Recurrent hospitalization and healthcare resource use among patients with deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: findings from a multi-payer analysis.

The objective of this study was to assess deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism (DVT/PE) recurrence rates and resource utilization among patients with an initial DVT or PE event across multiple payer perspectives. Retrospective analyses were performed using a software tool that analyzes health plan claims to evaluate treatment patterns and resource utilization for various cardiovascular conditions. Six databases were analyzed from three payer perspectives (Commercial, Medicare, and Medicaid). Patients were ≥18 years old with a primary diagnosis of DVT or PE associated with an inpatient and/or emergency room claim, had received an antithrombotic within 7 days before or 14 days after index, and had no diagnosis of atrial fibrillation during follow-up. Outcomes were assessed over a 1 year period following index. More PE patients were hospitalized for their index event than DVT patients (42-59 % DVT and 69-86 % PE) and had longer mean length of stay (2.35-2.95 days DVT and 3.26-3.76 days PE). Recurrent event rates among PE patients (12-32 %) were higher than those for DVT patients (6-16 %) across all payers. The highest rate of recurrence was observed among the Medicaid population [23 % overall (VTE); 16 % DVT; 32 % PE]. All-cause hospitalization in the year following their VTE episode occurred in 23-67 % DVT patients and 30-68 % PE patients. Medicaid had the highest proportion of patients with hospitalizations and ER visits. Recurrent VTE events and all-cause hospitalizations are relatively common, especially for patients who had a PE, and among those in the Medicaid payer population.

Imipenem resistance of Pseudomonas in pneumonia: a systematic literature review.

BACKGROUND: Pneumonia, and particularly nosocomial (NP) and ventilator-associated pneumonias (VAP), results in high morbidity and costs. NPs in particular are likely to be caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA), ~20% of which in observational studies are resistant to imipenem. We sought to identify the burden of PA imipenem resistance in pneumonia. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review of randomized controlled trials (RCT) of imipenem treatment for pneumonia published in English between 1993 and 2008. We extracted study, population and treatment characteristics, and proportions caused by PA. Endpoints of interest were: PA resistance to initial antimicrobial treatment, clinical success, microbiologic eradication and on-treatment emergence of resistance of PA. RESULTS: Of the 46 studies identified, 20 (N = 4,310) included patients with pneumonia (imipenem 1,667, PA 251; comparator 1,661, PA 270). Seven were double blind, and 7 included US data. Comparator arms included a ß-lactam (17, [penicillin 6, carbapenem 4, cephalosporin 7, monobactam 1]), aminoglycoside 2, vancomycin 1, and a fluoroquinolone 5; 5 employed double coverage. Thirteen focused exclusively on pneumonia and 7 included pneumonia and other diagnoses. Initial resistance was present in 14.6% (range 4.2-24.0%) of PA isolates in imipenem and 2.5% (range 0.0-7.4%) in comparator groups. Pooled clinical success rates for PA were 45.2% (range 0.0-72.0%) for imipenem and 74.9% (range 0.0-100.0%) for comparator regimens. Microbiologic eradication was achieved in 47.6% (range 0.0%-100.0%) of isolates in the imipenem and 52.8% (range 0.0%-100.0%) in the comparator groups. Resistance emerged in 38.7% (range 5.6-77.8%) PA isolates in imipenem and 21.9% (range 4.8-56.5%) in comparator groups. CONCLUSIONS: In the 15 years of RCTs of imipenem for pneumonia, PA imipenem resistance rates are high, and PA clinical success and microbiologic eradication rates are directionally lower for imipenem than for comparators. Conversely, initial and treatment-emergent resistance is more likely with the imipenem than the comparator regimens.

Antimicrobial therapy escalation and hospital mortality among patients with health-care-associated pneumonia: a single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Patients with health-care-associated pneumonia (HCAP) are frequently infected with a resistant pathogen and receive inappropriate empiric antibiotics (ie, pathogens resistant to administered treatment). Initial inappropriate treatment has been shown to increase hospital mortality. It is not known whether escalation in response to culture results mitigates this risk. METHODS: We identified patients admitted with a culture-positive pneumonia between January 2003 and December 2005. HCAP patients met one or more of the following criteria indicating ongoing contact with the health-care system: recent hospitalization (< or = 12 months), admission from a nursing home, immunosuppression, or long-term dialysis. We compared survivors to nonsurvivors among those patients with HCAP still hospitalized beyond 48 h. RESULTS: Of 431 HCAP patients, 396 patients (92%) were alive and still hospitalized beyond 48 h. The crude mortality rate was 21.5%. Compared to survivors, nonsurvivors were significantly more likely to be treated with inappropriate empiric antibiotics (37.6% vs 24.1%, p = 0.013). Although mortality was higher among patients receiving inappropriate than appropriate therapy (30.0% vs 18.3%, p = 0.013), this difference was more pronounced among nonbacteremic patients (odds ratio [OR], 2.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26 to 4.75) than bacteremic patients (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.41 to 3.57). In a logistic regression, inappropriate empiric antibiotic treatment among nonbacteremic patients was independently associated with mortality (OR, 2.88; 95% CI, 1.46 to 5.67); treatment escalation did not attenuate the risk of death. CONCLUSION: Among HCAP patients alive and hospitalized beyond 48 h, hospital mortality was high and, in the absence of bacteremia, greater with initial inappropriate antibiotic treatment. Despite subsequent escalation, initial inappropriate antibiotic choice nearly tripled the risk of hospital death.

Anaemia and the risk of injurious falls in a community-dwelling elderly population.

BACKGROUND: Anaemia in the elderly is associated with a number of health-related functional declines, such as frailty, disability and muscle weakness. These may contribute to falls which, in the elderly, result in serious injuries in perhaps 10% of cases. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether anaemia increases the risk of injurious falls in an elderly population. METHOD: Health insurance claims and laboratory test results data from January 1999 to April 2004 for 47 530 individuals >or=65 years of age enrolled in over 30 managed care plans were analysed. An open-cohort design was employed to classify patients' observation periods by anaemia status (based on the WHO definition) and haemoglobin (Hb) level category. Injurious falls outcomes were defined as an injurious event claim, within 30 days after a fall claim, for fractures of the hip/pelvis/femur, vertebrae/ribs, humerus or lower limbs; Colles' fracture; or head injuries/haematomas. Univariate and multivariate (adjusted for age, gender, health plan, history of falls, co-morbidities and concomitant medications) analyses were conducted. Subset analyses based on injurious falls of the hip and head were also conducted. RESULTS: In the univariate analysis, anaemia increased the risk of injurious falls by 1.66 times (95% CI 1.41, 1.95) compared with no anaemia. The incidence of injurious falls increased from 6.5 to 15.8 per 1000 person-years when Hb levels decreased from >or=13 to <10 g/dL (trend test: p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed that Hb levels were significantly associated with the risk of injurious falls (rate ratio = 1.47, 1.39 and 1.14 for Hb levels of <10, 10-11.9 and 12-12.9 g/dL, respectively, compared with Hb >or=13 g/dL; p < 0.001). Even stronger linear negative trends were observed in the subsets of hip and head injurious falls. CONCLUSION: Anaemia was significantly and independently associated with a risk increase for injurious falls. Furthermore, the risk of injurious falls increased as the degree of anaemia worsened. Correction of anaemia, a modifiable risk factor, warrants further investigation as a means of preventing falls in the elderly.

Current management of anemia in critically ill patients: analysis of a database of 139 hospitals.

PURPOSE: This analysis focused on three objectives: 1) to measure packed red blood cell (pRBC) use across different critical care settings; 2) to characterize transfused and nontransfused critically ill patients; and (3) to identify potential predictors of transfusion use. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of critically ill patients from 139 hospitals across the United States was conducted. Hospital administrative and laboratory data were collected for patients 18 years of age and older admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) (including coronary care unit and intermediate care units) from January 1, 2004, to May 31, 2005. Multivariate analyses controlling for patient and hospital heterogeneity evaluated the association between pRBC transfusions and patients' ICU or hospital length of stay. RESULTS: A total of 180,221 patients met all inclusion criteria, with 29,331 (16.3%) receiving pRBCs during their ICU stay. There was differential use of pRBCs by ICU/coronary care unit setting (ie, 23% of general ICU patients versus 7% of intermediate coronary care unit patients). Increasing age [odds ratio (OR), 1.007; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.006-1.008], declining hemoglobin concentrations (OR, 2.315; 95% CI, 2.288-2.342), mechanical ventilation (OR, 1.338; 95% CI, 1.287-1.392), dialysis (OR, 2.071; 95% CI, 1.913-2.242), and presence of acute renal failure (OR, 1.259; 95% CI, 1.193-1.329), congestive heart failure (OR, 1.156; 95% CI, 1.106-1.208), or septicemia (OR, 1.143; 95% CI, 1.071-1.221) were associated with a higher likelihood of pRBC use. Each pRBC transfusion significantly increased hospital length of stay (1.6, 0.5, and 2.7 additional days for patients with 1, 2, and 3 or more transfusions, respectively, P < 0.0001) as compared with nontransfused patients. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple factors increased the likelihood of pRBC use in ICU patients. In addition, pRBC transfusion was associated with increased length of stay. Clinicians should evaluate the risk-benefit ratio and consider interventions to limit any unnecessary pRBC use in the critically ill.

Cost analytic model to determine the least costly inpatient erythropoiesis stimulating therapy regimen.

BACKGROUND: Unlike in outpatient settings, the comparative costs of epoetin alpha (EPO) and darbepoetin alpha (DARB) have not been evaluated broadly from the inpatient hospital perspective. OBJECTIVE: To develop a cost analytic model comparing hospital inpatient costs for erythropoiesis stimulating therapies within the nephrology and oncology settings. METHODS: A cost analytic model incorporating erythropoietic drug, pharmacy, and nursing costs was developed from the inpatient hospital perspective to evaluate comparative costs of EPO and DARB. Erythropoietic drug costs were calculated using unit wholesale acquisition cost multiplied by the number of units or micrograms while comparing the following dosing regimens: EPO 3 times weekly, EPO once weekly, and DARB once weekly. Pharmacy costs included dispensing and delivery costs, while nursing costs incorporated administration time costs; all were calculated by estimated fractional hours per activity multiplied by hourly wages. The total frequency of erythropoiesis stimulating therapy administrations was determined based on the average hospital length of stay. The first erythropoiesis stimulating therapy dose was assumed to occur on day 3 of hospitalization. For total inpatient costs, a weighted average was calculated across disease states. One-way sensitivity analyses were conducted by varying length of stay, day of initial erythropoiesis stimulating therapy dose, pharmacy and nursing costs, and once-weekly DARB dose. RESULTS: EPO 3 times weekly was the least costly regimen across all disease states evaluated. Threshold analysis indicated that the cost of once-weekly DARB regimens would have to be reduced by 37% to equal the cost of EPO 3 times weekly for an average length of stay. Sensitivity analyses did not considerably affect the results. CONCLUSIONS: EPO 3 times weekly was found to be the least costly erythropoiesis stimulating therapy regimen for nephrology and oncology inpatients for the average length of stay as well as most other lengths of stay considered. Once-weekly EPO was the least costly erythropoiesis stimulating therapy regimen for several other lengths of stay, while once-weekly DARB was never found to be the least costly regimen.

The economic impact of pre-dialysis epoetin alpha on health care and work loss costs in chronic kidney disease: an employer's perspective.

The objective of the study was to quantify the direct and indirect incremental costs of epoetin alpha (EPO) therapy for anemia in pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD). Using employer claims data from January 1998 to January 2005, direct (medical and pharmacy) and indirect (sick leave and disability) costs were compared between CKD-anemic patients treated with EPO before dialysis (n = 199) and those not treated with an erythropoiesis-stimulating therapy (EST) (n = 196). Among the results, incremental direct and indirect cost savings for EPO-treated patients were $1443 and $328 per member per month (PMPM) (p < 0.001), respectively, compared to non-EST-treated patients with anemia. After multivariate adjustments, direct and indirect costs remained significantly lower by $852 and $308 PMPM (p < 0.001), respectively, for the EPO-treated group. Direct costs during the first 6 months of dialysis also were significantly lower for the EPO-treated group (who received EPO before dialysis), by $1515 PMPM (p = 0.0267, in multivariate regression). In conclusion, anemic CKD patients treated with EPO before dialysis had significantly lower direct and indirect costs compared to non-EST-treated patients.

The economic impact of epoetin alfa therapy on delaying time to dialysis in elderly patients with chronic kidney disease.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of epoetin alfa (EPO) therapy on delaying progression to renal dialysis and quantify the associated medical cost savings in elderly chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. Elderly (>/=65 years) dialysis patients who had >/=1 hemoglobin (Hb) value and >/=1 glomerular filtration rate (GFR) value of <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) were identified using health claims and laboratory data from the period January 1999 to February 2005. Exclusion criteria included: organ transplantation, blood transfusion, use of darbepoetin alfa, and dialysis for reasons other than CKD. Each EPO patient was matched by Hb and GFR to one control patient. The time from when matched patients had the same GFR value to dialysis was compared. The economic impact of EPO on delaying dialysis was monetized using standardized health plan payments, and adjusted to 2005 United States dollars. Sixty-eight patients (34 EPO and 34 matched controls) formed the study population. The average time to dialysis was 156 days longer for the EPO group compared to the matched control group (p = 0.003). Analysis by CKD severity revealed that EPO therapy in less severe CKD patients offered a greater delay in time to dialysis (Stage 4: 213 days difference, p = 0.003; Stage 5: 104 days difference, p = 0.160). EPO treatment resulted in cost savings of $43,374-$59,222 per patient compared to non-EPO matched controls. This retrospective matched cohort study suggests that EPO therapy has a beneficial impact on delaying progression to dialysis in elderly CKD patients, especially in those with less severe CKD.

Meaningful change and responsiveness in common physical performance measures in older adults.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the magnitude of small meaningful and substantial individual change in physical performance measures and evaluate their responsiveness. DESIGN: Secondary data analyses using distribution- and anchor-based methods to determine meaningful change. SETTING: Secondary analysis of data from an observational study and clinical trials of community-dwelling older people and subacute stroke survivors. PARTICIPANTS: Older adults with mobility disabilities in a strength training trial (n=100), subacute stroke survivors in an intervention trial (n=100), and a prospective cohort of community-dwelling older people (n=492). MEASUREMENTS: Gait speed, Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), 6-minute-walk distance (6MWD), and self-reported mobility. RESULTS: Most small meaningful change estimates ranged from 0.04 to 0.06 m/s for gait speed, 0.27 to 0.55 points for SPPB, and 19 to 22 m for 6MWD. Most substantial change estimates ranged from 0.08 to 0.14 m/s for gait speed, 0.99 to 1.34 points for SPPB, and 47 to 49 m for 6MWD. Based on responsiveness indices, per-group sample sizes for clinical trials ranged from 13 to 42 for substantial change and 71 to 161 for small meaningful change. CONCLUSION: Best initial estimates of small meaningful change are near 0.05 m/s for gait speed, 0.5 points for SPPB, and 20 m for 6MWD and of substantial change are near 0.10 m/s for gait speed, 1.0 point for SPPB, and 50 m for 6MWD. For clinical use, substantial change in these measures and small change in gait speed and 6MWD, but not SPPB, are detectable. For research use, these measures yield feasible sample sizes for detecting meaningful change.

Dosing patterns and costs of erythropoietic agents in patients with chronic kidney disease not on dialysis in managed care organizations.

BACKGROUND: Epoetin alfa (EPO) and darbepoetin alfa (DARB) are erythropoietic agents indicated in the United States for the treatment of anemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD). OBJECTIVE: This study investigated dosing patterns and costs associated with the use of erythropoietic-stimulating therapy (EST) in patients with CKD not on dialysis who were newly starting EPO or DARB therapy in managed care organizations. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of medical claims data from >30 health plans for the period from July 2002 to February 2005. Patients were included if they were aged > or =18 years, had > or =1 claim for CKD within 90 days before the initiation of treatment, had newly started therapy with EPO or DARB, and had received > or =2 doses of treatment. If a patient was undergoing renal dialysis, data were censored 30 days before the first date of dialysis. Patients with a diagnosis of cancer or who had undergone chemotherapy were excluded from the analysis. The mean dosing interval was determined for both groups. Mean weekly doses and costs (using 2005 wholesale acquisition costs), weighted by the treatment duration, were calculated. The frequency of outpatient nephrologist visits was described and included in cost considerations. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 595 patients who received EPO and 260 who received DARB. The EPO group was significantly older than the DARB group (mean age, 63.5 vs 61.2 years, respectively; P = 0.020). The proportion of women was similar between the 2 groups (51.6% and 50.4%). Use of extended dosing (> or =q2wk) was common in both groups (63.2% and 90.8%). The weighted mean weekly dose was 11,536 U for EPO and 42.5 mug for DARB. The mean number of outpatient nephrologist visits during treatment was similar between the 2 groups (3.9 and 3.5). Mean weekly costs (EST drug cost plus cost of nephrologist visits) were significantly lower for EPO compared with DARB (159 dollars vs 205 dollars; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of these CKD patients newly started on EST in managed care organizations received extended dosing regimens (> or =q2wk) of EPO or DARB. EPO treatment was associated with significantly lower mean weekly costs compared with DARB. The number of outpatient nephrology visits did not differ significantly between groups.

Dosing patterns, treatment costs, and frequency of physician visits in adults with cancer receiving erythropoietic agents in managed care organizations.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the dosing patterns and treatment costs of erythropoietic agents in adult (>or= 18 years of age) cancer patients newly initiated on epoetin alfa (EPO) or darbepoetin alfa (DARB) in managed care organizations. METHODS: An analysis of US medical claims (30 million lives in over 35 health plans) in the period July 1, 2002-February 28, 2005 was conducted. Patients with >or= 1 cancer claim within 90 days prior to initiating EPO or DARB, and who received at least two doses of the same erythropoietic agent, were included in this analysis. Weighted average weekly dosing, cumulative treatment dose, associated drug cost, dosing frequency patterns, and the frequency of outpatient visits were evaluated. The EPO:DARB dose ratio, based on average cumulative treatment doses, was assessed. RESULTS: 5639 EPO and 2166 DARB patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The EPO group was older (EPO 59.1 years; DARB 57.6 years; p < 0.001) with a higher proportion of men (EPO 38.1%; DARB 33.1%; p < 0.001). Variable dosing frequency was observed with similar treatment durations for the two groups (days: EPO 55.6; DARB 57.7; p = 0.122). A dose ratio of 236:1 was observed (average cumulative dose: EPO 252 856 U; DARB 1072 mcg). Average drug cost was significantly higher in the DARB group (drug cost: EPO 3077 dollars; DARB 4674 dollars; p < 0.001). The average number of hematology/oncology outpatient visits per patient (visits: EPO 7.4; DARB 7.3; p = 0.676) and outpatient visits for hemoglobin determination (visits: EPO 6.7; DARB 6.4; p = 0.093) during treatment was similar between the two groups. LIMITATIONS: The results were based on medical claims only. The absence of information on actual injection dates in pharmacy claims prevented their incorporation in the analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the average cumulative doses, the EPO:DARB dose ratio was 236:1 (Units EPO: mcg DARB) with 52% greater drug cost in the DARB group. Despite the variable administration frequency observed between the two agents, the number of hematology/oncology outpatient visits was not different.

Dosing patterns, hematologic outcomes, and costs of erythropoietic agents in predialysis chronic kidney disease patients with anemia.

OBJECTIVE: Few observational studies have evaluated the use of epoetin alfa (EPO) and darbepoetin alfa (DARB) in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients with anemia. The objective of this study was to investigate dosing patterns, hematologic outcomes, and intervention costs with EPO and DARB in anemic CKD patients treated in an ambulatory care setting. METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective, chart review of predialysis CKD patients with anemia treated with EPO or DARB. Charts were sequentially selected from 435 EPO and 432 DARB patients naive to erythropoietic therapy and treated for > or = 24 weeks. Hemoglobin (Hb) levels, dates, and EPO/DARB doses were recorded. Drug costs using 2005 wholesale acquisition costs (WAC) and Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) pricing were based on the mean cumulative drug dose over the 24-week study period. RESULTS: A total of 393 EPO and 396 DARB charts met all criteria with predominantly male subjects (EPO: 94%; DARB: 96%). Mean baseline GFR and Hb levels were similar. Once-weekly and extended dosing (> or = Q2W) was common in both groups. At Weeks 4, 8, and 12 following initiation of therapy, a greater proportion of EPO than DARB patients reached target Hb levels (> or = 11 g/dL) (p < 0.0001); at Week 24, all patients reached target Hb levels. Mean 24-week cumulative doses were EPO 279 336 +/- 68 302 units and DARB 1084 +/- 246 microg. Drug cost was higher for DARB independent of pricing utilized (WAC: EPO = 3400 US dollars, DARB = 4726 US dollars; FSS: EPO = 1528 US dollars, DARB = 2379 US dollars). CONCLUSIONS: Extended dosing (Q2W) was common in EPO- and DARB-treated patients with CKD-related anemia, with EPO-treated patients experiencing a significantly greater hematologic response (at Weeks 4, 8, and 12). In addition, drug cost was 39-56% higher in the DARB group. The male predominance may limit generalizability, warranting further research in other populations.

Dosing patterns and treatment costs of erythropoietic agents in elderly patients with pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease in managed care organisations.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate dosing patterns and drug costs of erythropoietic agents and assess the frequency of outpatient nephrologist visits in an elderly population with pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease (pCKD) newly initiated on epoetin alfa (EPO) or darbepoetin alfa (DARB). METHODS: An analysis of medical claims from more than 30 healthcare plans covering all census regions of the US in the period July 2002 through February 2005 was conducted. Patients were included if they were > or = 65 years of age, had at least one claim for CKD within 90 days prior to the initiation of any erythropoietic agent, were newly commenced on either EPO or DARB, and had received at least two treatment doses. If a patient received renal dialysis, data were censored 30 days prior to the first date of dialysis. Patients diagnosed with cancer or those who had undergone chemotherapy were excluded from the analysis. The average dosing interval for both EPO and DARB was calculated and classified as once weekly (qw), every 2 weeks (q2w) or every 3 weeks or less frequently (> or = q3w). Weighted average weekly doses were scaled based on treatment duration. The frequency of outpatient nephrologist visits was analysed. Average weekly treatment costs were calculated and presented using the May 2005 Wholesale Acquisition Costs. RESULTS: A total of 293 EPO and 102 DARB patients met the inclusion criteria. The two groups of patients had similar mean age (74.4 years for EPO vs 74.3 years for DARB) and gender distribution (47.4% female for EPO vs 51.0% for DARB). Extended dosing (every 2 weeks or less frequently: > or = q2w) during treatment was observed in both groups (EPO: qw 49.8%, q2w 31.7%, > or = q3w 18.4%; DARB: qw 19.6%, q2w 52.9%, > or = q3w 27.5%). The average dosing interval between injections was 13.6 days for the EPO group and 17.3 days for the DARB group. The weighted average weekly dose was 12,748 units for EPO and 43.5 microg for DARB. The average weekly erythropoietic treatment cost was significantly greater for DARB compared with EPO (190 US dollars vs 155 US dollars per week [2005 values]; p = 0.028). After controlling for covariates, the cost difference between the two groups was more pronounced and remained statistically significant (adjusted cost difference 41 US dollars/week higher for DARB patients; p = 0.013). The frequency of outpatient nephrologist visits during treatment was similar between the two groups (EPO 3.4 vs DARB 3.0 visits). CONCLUSIONS: Based on this analysis of claims data from more than 30 US healthcare plans, extended dosing (> or = q2w) of EPO and DARB was common in elderly pCKD patients treated with erythropoietic agents, with significantly higher weekly drug costs observed in the DARB group compared with the EPO group. The number of outpatient nephrologist visits was not significantly different between EPO and DARB patients. This study was the first to evaluate the dosing patterns of EPO and DARB in elderly pCKD patients in a large managed care population.

Economic evaluation of weekly epoetin alfa versus biweekly darbepoetin alfa for chemotherapy-induced anaemia: evidence from a 16-week randomised trial.

INTRODUCTION: A 16-week, open-label, multicentre, randomised trial of weekly epoetin alfa 40 000 units versus biweekly darbepoetin alfa 200microg among 358 patients with solid-tumour cancers and chemotherapy-induced anaemia demonstrated superior haematological outcomes with epoetin alfa. We sought to compare resource use, costs and clinical outcomes between treatment groups and report the results using a cost-consequences framework. METHODS: Pre-specified methods were used to assign costs (US dollars, year 2004-5 values) to medical resources and patient time using a societal perspective. Costs for inpatient care, outpatient care and physician services were based on US Medicare reimbursement rates. Indirect costs assigned to patient time spent receiving study medication were based on the mean hourly wage in the US. In the base-case analysis, the average wholesale price was used to assign costs to medications. Clinical outcomes included all haemoglobin levels and transfusions recorded throughout the trial. Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the impact of different costing methods, cost sources, perspectives and methods to assign haemoglobin values following a blood transfusion. RESULTS: Over a mean follow-up duration of 11.8 weeks, the average cost of study medications and their administration was the single largest component of total costs and was similar between groups (epoetin alfa 5979 US dollars and darbepoetin alfa 5935 US dollars, difference 44 US dollars; 95% CI -590, 692). There were no significant differences in the proportions of patients hospitalised (epoetin alfa 24.6%, darbepoetin alfa 22.0%; p = 0.57). Patients randomised to epoetin alfa experienced more inpatient days, on average, than patients randomised to darbepoetin alfa (2.6 vs 1.6, 95% CI for the difference, 0.07, 2.27). However, with regard to transfusions, patients in the epoetin alfa arm required fewer units of blood than patients in the darbepoetin alfa arm (0.46 vs 0.88, 95% CI for the difference -0.77, -0.08). Mean total costs, comprising costs for study medications and their administration, inpatient care, transfusions, unplanned radiation therapy, haematology and laboratory services, chemotherapy and non-chemotherapy drugs and indirect costs were 14,976 US dollars in the epoetin alfa arm compared with 14,101 US dollars in the darbepoetin alfa arm, a difference of 875 US dollars (95% CI for difference -849, 2607), of which 98% of the difference was attributable to higher inpatient costs in the epoetin alfa arm (2374 US dollars vs 1520 US dollars; 95% CI for difference -33, 1955). Assessments of multiple clinical measures demonstrated improved outcomes with epoetin alfa relative to darbepoetin alfa. CONCLUSION: Most clinical outcome measures suggested greater improvement with epoetin alfa relative to darbepoetin alfa, but most costs for both agents appeared similar. Decision makers must evaluate the differences in costs and efficacy measures that are most relevant from their perspectives.

Antithrombotic use and bleeding risk in patients with atrial fibrillation: findings from a multipayer analysis.

AIMS: To analyze administrative claims data from Medicaid, Medicare and commercial insurance sources to estimate stroke risk, bleeding risk, and the use of antithrombotic treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: Included patients were aged ≥18 years with a new or existing diagnosis of AF. Outcomes were assessed over 1 year and included stroke risk (CHADS2/CHA2DS2-VASc score), bleeding risk (ATRIA score) and anticoagulant use. RESULTS: A total of 115,906 patients with AF met inclusion criteria between six databases. Among patients with high stroke risk (CHADS2 ≥2) and low bleeding risk (ATRIA 0-3), 42-82% did not receive an antithrombotic. CONCLUSION: Levels of thromboprophylaxis for high-risk AF patients in real-world data differ significantly from current medical guidelines for stroke prevention.

The economic implications of switching to rivaroxaban from enoxaparin plus vitamin K antagonist in the treatment of venous thromboembolism.

OBJECTIVE: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) impacts ∼900,000 individuals annually in the US, causing up to 100,000 deaths. Patients experiencing VTE have heightened risk of recurrence. Initial parenteral anti-coagulation is standard therapy for acute VTE followed by ≥3 months of warfarin, which introduces the risk of major bleeding. Balancing increased risks of bleeding and recurrent VTE remains challenging. Recent clinical trials suggest that rivaroxaban, an oral direct inhibitor of factor Xa, provides an effective, safe, simplified approach to treatment. This study considers the economic implications of these data. METHODS: This study modeled inpatient, acute, and 1-year VTE costs for a hypothetical commercial plan with 1 million members. At baseline, all VTE patients receive standard therapy. Alternatively, 25% are instead treated with rivaroxaban. Model inputs are trial- and literature-based. RESULTS: Standard therapy for VTE consumes 9474 inpatient days ($31.6 million). Added to that is treatment for 74 recurrences ($1.4 million); major and non-major bleed events ($1 million); and direct costs of anti-coagulation ($5.3 million). Alternatively, a 25% shift to oral anti-coagulation with rivaroxaban reduces inpatient days (by 5%); associated acute-care costs (by 2%); recurrences and costs (by 6%). Four major bleeding events are prevented, at the cost of one additional non-major bleeding event, which, taken together, reduce net utilization by 9%. Direct costs of anti-coagulation increase by 5%. CONCLUSION: The reduction in inpatient utilization, recurrences, and major bleeding resulting from a 25% shift from standard therapy to rivaroxaban following acute VTE would conserve ∼$860,475 for every 1 million commercial health plan enrollees.

Inpatient resource use and cost burden of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in the United States.

PURPOSE: Venous thromboembolism (VTE), which comprises deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. VTE frequently leads to hospitalization and represents a considerable economic burden to the US health care system. However, little information exists on the duration of hospitalization and associated charges among patients with an admitting or primary diagnosis of DVT or PE. This study assessed the charges associated with hospitalization length of stay in patients with DVT or PE discharged from US hospitals in 2011. METHODS: Using data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample of the Healthcare Utilization Project database, this analysis examined hospital length of stay and associated charges in patients with DVT or PE discharged from US hospitals in 2011. Both initial and subsequent hospitalizations were analyzed. FINDINGS: DVT was responsible for fewer hospitalizations than PE. In 2011, among 330,044 patients with VTE discharged from US hospitals, 143,417 had DVT and 186,627 had PE. Mean length of stay for patients with DVT was 4.7 days (median, 3.9 days) compared with 5.1 days (median, 4.5 days) for patients with PE. For initial hospitalizations, the mean (SE) charge amounted to $30,051 ($246) for DVT compared with $37,006 ($214) for PE. Older patients with PE incurred greater hospital charges than younger ones, and for both DVT and PE patients, women incurred greater charges than men. Of 31,463 patients admitted to the hospital with PE, 4.0% had a subsequent admission, which was more costly than the initial admission. Many patients with both DVT and PE were discharged to specialist nursing facilities, indicating continuing posthospitalization charges. IMPLICATIONS: Hospital stays for DVT and PE represent a substantial cost burden to the US health care system. Health care systems have the potential to reduce the clinical and economic burden of VTE by ensuring that evidence-based, guideline-recommended anticoagulation therapy is adhered to by patients with an initial VTE. Appropriate anticoagulant therapy and continuity of care in these patients may reduce the incidence and frequency of hospital readmissions and VTE-related morbidity and mortality and have a potential effect on health care resources.

Daily costs of hospitalization in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients treated with anticoagulant therapy.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac rhythm disturbance in the US, with an estimated prevalence of 2.7-6.1 million persons in 2010. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the progression of daily hospitalization costs among non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients treated with anticoagulant therapy. METHODS: A claims analysis was conducted with Premier Perspective Comparative Hospital Database records from January 2009-March 2013. Patients of 18 years or older who were diagnosed with NVAF and used anticoagulant therapy were studied. Treatment patterns and mean daily costs of hospitalization per patient as well as total costs of hospitalization were reported. Comparisons of mean daily costs with those of the previous day were presented to identify statistical cost differences between hospitalization days. RESULTS: A total of 375,560 patients were identified; 67,017 with AF as admitting/primary diagnosis, and 308,543 with AF as a secondary diagnosis. The mean age of the overall population, primary AF diagnosis cohort, and secondary AF diagnosis cohort was 73.8, 67.9, and 75.0 years, while their proportion of females was 46.3%, 45.6%, and 46.5%, respectively. The mean length of stay was 6.8 days, 3.7 days, and 7.5 days for the overall population, the primary AF diagnosis cohort, and the secondary AF diagnosis cohort, respectively. For all cohorts, mean daily costs stabilized on the third day (overall population: $2103; primary AF diagnosis cohort: $1505; secondary AF diagnosis cohort: $2208). LIMITATIONS: Claims data may have contained inaccuracies or omissions in coded procedures, diagnoses, or pharmacy claims. CONCLUSION: The study showed that daily hospitalization costs for NVAF patients stabilized on the third day of hospitalization and that any reduction or prolongation in hospital length of stay could have a significant impact on the cost burden associated with AF.

Daily hospitalization costs in patients with deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism treated with anticoagulant therapy.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE), which includes deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), affects about 900,000 persons in the United States each year. OBJECTIVES: To quantify the progression of daily hospitalization costs among DVT and PE patients. PATIENTS/METHODS: A retrospective claims analysis was conducted from 01/01/2009 to 03/01/2013 using the Premier Perspective Comparative Hospital Database. Patients≥ 18years of age with an admitting/primary diagnosis of DVT or PE and receiving anticoagulant therapy were identified. Treatment patterns, mean daily costs, and total hospitalization costs were reported for the DVT and PE populations. Comparisons of mean daily costs with those of the previous day were presented to identify statistical cost differences between hospitalization days. RESULTS: A total of 28,953 and 35,550 patients were identified with a diagnosis of DVT and PE, respectively. The daily costs were at their highest during the first three days for DVT patients at $2,321, $1,875, and $1,558, respectively. Similar results were found for PE patients with costs at their highest in the first three days, at $2,981, $2,034, and $1,564, respectively. Among the DVT and PE populations, mean daily costs were $1,594 and $1,735, respectively, and daily hospitalization costs became stable on the third day of the hospitalization (standardized differences<10%). CONCLUSIONS: Daily hospitalization costs of patients with an admitting/primary diagnosis of DVT or PE were high in the first days and became stable on the third day. It was further suggested that any change in the LOS could significantly affect hospitalization costs.

Length of stay and economic consequences with rivaroxaban vs enoxaparin/vitamin K antagonist in patients with DVT and PE: findings from the North American EINSTEIN clinical trial program.

OBJECTIVE: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) (deep vein thrombosis [DVT] and pulmonary embolism [(PE]) represents a substantial economic burden to the healthcare system. Using data from the randomized EINSTEIN DVT and PE trials, this North American sub-group analysis investigated the potential of rivaroxaban to reduce the length of initial hospitalization in patients with acute symptomatic DVT or PE. METHODS: A post-hoc analysis of hospitalization and length-of-stay (LOS) data was conducted in the North American sub-set of patients from the randomized, open-label EINSTEIN trial program. Patients received either rivaroxaban (15 mg twice daily for 3 weeks followed by 20 mg once daily; n = 405) or dose-adjusted subcutaneous enoxaparin overlapping with (guideline-recommended 'bridging' therapy) and followed by a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) (international normalized ratio = 2.0-3.0; n = 401). The open-label study design allowed for the comparison of LOS between treatment arms under conditions reflecting normal clinical practice. LOS was evaluated using investigator records of dates of admission and discharge. Analyses were carried out in the intention-to-treat population using parametric tests. Costs were applied to the LOS based on weighted mean cost per day for DVT and PE diagnoses obtained from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project dataset. RESULTS: Of 382 patients hospitalized, 321 (84%), had acute symptomatic PE; few DVT patients required hospitalization. Similar rates of VTE patients were hospitalized in the rivaroxaban and enoxaparin/VKA treatment groups, 189/405 (47%) and 193/401 (48%), respectively. In hospitalized VTE patients, rivaroxaban treatment produced a 1.6-day mean reduction in LOS (median = 1 day) compared with enoxaparin/VKA (mean = 4.5 vs 6.1; median = 3 vs 4), translating to total costs that were $3419 lower in rivaroxaban-treated patients. CONCLUSION: In hospitalized North American patients with VTE, treatment with rivaroxaban produced a statistically significant reduction in LOS. When treating DVT and PE patients, clinicians should consider newer anti-coagulants with less complex treatment regimens.