Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Bioprocess Biosyst Eng ; 43(5): 785-796, 2020 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31894389

RESUMO

In recent years, there has been increasing consumer interest in carotenoids, particularly of marine sustainable origin with applications in the food, cosmeceutical, nutritional supplement and pharmaceutical industries. For instance, microalgae belonging to the genus Tetraselmis are known for their biotechnologically relevant carotenoid profile. The recently isolated marine microalgal strain Tetraselmis sp. CTP4 is a fast-growing, robust industrial strain, which has successfully been produced in 100-m3 photobioreactors. However, there are no reports on total carotenoid contents from this strain belonging to T. striata/convolutae clade. Although there are several reports on extraction methods targeting chlorophytes, extraction depends on the strength of cell coverings, solvent polarity and the nature of the targeted carotenoids. Therefore, this article evaluates different extraction methods targeting Tetraselmis sp. CTP4, a strain known to contain a mechanically resistant theca. Here, we propose a factorial experimental design to compare extraction of total carotenoids from wet and freeze-dried microalgal biomass using four different solvents (acetone, ethanol, methanol or tetrahydrofuran) in combination with two types of mechanical cell disruption (glass beads or dispersion). The extraction efficiency of the methods was assessed by pigment contents and profiles present in the extracts. Extraction of wet biomass by means of glass bead-assisted cell disruption using tetrahydrofuran yielded the highest amounts of lutein and ß-carotene (622 ± 40 and 618 ± 32 µg g-1 DW, respectively). Although acetone was slightly less efficient than tetrahydrofuran, it is preferable due to its lower costs and toxicity.


Assuntos
Clorófitas/química , Luteína , Microalgas/química , beta Caroteno , Luteína/química , Luteína/isolamento & purificação , Microalgas/isolamento & purificação , beta Caroteno/química , beta Caroteno/isolamento & purificação
2.
Int J Mol Sci ; 17(8)2016 Aug 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27527165

RESUMO

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a chronic disease whose neurological basis and pathophysiology remain poorly understood. Initially, it was proposed that genetic variations were responsible for the development of this disease. Nevertheless, several studies within the last decade have provided evidence suggesting that environmental factors play an important role in MDD pathophysiology. Alterations in epigenetics mechanism, such as DNA methylation, histone modification and microRNA expression could favor MDD advance in response to stressful experiences and environmental factors. The aim of this review is to describe genetic alterations, and particularly altered epigenetic mechanisms, that could be determinants for MDD progress, and how these alterations may arise as useful screening, diagnosis and treatment monitoring biomarkers of depressive disorders.


Assuntos
Transtorno Depressivo Maior/genética , Epigênese Genética , Antidepressivos/farmacologia , Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Metilação de DNA/efeitos dos fármacos , Metilação de DNA/genética , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/tratamento farmacológico , Epigênese Genética/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Modelos Genéticos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa