Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Allergy ; 77(8): 2292-2312, 2022 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35112371

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Anaphylaxis, which is rare, has been reported after COVID-19 vaccination, but its management is not standardized. METHOD: Members of the European Network for Drug Allergy and the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology interested in drug allergy participated in an online questionnaire on pre-vaccination screening and management of allergic reactions to COVID-19 vaccines, and literature was analysed. RESULTS: No death due to anaphylaxis to COVID-19 vaccines has been confirmed in scientific literature. Potential allergens, polyethylene glycol (PEG), polysorbate and tromethamine are excipients. The authors propose allergy evaluation of persons with the following histories: 1-anaphylaxis to injectable drug or vaccine containing PEG or derivatives; 2-anaphylaxis to oral/topical PEG containing products; 3-recurrent anaphylaxis of unknown cause; 4-suspected or confirmed allergy to any mRNA vaccine; and 5-confirmed allergy to PEG or derivatives. We recommend a prick-to-prick skin test with the left-over solution in the suspected vaccine vial to avoid waste. Prick test panel should include PEG 4000 or 3500, PEG 2000 and polysorbate 80. The value of in vitro test is arguable. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations will lead to a better knowledge of the management and mechanisms involved in anaphylaxis to COVID-19 vaccines and enable more people with history of allergy to be vaccinated.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas , Vacinas , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/etiologia , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/terapia , Humanos , Vacinas Sintéticas , Vacinas de mRNA
2.
East. Mediterr. health j ; 29(2): 146-150, 2023-02.
Artigo em Inglês | WHOLIS | ID: who-366546

RESUMO

Background: Data are scarce on differences in the rates of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) reinfection after the first infection. Aims: We examined nationwide data on SARS-CoV-2 reinfection in Kuwait according to four-time windows to reinfection: 29–45 days, 46–60 days, 61–90 days, and ≥ 91 days. Methods: This was a population-level retrospective cohort study conducted between 31 March 2020 and 31 March 2021. We reviewed evidence of second positive RT-PCR test results for those who had previously recovered from COVID-19 and tested negative. Results: Reinfection rates were: 0.52% for reinfection window 29–45 days, 0.36% for 45–60 days, 0.29% for 61–90 days, and 0.20% for ≥ 91 days. The mean age (standard deviation [SD]) of individuals with the shortest reinfection time interval (29–45 days) was significantly older than the mean age of all other groups – 43.3 years (SD 17.5) compared with: 39.0 years (SD 16.5), P = 0.037 for 46–60-day interval; 38.3 years (SD 16.5), P = 0.002 for 61–90-day interval; and 39.2 years (SD 14.4), P = 0.001 for ≥ 91-days interval. Conclusion: SARS-CoV-2 reinfection was uncommon among this adult population. Older age was associated with a shorter time to reinfection.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Surtos de Doenças , Betacoronavirus
3.
Asia Pacific Allergy ; (4): 106-112, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-749983

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hypersensitivity to penicillin has been studied worldwide, but data regarding patterns of sensitization in Arabian Gulf countries are scarce. OBJECTIVE: To describe the patterns of penicillin hypersensitivity during a 6-year study in Kuwait in terms of demographics, type of the culprit drug, in vivo and in vitro allergy testing. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-four patients referred to the drug allergy clinic for penicillin allergy were fully evaluated by skin prick and intradermal testing. Drug provocation test was done on patients with negative results. RESULTS: A total of 124 patients were evaluated for penicillin allergy. Mean age was 37.8 (standard deviation, 12.7) years, range from 8 to 74 years. Thirty-nine male (31.5%) and 85 female patients (68.5%) were included. Diagnosis of penicillin allergy was confirmed in 46 patients (37.1%). Among the 44 confirmed allergic patients by skin evaluation we had 15 (34.1%) positive skin prick test, and 29 (65.9%) positive intradermal testing. Among patients with positive skin testing, 47.7% were positive to major determinant benzylpenicilloyl poly-L-lysine, 20.4% to minor determinant mixture, 50.0% to penicillin G and 40.9% to ampicillin; 13.6% of patients were positive to amoxicillin by skin prick test. One patient had a positive radioallergosorbent test and one had a positive challenge test. CONCLUSION: Penicillin allergy is a common problem with an incidence of about one third in our study subjects.


Assuntos
Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Amoxicilina , Ampicilina , Demografia , Diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas , Hipersensibilidade , Técnicas In Vitro , Incidência , Testes Intradérmicos , Kuweit , Penicilina G , Penicilinas , Teste de Radioalergoadsorção , Pele , Testes Cutâneos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa