A model for abolitionist narrative medicine pedagogy.

To use narrative medicine as a means for action towards social justice in medical education, we need a renewal of our pedagogical methods that grapples not just with the worlds concocted within a text, but also our own world beyond the text. We propose a model for narrative medicine pedagogy that is oriented towards abolition. First, the composition of the classroom and syllabus must employ radical inclusion through recruitment of diverse voices and selection of diverse texts. After a traditional close reading is initiated, conscious expansion should take place through introduction of a text's context and current social structures. Whenever internal and external conflicts arise, active self-interrogation should be encouraged through José Esteban Muñoz's 'disidentification'.We present relevant critiques of narrative medicine, case studies from workshop experiences, and close readings of selected narrative medicine texts to unmask limitations in the standard narrative medicine workshop format and illustrate the utility of our abolitionist model. The model we propose offers methods for disrupting long-standing patterns of inclusion (and exclusion) and radically transforming the structure of spaces and ideas produced within them. When new texts are added to the syllabus, they should be accompanied by hermeneutics that can adequately attend to them. Abolitionist narrative medicine pedagogy should stimulate practitioners to examine their own role in social structures that surround the text and the setting of close reading and, ultimately, to dismantle harmful structures. We offer strategies for confronting discomfort without requiring an abandonment of identity, context or content. Instead, holding complexity works towards the long-term aim of transforming practitioners to think critically about structural violence that prevents universal and equitable access to compassionate healthcare. Using this model for abolition, we hope practitioners of narrative medicine will be equipped with more dynamic tools to engage with texts and patients within and beyond the scope of the narrative medicine workshop.

Thinking with two brains: Student perspectives on the presentation of race in pre-clinical medical education.

CONTEXT: There is growing concern that during their education medical students come to believe that 'race' is a biological construct and that differential treatment of patients based on 'race' is clinically beneficial. How 'race' is presented to medical students may influence both their implicit biases and future clinical practices, potentially widening racial disparities in care. METHODS: We conducted in-depth interviews with twenty-two pre-clinical mostly non-White medical students attending a public medical school in a major metropolitan area in the northeastern United States. Interview content focused on how medical students experience the presentation of race in medical education, use race in their learning experiences, and envision using race as physicians in future clinical encounters. Transcripts were analysed using the framework method and emergent themes were identified. RESULTS: Participants described being most aware of the presentation of race in board-style questions and least aware of the presentation of race during lectures. They described being aware of race in problem-based learning (PBL) modules if the case revolved around a likely race-disease association. They identified imprecision in how race was presented during lectures and insufficient explanations of causes of racial disparities in health. Participants described feeling ill-prepared to obtain racial self-identification and receiving mixed messages around the utility of race in diagnosing a patient. Participants reported experiences of cognitive dissonance around the presentation of race in board-style questions and lectures. CONCLUSIONS: Critical evaluation of the presentation of and instruction around 'race' is needed to address whether it is presented as a biological vs. social construct, the level of precision of racial categorisation in curricular content, and the causes of and mechanisms behind race-disease associations. This has the potential to minimise false beliefs about race as a biological construct and the resultant negative impacts on clinical care. Future research could evaluate whether problem-based or experiential (OSCE) learning, in contrast to board-style questions and didactic lectures, are the most effective way to educate students around race in health and illness. Additionally, future research can investigate if the mission (ie social) and composition (Predominantly White Institution or Historically Black College/University) of the faculty impacts student experiences of the presentation of race.

"It's Like Plan B but for HIV!" Design and Evaluation of a Media Campaign to Drive Demand for PEP.

Post-exposure Prophylaxis (PEP) is an effective yet underutilized HIV prevention tool. PEPTALK developed and evaluated a media campaign to drive demand for PEP among men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TW) living in high HIV prevalence areas in New York City. Formative qualitative research (38 in-depth interviews and five focus groups [N = 48]) with Black or African-American MSM or TW who reported condomless sex with a HIV-positive/unknown status man was conducted to inform campaign design. We assessed the impact of the campaign, 15 bus shelter ads and low or no-cost social media, by assessing change in the proportions of new PEP patient visits, to the clinical site where the campaign directed consumers, using one-sided z-test for proportions, before and after the media campaign. The proportion of new PEP patients increased significantly after the media campaign in the periods examined, suggesting that such campaigns may increase PEP demand.

Barriers to and Facilitators of Help-Seeking Behavior Among Men Who Experience Sexual Violence.

Research on sexual violence and related support services access has mainly focused on female victims; there is still a remarkable lack of research on men who experience sexual violence. Research demonstrates that people who both self-identify as men and are members of sexual-orientation minority populations are at higher risk of sexual violence. They are also less likely to either report or seek support services related to such experiences. The present study is an exploratory one aimed at filling the gap in the literature and better understanding how men, both straight and gay as well as cisgender and transgender, conceptualize, understand, and seek help related to sexual violence. A sample of 32 men was recruited on-line and participated in either a one-on-one in-depth interview ( N = 19) or one of two focus group discussions ( N = 13). All interviews and groups were audiotaped, professionally transcribed and coded using NVivo 9 qualitative software. The present analysis focused on barriers to and facilitators of support service access. Emergent and cross-cutting themes were identified and presented, with an emphasis on understanding what factors may prevent disclosure of a sexual violence experience and facilitate seeking support services and/or professional help. Through this analysis, the research team aims to add knowledge to inform the development of tools to increase service access and receipt, for use by both researchers and service professionals. Although this study contributes to the understanding of the issue of men's experiences of sexual violence, more research with diverse populations is needed.