Endometrial cancer with a POLE mutation progresses frequently through the type I pathway despite its high-grade endometrioid morphology: a cohort study at a single institution in Japan.

POLE-mutated endometrial cancer (EC) frequently shows high-grade endometrioid histology, which represents heterogeneity in the dualistic classification of EC. This study aimed to assess the clinicopathology and pathogenesis of POLE-mutated EC due to the scarcity of related information for Asian women. POLE variants were sequenced in tissues of Japanese women with EC. The tumor mutation burden (TMB) was assessed in tissues with a POLE variant of unknown significance. In the POLE-mutated EC tissues, the immunostaining expression of CD8, hormonal receptors, and p53 was evaluated, and the POLE variants in cancer and atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) lesions were assessed by laser-capture microdissection. POLE variants were identified in five patients (3.9%) with high-grade endometrioid carcinoma among 127 patients with EC (S459F in two tissues and P441P in three tissues with a high TMB). The five cancer tissues coexisted with normal endometrium and/or AEH. Both AEH and cancer cells showed hormonal receptor positivity and harbored the same POLE mutation. Two patients showed a subclonal overexpression pattern of p53 in cancer and AEH lesions. In conclusion, POLE-mutated EC progresses through the type I pathway, even though it frequently shows high-grade endometrioid morphology. The common POLE mutation sites in EC might vary among races.

Serum Prolactin Contributes to Enhancing Prolactin Receptor and pJAK2 in Type I Endometrial Cancer Cells in Young Women Without Insulin Resistance.

Elevated levels of serum prolactin and a high expression of prolactin receptor (PRLR) in cancer cells was recently identified in patients with endometrial cancer (EC). However, the impact of prolactin on EC remains unknown. The aim of this study was to elucidate the clinical and immunohistochemical characteristics of hyperprolactinemic patients with EC according to the pathogenetic types, type I and type II. EC patients were retrospectively divided into a high prolactin (HP) group and a low prolactin (LP) group by a serum prolactin level of 20 ng/mL and were compared between 2 groups. The expression of PRLR, phosphorylated Janus-kinase 2 (pJAK2), estrogen receptor-α, progesterone receptor, and PTEN in cancer tissue were evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Ninety-nine patients were identified. In the type I group, HP group was significantly younger (45.2 vs. 52.2, P=0.028) and their insulin resistance was significantly lower (1.6 vs. 2.5, P=0.033) than those in LP group, and the expression of PRLR and pJAK2 in the HP group was significantly higher than that in the LP group (immunoreactive score: 6.8 vs. 3.9, P=0.003; 5.7 vs. 2.6, P<0.001, respectively). In the type 2 group, there were no differences between all the term. In the type I group, the rate of loss of PTEN in the HP group was significantly lower than the LP group (25.0% vs. 60.7%, P=0.024). Prolactin-PRLR signaling may play a crucial role for the progression of type I EC without involving the PTEN mutation in young hyperprolactinemic women without insulin resistance.

Administration of Cabergoline Contributes to Preserving Fertility in Young Hyperprolactinemic Patients With Endometrial Cancer Treated With Medroxyprogesterone Acetate.

BACKGROUND: An association between high levels of serum prolactin and endometrial cancer (EC) has been reported. However, the effect of antiprolactin drugs on hyperprolactinemic patients with EC has not been determined. The aim of this study was to confirm the effect of cabergoline on young hyperprolactinemic patients treated with medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) for the preservation of fertility. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted to identify patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia or early-stage EC aged 40 years or younger who were treated with oral MPA in Kumamoto University Hospital between 1998 and 2016. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were identified and divided into two groups of 17 patients each, including a nonadministration of cabergoline group (noncabergoline group) and an administration of cabergoline group (cabergoline group). The ratio of pathological diagnoses of EC in the noncabergoline group was significantly lower than that in the cabergoline group (29.4% vs 70.6%, P = 0.016). The mean serum prolactin levels showed a significant decrease after the administration of cabergoline in the cabergoline group (25.2 [24.0] vs 5.2 [4.2] ng/mL, P = 0.003), and this decreased level was also significantly lower than that in the noncabergoline group (5.2 [4.2] vs 12.0 [5.0] ng/mL, P < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis conducted for 150 months revealed that the estimated mean period until hysterectomy in the noncabergoline group was significantly shorter than that in the cabergoline group (83.5 vs 140.8 months, P = 0.007). Significant differences were observed in EC but not atypical endometrial hyperplasia based on histological classification (25.6 vs 138.0 months, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The administration of cabergoline may contribute to preserving fertility in young hyperprolactinemic patients with EC who were treated with MPA.