Young Collision Athletes Have High Rate of Return to Play and Good Clinical Outcomes Following Open Latarjet Procedure.

PURPOSE: To evaluate return to play (RTP), clinical outcomes, and recurrence rates in collision athletes 20 years of age and younger who underwent open Latarjet for anterior shoulder instability. METHODS: A retrospective review of collision athletes 20 years of age and younger, who underwent an open Latarjet procedure by a single surgeon between the years of 2010-2020 was carried out. Inclusion criteria were 1) collision athlete, 2) underwent open Latarjet procedure, 3) 16-20 years old, and 4) minimum 24-month follow-up. Exclusion criteria were 1) other pathology of the ipsilateral shoulder and 2) noncollision athlete. Rate of RTP, time to RTP, rate of return to preinjury level, the Shoulder Instability Return to Sport after Injury score (SIRSI) score, Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, and recurrence events were recorded. Quantitative statistical analysis was carried out. RESULTS: The study included 105 male collision athletes with a mean age of 18.6 ± 1.0 years (range: 17-20). The mean follow-up for patients was 36 ± 26.2 months. A total of 93 (88.6%) RTP at a mean time of 6.3 ± 2.2 months, with 73 (69.5%) returning to their preinjury level of participation. The mean SIRSI score was 69.2 ± 21.8, the mean VAS score was 2.3 ± 2.1, and the mean SSV score was 84.1 ± 16.8. Five patients (4.8%) redislocated their shoulder, with 4 of these requiring a further surgery (3.8%). Two patients (1.9%) reported incidents of subluxation. CONCLUSIONS: The open Latarjet procedure in young collision athletes results in high rates of RTP, excellent functional outcomes and low recurrence rates at mid-term follow-up. Additionally, complication rates are low in this cohort. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

Type V superior labral anterior-posterior tears results in lower rates of return to play.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the rate of return to play (RTP) in patients who underwent Type V superior labrum anterior-posterior (SLAP) repair compared to patients who underwent isolated Bankart repair in the setting of traumatic anterior shoulder instability. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair and SLAP repair by a single surgeon between 2012 and 2017 was performed. Additionally, these were pair-matched in a 1:2 ratio for age, sex, sport and level of pre-operative play, with those undergoing isolated arthroscopic Bankart repair alone as a control group. RTP, level of RTP and the timing of RTP were assessed. RESULTS: The study included a total of 96 patients, with 32 in the study group and 64 in the control group, and a mean follow-up of 59 months. Overall, there was no significant difference in the overall rate of return to play (26/32 (81.3%) vs 56/64 (87.5%), n.s), but there was a significantly higher rate of RTP at the same/higher level in the control group (14/32 (43.6%) vs 43/64 (67.2%), p = 0.0463). There was no significant difference in timing of RTP between the groups (n.s). There was no significant difference in recurrent instability (6/32 (18.8%) vs 5/64 (7.8%), n.s) but there was a significant difference in revision rates (5/32 (15.6%) vs. 2/64 (3.1%), p = 0.0392) between the Type V SLAP repair group and the control group. CONCLUSION: Following arthroscopic repair, patients with Type V SLAP tears had a similar overall rate of RTP when compared directly to a control group of patients who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair alone. However, those who underwent Type V SLAP repair reported significantly lower rates of RTP at the same or higher level compared to the control group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Outcomes following arthroscopic Bankart repair in female patients.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate clinical outcomes and recurrence among women who have undergone an arthroscopic Bankart repair for recurrent anterior shoulder instability. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with anterior shoulder instability that have undergone an arthroscopic Bankart repair between 2012-2017 was performed. Patients were followed up to assess their visual analog scale (VAS) score, Rowe score, Shoulder Instability-Return to Sport after Injury (SIRSI), and the Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) and their satisfaction level. Whether they were able to return to sport, the timing of return, and the level to which they returned were reported. RESULTS: Our study included 31 female patients (34 shoulders), with a mean follow-up of 51.9 months. Overall, 82.4% (28/34 shoulders) were satisfied/very satisfied with their surgery. The mean scores were as follows: Rowe, 79.2; SIRSI, 53.9; SSV, 81.9; and VAS, 1.9. Of the 29 patients (32 shoulders) who played sport prior to surgery, 24 returned to play and 17 returned to the same or higher level. One patient suffered a recurrent dislocation and 2 patients suffered recurrent subluxation. No patients underwent a revision procedure. CONCLUSION: Female patients with anterior shoulder instability treated with arthroscopic Bankart repair have low recurrence rates, with good patient-reported outcomes and high satisfaction rates. Of those participating in sport prior to surgery, there was a high rate of return to play. The overall rate of complications was low, with a low rate of revision surgery.

Posterior Shoulder Instability but Not Anterior Shoulder Instability Is Related to Glenoid Version.

Purpose: To assess and compare glenoid version in patients with anterior shoulder instability (ASI), posterior shoulder instability (PSI), and a control group. Methods: The operative notes of all patients that had undergone arthroscopic shoulder instability repair between January 2017 and May 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Magnetic resonance imaging scans were then analyzed, and glenoid version was measured by a single blinded observer. A P value <.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: There were 100 patients included in the ASI group, 65 in PSI group, and 100 in the control group. The mean glenoid versions for the ASI group were -16°, -9.1°, and -9.2° for the vault version, simplified vault version, and chondrolabral version, respectively. The mean glenoid versions for the PSI group were -21°, -13.4°, and -16.6° for the vault version, simplified vault version, and chondrolabral version, respectively. The mean versions for the control group were -17.8°, -9.5°, and -9.8° for the vault version, simplified vault version and chondrolabral version, respectively. ANOVA testing and post hoc comparisons revealed the PSI group to be significantly more retroverted than both other groups P < .001. The ASI group's degree of glenoid version was not significantly different to that of the control P = .009. Conclusion: Patients with PSI have a higher degree of retroversion in comparison to those with ASI and control. There is no significant difference in glenoid version among patients with ASI when compared with control. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Return to play in paediatric & adolescent patients following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: There is an increased risk of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture and subsequent ACL reconstruction in patients <18 years old due to their high levels of sporting participation. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the rate and timing of return to play (RTP) in paediatric and adolescent patients following ACL reconstruction, and to compare the outcomes between those undergoing ACL reconstruction with bone patella tendon bone autograft (BTB) and hamstring tendon (HT) autograft. STUDY DESIGN: Level of Evidence: Level III; Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study. METHODS: The institutional ACL registry was screened for patients <18 that had undergone a primary ACL reconstruction. Outcomes were analysed for patients undergoing either a BTB or HT autograft for rate and timing of return to play, functional outcomes and subsequent knee injuries. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS. RESULTS: 358 (BTB; 253, HT; 105) patients were followed up for 24-months (95% follow up). 86 athletes (27 BTB; 59 HT) were aged 13-15 years old with no significant difference in RTP rate or timing between graft types, however, there was a difference in ipsilateral re-ruptures (10.2% HT vs 0% BTB p = 0.03). 272 athletes (226 BTB; 46 HT) were aged 16-18 years old with no significant difference in RTP rate or timing between graft types, or ipsilateral re-ruptures (8.7% HT vs 2.7% BTB p = 0.07). Concurrent ligament, meniscal or chondral injuries found at the time was treated as necessary. CONCLUSION: Paediatric and adolescent patients undergoing ACL reconstruction with either BTB or HT had high rates of return to play. This was seen in both subgroups with 13-15-year-olds mostly receiving a HT graft repair and 16-18-year-olds mainly receiving a BTB repair. A moderate re-rupture rate was seen at 24-months. However longer follow up is needed to truly see the long-term impact of such an injury at such a young age.

Today's sterilizer is not your father's water heater.

Today's sterilizers are sophisticated, automatic, and computerized devices that accurately execute programmed jobs, creating uniform conditions inside pressure vessels to achieve sterilization. Specialized knowledge is necessary to ensure that the right cycle is selected; this requires an educated and competent operator.Perioperative nurses need to understand regulatory requirements for sterilizers, sterilizer design and performance validation, sterilizer cycle functions for everyday use, and everyday sterilization procedures.

Community service by North Carolina family physicians.

BACKGROUND: Community service is an integral part of American society. Although Family Medicine advocates community service through community medicine, few data exist on family physicians' involvement in voluntary community service activities or roles as community advocates. METHODS: A questionnaire was mailed to 489 North Carolina family physicians, including a 20% random sample of those in community practice and all statewide faculty physicians. The survey assessed types and amount of volunteer activity, attitudes toward volunteer work, and factors that support or inhibit participation in community service. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 54%. Most respondents reported strong interests in community service before medical school and residency, yet few reported any relevant training during medical education. More than 85% of faculty and community practice family physicians reported participating in volunteer service in the previous year (70.8 mean hours for faculty vs 45.5 mean hours for community practice; P = .06). Family physicians also reported a wide variety of lifetime volunteer activities (mean number of different faculty physician activities 20.8 vs mean number of different community practice physician activities 16.7, P = .00). Less than 50% of both physician groups reported that their practice or program publicly supports those performing community service. CONCLUSIONS: The great majority of family physicians in North Carolina regularly participate in one or more volunteer community service activities, frequently without organizational recognition. Data about the scope of service expected by communities and provided by physicians may assist the discipline in clarifying the place of volunteer community service in medical education, promotion guidelines and practice.