In vitro resistance to fracture of roots obturated with Resilon or gutta-percha.

INTRODUCTION: There have been varied results from studies comparing postendodontic fracture resistance between teeth obturated with Resilon or gutta-percha. This study was performed to evaluate the fracture resistance of roots obturated by using Resilon (RealSeal system) or gutta-percha (with AH Plus sealer). METHODS: Eighty extracted human mandibular single-rooted premolars stored in 10% formalin were used in the study. They were prepared by using a crown-down technique, debrided with NaOCl, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, and sterile water and divided into 4 groups. Obturation was performed by using the lateral condensation method. The negative control group consisted of unfilled specimens, and the positive control group consisted of those obturated with flowable, dual-cure composite resin. All root specimens were stored for 2 weeks in 100% humidity to allow complete setting of the sealer. Each specimen was mounted in acrylic in a polyvinyl ring and tested for fracture resistance with the Universal testing machine. The loading fixture of the machine was mounted with its spherical tip aligned with the center of the canal opening of each root. A vertical loading force was applied until it fractured the root. The force values were subjected to statistical analysis including analysis of variance and Fisher least significant difference testing. RESULTS: Teeth obturated with Resilon were more resistant to fracture than those obturated with gutta-percha. The difference was found to be highly significant (P=.00001). CONCLUSIONS: Resilon increased the resistance to fracture of single-rooted teeth in vitro.

In vitro study comparing fracture strength recovery of teeth restored with three esthetic bonding materials using different techniques.

Reattachment of the fractured fragment of a traumatized tooth (whenever available and usable) has become the treatment of choice in cases of uncomplicated crown fractures. Despite the presence of various bonding materials and techniques, laboratory data evaluating the biomechanical aspects of such procedures is largely lacking in the literature. The objective of this in vitro study was to evaluate the fracture strength recovery of incisors, following fragment restoration with three different techniques. A total of 90 extracted human maxillary central incisors were subjected to crown fractured under standard conditions. This was carried out by applying a compressive force from the buccal aspect of the clinical crown using a universal strength testing machine. The fractured teeth were equality distributed in three groups, defined on the basis of the technique used for reattachment: i) overcontour, ii) internal dentinal groove and iii) direct buildup. Each group was further subdivided into three subgroups on the basis of the intermediate restorative material used for reattachment, namely: i) hybrid composite (Filtek Z100 Universal Restorative, ii) nanocomposite (Filtek Z350) and iii) Ormocer (Voco Admira). Following reattachment, the crowns were re-fractured under standard conditions. The force required for fracture was recorded and was expressed as a percentage of the fracture strength of the intact tooth. The data was expressed as a percentage of the fracture strength of the intact tooth. The data was analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni tests for pair-wise comparison. The results showed no statistically significant differences in fractures strength between the three groups (P > 0.05). However, comparison of the subgroups revealed statistically significant higher strength recovery percentages for the hybrid and the nanocomposite compared with the Ormocer material (P < 0.05). It was concluded that material properties have a significant influence on the success of reattachment procedures.