Mechanisms of late stent malapposition after primary stenting in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a subanalysis of the selection trial.

BACKGROUND: One of the major predictors of late stent malapposition (LSM) is primary stenting in acute myocardial infarction. However, mechanisms of LSM are still under debate. METHODS: Patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and enrolled in the SELECTION trial (38 patients in the paclitaxel-eluting stent, PES, and 35 in the bare metal stent, BMS, cohort) were retrospectively analyzed to evaluate LSM, by means of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) data recorded at the index and 7-month follow-up procedures. RESULTS: Stent malapposition was documented in 21 lesions in 21 patients (28.8%): in 8 of these 21 patients (38.1%) it was LSM. Although statistical significance was not reached, LSM was more frequent after PES than BMS implantation (15.8% vs. 5.7%). LSM was mainly located within the body of the stent (62.5% of the cases). At the LSM segment, a significant increase of vessel area (19.2 +/- 3.3 mm(2) vs. 21.9 +/- 5.3 mm(2), P = 0.04) and a reduction of plaque area (12.6 +/- 4.6 mm(2) vs. 9.1 +/- 3.9 mm(2), P = 0.04) were observed at IVUS between the index and follow-up procedure. CONCLUSIONS: After primary stenting for STEMI, LSM seems to be more frequent after PES rather than BMS implantation. In the STEMI setting, possible mechanisms leading to LSM include positive remodeling and plaque mass decrease.

[Arterial hypertension and RU-486: a complex case of secondary hypertension]. / Dall'ipertensione alla pillola RU-486: un complesso caso di ipertensione secondaria.

Secondary hypertension accounts for 10-15% of all cases of hypertension, and early diagnosis with identification of its etiology can be challenging. In this scenario, therapeutic management of affected patients may be difficult. Hypercortisolism is one of the possible causes of secondary hypertension, but its low prevalence and atypical clinical symptoms can lead to a delayed diagnosis. The complex clinical presentation and potential complications need a close collaboration among different clinicians in order to plan optimal or new treatment protocols.

[Prevalence and subtypes of systemic hypertension in an unselected patient population with severe obesity undergoing bariatric surgery]. / Prevalenza e tipologie di ipertensione arteriosa in una popolazione di pazienti non selezionati affetti da obesità morbigena in previsione di intervento di chirurgia bariatrica.

BACKGROUND: Obesity plays a pivotal role in the development of systemic hypertension and the two diseases are often related. Severe obesity is getting more and more prevalent in our country. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of systemic hypertension in an unselected population of obese patients observed in the Regional Referral Center for Surgical Obesity of our hospital. METHODS: 233 consecutive patients (52 male, 181 female, mean age 42 years, mean weight 120 kg, mean body mass index [BMI] 43.7 kg/m2) were screened in order to plan a surgical procedure for severe obesity. Each patient underwent cardiovascular clinical evaluation, ECG and echocardiographic examination, blood pressure ambulatory monitoring, and 24h Holter monitoring. RESULTS: Thirty-five percent of patients were under drug treatment for hypertension or were at least aware of being hypertensive; among the remaining 65% of patients who declared having normal blood pressure, 33% suffered from systemic hypertension, 11% had isolated clinical hypertension, and 14% had masked hypertension. Thus, the global prevalence of systemic hypertension in this population raised to 72.5%. ECG and echocardiographic findings were normal in about 90% of the whole population, whereas 24h Holter monitoring showed minor or major abnormalities in approximately 25% of patients. At a follow-up of at least 18 months, a subgroup of 48 patients showed a decrease in body weight from 129 to 92 kg, BMI from 47 to 33 kg/m 2, blood pressure from 134.4/86.4 to 127.7/81.1 mmHg, and heart rate from 79.7 to 69.4 bpm. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of systemic hypertension in an unselected population of severely obese patients is much higher than in the general population. The surgical procedures performed in the Regional Referral Center for Surgical Obesity of our hospital were virtually free from serious adverse events and proved to be effective in reducing not only body weight and BMI but also blood pressure. We believe that ambulatory blood pressure and 24h Holter monitoring are the most relevant examinations to be performed in these patients in the preoperative period.