RESUMO
BACKGROUND AIMS: Intensified immunosuppressive prophylaxis for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) may be toxic and therefore warranted only in patients at high risk of developing GVHD. In patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant at the authors' center, high serum soluble IL-2 receptor alpha (sIL-2Rα) and low IL-15 levels on day 7 post-transplant were found to predict a high risk of developing clinically significant GVHD (sGVHD), defined as grade 2-4 acute GVHD or moderate to severe chronic GVHD. METHODS: This was a prospective, phase 2 trial in which high-risk patients (serum sIL-2Rα >4500 ng/L or IL-15 <31 ng/L) received rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) 3 mg/kg on day 8 post-transplant. Controls consisted of patients who had their sIL-2Rα/IL-15 levels measured but did not participate in the trial. A total of 68 trial patients and 143 controls were accrued to this study. The primary endpoint was incidence of sGVHD. RESULTS: There was a reduction in sGVHD in high-risk trial patients (received day 8 ATG) compared with high-risk controls (did not receive day 8 ATG) (sub-hazard ratio [SHR] = 0.48, P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the groups in overall survival or relapse; however, there was a greater incidence of non-GVHD-associated non-relapse mortality in high-risk trial patients (SHR = 3.73, P < 0.05), mostly related to infections. This may be due in part to the biomarkers ineffectively stratifying GVHD risk. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-emptive ATG therapy is both feasible and effective at reducing sGVHD without increasing relapse. Further mitigation strategies are needed to reduce the risk of infection associated with intensified GVHD prophylaxis. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01994824).
Assuntos
Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Soro Antilinfocitário , Biomarcadores , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Transplante HomólogoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Objective response rates (ORR) appear to be higher in melanoma patients who develop immune-related adverse events (irAEs), but whether there is a similar association between irAEs and survival remains unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced melanoma treated with single-agent pembrolizumab or nivolumab in the province of Alberta from June 2014 to May 2017 were identified through the provincial pharmacy database. Chart review identified and categorized all irAEs that occurred while on anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) checkpoint inhibitors. The primary objective was to compare overall survival (OS) with patients who developed any irAEs versus those who did not. Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS) and ORR. RESULTS: Among 186 patients, any-grade and grade ≥3 irAEs occurred in 88 (47%) and 27 (15%) patients, respectively; one patient died of pneumonitis. In a landmark analysis excluding patients who died within the first 12 weeks, the median follow-up was 24 months, 20 months in patients without any irAEs and 26 months in patients with irAEs (p = .006). Median OS was 39 versus 23 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.46; p = .001) for any irAE and no irAE, respectively, and median OS not reached versus 29 months for grade ≥3 irAEs and no grade ≥3 irAEs, respectively. In multivariate analysis, elevated lactate dehydrogenase correlated with reduced OS (HR, 2.34; p = .001), whereas each additional cycle of treatment received (HR, 0.94; p < .001) and development of grade ≥3 irAEs (HR, 0.29, p = .024) were significantly associated with longer OS. CONCLUSION: Anti-PD-1-associated grade ≥3 irAEs in patients with advanced melanoma is associated with better patient outcomes, including overall survival. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Previous prospective randomized clinical trials demonstrate improved response rates in patients with melanoma who develop select adverse events. The current population-based real-world study in advanced melanoma reports an association with anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)-induced grade ≥3 immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and better patient outcomes, including overall survival. These results suggest that irAEs may be a manifestation of a patient's ability to mount a systemic immune response from PD-1-directed therapies, which may be associated with therapeutic benefit. The finding of irAEs coinciding with clinical benefit from these therapies supposes that these events are, by and large, unavoidable, and the critical management of irAEs remains essential for optimizing patient outcomes.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Imunológicos , Melanoma , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Imunoterapia/efeitos adversos , Melanoma/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Acute reoviral infection has been extensively studied given the virus's propensity to target malignant cells and activate caspase-3 mediated apoptosis. Reovirus infection of malignant N1E-115 mouse neuroblastoma cells led to significant increased expression of importin-ß and exportin-5 mRNAs (qRTPCR) and proteins (immunohistochemistry) which was partially blocked by small interfering LNA oligomers directed against the reoviral genome. Co-expression analysis showed that the N1E-115 cells that contained reoviral capsid protein had accumulated importin-ß and exportin-5, as well as activated caspase 3. Reoviral oncolysis using a syngeneic mouse model of multiple myeloma similarly induced a significant increase in importin-ß and exportin-5 proteins that were co-expressed with reoviral capsid protein and caspase-3. Apoptotic proteins (BAD, BIM, PUMA, NOXA, BAK, BAX) were increased with infection and co-localized with reoviral capsid protein. Surprisingly the anti-apoptotic MCL1 and bcl2 were also increased and co-localized with the capsid protein suggesting that it was the balance of pro-apoptotic molecules that correlated with activation of caspase-3. In summary, productive reoviral infection is strongly correlated with elevated importin-ß and exportin-5 levels which may serve as biomarkers of the disease in clinical specimens.
Assuntos
Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Carioferinas/metabolismo , Mieloma Múltiplo/metabolismo , Terapia Viral Oncolítica/métodos , Infecções por Reoviridae/metabolismo , beta Carioferinas/metabolismo , Animais , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Camundongos , Camundongos Endogâmicos C57BL , Mieloma Múltiplo/virologia , Vírus OncolíticosRESUMO
AIMS: The clinical courses of patients with low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC) can be substantially different. The purpose of this study was to explore whether molecular or pathological features could identify patients who follow a more aggressive course. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-six primary LGSCs (11 with an aggressive clinical course, and 15 with an indolent clinical course) and five paired recurrences were assessed for non-synonymous somatic mutations in 18 MAPK pathway genes and in 42 other classic cancer 'hotspot' genes by use of a custom-designed AmpliSeq panel based on the AmpliSeq Cancer hotspot panel v2. Copy number alterations for 94 target genes were assessed with the nCounter v2 Cancer CN assay. Immunohistochemistry for 12 proteins was performed. We detected 16 mutations in 13 of 26 cases (50%), affecting five genes that signal through the MAPK pathway, and one ESR1 mutation implicated in resistance to endocrine therapy in breast cancer. Recurrent samples were concordant with the primary tumour with respect to the mutational status, but all five cases showed additional alterations at the copy number or protein expression level. The absence of progesterone receptor (PR) expression and the presence of myometrial lymphovascular invasion were associated with an unfavourable outcome (log-rank P = 0.016 and P < 0.0001, respectively), but none of the other molecular features assessed showed an association. CONCLUSION: Despite limited case numbers, it appears that current molecular testing is inferior to a pathological parameter or protein expression in predicting the outcome of LGSCs. Prediction of outcome based on the primary tumour may be confounded by additional changes acquired over time.
Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/análise , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/genética , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/patologia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/genética , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/mortalidade , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Ovarianas/mortalidade , Prognóstico , Análise Serial de TecidosRESUMO
In contrast to cyclosporine or methotrexate, rabbit antithymocyte globulin (ATG) used for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with myeloablative conditioning does not increase the risk of relapse after hematopoietic cell transplantation. The reason for this is unknown. We hypothesized that ATG at concentrations achieved with our standard ATG dose of 4.5 mg/kg exerts antileukemic activity. We measured ATG-induced killing of leukemic blasts via complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) and via complement-independent cytotoxicity (CIC) in marrow or blood from 36 patients with newly diagnosed acute leukemia. The median percentage of blasts killed by CDC was 0.3% at 1 mg/L ATG, 2.8% at 10 mg/L ATG, 12.6% at 25 mg/L ATG, and 42.2% at 50 mg/L ATG. The median percentage of blasts killed by CIC after a 4-hour incubation with ATG was 1.9% at 1 mg/L ATG, 7.15% at 10 mg/L ATG, 12.1% at 25 mg/L ATG, and 13.9% at 50 mg/L ATG. CIC appeared to represent a direct induction of apoptosis by ATG. There was a high variability in the sensitivity of the blasts to ATG; at 50 mg/L, the percentage of blasts killed ranged from 2.6% to 97.2% via CDC and from 1.4% to 69.9% via CIC. In conclusion, ATG at clinically relevant concentrations kills leukemic blasts in vitro. Some acute leukemias are highly sensitive to ATG, whereas others are relatively resistant. This finding could lead to personalized administration of ATG.
Assuntos
Citotoxicidade Celular Dependente de Anticorpos/efeitos dos fármacos , Soro Antilinfocitário/administração & dosagem , Apoptose/efeitos dos fármacos , Crise Blástica , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro , Leucemia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Animais , Crise Blástica/sangue , Crise Blástica/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/sangue , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Leucemia/sangue , Leucemia/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , CoelhosRESUMO
Breast cancers are routinely assessed for estrogen receptor status using immunohistochemical assays to assist in patient prognosis and clinical management. Specific assays vary between laboratories, and several antibodies have been validated and recommended for clinical use. As numerous factors can influence assay performance, many laboratories have opted for ready-to-use assays using automated stainers to improve reproducibility and consistency. Three commonly used autostainer vendors-Dako, Leica, and Ventana-all offer such estrogen receptor assays; however, they have never been directly compared. Here, we present a systematic comparison of three platform-specific estrogen receptor ready-to-use assays using a retrospective, tamoxifen-treated, breast cancer cohort from patients who were treated in Calgary, Alberta, Canada from 1985 to 2000. We found all assays showed good intra-observer agreement. Inter-observer pathological scoring showed some variability: Ventana had the strongest agreement followed closely by Dako, whereas Leica only showed substantial agreement. We also analyzed each estrogen receptor assay with respect to 5-year disease-free survival, and found that all performed similarly in univariate and multivariate models. Determination of measures of test performance found that the Leica assay had a lower negative predictive value than Dako or Ventana, compared with the original ligand-binding assay, while other measures-sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and accuracy-were comparable between the three ready-to-use assays. When comparing against disease-free survival, the difference in negative predictive value between the vendor assays were not as extreme, but Dako and Ventana still performed slightly better than Leica. Despite some discordance, we found that all ready-to-use assays were comparable with or superior to the ligand-binding assay, endorsing their continued use. Our analysis also allowed for exploration of estrogen receptor-negative, progesterone receptor-positive cases, and we discovered that this phenotype was not consistent across the assays, suggesting this might be an artifact.
Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/análise , Neoplasias da Mama/química , Imuno-Histoquímica , Kit de Reagentes para Diagnóstico , Receptores de Estrogênio/análise , Alberta , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Antagonistas de Estrogênios/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Tamoxifeno/uso terapêutico , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor status are routinely assessed using immunohistochemistry assays to assist in patient prognosis and clinical management. Three commonly utilized autostainer vendors-Dako, Leica and Ventana-provide ready-to-use progesterone receptor assays; however, they have never been directly compared in a single breast cancer cohort. We looked at three immunohistochemical progesterone receptor assays, in addition to original ligand-binding assay results, in a single retrospective, tamoxifen-treated breast cancer cohort to investigate inter- and intra-observer agreement, concordance, prognostic ability and measures of test performance. All immunohistochemical assays utilized the manufacturer's specified protocols. Five-year disease-free survival was the endpoint of interest, and multivariate models were adjusted for lymph node status, tumor grade, tumor size and human epidermal growth factor 2 status. All assays showed substantial to almost perfect agreement between the three observers (Dako κ=0.69-0.90; Leica κ=0.70-0.89; and Ventana κ=0.78-0.94) and concordance (Dako/Leica κ=0.81; Dako/Ventana κ=0.78; and Leica/Ventana κ=0.82). Univariate survival analyses showed that only the ligand-binding assay, Dako and Ventana assays achieved statistical significance. No statistically significant results were seen in multivariate models, although a strong trend was seen with the Ventana progesterone receptor assay. All assays performed similarly with regards to measures of test performance with ligand-binding assay set as the reference, and all immunohistochemical assays outperformed the ligand-binding assay in regards to 5-year disease-free survival. Despite similar agreement and concordance with the progesterone receptor assays, clear differences were noted with regards to 5-year disease-free survival. Additional survival analyses suggest that clinical utility of estrogen receptor assays vary when investigated in combination with progesterone receptor.
Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/análise , Neoplasias da Mama/metabolismo , Kit de Reagentes para Diagnóstico , Receptores de Progesterona/análise , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica/métodos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Moduladores Seletivos de Receptor Estrogênico/uso terapêutico , Tamoxifeno/uso terapêuticoAssuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Toxidermias/etiologia , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Melanoma/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Cutâneas/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Aprendizado de Máquina , Melanoma/secundário , Redes Neurais de Computação , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudo de Prova de Conceito , Curva ROC , Medição de Risco/métodos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologiaRESUMO
Biospecimens are the essential substrates for human biomarker research. Across the globe, biobanks have developed the facilities and mechanisms to collect, process, store and distribute those substrates to researchers. However, despite some notable successes, less than one hundred of the tens of thousands of purported biomarkers have been independently validated. We propose the need for a new paradigm in biobanking; simply pursuing larger numbers of participants, larger networks of biobanks and higher sample integrity will not, in itself, transform the success rate or efficiency of biomarker research. We propose that biobanks must embrace the intrinsic observational nature of biospecimens and furnish the recipients of biospecimens with the population metrics (descriptive statistics) that can facilitate the scientific rigor that is mandated in other areas of observational research. In addition, we discuss the value of population-based ascertainment and recruitment and the importance of the timing of biospecimen collections. Any assessment of biospecimen quality must go beyond the sample itself and consider both the patient/participant selection and the most appropriate and informative timing for specimen collection, particularly prior to any treatment intervention in diseased populations. The examples and rationales that we present are based largely on cancer-related collections because the feasibility of population metrics is greatly assisted by the comprehensive registries that are more common for cancer than other chronic diseases. Changing the biobanking paradigm from tacitly 'experimental' to explicitly 'observational' represents a profound but urgent methodological shift that will influence the establishment, management, reporting and impact of biobanks in the twenty-first century.
Assuntos
Bancos de Espécimes Biológicos/normas , Biomarcadores , Humanos , Manejo de EspécimesRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcome association of PIK3CA mutational status within histological types of rigorously classified high-grade endometrial carcinomas. METHODS: We assessed PIK3CA mutational status in exon 9 and exon 20 hot spots by Sanger sequencing of DNA derived from formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue of 57 grade 3 endometrioid, 26 serous, 11 clear cell and 5 dedifferentiated carcinomas. We correlated PIK3CA mutation status with clinicopathological and other molecular parameters. Univariate and multivariate disease specific survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: PIK3CA exon 9 or exon 20 missense mutations were identified in 20 of 99 (20%) high-grade endometrial carcinomas without significant difference across histological types (p=0.22). Presence of PIK3CA exon 9 or exon 20 missense mutations was associated with shorter disease specific survival within grade 3 endometrioid (p=0.0029) but not endometrial serous (p=0.57) carcinoma based on univariate analysis. Within grade 3 endometrioid carcinoma, PIK3CA exon 9 or exon 20 missense mutations were more commonly observed in cases that were deficient for mismatch repair protein expression (p=0.0058) and showed loss of ARID1A expression (p=0.037). CONCLUSIONS: PIK3CA exon 9 or exon 20 missense mutations are present across all histological types of high-grade endometrial carcinomas but a significant outcome association is only seen in grade 3 endometrioid carcinoma, suggesting a greater biological importance in this tumor type.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Endometrioide/genética , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/genética , Neoplasias do Endométrio/genética , Mutação de Sentido Incorreto , Fosfatidilinositol 3-Quinases/genética , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma Endometrioide/mortalidade , Carcinoma Endometrioide/patologia , Classe I de Fosfatidilinositol 3-Quinases , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/mortalidade , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/patologia , Reparo de Erro de Pareamento de DNA , Neoplasias do Endométrio/mortalidade , Neoplasias do Endométrio/patologia , Éxons , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gradação de Tumores , Estadiamento de NeoplasiasRESUMO
Background: Bone metastases (BoMs) are prevalent in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) however, there are limited data detailing how BoMs respond to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The purpose of this study was to compare the imaging response to ICIs of BoMs against visceral metastases and to evaluate the effect of BoMs on survival. Materials and methods: A retrospective, multicentre cohort study was conducted in patients with NSCLC treated with nivolumab or pembrolizumab in Alberta, Canada from 2015 to 2020. The primary endpoint was the real-world organ specific progression free survival (osPFS) of bone versus visceral metastases. Visceral metastases were categorized as adrenal, brain, liver, lung, lymph node, or other intra-abdominal lesions. The secondary outcome was overall survival (OS) amongst patients with and without BoMs. Results: A total of 573 patients were included of which all patients had visceral metastases and 243 patients (42.4%) had BoMs. High PD-L1 expression was identified in 268 patients (46.8%). No significant difference in osPFS was observed between bone, liver, and intra-abdominal metastases (p=0.20 and p=0.76, respectively), with all showing shorter osPFS than other disease sites. There was no difference in the osPFS of extra-thoracic sites of disease in patients with high PD-L1 expression. There was significant discordance between visceral disease response and bone disease response to ICI (p=0.047). The presence of BoMs was an independent poor prognostic factor for OS (HR 1.26, 95%CI: 1.05-1.53, p=0.01). Conclusion: Metastatic bone, liver, and intra-abdominal lesions demonstrated inferior clinical responses to ICI relative to other sites of disease. Additionally, the presence of bone and liver metastases were independent poor prognostic factors for overall survival. This real-world data suggests that BoMs respond poorly to ICI and may require treatment adjuncts for disease control.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Ósseas , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Feminino , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/mortalidade , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/secundário , Idoso , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/secundário , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidade , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Ósseas/secundário , Neoplasias Ósseas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ósseas/mortalidade , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Importance: Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) secondary to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy reportedly improve overall survival (OS) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, studies have been small and the association between irAE severity and OS remains poorly defined. Objective: To examine the association between irAEs and their severity with OS in patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC receiving ICIs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective observational cohort study included patients with NSCLC receiving ICIs between March 1, 2014, and November 30, 2021, with follow-up until March 31, 2023. Data analysis was completed April 26, 2023. The Alberta Immunotherapy Database, a provincial, multicenter cohort, was used to capture data from patients receiving ICIs in Alberta, Canada. Participants included 803 patients 18 years or older who received at least 1 cycle of ICI (alone or with chemotherapy), agnostic to treatment line. Exposure: Developing an irAE mandating delay or discontinuation of ICI therapy and/or systematic corticosteroids for management of toxic effects (hereinafter referred to as clinically meaningful irAEs). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was association between irAEs and OS according to Kaplan-Meier analysis. Clinically meaningful irAEs were identified. Patients with poor prognosis (survival <3 months) who may have died prior to irAE development were excluded from OS analysis, mitigating immortal time bias. Adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression analyses ascertained variables associated with OS. Results: Among the 803 patients included in the analysis, the median age of patients with irAEs was 69.7 (IQR, 63.1-75.2) years and the median age of those without irAEs was 67.5 (IQR, 60.4-73.3) years, with comparable sex distribution (139 of 295 men [47.1%] and 156 of 295 women [52.9%] with irAEs vs 254 of 505 men [50.3%] and 251 of 505 women [49.7%] without irAEs). Mitigating immortal time bias (n = 611), irAEs were associated with OS (median OS with irAEs, 23.7 [95% CI, 19.3-29.1] months; median OS without irAEs, 9.8 [95% CI, 8.7-11.4] months; P < .001). No OS difference was associated with treatment in hospital vs as outpatients for an irAE (median OS, 20.8 [95% CI, 11.7-30.6] vs 25.6 [95% CI, 20.1-29.8] months; P = .33). Developing irAEs remained associated with OS in the total cohort after Cox proportional hazards regression with known prognostic characteristics (hazard ratio, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.40-0.70]; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of 803 patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC receiving ICIs, developing a clinically meaningful irAE was associated with improved OS. This association was not compromised by hospitalization for severe toxic effects. Whether and how ICI therapy resumption after an irAE is associated with OS warrants further study.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Alberta/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos de Coortes , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adolescente , AdultoRESUMO
PURPOSE: This open-labeled, phase I clinical trial was designed to determine the safety and tolerability of percutaneous intralesional administration of wild-type oncolytic revovirus type 3 Dearing (Reolysin®) in cancer patients with accessible and evaluable disease, who had otherwise failed to improve on standard cancer interventions. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: An escalating dose of Reolysin® starting from up to 10(10) plague forming units (PFU) was administered to each cohort of three patients per dose level. Viral shedding, reovirus neutralizing antibody response, toxicity and clinical response were assessed. RESULTS: Nineteen patients with various advanced solid tumors were treated. The most common toxicities related to treatment were grade 2 (or less) local erythema and transient flu like symptoms. Viral shedding was not seen in cerebral spinal fluid (CSF), urine and stool samples in all patients. Rising viral antibody titres were seen in all patients. In addition, we observed some evidence of local target tumor response activity in 7/19 patients (37 %) at the end of six or more weeks follow-up, with one patient exhibiting a complete response (CR), two a partial response (PR), and four stable disease (SD) to the local injected lesion. CONCLUSIONS: Reolysin® is well tolerated given intralesionaly, with DLT/MTD not reached at a dose of 10(10) PFU. The favorable toxicity profile, lack of viral shedding and possible therapeutic activity has made this unattenuated oncolytic reovirus an attractive cancer therapeutic agent for ongoing clinical studies, including in the setting of locally advanced accessible disease for palliation of symptoms.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Orthoreovirus Mamífero 3 , Neoplasias/terapia , Terapia Viral Oncolítica , Vírus Oncolíticos , Administração Cutânea , Adulto , Idoso , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Cefaleia/etiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Náusea/etiologia , Neoplasias/sangue , Neoplasias/virologia , Terapia Viral Oncolítica/efeitos adversos , Eliminação de Partículas Virais , Vômito/etiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of MMR deficiency (dMMR) in contemporary reclassified high-grade endometrial carcinomas and correlate dMMR with molecular alterations and patient outcome. METHODS: In this study we evaluated the expression of MLH1, MSH2, PMS2 and MSH6 assessed by two different methods in a series of 102 high-grade endometrial carcinomas. The series was comprised of 64 high-grade endometrioid carcinomas (HGEC), 27 serous (ESC), and 11 clear cell (CCC) carcinomas. Absence of expression in any of the proteins was considered dMMR. dMMR was correlated with clinicopathological parameters using a Chi-square test. Univariate and multivariate survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of dMMR was 28% (29/102) and was seen in 29/64 (45%) HGEC but not detected in any of the ESC and CCC. Within HGEC, dMMR was associated with loss of ARID1A (p=0.0099), loss of PTEN (p=0.044) and wild-type TP53 (p=0.024) expression. dMMR was associated with increased risk for disease specific death by univariate analysis (p=0.013) among stage III/IV HGEC but not in multivariate analysis (p=0.12). CONCLUSIONS: Among high-grade endometrial carcinomas, dMMR is restricted to HGEC and could be used as an adjunct diagnostic tool to refute a diagnosis of ESC. The association with dMMR in HGEC with ARID1A/PTEN alterations, TP53 wild type expression pattern and unfavorable outcome suggests that different oncogenetic pathways within HGEC are present.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Endometrioide/genética , Reparo de Erro de Pareamento de DNA , Neoplasias do Endométrio/genética , Proteínas Adaptadoras de Transdução de Sinal/biossíntese , Proteínas Adaptadoras de Transdução de Sinal/deficiência , Proteínas Adaptadoras de Transdução de Sinal/genética , Adenocarcinoma de Células Claras/genética , Adenocarcinoma de Células Claras/metabolismo , Adenosina Trifosfatases/biossíntese , Adenosina Trifosfatases/deficiência , Adenosina Trifosfatases/genética , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma Endometrioide/metabolismo , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/genética , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/metabolismo , Enzimas Reparadoras do DNA/biossíntese , Enzimas Reparadoras do DNA/deficiência , Enzimas Reparadoras do DNA/genética , Proteínas de Ligação a DNA/biossíntese , Proteínas de Ligação a DNA/deficiência , Proteínas de Ligação a DNA/genética , Neoplasias do Endométrio/metabolismo , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Endonuclease PMS2 de Reparo de Erro de Pareamento , Proteína 1 Homóloga a MutL , Proteína 2 Homóloga a MutS/biossíntese , Proteína 2 Homóloga a MutS/deficiência , Proteína 2 Homóloga a MutS/genética , Gradação de Tumores , Proteínas Nucleares/biossíntese , Proteínas Nucleares/deficiência , Proteínas Nucleares/genética , Análise Serial de TecidosRESUMO
Introduction: Landmark trials testing immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced NSCLC are difficult to extrapolate to real-world practice given the exclusion of patients with poor (i.e., ≥2) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS). We sought to evaluate the impact of ECOG PS on clinical outcomes and health care utilization in patients with NSCLC treated with ICIs in real-world practice. Methods: Patients with advanced NSCLC who received at least one dose of pembrolizumab or nivolumab were retrospectively identified from the Alberta Immunotherapy Database. The primary outcome was median overall survival, as stratified by ECOG PS. Secondary outcomes included median time-to-treatment failure and metrics of health care utilization, including emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and death in hospital. Results: A total of 790 patients were included, with 29.2% having poor ECOG PS at initiation of ICI. These patients had significantly lower median overall survival (3.3 versus 13.4 mo) and median time-to-treatment failure (1.4 versus 4.9 mo) compared with those with favorable ECOG PS (p < 0.0001 for both outcomes). Patients with poor ECOG PS were also more likely to present to the emergency department, be admitted to the hospital, and die in the hospital during their first admission (risk ratio = 1.6, 2.3-2.7, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Patients with NSCLC with poor ECOG PS treated with ICI had significantly worse survival outcomes and were significantly more likely to use health care services than those with favorable ECOG PS. The large proportion of patients with poor ECOG PS further justifies the urgent need for randomized trials evaluating the efficacy of ICI in this high-risk population.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to identify baseline characteristics, that are prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) in patients with NSCLC treated with ICI monotherapy, in order to derive the Lung Immune Therapy Evaluation (LITE) risk, a prognostic model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multi-center observational cohort study of patients with advanced NSCLC that received ≥1 dose of ICI monotherapy. The training set (n=342) consisted of patients with NSCLC who received first line ICI. The test set (n=153) used for external validation was a discrete cohort of patients who received second line ICI. 20 candidate prognostic factors were examined. Penalized Cox regression was used for variable selection. Multiple imputation was used to address missingness. RESULTS: Three baseline characteristics populated the final model: ECOG (0, 1 or ≥2), lactate dehydrogenase>upper limit of normal, and derived neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio ≥3. Patients were parsed into 3 risk groups; favorable (n=146, risk score 0-1), intermediate (n=101, risk score 2) and poor (n=95, risk score ≥3). The c-statistic of the training cohort was 0.702 and 0.694 after bootstrapping. The test cohort c-statistic was 0.664. The median OS for favorable, intermediate and poor LITE risk were; 28.3 months, 9.1 months and 2.1 months respectively. Improving LITE risk group was associated with improved OS, intermediate vs favorable HR 2.08 (95%CI 1.46-2.97, P < .001); poor vs favorable HR 5.21 (95%CI 3.69-7.34, P < .001). CONCLUSION: A simple prognostic model, utilizing accessible clinical data, can discriminate survival outcomes in patients with advanced NSCLC.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/uso terapêutico , Prognóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Pulmão , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
PURPOSE: to develop several digital pathology-based machine vision algorithms for combining TMEM and MenaCalc scores and determine if a combination of these biomarkers improves the ability to predict development of distant metastasis over and above that of either biomarker alone. METHODS: This retrospective study included a subset of 130 patients (65 patients with no recurrence and 65 patients with a recurrence at 5 years) from the Calgary Tamoxifen cohort of breast cancer patients. Patients had confirmed invasive breast cancer and received adjuvant tamoxifen therapy. Of the 130 patients, 86 cases were suitable for analysis in this study. Sequential sections of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded patient samples were stained for TMEM doorways (immunohistochemistry triple staining) and MenaCalc (immunofluorescence staining). Stained sections were imaged, aligned, and then scored for TMEM doorways and MenaCalc. Different ways of combining TMEM doorway and MenaCalc scores were evaluated and compared to identify the best performing combined marker by using the restricted mean survival time (RMST) difference method. RESULTS: the best performing combined marker gave an RMST difference of 5.27 years (95% CI: 1.71-8.37), compared to 3.56 years (95% CI: 0.95-6.1) for the associated standalone TMEM doorway analysis and 2.94 years (95% CI: 0.25-5.87) for the associated standalone MenaCalc analysis. CONCLUSIONS: combining TMEM doorway and MenaCalc scores as a new biomarker improves prognostication over that observed with TMEM doorway or MenaCalc Score alone in this cohort of 86 patients.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: We looked at the utility of PO versus IV etoposide for first-line treatment in combination with a platinum agent (cisplatin/carboplatin) for Small-Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC). METHODS: Patients with SCLC in Alberta from 2008 to 2015 were identified through the registry. Patients were separated on the basis of stage; limited disease (LD) and extensive disease (ED). Chemotherapy naïve patients receiving one cycle of combination chemotherapy, route of etoposide administration, dose reductions and vital status was noted. Survival was assessed using log-rank method and Kaplan-Meyer model RESULTS: About 2066 patients were identified with SCLC. N = 762 were diagnosed with LD and n = 1264 with ED. Patient characteristics were well balanced between age and sex among the two treatment groups. LS-SCLC: No statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS) between IV versus PO Etoposide (17.5 months vs 17.9 months). More dose reductions were seen in the PO group as compared to the IV group (32.5% vs 21.9% P = 0.095). ES-SCLC: There was a nonsignificant numerical difference in OS in IV versus PO Etoposide (8.7 months vs 9.7 months P = 0.124). More dose reductions were noted in the PO group as compared to the IV group (35.3% vs 21.1%). CONCLUSION: The two dosing schemes (PO and IV) yield similar OS in ES and LS SCLC, however, patients in the PO arm did require more dose modifications. Suggesting that PO etoposide may be equivalent and lead to similar outcomes as IV, however, more toxic but saving the patients multiple visits to the chemotherapy suite. Further analyses on cost efficacy and quality of life are required.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Carcinoma de Pequenas Células do Pulmão , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Carboplatina/uso terapêutico , Etoposídeo/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Qualidade de Vida , Carcinoma de Pequenas Células do Pulmão/tratamento farmacológico , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Evidence suggests that the expression of certain cytokine receptors increases with lung cancer evolution. Overexpression of the cytokine receptor CXCR4 is associated with poor outcomes in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with shorter survival in females with high CXCR4 expression. This study quantifies CXCR4 expression in early stage disease and evaluates its association with gender-specific recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in resected stage I-III NSCLC patients. METHODS: Patient characteristics and clinical outcomes were obtained from the Glans-Look Lung Cancer (G-LLC) database for early stage NSCLC patients diagnosed between 2003-2006 at the Tom Baker Cancer Centre (TBCC). CXCR4 expression was quantified on tissue microarrays (TMA). Median RFS and OS were evaluated by gender using Kaplan-Meier analyses. CXCR4 expression and outcome data were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards (PH) and multi-state models (MSM). RESULTS: 176 stage I-III NSCLC patients were identified. CXCR4 expression was lower in early stage NSCLC patients, with a mean CXCR4 expression of 1729 (SD 1083) compared to 2640 (SD 1541) in stage IV patients. On Kaplan-Meier, median RFS by gender was similar (male 52.8 months vs. female 54.5 months) as was median OS (male 80.9 months vs. female 89.0 months), and there was no significant difference in RFS (p = 0.60) or OS (p = 0.30) by gender and CXCR4 groups over follow-up. By multivariable analysis, CXCR4 expression was not prognostic for RFS (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 1.00, p = 0.73) or OS (HR = 1.00, p = 0.44), and no gender difference was observed. CONCLUSIONS: CXCR4 expression increases with stage progression in NSCLC but is not prognostic in early stage NSCLC patients of either gender. Mechanisms by which CXCR4 expression increases during lung carcinogenesis warrant further exploration and testing in clinical trials.
Assuntos
Carcinogênese , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Regulação Neoplásica da Expressão Gênica , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Proteínas de Neoplasias/biossíntese , Receptores CXCR4/biossíntese , Caracteres Sexuais , Adulto , Idoso , Carcinogênese/metabolismo , Carcinogênese/patologia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/metabolismo , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/mortalidade , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/patologia , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/metabolismo , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidade , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Sexuais , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Metastatic uveal melanoma (MUM) is associated with poor survival and inferior response to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy when compared with metastatic cutaneous melanoma. Currently, prognostic biomarkers are lacking to guide treatment decisions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective cohort study using a centralized, province-wide cancer database in Alberta, Canada. We identified 37 patients with histologically confirmed MUM who received at least one dose of single-agent pembrolizumab or nivolumab, or combination therapy nivolumab and ipilimumab. A modified immune prognostic index (IPI), based on the previously reported lung immune prognostic index, was used to stratify patients into favorable and poor IPI groups. Survival analyses were conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for baseline age (≥60) and ECOG performance status, to assess the associations between IPI and overall survival (OS). Time to treatment failure (TTF) was also assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The association between IPI and objective response rate was examined using chi-squared tests. Logistic regression was used to determine the association between IPI and immune-related adverse events (irAEs). RESULTS: Median OS was 15.6 (range 0.6-57.6) months with 45.9% 1-year survival rate at a median follow-up of 11.8 months. We found that a favorable IPI was significantly associated with OS [median 30.5 (12.0-not reached) months in the favorable IPI group compared with 4.6 (2.1-16.0) months in the poor IPI group (p = 0.001)] (HR=4.81, 95% CI; 1.64-14.10, p = 0.004), TTF [median 5.1 (95% CI; 2.1-10.4) months in the favorable IPI group compared with 3.7 (95% CI; 1.4-6.4) months in the poor IPI group (p = 0.0191)], and irAE (HR=6.67, 95% CI; 1.32-33.69, p = 0.0220). CONCLUSIONS: The modified IPI may be a useful tool in clinical practice for identifying MUM patients who are more likely to experience irAEs and realize a survival benefit from ICI treatment.