Antinociceptive Activity of Trichilia catigua Hydroalcoholic Extract: New Evidence on Its Dopaminergic Effects.

Trichilia catigua is a native plant of Brazil; its barks are used by some local pharmaceutical companies to prepare tonic drinks, such as Catuama. The present study was addressed to evaluate the effects of T. catigua hydroalcoholic extract in mouse nociception behavioral models, and to evaluate the possible mechanisms involved in its actions. Male Swiss mice were submitted to hot-plate, writhing and von Frey tests, after oral treatment with T. catigua extract (200 mg kg(-1), p.o.). The extract displayed antinociceptive effect in all three models. For characterization of the mechanisms involved in the antinociceptive action of the extract, the following pharmacological treatments were done: naloxone (2.5 mg kg(-1), s.c.), SR141716A (10 mg kg(-1), i.p.), SCH23390 (15 µg kg(-1), i.p.), sulpiride (50 mg kg(-1), i.p.), prazosin (1 mg kg(-1), i.p.), bicuculline (1 mg kg(-1), i.p.) or dl-p-chlorophenylalanine methyl ester (PCPA, 100 mg kg(-1), i.p.). In these experiments, the action of T. catigua extract was evaluated in the hot-plate test. The treatment with SCH23390 completely prevented the antinociceptive effect, while naloxone partially prevented it. The possible involvement of the dopaminergic system in the actions of T. catigua extract was substantiated by data showing the potentiation of apomorphine-induced hypothermia and by the prevention of haloperidol-induced catalepsy. In conclusion, the antinociceptive effects of T. catigua extract seem to be mainly associated with the activation of dopaminergic system and, to a lesser extent, through interaction with opioid pathway.

Activation of the alpha-7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (α7 nAchR) reverses referred mechanical hyperalgesia induced by colonic inflammation in mice.

In the current study, we investigated the effect of the activation of the alpha-7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (α7 nAchR) on dextran sulphate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis and referred mechanical hyperalgesia in mice. Colitis was induced in CD1 male mice through the intake of 4% DSS in tap water for 7 days. Control mice received unadulterated water. Referred mechanical hyperalgesia was evaluated for 7 days after the beginning of 4% DSS intake. Referred mechanical hyperalgesia started within 1 day after beginning DSS drinking, peaked at 3 days and persisted for 7 days. This time course profile perfectly matched with the appearance of signs of colitis. Both acute and chronic oral treatments with nicotine (0.1-1.0 mg/kg, p.o.) were effective in inhibiting the established referred mechanical hyperalgesia. The antinociceptive effect of nicotine was completely abrogated by cotreatment with the selective α7 nAchR antagonist methyllycaconitine (MLA) (1.0 mg/kg). Consistent with these results, i.p. treatment with the selective α7 nAchR agonist PNU 282987 (0.1-1.0 mg/kg) reduced referred mechanical hyperalgesia at all periods of evaluation. Despite their antinociceptive effects, nicotinic agonists did not affect DSS-induced colonic damage or inflammation. Taken together, the data generated in the present study show the potential relevance of using α7 nAchR agonists to treat referred pain and discomfort associated with inflammatory bowel diseases.

Anti-nociceptive effect of kinin B1 and B2 receptor antagonists on peripheral neuropathy induced by paclitaxel in mice.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In the current study, we investigated the role of both kinin B1 and B2 receptors in peripheral neuropathy induced by the chronic treatment of mice with paclitaxel a widely used chemotherapeutic agent. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Chemotherapy-evoked hyperalgesia was induced by i.p. injections of paclitaxel (2 mg·kg⁻¹) over 5 consecutive days. Mechanical and thermal hyperalgesia were evaluated between 7 and 21 days after the first paclitaxel treatment. KEY RESULTS: Treatment with paclitaxel increased both mechanical and thermal hyperalgesia in mice (C57BL/6 and CD1 strains). Kinin receptor deficient mice (B1, or B2 receptor knock-out and B1B2 receptor, double knock-out) presented a significant reduction in paclitaxel-induced hypernociceptive responses in comparison to wild-type animals. Treatment of CD1 mice with kinin receptor antagonists (DALBK for B1 or Hoe 140 for B2 receptors) significantly inhibited both mechanical and thermal hyperalgesia when tested at 7 and 14 days after the first paclitaxel injection. DALBK and Hoe 140 were also effective against paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy when given intrathecally or i.c.v. A marked increase in B1 receptor mRNA was observed in the mouse thalamus, parietal and pre-frontal cortex from 7 days after the first paclitaxel treatment. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Kinins acting on both B1 and B2 receptors, expressed in spinal and supra-spinal sites, played a crucial role in controlling the hypernociceptive state caused by chronic treatment with paclitaxel.

The role of kinin B1 and B2 receptors in the scratching behaviour induced by proteinase-activated receptor-2 agonists in mice.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Activation of the proteinase-activated receptor-2 (PAR-2) induces scratching behaviour in mice. Here, we have investigated the role of kinin B(1) and B(2) receptors in the pruritogenic response elicited by activators of PAR-2. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Scratching was induced by an intradermal (i.d.) injection of trypsin or the selective PAR-2 activating peptide SLIGRL-NH(2) at the back of the mouse neck. The animals were observed for 40 min and their scratching response was quantified. KEY RESULTS: I.d. injection of trypsin or SLIGRL-NH(2) evoked a scratching behaviour, dependent on PAR-2 activation. Mice genetically deficient in kinin B(1) or B(2) receptors exhibited reduced scratching behaviour after i.d. injection of trypsin or SLIGRL-NH(2). Treatment (i.p.) with the non-peptide B(1) or B(2)receptor antagonists SSR240612 and FR173657, respectively, prevented the scratching behaviour caused by trypsin or SLIGRL-NH(2). Nonetheless, only treatment i.p. with the peptide B(2)receptor antagonist, Hoe 140, but not the B(1)receptor antagonist (DALBK), inhibited the pruritogenic response to trypsin. Hoe 140 was also effective against SLIGRL-NH(2)-induced scratching behaviour when injected by i.d. or intrathecal (i.t.) routes. Also, the response to SLIGRL-NH(2) was inhibited by i.t. (but not by i.d.) treatment with DALBK. Conversely, neither Hoe 140 nor DALBK were able to inhibit SLIGRL-NH(2)-induced scratching behaviour when given intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The present results demonstrated that kinins acting on both B(1) and B(2) receptors played a crucial role in controlling the pruriceptive signalling triggered by PAR-2 activation in mice.

Roles of endothelin ETA and ETB receptors in nociception and chemical, thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia induced by endothelin-1 in the rat hindpaw.

Evidence on the relative roles of endothelin ET(A) and ET(B) receptors in mediating the nociceptive and hyperalgesic actions of endothelin-1 is still fragmented and conflicting, due to variations between species and/or models. This study assesses the participation of ET(A) and ET(B) receptors on the nociceptive behavior and hyperalgesia to chemical (formalin), mechanical and thermal stimuli evoked by endothelin-1 injected into the rat hind-paw. Intraplantar (i.pl.) injection of endothelin-1 (1-30 pmol, 50 microl) induced dose-dependent nociceptive behaviors over the first hour. Endothelin-1 (3-30 pmol) also potentiated both phases of nociception induced by a subsequent ipsilateral i.pl. injection of formalin (0.5%, 50 microl). Endothelin-1, at 10 pmol, increased responses of the first phase (0-10 min) by 97% and of the second phase (15-60 min) by 120%, and similar degrees of potentiation were observed following 30 pmol of the peptide. Endothelin-1 (1-30 pmol) caused slowly developing long-lasting thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia with maximum effects at 10 and 30 pmol, respectively, reaching significance at 2-3h and remaining elevated for up to at least 8h after injection. Treatment with the selective ET(A) and ET(B) peptidic antagonists BQ-123 and BQ-788 (i.pl., both at 10 nmol, 3.5h after ET-1 injection) or with the non-peptidic antagonists atrasentan and A-192621 systemically (i.v., 10 and 20mg/kg, respectively) each caused significant reductions in endothelin-1-induced nociception, as well as chemical, thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia. Thus, the nociceptive and hyperalgesic effects induced by i.pl. endothelin-1 seem to be mediated by both ET(A) and ET(B) receptors.

Mechanisms underlying the nociceptive responses induced by platelet-activating factor (PAF) in the rat paw.

Platelet-activating factor (PAF) is an inflammatory mediator widely known to exert relevant pathophysiological functions. However, the relevance of PAF in nociception has received much less attention. Herein, we have investigated the mechanisms underlying PAF-induced spontaneous nociception and mechanical hypersensitivity in the rat paw. PAF injection (1- 30 nmol/paw) resulted in a dose-related overt nociception, whilst only the dose of 10 nmol/ paw produced a significant and time-related mechanical hypersensitivity. Local coinjection of PAF antagonist WEB2086 significantly inhibited both spontaneous nociception and mechanical hypersensitivity. Moreover, the coinjection of the natural IL-1beta receptor antagonist (IRA) notably prevented both PAF-induced nociceptive responses, whilst these responses were not altered by anti-TNFalpha coinjection. Interestingly, pretreatment with the ultrapotent vaniloid agonist resiniferotoxin, coinjection of the TRPV1 receptor antagonist SB366791, or mast cell depletion with compound 48/80 markedly prevented PAF-induced spontaneous nociception. Conversely, PAF-elicited mechanical hypersensitivity was strikingly susceptible to distinct antineutrophil-related strategies, namely the antineutrophil antibody, the selectin blocker fucoidin, the chemokine CXCR2 receptor antagonist SB225002, and the C5a receptor antibody anti-CD88. Notably, the same antineutrophil migration strategies significantly prevented the increase of myeloperoxidase activity induced by PAF. The mechanical hypersensitivity caused by PAF was also prevented by the cyclooxygenase inhibitors indomethacin or celecoxib, and by the selective beta(1) adrenergic receptor antagonist atenolol. Collectively, the present results provide consistent evidence indicating that distinct mechanisms are involved in the spontaneous nociception and mechanical hypersensitivity caused by PAF. They also support the concept that selective PAF receptor antagonists might constitute interesting targets for the development of new analgesic drugs.