Offering extended use of the contraceptive implant via an implementation science framework: a qualitative study of clinicians' perceived barriers and facilitators.

BACKGROUND: The etonogestrel contraceptive implant is currently approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the prevention of pregnancy up to 3 years. However, studies that suggest efficacy up to 5 years. There is little information on the prevalence of extended use and the factors that influence clinicians in offering extended use. We investigated clinician perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to offering extended use of the contraceptive implant. METHODS: Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), we conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews. Participants were recruited from a nationwide survey study of reproductive health clinicians on their knowledge and perspective of extended use of the contraceptive implant. To optimize the diversity of perspectives, we purposefully sampled participants from this study. We used content analysis and consensual qualitative research methods to inform our coding and data analysis. Themes arose deductively and inductively. RESULTS: We interviewed 20 clinicians including advance practice clinicians, family medicine physicians, obstetrician/gynecologist and complex family planning sub-specialists. Themes regarding barriers and facilitators to extended use of the contraceptive implant emerged. Barriers included the FDA approval for 3 years and clinician concern about liability in the context of off-label use of the contraceptive implant. Educational materials and a champion of extended use were facilitators. CONCLUSIONS: There is opportunity to expand access to extended use of the contraceptive implant by developing educational materials for clinicians and patients, identifying a champion of extended use, and providing information on extended use prior to replacement appointments at 3 years.

Interest in peer support persons among patients experiencing early pregnancy loss.

BACKGROUND: Limited data exist regarding the type of support patients need when experiencing early pregnancy loss (EPL). The objective of this study is to explore how patients emotionally cope with EPL and to assess if there is interest in a peer EPL support program with a self-compassion component. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with patients who experienced EPL in the past two years. We evaluated the kinds of support that patients felt were most helpful, interest in a possible peer EPL support person, and suggestions for the creation of such a program. Content analysis was utilized to analyze the data and identify themes. RESULTS: Twenty-one individuals participated in the study. Approximately 52.3% (n = 11) of interviewees reported expectant management of their EPL, 23.8% (n = 5) reported medication management, and 23.8% (n = 5) reported undergoing dilation and curettage. We identified five themes: (1) therapy and in-person support groups are helpful when experiencing EPL, but are sometimes inaccessible; (2) social media support groups are initially advantageous for creating a sense of solidarity, but in the long term can be triggering; (3) support from a peer who has also experienced EPL is uniquely valuable; (4) developing self-compassion is important in emotionally coping with EPL; and (5) there is a demand for emotional and informational support following EPL. CONCLUSIONS: Given the unique support participants identified receiving from a peer with shared lived experience, there is interest in a peer EPL support program with a self-compassion component for emotional and informational support following EPL.

Refugee Women's Receptiveness for Virtual Engagement on Reproductive Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Refugee women who leave their country due to persecution and violence have multiple barriers to sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services. The COVID-19 pandemic added an additional barrier to in-person reproductive health education, dialogue, and clinical care. This study aimed to assess the potential of using virtual group meetings as a forum for refugee women to learn about and discuss reproductive health concerns such as cervical cancer screening, family planning, childbirth, and postpartum care. METHOD: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 36 refugee women and stakeholders to assess factors that impact refugee women's receptiveness for virtual platforms to obtain information and engage in discussions on reproductive health. Thematic analysis was conducted using the software Dedoose. RESULTS: Openness to engage in virtual platforms varied by refugee community, women's demographic, and life experience. The women's involvement with local refugee groups facilitated their engagement with virtual platforms. Furthermore, individuals' family structure and marital relationship, along with literacy and English proficiency, and access to and familiarity with technology impacted engagement. Virtual groups needed to mirror confidentiality and women expressed a strong preference that groups were all-women. CONCLUSION: Refugee women are receptive to virtual groups on SRH when they are offered in a culturally appropriate manner that considers the living situations and access to technology after arrival to the USA. Findings from this study provide a framework to develop and tailor effective virtual or hybrid virtual-in-person programs for women in refugee communities.

Access to contraception in pharmacies during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: As a result of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, shifts in traditional contraception access points have presented new challenges, leading people to seek alternative sources of contraception care, including pharmacies. Pharmacists in one-fourth of U.S. states are able to prescribe hormonal contraception, a model known as pharmacy access. Pharmacy access became available in California in 2016 and in Colorado in 2017. OBJECTIVE: To characterize how access to contraception products and services in pharmacies changed during the COVID-19 pandemic, including pharmacist prescribing practices and innovations in service delivery. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey among California and Colorado pharmacists from September to October 2020. Survey questions included pharmacist and pharmacy practice site characteristics, prescribing practices, pharmacist perspectives, and pharmacy services in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: A total of 128 pharmacists participated in the study, with 38% (n = 49) from California and 62% (n = 79) from Colorado. Among participants, 41% (n = 53) prescribed contraception, of which 94% (n = 50) continued, 4% (n = 2) started, and 2% (n = 1) suspended during the pandemic. Most participants reported interest (79%) and effort (75%) in prescribing contraception to be about the same during the pandemic. Community need for contraceptive services was perceived to be slightly or much higher (45%) or about the same (47%). Patient interest in pharmacy access was perceived to be slightly or much higher by 26% and about the same by 57% of the participants. When distributing contraception prescriptions, pharmacies increased curbside (from 12% to 52%), home delivery (from 40% to 60%), and mailing options (from 41% to 71%) during the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacists prescribing hormonal contraception who participated in this study remained committed to providing this service during the pandemic. Some perceived increased community need for contraception and patient interest in direct pharmacy access. There was an increase in options for patients to receive contraception prescriptions with minimal contact.

Using the electronic medical record to assess contraception usage among women taking category D or X medications.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to investigate contraceptive usage among women prescribed or currently taking a category D or X medication using the electronic medical record. METHODS: This is a retrospective study assessing contraceptive usage among women prescribed category D or X medications. We obtained access to the electronic medical records of women seen in an academic Family Medicine Department between April 2011 and April 2012 who were prescribed a category D or X medication. Information was abstracted regarding the specific category D or X medication, demographics, sexual activity, sexual partner gender, and contraceptive usage. RESULTS: There were a total of 610 women included in this study. Among the 610 women, 72 (11.8%) of women had documentation that they were not asked about their sexual activity. Sexual activity with men was documented in 407 of the 610 women (66.7%). Of these 407 women, 132 (32.4%) had no contraceptive method documented. Among the women using contraception, the most common method used was oral contraception. CONCLUSION: According to data obtained from the electronic medical record, women who are taking a category D or X medication are not always asked about sexual activity. Contraception usage among women taking category D or X medications and who were sexually active with men was similar to the general population. Contraception usage should be better in this population given the risk of an unintended pregnancy includes fetal exposure to a potential teratogen. The electronic medical record creates an opportunity for an intervention to increase contraception utilization in this population.

Using the electronic medical record to refer women taking category D or X medications for teratogen and contraceptive counseling.

BACKGROUND: Women taking teratogens may not receive teratogen and contraceptive counseling. The objective of this study is to explore the feasibility of an electronic medical record (EMR) alert and referral system to improve teratogen and contraceptive counseling. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive study in an academic outpatient setting to evaluate the feasibility of an EMR alert and referral system. Reproductive age women taking category D or X medications seen in family medicine clinics were referred by means of an EMR alert for teratogen and contraceptive counseling. A subset of these women consented to follow-up surveys assessing contraceptive usage before counseling, intended contraceptive method after counseling and satisfaction with the counseling. Participants were contacted at 1 and 3 months to assess contraceptive usage. RESULTS: A total of 354 women were prescribed category D or X medications by clinicians who received the EMR alert, 170 women were referred, 59 women received counseling, and 33 participants enrolled in the study. One participant did not use any contraception. Among the 32 participants using contraception, 12 (37.5%) used oral contraceptives, 11 (34.4%) used condoms, 3 (9.4%) used withdrawal, 3 (9.4%) used intrauterine devices, 2 (6.3%) used contraceptive rings, and 1 (3.1%) used the diaphragm. After counseling, one-third of participants were considering more effective contraception. Almost all participants strongly agreed or agreed that the counseling was helpful. CONCLUSION: Creating an EMR alert and referral system for women prescribed category X or D medications is feasible. Counseling on teratogen exposure and contraception may improve the acceptability of more effective contraception.

Obesity and contraception.

Utilizing contraception is critical in preventing unintended pregnancies among obese women. However, clinicians and obese patients may be unclear about which contraceptive methods are optimal. This review discusses the literature on any weight gain associated with contraceptive use, contraceptive efficacy among obese women, and special considerations for contraceptive method selection for women after bariatric surgery. The review also covers new findings on oral emergency contraception and obesity.

Contraceptive use in female recipients of a solid-organ transplant.

CONTEXT: Women of reproductive age account for more than one-third of all solid-organ transplant recipients and are advised against becoming pregnant for 1 to 2 years after their surgeries. The risks posed to the woman, the transplanted organ, and the fetus underscore the importance of systems to ensure that patients receive counseling on family planning, including return to fertility, contraceptive use, and when pregnancy can be safely considered, and highly effective methods of contraception. OBJECTIVE: To investigate use of contraceptives among women after solid-organ transplant and to identify opportunities to improve care. DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey study. SETTING: An urban academic medical center. PATIENTS: Women 18 to 50 years old who have received a kidney, pancreas, and/or liver transplant within the past 1 to 24 months. INTERVENTION: Participants completed self-administered questionnaires regarding their menstrual pattern, pregnancy history, contraceptive use before and after transplant, and counseling on family planning issues. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Contraceptive use. RESULTS: The most common contraceptive method used in both the year preceding transplant and the year after transplant was condoms. Participants desired more counseling on highly effective contraceptive methods, such as intrauterine devices. Participants would like to receive contraceptive counseling from an obstetrician/gynecologist or transplant care team provider. CONCLUSION: Female recipients of solid-organ transplants want more counseling on highly effective methods of contraception.

Assessing Interest in a Peer Support Person for Patients Experiencing Early Pregnancy Loss: Results from a National Survey.

Introduction: The use of a peer support person as an intervention for early pregnancy loss (EPL) is not well studied. In addition, limited literature exists regarding the type of support patients need when experiencing EPL. The objective of this study is to quantify interest in a peer EPL support person intervention, to assess the types of support desired following EPL, and to investigate if there is an association between self-compassion or resilience and coping ability post-EPL. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional, web-based survey with 110 individuals who experienced EPL in the past 2 years. Questions explored interest in a peer EPL support person and different types of support, as well as perceived self-compassion and resilience. Analyses of variance were used to test if interest in the peer support intervention and in different types of support varied by demographics, while linear regression modeling was used to test the relationship between self-compassion, resilience, and coping ability. Results: Nearly all participants (98.2%, n = 108) were interested in peer support. The majority (31.8%, n = 35) of participants prioritized informational and educational support at the time of their EPL and in the months following. There was a positive relationship between self-compassion scores and ability to cope with EPL (p = 0.2) and between resilience scores and coping ability (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Almost all participants were interested in a peer support person for coping with EPL. Given the types of support participants identified in this study, a peer support person may provide emotional and informational support as well as resilience training.

Barriers and Facilitators of Extended Use of the Contraceptive Implant: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Clinicians.

BACKGROUND: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the etonogestrel contraceptive implant for 3 years of use. Evidence suggests that it may be used for up to 5 years for pregnancy prevention, also known as extended use. METHODS: We conducted a national cross-sectional survey among a group of reproductive health clinicians. We developed an online survey using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and distributed it through e-mail listservs and social media groups from May to June 2021. We analyzed results using multivariable logistical regression. RESULTS: Among the 300 respondents, 195 (65.0%) reported that they always offer extended use, and 50 (16.7%) reported that they sometimes offer extended use. Fifty-five respondents (18.3%) reported that they never offer extended use. After adjusting for age, gender, and clinical setting, we found that complex family planning sub-specialists (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 9.32; 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.81, 48.03]) and family medicine physicians (aOR = 4.37, 95% CI [1.58, 12.10]) were significantly more likely to recommend extended use compared with general obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) physicians. Clinicians from private practices or health maintenance organizations were significantly less likely to offer extended use than those from academic centers (aOR = 0.19, 95% CI [0.07, 0.51]; aOR = 0.06, 95% CI [0.01, 0.31]). The most common barriers to offering extended use were concerns about pregnancy risk, bleeding, and lack of FDA approval in the past 3 years. Meanwhile, clinicians identified strong published evidence supporting extended use as a key facilitator for offering it, and they perceived that prior counseling on extended use from a past clinician was a key facilitator for patients to adopt it. CONCLUSIONS: One-third of clinicians in this study did not consistently offer extended use of the contraceptive implant. An opportunity exists to expand access to extended use by focusing on education interventions for clinicians and seeking FDA approval for 5 years of use.

Understanding medication abortion ineligibility due to gestational age among a cohort of patients in Southern California.

OBJECTIVE: Medication abortion (MAB) is safe and effective up to 77 days gestation. Limited data are available on how often patients are ineligible for MAB due to advanced gestational age and how many of those ineligible go on to receive procedural abortion. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of electronic health records from Planned Parenthood of the Pacific Southwest (PPPSW) from January - December 2021. PPPSW has four procedural abortion sites and 15 MAB-only clinics that offered appointments only if last menstrual period-based GA was ≤70 days or unknown. Patients >70 days gestation by intake ultrasound at a MAB-only clinic were referred to a procedural center. RESULTS: Of 11,684 patients presenting for MAB at MAB-only sites 2224 (19%) did not receive a MAB; 3.8% (N = 444) presented past 70 days gestation and were thus ineligible due to gestational age limits. Of those ineligible (N = 444), 234 (53%) measured between 71-77 days of gestation. Three quarters (75.7%) of those ineligible went on to receive a procedural abortion at PPPSW after a mean wait time of 10 days. In multivariable analysis, no demographic factors were associated with higher odds of receiving a procedural abortion. CONCLUSIONS: Presenting for MAB past a gestational age limit was uncommon, supporting safety of no-test MAB protocols. A quarter of people ineligible for MAB due to gestational age did not receive a procedural abortion at PPPSW. If MAB were offered up to 77 days, half of patients who were denied MAB due to gestational age could have received MAB, expanding patient access. IMPLICATIONS: Being ineligible for MAB due to advanced gestational age was uncommon. Increasing MAB gestational age limits from 70 days to 77 days could further improve abortion access.

"My IUD is expiring": A national U.S. mystery client study regarding use of the LNG 52-mg IUD for pregnancy prevention beyond 5 years after multiple FDA extensions.

OBJECTIVES: Since 2020, the Food and Drug Administration has approved multiple extensions to the use of the levonorgestrel (LNG) 52-mg intrauterine device (IUD) for pregnancy prevention beyond 5 years. The accessibility of this information to patients calling a reproductive health clinic to schedule replacement remains unknown. We assess the patient experience in accessing information via phone call on the duration of pregnancy prevention for LNG 52-mg IUD. STUDY DESIGN: We utilized a mystery client study design to inquire about LNG 52-mg IUD use beyond 5 years. Purposeful sampling ensured clinic diversity. RESULTS: In June 2022, 18 (32%) clinics offered extended use beyond 5 years, 25 (44%) recommended replacement at 5 years, and 14 (25%) could not provide information. The number of clinics offering extended LNG 52-mg IUD use did not significantly increase in August 2023 (n = 22, 39%, p = 0.27). CONCLUSIONS: Patients scheduling a replacement of the LNG 52-mg IUD may not receive information about use beyond 5 years. IMPLICATIONS: Reproductive health clinics scheduling staff need further training on updated guidelines.

Social determinants of choosing telemedicine for contraceptive care: A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Compare demographic characteristics and contraception choices among individuals seeking contraception care via telemedicine versus in-person. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of contraception visits from June-September 2021 at Planned Parenthood of the Pacific Southwest. We assessed demographics and contraception choices. We used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate effect of language, age, income, having children, and insurance type on choosing telemedicine. RESULTS: We included 16,855 patients: 2383 (14.1%) telemedicine visits and 14,472 (85.9%) in-person visits; 149/2383 (6.3%) non-English speakers used telemedicine compared to 1194/14,472 (8.3%) who used in-person care. A higher proportion of the telemedicine cohort had public insurance compared to the in-person cohort (2312/2383 [97.0%] telemedicine vs 11,646/14,472 [80.5%] in-person). Among the telemedicine cohort, a higher proportion of patients chose a barrier method (691/2363 [29.2%] telemedicine vs 1564/14,215 [11.0%] in-person) and short-acting method (1248/2363 [52.8%] telemedicine vs 5834/14,215 [41.0%] in-person) compared to in-person. A higher proportion of in-person patients chose long-acting reversible contraception (2681/14,215 [18.9%] in-person vs 179/2363 [7.6%] telemedicine) and injection (3779/14,215 [26.6%] in-person vs 115/2363 [4.9%] telemedicine) compared to telemedicine. Speaking Spanish was associated with decreased odds of choosing telemedicine after adjusting for covariates (aOR 0.53 [95% CI 0.44-0.64], p < 0.001). Older age, having children, lower income, and public insurance were associated with increased odds of choosing telemedicine. CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine for contraception visits was associated with language, age, parity, income, and insurance. Despite small absolute difference in the proportion of patients that speak Spanish, in adjusted multivariate analysis speaking Spanish was associated with lower odds of choosing telemedicine. IMPLICATIONS: Increasing access for people with limited technology as well as those who prefer non-English languages is essential to promote equitable reproductive care. Prospective research that focuses on patient experience and preferences is needed to better guide access to equitable, person-centered contraception care.

Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate concentrations in patients with and without the use of antiseizure medications.

OBJECTIVES: To measure plasma concentrations of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) in users with epilepsy treated with antiseizure medications and compare these to MPA concentrations in those without epilepsy. STUDY DESIGN: For this multisite cross-sectional study, we obtained a single blood sample from those with epilepsy treated with various antiseizure medications (n = 18) within the week before their next depot medroxyprogesterone injection. Among the participants without epilepsy (n = 20), 10 similarly were scheduled within the week prior to the next injection, and 10 were scheduled at earlier intervals to attempt to balance the time intervals between groups. MPA concentrations were determined by a validated assay. RESULTS: MPA concentrations were similar among those with epilepsy and controls and between groups with and without the use of enzyme-inducing medications. The lowest MPA concentrations, under 0.07 ng/mL, were observed among two of eight using enzyme-inducing antiseizure medications, one of 10 using noninducing medications, and one of 19 controls had concentrations below 0.2 ng/mL. CONCLUSIONS: In this exploratory study, lower MPA concentrations in some participants using enzyme-inducing antiseizure medications suggest a potential interaction that could reduce depot medroxyprogesterone efficacy.

The World Health Organization-United Nations Population Fund Strategic Partnership Programme's implementation of family planning guidelines and tools in Asia-Pacific countries.

AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the Strategic Partnership Programme, a collaboration between the World Health Organization and the United Nations Population Fund to improve evidence-based guidance for country programs through the introduction of selected practice guidelines to improve sexual and reproductive health. METHODS: Information for this report is from questionnaires sent to Ministries of Health in 2004 (baseline assessment) and in 2007 (assessment of outcome), annual country reports and personal communication with focal points from Ministries of Health and World Health Organization regional and country offices. RESULTS: Following the Strategic Partnership Programme, family planning guidance was used extensively to: formulate and update reproductive health policy; update standards and guidelines; improve training curricula; conduct training activities; develop advocacy and communication materials; and promote change in service. CONCLUSION: The Strategic Partnership Programme was successful in promoting the introduction of evidence-based guidelines for reproductive health in several Asian countries. The countries that adapted the family planning guidance observed an increase in demand for contraceptives commodities.

"My implant is expiring": A national US mystery shopper study regarding extended use of the contraceptive implant.

OBJECTIVES: To assess if patients can access extended use of the contraceptive implant when they call to schedule a removal or replacement. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a national secret-shopper study of reproductive clinics with a standardized script. Purposeful sampling provided geographic and practice type diversity. RESULTS: Of 59 clinics sampled, the majority (n=40, 67.8%) recommended replacement at three years or could not provide information regarding extended use by phone, and 19 (32.2%) offered extended use. Offering extended use varied by clinic type. CONCLUSIONS: Patients calling to schedule a removal or replacement of the implant often do not receive information regarding extended use beyond three years.

Impact of COVID-19 on abortion method under ten weeks gestational age in Southern California.

OBJECTIVE: We assessed the proportion of medication versus suction aspiration abortions before and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in a health system that did not limit access to abortion. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted an interrupted time series analysis among patients having an abortion at 10 weeks gestation or less at Planned Parenthood health centers in San Diego, Imperial, and Riverside Counties in California. Centers required in-person follow up for medication abortion throughout the pandemic. We compared the nine months prior to the pandemic (June 2019 to February 2020) to the first nine months of the pandemic (April 2020 to December 2020), with March 2020 as a washout period. RESULTS: There was an average monthly increase of 0.78% in the proportion of medication abortions from June 2019 to February 2020 (p = 0.01, pre-pandemic trend). Immediately following the start of the pandemic, there was an estimated increase in the proportion of medication abortions of 2.58% (p = 0.23, post-level change). However, the monthly pre-pandemic trend towards medication abortions reversed by 1.07% after the start of the pandemic (p = 0.02, post-trend change), for an average monthly decrease in the proportion of medication abortions of 0.29% from April to December 2020 (p = 0.37, pandemic trend). CONCLUSIONS: The trend towards medication abortions that was present before the COVID-19 pandemic reversed after an initial increase in medication abortions at the start of the pandemic. IMPLICATIONS: Both types of abortion should remain available during public health emergencies. Further research is needed to understand how the pandemic affected abortion methods in areas with limited access and in health centers that did not require two in-person appointments for medication abortions.

Effect of Paracervical Block Volume on Pain Control for Dilation and Aspiration: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare pain scores during office dilation and aspiration between low-volume and high-volume paracervical block of the same dose. METHODS: We conducted a multi-site, randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled trial from October 2018 to December 2020. We randomized participants presenting for office dilation and aspiration under minimal sedation stratified by procedural indication (induced abortion vs early pregnancy loss) to a 20-mL buffered 1% lidocaine paracervical block or a 40-mL buffered 0.5% lidocaine paracervical block, both with two units of vasopressin in a standardized technique. To detect a 15-mm or greater difference in pain at the time of cervical dilation with 80% power and a two-sided alpha of 0.05, a total of 104 participants was required. The study was also powered to detect a 20-mm or greater difference in pain at the time of cervical dilation within each stratum (induced abortion and early pregnancy loss). The primary outcome was pain with cervical dilation on a 100-mm visual analog scale in the overall cohort. Secondary outcomes included pain with cervical dilation within each stratum. We used a Wilcoxon rank-sum test to compare median pain scores between groups. RESULTS: We enrolled 114 participants. There was no difference in median pain scores between low-volume and high-volume groups during dilation (62 mm vs 59 mm, P=.94), aspiration (69.5 mm vs 70 mm, P=.47), postprocedure (25 mm vs 25 mm, P=.76), or overall (60 mm vs 60 mm, P=.23). Stratified by indication, there were no significant differences in scores at any time point between the low-volume and high-volume paracervical block groups. There was decreased overall pain in patients with induced abortion who received the higher volume paracervical block, though this did not reach statistical significance (67.5 mm vs 60.5 mm, P=.08). Pain during paracervical block administration was similar between groups (55 mm vs 45 mm, P=.24) and there was no difference in occurrence of side effects (P=.63). CONCLUSION: We found no difference in pain with cervical dilation among participants who received the low-volume compared with high-volume paracervical block when studied alone. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03636451.

Refugee women's experiences with contraceptive care after resettlement in high-income countries: A critical interpretive synthesis.

Refugee women often share histories of forced displacement, economic hardship, or gender-based violence and may face common barriers to reproductive health care access after resettlement in high-income countries. This Critical Interpretive Synthesis integrates the available data on contraceptive care for refugee women after resettlement. The review examined shared aspects of the refugee experience that impact women's access to high-quality contraceptive care and transcend the particularities of specific health systems or countries of origin. These include possible shifts in gendered norms and fertility preferences after resettlement, prior experiences with contraception in home countries, refugee camps, and other sites of first-asylum, and negative experiences with health care providers after resettlement (i.e., communication barriers or experiencing discrimination). Our findings demonstrate the need for further methodologically-rigorous research in the field of refugee reproductive health, specifically in relation to evidence-based approaches to training interpreters and providers in contraceptive care for refugees and on male partners and their influence on contraceptive use.

Contraceptive use among women with medical conditions: Factors that influence method choice.

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors that influence contraceptive initiation among women with medical conditions. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted an exploratory cross-sectional survey of women 18-45 years old with medical conditions who received contraception consultation from complex family planning specialists at five University of California Medical Centers from June 2014-June 2015. We asked survey participants about factors that influence their decision of choosing and initiating a contraceptive method, how they accessed family planning specialists and the impact of this consultation on their contraceptive method choice. RESULTS: Among 97 participants, 61 (63%) had one medical condition, 28 (29%) had two medical conditions, and 8 (8%) had three or four medical conditions. A majority of participants initiated long-acting reversible contraceptive methods including an intrauterine device (n = 54, 56%) and the contraceptive implant (n = 17, 18%). The most common reason for initiating contraception was to avoid pregnancy in the immediate future for personal reasons (n = 43, 44%). The most common reason for initiating a particular contraceptive method was safety given their medical condition (n = 19, 20%). After the consultation with the complex family planning specialist, participants commonly reported that the person with the most influence on their contraceptive method choice was the complex family planning specialist (n = 35, 36%) and less commonly the primary care provider (n = 9, 9%) and not at all by a family member or friend (n = 0, 0%). CONCLUSION: Women with medical conditions are highly influenced by a complex family planning specialist in regard to their contraceptive options and when receiving such counseling, will often choose highly effective methods. IMPLICATIONS: This study provides insight into contraceptive decision-making among women with medical conditions referred to a complex family planning specialist for contraceptive care.