RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Children with aerodigestive dysfunction often undergo triple endoscopy (flexible bronchoscopy, rigid direct laryngoscopy and bronchoscopy, and esophagogastroduodenoscopy) for diagnostic evaluation as well as screening prior to airway reconstruction. Prevalence and risk factors for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) in this population are poorly understood. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed for pediatric patients, aged 0-21 years, who received a triple endoscopy with biopsy from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2019, at the Children's Hospital at Montefiore (CHAM). Bivariate and multivariable analyses were used to compare the baseline characteristics between patients with and without EoE to assess for potential predictors of EoE. RESULTS: Of the 119 cases included in the analysis, 16.0 % (19) received a histopathologic diagnosis of EoE following triple endoscopy. Patients with EoE were more likely to have a family history of eczema (p = 0.02) and a dairy-free diet (p = 0.02). Age, sex, history of environmental allergies, and recency of initiating oral diet were not significantly associated with increased odds of an EoE diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: A family history of eczema and a diet lacking allergenic foods, such as milk, may be associated with an increased risk of a future diagnosis of EoE in patients with aerodigestive dysfunction. Larger, multi-institutional studies are needed to identify early predictors of EoE.
Assuntos
Eczema , Esofagite Eosinofílica , Humanos , Criança , Esofagite Eosinofílica/diagnóstico , Esofagite Eosinofílica/epidemiologia , Esofagite Eosinofílica/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Atenção Terciária à Saúde , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal , Eczema/complicaçõesRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To examine the effect of proposed the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fifth Edition (DSM-5) changes to pathological gambling relative to DSM-IV criteria in a large gambling helpline sample (N = 2,750). Changes in prevalence rates, the diagnostic utility of the illegal acts criterion, and severity of alternative diagnostic formulation thresholds were examined. METHOD: Callers to the helpline completed a semistructured interview and DSM-IV criteria were assessed. RESULTS: Without lowering the diagnostic threshold, removal of the illegal acts criterion resulted in loss of diagnostic status in less than 2% of helpline callers. The DSM-IV prevalence rate in this sample was 81.2%, and DSM-5 formulations with lowered thresholds of 4, 3, and 2 symptoms increased prevalence rates by 9% to 17%. However, item-level symptom endorsement suggested that subclinical gamblers experience significant adverse consequences. CONCLUSIONS: Lowered thresholds may lead to earlier provision of treatment to gamblers and prevent escalation of the disorder, while being more consistent with diagnostic thresholds of other addiction disorders.
Assuntos
Sintomas Comportamentais/diagnóstico , Manual Diagnóstico e Estatístico de Transtornos Mentais , Jogo de Azar/diagnóstico , Adulto , Idoso , Sintomas Comportamentais/classificação , Sintomas Comportamentais/epidemiologia , Feminino , Jogo de Azar/classificação , Jogo de Azar/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Consulta Remota/estatística & dados numéricos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Telefone/estatística & dados numéricos , West Virginia/epidemiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Objectives: The Cornell Research-to-Practice (RTP) Consensus Workshop Model is a strategy for bridging the gap between aging research and practice but lacks a technique for evaluating the relative importance of ideas. This project assessed the feasibility of adding a quantitative survey to the RTP model to address this gap. Method: Older adults with cancer (OACs), OAC caregivers, researchers, clinicians, and advocacy organization representatives participated in a RTP workshop on implementing psychological interventions for OACs. Following an in-person workshop, participants completed surveys assessing the relative importance of barriers and strategies for psychological intervention implementation. Results: Seventeen of 35 participants completed the survey, the majority of which were likely clinicians. Barriers and strategies to implementation rated as having the greatest impact were associated with the care team and institutional factors. Conclusion: Quantitative ratings add novel information to the RTP model that could potentially enhance the model's impact on aging research and practice.
Assuntos
Envelhecimento , Neoplasias/psicologia , Idoso , Consenso , Geriatria , Humanos , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To investigate how inpatient palliative care teams nationwide currently screen for and treat psychological distress. METHODS: A web-based survey was sent to inpatient palliative care providers of all disciplines nationwide asking about their practice patterns regarding psychological assessment and treatment. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the sample and responses, and analysis of variance was conducted to determine whether certain disciplines were more likely to utilize specific treatment modalities. RESULTS: A total of N = 236 respondents were included in the final analyses. Providers reported that they encounter psychological distress regularly in their practice and that they screen for distress using multiple methods. When psychological distress is detected, providers reported referring patients to an average of 3 different providers (standard deviation = 1.46), most frequently a social worker (69.6%) or chaplain (65.3%) on the palliative care team. A total of 84.6% of physicians and 54.5% of nurse practitioners reported that they prescribe anxiolytics or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors to patients experiencing psychological distress. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed significant variability and redundancy in how palliative care teams currently manage psychological distress. The lack of consistency potentially stems from the variability in the composition of palliative care teams across care settings and the lack of scientific evidence for best practices in psychological care in palliative care. Future research is needed to establish best practices in the screening and treatment of psychological distress for patients receiving palliative care.
Assuntos
Medicina de Família e Comunidade/normas , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Relações Profissional-Paciente , Encaminhamento e Consulta/normas , Estresse Psicológico/diagnóstico , Adulto , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estresse Psicológico/terapiaRESUMO
Gambling help-lines are an essential access point, or frontline resource, for treatment seeking. This study investigated treatment engagement after calling a gambling help-line. From 2000-2007 over 2,900 unique callers were offered an in-person assessment appointment. Logistic regression analyses assessed predictors of (a) accepting the referral to the in-person assessment appointment and (b) attending the in-person assessment appointment. Over 76% of callers accepted the referral and 55% of all callers attended the in-person assessment appointment. This treatment engagement rate is higher than typically found for other help-lines. Demographic factors and clinical factors such as gender, severity of gambling problems, amount of gambling debt, and coercion by legal and social networks predicted engagement in treatment. Programmatic factors such as offering an appointment within 72 hr also aided treatment engagement. Results suggest gambling help-lines can be a convenient and confidential way for many individuals with gambling problems to access gambling-specific treatment. Alternative services such as telephone counseling may be beneficial for those who do not engage in treatment.
Assuntos
Comportamento Aditivo/psicologia , Jogo de Azar/psicologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/psicologia , Adulto , Idoso , Comportamento Aditivo/terapia , Aconselhamento , Feminino , Jogo de Azar/terapia , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , West VirginiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Umbilical cord blood (UCB) transplantation is becoming more widely used, yet ethical and policy issues regarding consent and health history persist. Whereas most UCB banks do not require paternal consent or paternal health history (PHH), both are obtained at this institution whenever possible. This study assessed the value of PHH in making UCB safer. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all cord blood units (CBUs) collected by this bank between November 1999 and October 2000. All discarded CBUs were studied to identify those deferred based exclusively on PHH provided by the father in the PHH questionnaire. RESULTS: PHH was obtained for 301 of 655 (46%) CBUs collected. Of the 339 CBUs banked, 269 (79%) had PHH available. Three of the 301 CBUs in which PHH was available were discarded based solely on PHH, since maternal medical history and infectious disease testing were negative. Paternal high-risk factors in those three cases were: gave money or drugs for sex; traveled to an HIV high-risk area; and did not answer high-risk questions. CONCLUSION: Considerable time and effort is expended in the process and follow-up of obtaining PHH with an overall indistinct and unconvincing role in minimizing infectious disease transmission risk in UCB banking.