Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Jpn J Clin Oncol ; 54(2): 175-181, 2024 Feb 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37899139

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Comprehensive genomic profiling testing using a hybrid-capture next-generation sequencing is commonly used in clinical practice to employ precision medicine in cancer treatment worldwide. In this study, we aimed to analyze the profiles obtained using comprehensive genomic profiling testing that was performed in Japanese castration-resistant prostate cancer patients and to discuss the genetic findings in a real-world setting. METHODS: A total of 60 cases and 57 castration-resistant prostate cancer patients underwent comprehensive genomic profiling testing between 1 January 2021 and 31 December 2022. Four types of comprehensive genomic profiling testing were selected, and clinically significant cancer-specific gene alterations were identified. RESULTS: The median age of patients was 74 years, and the median prostate-specific antigen value at the time of submission was 18.6 ng/ml. Fifty-seven (95%) of 60 cases were metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancers, and 3 cases (5%) were non-metastatic. Among all genetic alterations, androgen-receptor alteration was the most frequently detected in 17 cases (28.3%), followed by 15 cases of TP53 (25.0%), 14 cases of CDK12 (23.3%), 10 cases of phosphatase and tensin homolog (16.7%) and 9 cases of ATM (15.0%) mutations. A total of 13 patients (21.7%) received systemic therapy according to the comprehensive genomic profiling testing results. Overall, the survival rate was significantly greater in the group treated through systemic therapy based on comprehensive genomic profiling testing compared with the group without new therapeutic treatment (P = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive genomic profiling testing is recommended in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients identified as resistant to standard therapy as this can provide a new therapeutic option.


Assuntos
Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração , Masculino , Humanos , Idoso , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Japão , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Genômica
2.
J Thorac Dis ; 16(5): 3381-3388, 2024 May 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38883673

RESUMO

Background: There is no established standard 3rd line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents that are not used as 1st or 2nd line treatment are administrated as 3rd line treatment, their anti-tumor efficacy is insufficient. Anti-programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1)/programmed death-1 (PD1) treatment is more effective and less toxic than chemotherapy in anti-PD-L1/PD-1 treatment-naïve patients with NSCLC. Therefore, anti-PD-L1/PD-1 therapy is considered an appropriate 3rd line treatment. However, the anti-tumor efficacy is limited in patients previously treated with anti-PD-L1/PD-1 antibody. Today, new drugs are needed to increase the efficacy of anti-PD-L1/PD-1 antibodies. Methods: This open-label, single-arm, investigator-initiated phase II study is designed to evaluate combination treatment of nivolumab and TM5614, a plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-1) inhibitor as 3rd or more line treatment in NSCLC patients who underwent standard treatment. The primary endpoint is the objective response rate and the secondary endpoints are progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), duration of response (DOR) and safety. Recruitment began in September 2023 and is expected to continue for approximately three years. Discussion: Currently, there is no standard 3rd line treatment for advanced NSCLC, and we hope that the findings of this study will facilitate more effective treatments in this setting. Ethics and dissemination: the study protocol conformed to the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. All patients will provide written informed consent prior to enrollment. Results will be published in a peer-reviewed publication. Trial Registration: This study is registered to Japan Registry of Clinical Trials with number: jRCT2061230039 (19/July/2023).

3.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol ; 76(4): 713-21, 2015 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26233803

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Docetaxel and gefitinib play key roles in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and their combination could be of interest. Both drugs are mainly metabolized by CYP3A4, and drug-drug interactions are a major concern. This phase I dose-finding study was designed to assess the tolerability and drug-drug interactions in this combination using full pharmacokinetic (PK) samplings. METHODS: Docetaxel was intravenously administered on days 1 and 22 at a dose of 45 or 60 mg/m(2). Gefitinib (250 mg/day) was orally administrated starting on day 2. Ten PK samplings of docetaxel were performed on days 1 and 22. Seven PK samplings of gefitinib were performed on day 18 ± 3 and on day 22. RESULTS: Twelve patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC were enrolled without considering EGFR mutation status. The major toxicity was neutropenia. Two patients withdrew from this study due to dose-limiting toxicities; however, the toxicity profiles in this combination were generally acceptable. The docetaxel AUC0-24 and C max did not differ whether administered alone or with gefitinib, and the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of AUC0-24 and C max (co-administrated/administrated alone) were 0.95 (90 % CI 0.85-1.06) and 0.95 (90 % CI 0.85-1.05), respectively. Furthermore, the GMRs of the steady state gefitinib AUC0-24 and C max were 0.93 (90 % CI 0.84-1.03) and 0.98 (90 % CI 0.88-1.09), respectively. CONCLUSION: The tolerability of 60 mg/m(2) docetaxel with 250 mg/day gefitinib was confirmed, and we observed no drug-drug interaction in this combination.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Antineoplásicos/farmacocinética , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacocinética , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Quinazolinas/farmacocinética , Taxoides/farmacocinética , Adenocarcinoma/sangue , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Adenocarcinoma/secundário , Adulto , Idoso , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos/sangue , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/sangue , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/sangue , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/patologia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/secundário , Docetaxel , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Esquema de Medicação , Interações Medicamentosas , Feminino , Seguimentos , Gefitinibe , Meia-Vida , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/sangue , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Masculino , Taxa de Depuração Metabólica , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neutropenia/induzido quimicamente , Pacientes Desistentes do Tratamento , Quinazolinas/administração & dosagem , Quinazolinas/efeitos adversos , Quinazolinas/sangue , Taxoides/administração & dosagem , Taxoides/efeitos adversos , Taxoides/sangue
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa