 36 W vs. 192 +/- 46.7 W, p<0.001) compared with normal controls. Following the training program, both peak VO2 (20.4 +/- 4.9 ml/kg/min vs. 25.1 +/- 6.5 ml/kg/min, p<0.05), VO2 at anaerobic threshold (12.8 +/- 1.9 ml/kg/min vs. 15.1 +/- 3.8 ml/kg/min, p<0.05), peak working capacity (113 +/- 33 W vs. 134 +/- 37 W, p<0.01) and SF-36 scores improved. No side effects related to intervention occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Dialysis patients showed impaired muscular exercise capacity, but 12 months of moderate exercise training was able to improve their physical function, aerobic capacity and quality of life. Our study suggests that mild, regular physical activity should be recommended and encouraged as an important aspect of the care of selected dialysis patients.