The Relationship Between Perceptions of Emergency Preparedness, Disaster Experience, Health-Care Provider Education, and Emergency Preparedness Levels.

Objective The purpose of this study was to assess the self-reported level of individual emergency preparedness, the dependent variable, of people who attended a community health-related fair. The study's independent variables included demographic characteristics, perceptions of preparedness, previous disaster experience, and the presence of a medical condition and were used to examine the variability in self-reported emergency preparedness levels. Methods Data came from attendees at two community health-related fairs. Multivariate analysis on 188 participants was performed. A model predicting preparedness levels with demographic variables was constructed; successive models were built adding perceptions of preparedness, personal experiences with disasters, and presence of a medical condition. Results Preparedness levels varied little across sociodemographic dimensions explaining virtually no variance in overall preparedness. Subsequent models adding perceptions of preparedness and personal experiences significantly increased the explained variance to 40%. Of participants who reported a medical condition, the model including discussions about emergency preparedness with health-care providers explained 67% of the variance in overall preparedness levels. Conclusion The strong, positive relationship between the health-care provider and preparedness levels indicates a pathway for effecting change in preparedness levels and ultimately community health after an emergency. The inclusion of such education at community events should be considered. Research agendas should include providing evidence for the contents of disaster supply kits.

Evaluating the Effectiveness of the How to Talk to Your Doctor HANDbook Program.

BACKGROUND: Millions of Americans have low health literacy, potentially leading to a number of issues including medication errors, hospital admissions, unnecessary emergency department visits, skipped screenings and shots, and misinterpretation of treatment plans. People with low health literacy have less knowledge of illness management, less ability to share in decision-making, and poorer self-reported health status. Addressing health literacy is necessary to improve health care quality, reduce costs, and reduce disparities. OBJECTIVE: The How to Talk to Your Doctor (HTTTYD) HANDbook Program addresses health literacy among rural participants who have low incomes, with a focus on improving health communication among populations that are medically vulnerable by using the HANDbook tool. METHODS: Participants were recruited from 55 rural counties by county extension agents (CEA) to participate in the 1-hour HTTTYD session. Pre- and post-test surveys were completed. A subset of the sample completed a 3-month follow-up survey. KEY RESULTS: Of the 548 participants who fully completed the survey, a Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test was performed on 484 of the participants who completed both the pre- and post-test. A statistically significant median increase in overall confidence among the participants from pre- (M = 15.99) to post-test (M = 17.76), (z = 13.454, p = .000), was noted. A subset of 166 participants also completed the 3-month follow-up survey. A significant increase in health literacy after participation in the HTTTYD HANDbook program from pre-test to 3-month follow-up was noted; effect sizes ranged from moderate to large. CONCLUSION: The HTTTYD HANDbook program meets recommendations for successful health literacy programs; significant positive outcomes demonstrate program effectiveness. HTTTYD HANDbook program delivery in rural communities by CEAs demonstrates access to understudied and often difficult-to-reach populations. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2019;3(2):e103-e109.]. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: The How to Talk to Your Doctor HANDbook program delivered by county extension agents in rural communities showed capacity to access understudied and often difficult-to-reach populations. The significant, sustained improvement in health literacy noted among program participants demonstrated program effectiveness among those with low health literacy.

Development and Implementation of the How to Talk to Your Doctor HANDbook Health Literacy Program in Rural Counties.

BACKGROUND: Improvements in health literacy are unlikely without intervention in community settings. However, interventions appropriate for delivery in these settings are lacking, limiting reach to rural adults who are disproportionately affected by low health literacy and poor health outcomes. The How to Talk to Your Doctor (HTTTYD) HANDbook Program was developed through a research-practice partnership to educate rural residents to effectively advocate and participate in their own health care. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY: We describe development of the HTTTYD HANDbook Program delivered through the Cooperative Extension Service to educate adults who are eligible for Medicaid and have low health literacy. HTTTYD HANDbook implementation is described using the RE-AIM (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance) framework (and specifically the reach, adoption, implementation, and maintenance dimensions). IMPLEMENTATION: The HTTTYD HANDbook was developed using health literacy best practices with user-centered design, and it was field tested with community members with varying levels of health literacy. Reach, adoption, implementation, and maintenance of the HTTTYD HANDbook were assessed by tracking distribution of HTTTYD HANDbook Program materials, return submission of evaluation and tracking instruments, adherence to program and data collection/submission protocols, and program continuation. RESULTS: Overall reach into the population was 6 per 10,000; about 25% were Medicaid recipients and 28.2% had low health literacy. Most participants were age 65 years or older. Of the 72 counties with program access, 52.7% requested HTTTYD HANDbook Program materials; 31% adopted the program, but only 30% of these counties adhered to program implementation and data collection protocols. Reach and adoption were higher among rural counties, and rural counties were more likely than nonrural counties to maintain the HTTTYD HANDbook Program. LESSONS LEARNED: The HTTTYD HANDbook Program addresses barriers to engagement in patient-provider communication for rural, low-income community members. Programs can be implemented in community settings through established local organizations, such as county extension offices, to increase access for rural adults. Implementation barriers included staff turnover and transportation of program materials. Online facilitator training availability had little impact on adherence to program protocols. Organizational context and established procedures for program delivery and evaluation should be considered in adoption decisions and integrated into implementation protocols. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2019;3(3):e205-e215.]. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: The How to Talk to Your Doctor HANDbook Program was created with people from the community to help patients prepare for doctor visits. The How to Talk to Your Doctor HANDbook Program helps patients to overcome barriers to talking to their doctor so that they can better understand how to get healthy and stay healthy.

Stories after disaster survival: Preparing, heeding warnings, and self-reliance.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to examine the content of stories told by people personally impacted by disasters. DESIGN: Semistructured, qualitative interviews. SETTING: Northwest part of a mid-south state. PARTICIPANTS: Fourteen disaster survivors who were recruited through their attendance at an emergency preparedness-related fair. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Interview schedule based on previous research using the family resilience framework. RESULTS: Three themes emerged: prior emergency preparation, heeding warnings of impending disaster, and rural self-reliance. CONCLUSIONS: Participants had made prior emergency preparedness plans, but their personal experiences led to them adjusting their plans, or making more relevant plans for future disasters. Participants expressed the importance of sharing their experiences with family and community members, expressing hope that others would learn, vicariously rather than first-hand, from their experiences.

Emergency Preparedness of Persons Over 50 Years Old: Further Results From the Health and Retirement Study.

OBJECTIVE: This article conceptualized emergency preparedness as a complex, multidimensional construct and empirically examined an array of sociodemographic, motivation, and barrier variables as predictors of levels of emergency preparedness. METHODS: The authors used the 2010 wave of the Health and Retirement Study's emergency preparedness module to focus on persons 50 years old and older in the United States by use of logistic regression models and reconsidered a previous analysis. RESULTS: The models demonstrated 3 key findings: (1) a lack of preparedness is widespread across virtually all sociodemographic variables and regions of the country; (2) an authoritative voice, in the role of health care personnel, was a strong predictor of preparedness; and (3) previous experience in helping others in a disaster predisposes individuals to be better prepared. Analyses also suggest the need for caution in creating simple summative indexes and the need for further research into appropriate measures of preparedness. CONCLUSION: This population of older persons was generally not well prepared for emergencies, and this lack of preparedness was widespread across social, demographic, and economic groups in the United States. Findings with implications for policy and outreach include the importance of health care providers discussing preparedness and the use of experienced peers for outreach. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2017;11:80-89).

Attenuation of racial differences in health service utilization patterns for previously uninsured children in the Delta.

CONTEXT: A school-based health insurance program for children of the working poor was conducted in 2 isolated, rural communities in the Lower Mississippi Delta region. The larger of the 2 communities had an array of locally available health care providers, whereas the smaller community did not. In response to this lack of available care, the project designed and delivered outreach programs, including transportation to providers. PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to examine the role of race, age, and gender in the relationships between the utilization of care and the impact of outreach programs. METHOD: General estimating equation models are used to examine the response of utilization variables to race, age, gender, and community. Four years of insurance claims data are analyzed. FINDINGS: Race is seen to be an important component of utilization. The majority of participants were African American; however, children receiving prescription services, emergency room care, routine physician visits, and hospital outpatient services were more likely to be white. Outreach programs in vision and dental services were found to eliminate racial differences and increase utilization. A relatively strong gender effect was found in prescription, wellness, vision, and dental services. CONCLUSIONS: Previous research has shown differences by race in utilization of care. Our findings show that targeted outreach programs can significantly diminish these differences. Findings also suggest that barriers to health care for poor rural children are closely linked to transportation and availability of providers, not merely to cost of care or insurance.