Predictors of Breastfeeding among Patients Admitted with Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe rates of breastmilk feeding (BF) at hospital discharge and 6 weeks postpartum and to identify risk factors for noninitiation or cessation among pregnancies complicated by preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of pregnant persons with PPROM admitted to a single tertiary center (2013-2019). Patients with deliveries complicated by intrauterine or neonatal demise or with incomplete BF data were excluded. Demographic, antepartum, and delivery characteristics were evaluated. Primary analysis identified rate of BF initiation at maternal discharge and factors associated with noninitiation. Secondary analysis evaluated BF continuation and factors associated with cessation at 6 weeks postpartum. Bivariate statistics were used to compare characteristics and logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aOR). RESULTS: Of 397 patients with PPROM, 342(86%) initiated BF prior to discharge. Those reporting tobacco use in pregnancy were less likely to initiate BF (aOR: 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.16, 0.64). In contrast, private insurance (aOR: 2.53; 95% CI: 1.19, 5.37) and pregnancy latency ≥ 14 days (aOR: 3.02; 95% CI: 1.09, 8.38) were associated with BF initiation at hospital discharge. Of the 293 patients with postpartum follow-up, only 214 (73%) had BF continuation at 6 weeks postpartum. Maternal age <20 years (aOR: 0.07; 95% CI: 0.01, 0.68) and multiparity (aOR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.29, 0.99) were associated with BF cessation. Patients with private insurance were observed to have increased odds of BF continuation (aOR: 2.10; 95% CI: 1.07, 4.12). CONCLUSION: Among patients with PPROM, tobacco use may be associated with noninitiation of BF prior to discharge, whereas age < 20 years and multiparity were associated with cessation by 6 weeks postpartum. Longer pregnancy latency ≥ 14 days was associated with BF initiation prior to discharge. Private insurance was associated with increased rates of BF initiation and continuation postpartum. BF education and support should be offered to all patients admitted for PPROM. KEY POINTS: · Tobacco use may be associated with BF noninitiation.. · Young age and multiparity are linked with BF cessation.. · Private insurance resulted in BF initiation and continuation..

Impact of in vitro fertilization state mandates for third party insurance coverage in the United States: a review and critical assessment.

The American Society for Reproductive Medicine estimates that fewer than a quarter of infertile couples have sufficient access to infertility care. Insurers in the United States (US) have long considered infertility to be a socially constructed condition, and thus in-vitro fertilization (IVF) an elective intervention. As a result, IVF is cost prohibitive for many patients in the US. State infertility insurance mandates are a crucial mechanism for expanding access to fertility care in the US in the absence of federal legislation. The first state insurance mandate for third party coverage of infertility services was passed by West Virginia in 1977, and Maryland passed the country's first IVF mandate in 1985. To date, twenty states have passed legislation requiring insurers to cover or offer coverage for the diagnosis and treatment of infertility. Ten states currently have "comprehensive" IVF mandates, meaning they require third party coverage for IVF with minimal restrictions to patient eligibility, exemptions, and lifetime limits. Several studies analyzing the impact of infertility and IVF mandates have been published in the past 20 years. In this review, we characterize and contextualize the existing evidence of the impact of state insurance mandates on access to infertility treatment, IVF practice patterns, and reproductive outcomes. Furthermore, we summarize the arguments in favor of insurance coverage for infertility care and assess the limitations of state insurance mandates as a strategy for increasing access to infertility treatment. State mandates play a key role in the promotion of evidence-based practices and represent an essential and impactful strategy for the advancement of gender equality and reproductive rights.

The Problems with Crisis Pregnancy Centers: Reviewing the Literature and Identifying New Directions for Future Research.

Crisis pregnancy centers (CPCs) are nonprofit organizations that present themselves as healthcare clinics while providing counseling explicitly intended to discourage and limit access to abortion. These facilities engage in purposefully manipulative and deceptive practices that spread misinformation on sexual health and abortion. CPCs have also been shown to delay access to medically legitimate prenatal and abortion care, which negatively impacts maternal health. Along with increasing anti-abortion legislation, the proliferation of CPCs paired with the closure of abortion clinics exacerbates the ongoing harmful impact these centers have on the reproductive healthcare landscape; however, despite their growing influence, there is still limited research on patients' understanding of and experiences with CPCs. This article provides a review of academic literature on CPCs and suggests future directions for research. Ongoing scholarship may aid in improving patient awareness and education regarding CPCs, an important step toward protecting reproductive autonomy.

Reproductive Considerations for the LGBTQ+ Community.

When working with LGBTQ+ patients who want to build families, primary care providers play a key role in increasing access to reproductive health care. There is growing demand for assisted reproductive services among LGBTQ+ individuals who do not already have their own children or do not wish to adopt. Fertility-preservation options are available for transgender patients; however, many of these treatments are inaccessible to patients because of lack of insurance coverage and high cost. Legal options for LGBTQ+ patients' reproduction vary by state. Knowledge of the laws and regulations in your own state of practice is necessary to manage expectations.