RESUMO
To provide a rational method for the timely evaluation of possible reproductive/developmental toxicants, a prioritization scheme was developed by the California Department of Health Services to select chemicals for consideration by the Proposition 65 Scientific Advisory Panel. Initially, four ascertainment methods were used to identify and construct a master list of 164 candidate agents. Using two criteria, the potential for human exposure and the perceived reproductive/developmental hazard as judged by an ad hoc committee of experts, 42 candidates from the master list were identified as priority agents. For practical purposes, the 15 priority agents with the highest rankings will be given the highest priority in the review process. Limitations in the prioritization method used and refinements to be incorporated in an annual update are described.