Nivolumab Combination Therapy in Advanced Esophageal Squamous-Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: First-line chemotherapy for advanced esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma results in poor outcomes. The monoclonal antibody nivolumab has shown an overall survival benefit over chemotherapy in previously treated patients with advanced esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma. METHODS: In this open-label, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned adults with previously untreated, unresectable advanced, recurrent, or metastatic esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive nivolumab plus chemotherapy, nivolumab plus the monoclonal antibody ipilimumab, or chemotherapy. The primary end points were overall survival and progression-free survival, as determined by blinded independent central review. Hierarchical testing was performed first in patients with tumor-cell programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression of 1% or greater and then in the overall population (all randomly assigned patients). RESULTS: A total of 970 patients underwent randomization. At a 13-month minimum follow-up, overall survival was significantly longer with nivolumab plus chemotherapy than with chemotherapy alone, both among patients with tumor-cell PD-L1 expression of 1% or greater (median, 15.4 vs. 9.1 months; hazard ratio, 0.54; 99.5% confidence interval [CI], 0.37 to 0.80; P<0.001) and in the overall population (median, 13.2 vs. 10.7 months; hazard ratio, 0.74; 99.1% CI, 0.58 to 0.96; P = 0.002). Overall survival was also significantly longer with nivolumab plus ipilimumab than with chemotherapy among patients with tumor-cell PD-L1 expression of 1% or greater (median, 13.7 vs. 9.1 months; hazard ratio, 0.64; 98.6% CI, 0.46 to 0.90; P = 0.001) and in the overall population (median, 12.7 vs. 10.7 months; hazard ratio, 0.78; 98.2% CI, 0.62 to 0.98; P = 0.01). Among patients with tumor-cell PD-L1 expression of 1% or greater, a significant progression-free survival benefit was also seen with nivolumab plus chemotherapy over chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.65; 98.5% CI, 0.46 to 0.92; P = 0.002) but not with nivolumab plus ipilimumab as compared with chemotherapy. The incidence of treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 was 47% with nivolumab plus chemotherapy, 32% with nivolumab plus ipilimumab, and 36% with chemotherapy alone. CONCLUSIONS: Both first-line treatment with nivolumab plus chemotherapy and first-line treatment with nivolumab plus ipilimumab resulted in significantly longer overall survival than chemotherapy alone in patients with advanced esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma, with no new safety signals identified. (Funded by Bristol Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical; CheckMate 648 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03143153.).

Adjuvant Nivolumab in Resected Esophageal or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer.

BACKGROUND: No adjuvant treatment has been established for patients who remain at high risk for recurrence after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery for esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer. METHODS: We conducted CheckMate 577, a global, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial to evaluate a checkpoint inhibitor as adjuvant therapy in patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer. Adults with resected (R0) stage II or III esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer who had received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and had residual pathological disease were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive nivolumab (at a dose of 240 mg every 2 weeks for 16 weeks, followed by nivolumab at a dose of 480 mg every 4 weeks) or matching placebo. The maximum duration of the trial intervention period was 1 year. The primary end point was disease-free survival. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 24.4 months. Among the 532 patients who received nivolumab, the median disease-free survival was 22.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.6 to 34.0), as compared with 11.0 months (95% CI, 8.3 to 14.3) among the 262 patients who received placebo (hazard ratio for disease recurrence or death, 0.69; 96.4% CI, 0.56 to 0.86; P<0.001). Disease-free survival favored nivolumab across multiple prespecified subgroups. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events that were considered by the investigators to be related to the active drug or placebo occurred in 71 of 532 patients (13%) in the nivolumab group and 15 of 260 patients (6%) in the placebo group. The trial regimen was discontinued because of adverse events related to the active drug or placebo in 9% of the patients in the nivolumab group and 3% of those in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with resected esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer who had received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, disease-free survival was significantly longer among those who received nivolumab adjuvant therapy than among those who received placebo. (Funded by Bristol Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical; CheckMate 577 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02743494.).

Squamous cell carcinoma-derived G-CSF promotes tumor growth and metastasis in mice through neutrophil recruitment and tumor cell proliferation, associated with poor prognosis of the patients.

Tumor-derived G-CSF is a well-known factor to aggravate disease progression in various types of cancers. In this study, we investigated a role of G-CSF in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). High expression of G-CSF in the tumor tissues of esophageal SCC (ESCC) patients correlated with poor prognosis. Murine SCC NR-S1M cells produce considerable amount of G-CSF, which expression is correlated with its metastatic potentials. Deletion of G-CSF in NR-S1M cells mitigated tumor growth and metastasis to lymph node and lung of subcutaneous NR-S1M tumors in the mice. Mechanistically, G-CSF enhanced cell proliferation in autocrine manner in vitro, whereas in NR-S1M tumor-bearing mice, accumulation of plasma G-CSF was associated with expansion of peripheral neutrophils, which led to a decreased proportion of CD8+ T cells. Antibody depletion of neutrophils restored the number of CD8+ T cells and modestly suppressed tumor outgrowth, albeit no changes in distant metastasis. We propose that G-CSF produced by NR-S1M cells facilitates tumor progression in mice through bi-functional effects to promote neutrophil recruitment and tumor cell proliferation, which may render poor prognosis to the ESCC patients with high G-CSF expression.

First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab or chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a Japanese subgroup analysis of open-label, phase 3 trial (CheckMate 648/ONO-4538-50).

BACKGROUND: Programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)-based treatments are approved for several cancers. CheckMate 648, a global, phase 3 trial, showed that first-line nivolumab (anti-PD-1 antibody) plus ipilimumab (NIVO + IPI) or nivolumab plus chemotherapy (NIVO + Chemo) significantly increased survival in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) without new safety signals versus chemotherapy alone (Chemo). METHODS: We evaluated the Japanese subpopulation of CheckMate 648 (n = 394/970), randomized to receive first-line NIVO + IPI, NIVO + Chemo, or Chemo. Efficacy endpoints included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival assessed by blinded independent central review in Japanese patients with tumor-cell programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥ 1% and in all randomized Japanese patients. RESULTS: In the Japanese population, 131, 126, and 137 patients were treated with NIVO + IPI, NIVO + Chemo, and Chemo, and 66, 62, and 65 patients had tumor-cell PD-L1 ≥ 1%, respectively. In patients with tumor-cell PD-L1 ≥ 1%, median OS was numerically longer with NIVO + IPI (20.2 months; hazard ratio [95% CI], 0.46 [0.30-0.71]) and NIVO + Chemo (17.3 months; 0.53 [0.35-0.82]) versus Chemo (9.0 months). In all randomized patients, median OS was numerically longer with NIVO + IPI (17.6 months; 0.68 [0.51-0.92]) and NIVO + Chemo (15.5 months; 0.73 [0.54-0.99]) versus Chemo (11.0 months). Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 37%, 49%, and 36% of all patients in the NIVO + IPI, NIVO + Chemo, and Chemo arms, respectively. CONCLUSION: Survival benefits with acceptable tolerability observed for NIVO + IPI and NIVO + Chemo treatments strongly support their use as a new standard first-line treatment in Japanese patients with advanced ESCC. GOV ID: NCT03143153.

Does Esophagectomy Provide a Survival Advantage to Patients Aged 80 Years or Older? Analyzing 5066 Patients in the National Database of Hospital-based Cancer Registries in Japan.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether esophagectomy provides a survival advantage in octogenarians with resectable thoracic esophageal cancer. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Elderly patients with thoracic esophageal cancer do not always receive the full standard treatment; however, advanced age alone should not preclude the use of effective treatment that could meaningfully improve survival. METHODS: We retrieved the 2008 to 2011 data from the National Database of Hospital-based Cancer Registries from the National Cancer Centerin Japan, divided the patients into a ≥75 group (75-79 years; n = 2935) and a ≥80 group (80 years or older; n = 2131), and then compared the patient backgrounds and survival curves. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model was developed to compare the effects of esophagectomy and chemoradiotherapy in the 2 groups. RESULTS: A significantly greater percentage of patients were treated with esoph-agectomy in the ≥75 group (34.6%) than the ≥80 group (18.4%). Among patients who received esophagectomy, the 3-year survival rate was 51.1% in the ≥ 75 group and 39.0% in the ≥80 group (P < 0.001). However, among patients who received chemoradiotherapy, there was no difference in survival curve between the 2 groups (P = 0.17). Multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis revealed that esoph-agectomy for clinical Stage ii-iii patients was significantly associated to better survival (adjusted HR: 0.731) (95%CI: 0.645-0.829, P < 0.001) in the ≥75 group but not the ≥ 80 group when compared with chemoradiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Many octogenarians do not necessarily get a survival benefit from esophagectomy. However, patients should be evaluated based on their overall health before ruling out surgery based on age alone.

PET-Uptake Reduction into Lymph Nodes After Neoadjuvant Therapy is Highly Predictive of Prognosis for Patients Who have Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated with Chemoradiotherapy Plus Esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: Patients with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET)-positive lymph nodes before treatment have a poor prognosis after esophagectomy. This study investigated whether FDG uptake into lymph nodes on FDG-PET (PET-N) during the pre- or posttreatment stage is more predictive of survival for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC) patients who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) followed by esophagectomy. METHODS: Of 129 TESCC patients with clinical lymphatic metastasis who underwent curative-intent esophagectomy after NACRT between 2010 and 2018, 97 who received PET before and after NACRT were enrolled in the study. The study defined lymph nodes with a maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) greater than 2.5 on FDG-PET before NACRT as cPET-N(+) and after NACRT as CRT-cPET-N(+). Both the cPET-N(+) and CRT-cPET-N(-) patients were defined as PET-N responders. Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: No significant difference in survival was detected between the cPET-N(+) and cPET-N(-) patients. However, the CRT-cPET-N(-) patients had significantly better 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) than the CRT-cPET-N (+) patients. The PET-N responders had significantly better 5-year OS and DSS than the PET-N non-responders, and PET-N response was an independent prognostic factor for 5-year DSS. CONCLUSION: The PET-N response is a highly predictive prognostic marker for TESCC patients who undergo NACRT followed by esophagectomy. The PET-N response may help clinicians to establish a strategy for perioperative treatments that improves survival for patients with lymph node metastasis in TESCC.

Using CT to evaluate mediastinal great vein invasion by thymic epithelial tumors: measurement of the interface between the tumor and neighboring structures.

OBJECTIVES: For thymic epithelial tumors, simple contact with adjacent structures does not necessarily mean invasion. The purpose of our study was to develop a simple noninvasive technique for evaluating organ invasion using routine pretreatment computed tomography (CT). METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed the pathological reports on 95 mediastinal resections performed between January 2003 and June 2020. Using CT images, the length of the interface between the primary tumor and neighboring structures (arch distance; Adist) and maximum tumor diameter (Dmax) was measured, after which Adist/Dmax (A/D) ratios were calculated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to analyze the Adist and A/D ratios. RESULTS: An Adist cut-off of 37.5 mm best distinguished between invaded and non-invaded mediastinal great veins based on ROC curves. When Adist > 37.5 mm was used for diagnosis of invasion of the brachiocephalic vein (BCV) or superior vena cava (SVC), the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy, and area under the ROC curve for diagnosis of invasion were 61.9%, 92.5%, 81.25%, 82.2%, 81.97%, and 0.76429, respectively. Moreover, there were significant differences between BCV/SVC Adist > 37.5 mm and ≤ 37.5 mm for 10-year relapse-free survival and 10-year overall survival (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: When diagnosing invasion of the mediastinal great veins based on Adist > 37.5 mm, we achieved a higher performance level than the conventional criteria such as irregular interface with an absence of the fat layer. Measurement of Adist is a simple noninvasive technique for evaluating invasion using CT. Key Points • Simple contact between the primary tumor and adjacent structures on CT does not indicate direct invasion. • Using CT images, the length of the interface between the primary tumor and neighboring structures (arch distance; Adist) is a simple noninvasive technique for evaluating invasion. • Adist > 37.5 mm can be a supportive tool to identify invaded mediastinal great veins and surgical indications for T3 and T4 invasion by thymic epithelial tumors.

Disturbance of Gastrointestinal Cancers Diagnoses by the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Depopulated Area of Japan: A Population-Based Study in Akita Prefecture.

Disruption of cancer screening programs and diagnoses of gastrointestinal cancers by the COVID-19 pandemic has been reported; however, little attention has been paid to the situation in depopulated areas with low infection rates. Akita Prefecture is one of the most depopulated areas of Japan and has the lowest COVID-19 infection rate per capita; at the same time, the prefecture has been top-ranked for mortality due to gastrointestinal cancer for years. In this population-based study in Akita Prefecture, we investigated the occurrence of gastrointestinal cancers and the number of cancer screening procedures over the five-year period of 2016-2020, employing a database from the collaborative Akita Prefecture hospital-based registration system of cancers. The occurrence of gastrointestinal cancers, especially esophago-gastric cancers, declined by 11.0% in 2020, when the COVID-19 pandemic affected the overall healthcare system, compared with the average of 2016-2019. Nonetheless, the occurrence of advanced-stage (stage IV) esophago-gastric cancers increased by 7.2% in 2020. The decrease in the gastrointestinal cancer diagnosis rate in 2020 coincided with a 30% decline in the total number of regular population-based screening programs. Under the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, cancer screening was uniformly suspended throughout Japan. Accordingly, the COVID-19 pandemic has substantially disrupted the cancer screening system, leading to delays in diagnoses of gastrointestinal cancer, even in depopulated areas (Akita Prefecture) of Japan with a low prevalence of infection. Suspension of cancer screening procedures during an infectious disease pandemic should be thoroughly considered for each region based on the cancer incidence and infection status in that area.

Association between ABCC2 polymorphism and hematological toxicity in patients with esophageal cancer receiving platinum plus 5-fluorouracil therapy.

BACKGROUND: Platinum agents are taken up into cells by copper transporter (CTR) 1 (gene code: SLC31A1) and are excreted from cells by copper-transporting P-type adenosine triphosphatase (ATP7B) and multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP) 2 (gene code: ABCC2). In addition, glutathione S transferase (GST) P1 is involved in the metabolism of platinum agents. The present study aimed to determine whether the rate of grade 3-4 hematological toxicity associated with platinum plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) therapy in 239 patients with esophageal cancer was affected by the SLC31A1 rs10981694A>C and rs12686377G>T, ATP7B rs9535828A>G, GSTP1 rs1695A>G, and ABCC2 -24C>T polymorphisms. METHODS: Chemotherapy consisted of protracted infusion of 5-FU (800 mg/m2/day) on days 1-5 and cisplatin or nedaplatin (80 mg/m2/day) on day 1. RESULTS: A total of 82 of 239 patients developed grade 3-4 hematological toxicity after chemotherapy. Univariate analysis showed that ABCC2 -24C/T + T/T genotypes (P = 0.038), radiation therapy (P = 0.013), baseline white blood cell count < 6000/µL (P = 0.003), and baseline neutrophil count < 3900/µL (P = 0.021) were statistically significant predictors of grade 3-4 hematological toxicity. Multivariate analysis revealed that ABCC2 -24C/T + T/T genotypes (P = 0.036), radiation therapy (P = 0.005), and baseline white blood cell count < 6000/µL (P < 0.001) were significant risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: We determined that ABCC2 -24C>T is significantly associated with grade 3-4 hematological toxicity after platinum plus 5-FU therapy. These findings might contribute to improved treatment strategies for patients with esophageal cancer.

Differences in treatment and survival between elderly patients with thoracic esophageal cancer in metropolitan areas and other areas.

To address the major issue of regional disparity in the treatment for elderly cancer patients in an aging society, we compared the treatment strategies used for elderly patients with thoracic esophageal cancer and their survival outcomes in metropolitan areas and other regions. Using the national database of hospital-based cancer registries in 2008-2011, patients aged 75 years or older who had been diagnosed with thoracic esophageal cancer were enrolled. We divided the patients into two groups: those treated in metropolitan areas (Tokyo, Kanagawa, Osaka, Aichi, Saitama, and Chiba prefectures) with populations of 6 million or more and those treated in other areas (the other 41 prefectures). Compared were patient backgrounds, treatment strategies, and survival curves at each cancer stage. In total, 1236 (24%) patients from metropolitan areas and 3830 (76%) patients from nonmetropolitan areas were enrolled. Patients in metropolitan areas were treated at more advanced stages. There was also a difference in treatment strategy. The 3-year survival rate among cStage I patients was better in metropolitan areas (71.6% vs. 63.7%), and this finding mainly reflected the survival difference between patients treated with radiotherapy alone. For cStage II-IV patients, there were no differences. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis including interaction terms between treatment areas, cStage, and the first-line treatments revealed that treatments in the metropolitan areas were significantly associated with better survival among patients treated with radiotherapy alone for cStage I cancer. Treatment strategies for elderly patients with thoracic esophageal cancer and its survival outcomes differed between metropolitan areas and other regions.

m6 A demethylase ALKBH5 promotes proliferation of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma associated with poor prognosis.

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is one of the most fatal types of malignant tumors worldwide. Epitranscriptome, such as N6 -methyladenosine (m6 A) of mRNA, is an abundant post-transcriptional mRNA modification and has been recently implicated to play roles in several cancers, whereas the significance of m6 A modifications is virtually unknown in ESCC. Analysis of tissue microarray of the tumors in 177 ESCC patients showed that higher expression of m6 A demethylase ALKBH5 correlated with poor prognosis and that ALKBH5 was an independent prognostic factor of the survival of patients. There was no correlation between the other demethylase FTO and prognosis. siRNA knockdown of ALKBH5 but not FTO significantly suppressed proliferation and migration of human ESCC cells. ALKBH5 knockdown delayed progression of cell cycle and accumulated the cells to G0/G1 phase. Mechanistically, expression of CDKN1A (p21) was significantly up-regulated in ALKBH5-depleted cells, and m6 A modification and stability of CDKN1A mRNA were increased by ALKBH5 knockdown. Furthermore, depletion of ALKBH5 substantially suppressed tumor growth of ESCC cells subcutaneously transplanted in BALB/c nude mice. Collectively, we identify ALKBH5 as the first m6 A demethylase that accelerates cell cycle progression and promotes cell proliferation of ESCC cells, which is associated with poor prognosis of ESCC patients.

Verification of the Optimal Interval Before Esophagectomy After Preoperative Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Thoracic Esophageal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The interval between preoperative chemoradiotherapy and surgery reportedly affects perioperative outcomes and survival; however, the optimal interval in esophageal cancer patients remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to determine whether a prolonged interval between preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) and esophagectomy affects the outcomes of esophageal cancer patients. METHODS: A total of 131 patients with esophageal cancer received curative surgery following NACRT at Akita University Hospital between 2009 and 2017. We divided these patients into two groups based on the median interval from NACRT to esophagectomy, and compared the rates of pathological complete response (pCR), surgical outcomes, and survival. RESULTS: The median interval from NACRT to esophagectomy was 39 days (range 21-95). Of the 131 patients, 70 (53%) received esophagectomy after 39 days or more from completion of NACRT. There were no significant differences in the clinicopathological features, including pCR rates, between the two groups. Prolongation of the interval from NACRT to esophagectomy was significantly associated with an increased rate of anastomotic leakage and recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy (p = 0.0225 and p = 0.0022, respectively); however, no association with overall survival was detected. CONCLUSIONS: A prolonged interval between NACRT and esophagectomy had no impact on pCR rates or survival. However, delaying esophagectomy may increase the likelihood of surgical complications such as anastomotic leakage and recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy.

Patterns and timing of recurrence in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: Tumor regression grade (TRG) after neoadjuvant therapy is reportedly predictive of prognosis in esophageal cancer patients, as lack of a response to neoadjuvant therapy is associated with a poor prognosis. However, there is little information available on the timing and pattern of recurrence after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC) that takes into consideration TRG after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT). Here, in an effort to gain insight into a treatment strategy that improves the prognosis of NACRT non-responders, we evaluated the patterns and timing of recurrence in TESCC patients, taking into consideration TRG after NACRT. METHODS: A total of 127 TESCC patients treated with NACRT and esophagectomy between 2009 and 2017 were enrolled in this observational cohort study. TRGs were assigned based on the proportion of residual tumor cells in the area (TRG1, ≥1/3 viable cancer cells; 2, < 1/3 viable cancer cells; 3, no viable cancer cells). We retrospectively investigated the timing and patterns of recurrence and the prognoses in TESCC patients, taking into consideration TRG after NACRT. RESULTS: The 127 participating TESCC patients were categorized as TRG1 (42 patients, 33%), TRG2 (56 patients, 44%) or TRG3 (29 patients, 23%). The locoregional recurrence rate was higher in TRG1 (36.4%) patients than combined TRG2-3 (7.4%) patients. Patients with TRG3 had better prognoses, though a few TRG3 patients experienced distant recurrence. There were no significant differences in median time to first recurrence or OS among patients with locoregional or distant recurrence. There was a trend toward better OS in TRG2-3 patients with recurrence than TRG1 patients with recurrence, but the difference was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: NACRT non-responders (TRG1 patients) experienced higher locoregional recurrence rates and earlier recurrence with distant or locoregional metastasis. TRG appears to be useful for establishing a strategy for perioperative treatments to improve TESCC patient survival, especially among TRG1 patients. (303 words).

IGF2BP3 Expression Correlates With Poor Prognosis in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Insulin-like growth factor-II mRNA binding protein 3 (IGF2BP3) is an oncofetal RNA-binding protein normally involved in cell growth and migration during the early stages of embryogenesis. However, it is also expressed in various cancers, and the relationship between IGF2BP3 and the clinicopathological features and prognosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients is not fully understood. Our aim in this study was to determine whether IGF2BP3 expression status correlates with prognosis in patients with advanced thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS: The IGF2BP3 expression statuses of 177 patients treated with esophagectomy without preoperative therapy were evaluated immunohistochemically using tissue microarray analysis. The relationships between IGF2BP3 expression status and clinicopathological features and survival were then assessed using appropriate statistics. RESULTS: Among 177 esophageal tumors, 122 (68.9%) expressed high levels of IGF2BP3. In patients undergoing surgery alone, IGF2BP3-high expression was significantly associated with a poorer prognosis. By contrast, there were no significant associations between IGF2BP3 expression and clinicopathological features or outcomes in patients treated with surgery plus postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: IGF2BP3 positivity in advanced thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is associated with adverse clinical outcomes in patients treated with surgery alone.

SUVmax reduction predicts long-term survival in patients of non-pCR both in the tumor and lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: A pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) ensures long-term survival in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients following esophagectomy, but pCR patients are a minority. The aim here was to identify prognostic factors in patients with non-pCR ESCC after NACRT. METHODS: This is a retrospective study. Investigated were 5-year overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and relapse-free survival (RFS) among non-pCR ESCC patients divided into pT0N0, primary site pCR (pT0N+), lymph node pCR (pT+N0), and non-pCR in both the tumor and lymph node (pT+N+) subgroups after NACRT and esophagectomy. Focusing on the SUVmax reduction rate in the primary tumor in 88 patients who underwent FDG-PET before and after NACRT, we used univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models to identify prognostic factors. RESULTS: Although there were no significant survival differences among non-pCR ESCC patients with pT0N+, pT+N0, or pT+N+, survival rate among pT+N+patients was the poorest. After setting a 60% cutoff for the SUVmax reduction rate in the tumor, RFS curves for non-pCR patients significantly differed between patients above the cutoff and those below it. For pT+N+ patients, the SUVmax reduction rate (<60% vs ≥ 60%) was an independent prognostic factor of OS, DSS, and RFS. CONCLUSION: Because ESCC patients with SUVmax reduction rates of <60% in the tumor after NACRT and categorized as pT+N+ after NACRT had significantly poorer prognoses, even after esophagectomy, a change in treatment strategy may be an option to improve survival.

[Re-operation for Intrathoracic Complications after Surgery for Thoracic Esophageal Cancer (Chylothorax, Trachea-bronchial Fistula, Post-operative Bleeding)].

Post-operative complications in thoracic esophageal cancer surgery occurred in more than 40% of patients, of which intrathoracic complications are the most serious complications and may require re-operation. Surgeons require a high degree of judgment, skill, and experience at all stages for surgical indications, surgical procedures, and post-operative managements, because re-operation puts a great degree of stress on the patient's mind and body. This article focuses the relatively common post-operative complications that require re-operation, chylothorax, tracheal/bronchial fistula, and post-operative bleeding. The key point of surgery for chylothorax is to identify the site of chylothorax by lymphangiography. The key points of surgery for tracheal and bronchial fistulas are intraoperative and post-operative respi ratory management and reliable covering of the fistula using latissimus dorsi or pectoralis major muscle flaps. The key point of surgery for post-operative bleeding is to reliably identify the point of bleeding and perform hemostasis without damaging the reconstructed gastro-intestinal tract. Surgeons are needed to acquire the knowledge and skills of how to perform re-operation at an appropriate time and method.

Approaches to resection of recurrent solitary mediastinal lymph nodes after esophagectomy.

Esophageal cancer recurrence in solitary mediastinal lymph node that may possibly been left behind in the first surgery differs from other recurrence patterns because it is still local disease and offers the possibility of complete cure through resection, but it is technically difficult. We resected recurrent mediastinal lymph nodes in six cases. A left transthoracic approach was used in three patients. Other approaches were left thoracoabdominal, right open transthoracic and transcervical. R0 resections were achieved in five patients without severe surgical stress or postoperative complications. Overall survival after resection of recurrent lymph nodes was 43 (16-82) months. Approaches to resection of recurrent solitary mediastinal lymph nodes after esophagectomy should be consider to perform curative treatment safely and less invasively.

Nivolumab versus chemotherapy in Japanese patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a subgroup analysis of a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial (ATTRACTION-3).

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of nivolumab versus chemotherapy was evaluated in the Japanese subpopulation from the overall intent-to-treat (ITT) population of the ATTRACTION-3 trial conducted in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) as second-line treatment. METHODS: Data from Japanese patients enrolled in the multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 3 ATTRACTION-3 trial were analyzed. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety. Exploratory subgroup analyses evaluated the association between OS and stratification factors/baseline variables. RESULTS: Overall, 274 (nivolumab, 136; chemotherapy, 138) of the 419 patients in ATTRACTION-3 were enrolled from Japan: response-evaluable population (107; 108) and safety population (135; 138). OS tended to be longer in the nivolumab group versus the chemotherapy group (median: 13.4 months vs. 9.4 months; HR, 0.77; 95% CI 0.59-1.01). Median DOR was longer in the nivolumab group (7.6 months) versus the chemotherapy group (3.6 months). ORRs were similar between the nivolumab [22.4% of patients (24/107)] and chemotherapy groups [22.2% (24/108); odds ratio, 0.98; 95% CI 0.52-1.87]. DCR was lower in the nivolumab group [41.1% (44/107)] versus the chemotherapy group [66.7% (72/108)]. OS in the exploratory analysis consistently favored the nivolumab group versus the chemotherapy group. Overall, nivolumab demonstrated favorable efficacy and safety versus chemotherapy in the Japanese subpopulation, and the trend was similar to that observed in the overall ATTRACTION-3 ITT population. CONCLUSION: Nivolumab represents a new standard second-line treatment option for Japanese patients with advanced ESCC.

Expression and Malignant Potential of B4GALNT4 in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: ß-1,4-N-Acetyl-galactosaminyltransferase 4 (B4GALNT4), an enzyme involved in ganglioside synthesis, is upregulated in many cancers. We examine B4GALNT4 expression and its relationship to prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Expression of B4GALNT4 mRNA and B4GALNT4 protein was analyzed by quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and immunohistochemistry, respectively, in 17 human ESCC cell lines and/or clinical specimens from two independent cohorts of 147 and 159 ESCC patients. The contributions of B4GALNT4 to proliferation, invasion, migration, and adhesion was evaluated in ESCC cells subjected to siRNA-mediated gene knockdown. Correlations between clinicopathological parameters and B4GALNT4 expression in clinical specimens were analyzed in both patient cohorts. RESULTS: B4GALNT4 mRNA expression levels varied widely in ESCC cell lines, regardless of differentiation status or the originating tissue. Knockdown of B4GALNT4 significantly suppressed the proliferation, invasion, migration, and adhesion of ESCC cell lines compared with control cells. B4GALNT4 mRNA was overexpressed in ESCC tissues compared with adjacent normal esophageal tissues. High mRNA expression was significantly associated with poor disease-free survival and hematogenous recurrence, and high B4GALNT4 protein expression was also significantly related to poor disease-specific survival. On multivariable analysis, high B4GALNT4 expression was an independent predictor of poor prognosis. In both patient cohorts, high B4GALNT4 expression did not correlate with known prognostic factors, such as disease stage, lymphovascular invasion, or squamous cell-carcinoma-related antigen level. CONCLUSIONS: B4GALNT4 influences the malignant behavior of ESCC cells. B4GALNT4 expression may serve as a novel prognostic marker, independent of established risk factors, for ESCC patients.

Development of a Novel One-Step Automated Rapid in situ Hybridization for Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Rearrangement Using Non-Contact Alternating-Current Electric-Field Mixing.

Echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion gene rearrangement is a key driver mutation in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although Break-Apart ALK fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is a reliable diagnostic method for detecting ALK gene rearrangement, it is also costly and time-consuming to use as a routine screening test. Our aim was to evaluate the clinical utility of a novel one-step, automated, rapid FISH (Auto-RaFISH) method developed to facilitate hybridization. This method takes advantage of the non-contact mixing effect of an alternating-current electric field. Ten representative specimens from 85 patients diagnosed at multiple centers with primary lung cancer with identified ALK-FISH status were collected. The specimens were all tested using FISH, RaFISH, and Auto-RaFISH. With both RaFISH protocols, the ALK test was completed within 4.5 h, as compared to the 20 h needed for the standard protocol. We found 100% agreement between the standard FISH, RaFISH, and new Auto-RaFISH based on the ALK status, and all methods stained equally well. These findings suggest that Auto-RaFISH could potentially serve as an automated clinical tool for prompt determination of ALK status in NSCLC.