Correlation Between Serum and Fecal Biomarkers and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients with Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis.

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs), such as the short CD activity index (sCDAI) and partial Mayo Score (PMS), are used to define clinical remission in IBD, but may not represent the true degree of inflammation and endoscopy is invasive. Non-invasive testing options include c-reactive protein (CRP) and fecal calprotectin (FCP). AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the degree of correlation of non-invasive biomarkers with PROs and the impact other clinical variables can have on their levels. METHODS: We reviewed data collected from the prospective cohort, Study of a Prospective Adult Research Cohort with IBD (SPARC-IBD), comprised of over 3000 patients from 17 tertiary referral centers. Demographic and clinical variables were analyzed by disease type, disease severity was based on PROs, and baseline CRP and FCP were measured. For comparative analysis, we performed Fisher's exact test and Welch's t test, where p < 0.05 was significant. RESULTS: 1547 patients were included; 63% had CD, 56% were female, with an average disease duration of 13.6 years. CRP and FCP were associated with symptom severity in inflammatory CD. CRP was useful to differentiate symptoms across different disease locations in CD, whereas FCP was associated with symptom severity in Crohn's colitis only. For UC, FCP was able to distinguish symptom severity better in distal UC, whereas in extensive or pancolitis, it was useful only to distinguish severe symptoms from other categories of symptom severity. CONCLUSION: PROs correlate with CRP and FCP; however, disease location and phenotype impact their ability to distinguish symptom severity.

Upadacitinib as Rescue Therapy for the Treatment of Acute Severe Colitis in an Acute Care Setting.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease is a chronic, relapsing, and remitting inflammatory disorder that despite advances in medical therapy often requires hospitalization for treatment of acute flares with intravenous corticosteroids. Many patients will not respond to corticosteroids and require infliximab or cyclosporine as rescue therapy. If medical therapy fails, definitive surgical management is required. Recently, Janus Kinase inhibitors, including upadacitinib, have been proposed as an alternative rescue therapy. AIMS: We hypothesized that upadacitinib may be effective in treating acute severe colitis. METHODS: A retrospective review of 12 inflammatory bowel disease patients admitted for acute severe colitis who received upadacitinib induction therapy was performed. The rates of surgery, repeat or prolonged steroid use, and re-admission within 90 days of index hospitalization were measured. The need for re-induction with upadacitinib, change in medical therapy, rates of clinical remission, change in 6-point partial Mayo score, and laboratory markers of inflammation were measured as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Five patients met the primary composite endpoint including four patients requiring surgery and one additional patient being unable to withdraw steroids within 90 days of hospital discharge. One patient required re-induction with upadacitinib within 90 days and no patients required change in medical therapy within 90 days. Most patients who did not undergo surgery were in clinical remission within 90 days and showed clinical improvement with decreased 6-point partial Mayo scores. CONCLUSION: Upadacitinib may be effective salvage therapy for acute severe colitis, but larger controlled trials are required to validate these results.

The Sigmoid Colon as an Unusual Primary Site of T Cell Lymphoma in a Patient Presenting With Brain Metastasis.

Intestinal T-cell lymphomas are an uncommon type of gastrointestinal malignancy, primarily found in the stomach and small bowel. The liver represents the most common distant organ for metastasis in gastrointestinal malignancies, followed by the lungs. Brain and muscular metastases are rare. We present intestinal T-cell lymphoma with a primary site in the sigmoid colon and metastasis to the brain, meninges, and psoas muscle. Biopsy of the malignant mass confirmed intestinal T-cell lymphoma. To our knowledge, this is the first colon T-cell lymphoma with primary brain and meningeal metastasis with another uncommon site of muscular metastasis.

Impact of Holding Immunosuppressive Therapy in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Around mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine Administration on Humoral Immune Response and Development of COVID-19 Infection.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccines are efficacious in patients with inflammatory bowel disease; but there is a lack of data examining if holding immunosuppressive therapy around vaccination improves immune response. We studied the effect of holding IBD medications around the time of vaccination on antibody response and breakthrough COVID-19 infection. METHODS: Partnership to Report Effectiveness of Vaccination in populations Excluded from iNitial Trials of COVID is a prospective cohort of individuals with IBD receiving COVID-19 vaccination. Quantitative measurement of anti-receptor binding domain IgG antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 was performed 8 weeks after completing a vaccination series. RESULTS: A total of 1854 patients were included; 59% were on anti-tumour necrosis factor [TNF] [10% of these on combination therapy], 11% on vedolizumab, and 14% on ustekinumab; 11% of participants held therapy before or after vaccine administration for at least 2 weeks. Antibody levels were similar in participants continuing versus holding anti-TNF monotherapy before or after the second vaccine [BNT162b2: 10 µg/mL vs 8.9 µg/mL; mRNA-1273: 17.5 µg/mL vs 14.5 µg/mL]. Comparable results were seen in those on combination therapy. Antibody titres in those on ustekinumab or vedolizumab were higher compared with anti-TNF users, but there was no significant difference if the drug was held or continued [BNT162b2: 22.5 µg/mL vs 23 µg/mL; mRNA-1273: 88 µg/mL vs 51 µg/mL]. Holding therapy was not associated with decreased rate of COVID-19 infection compared with those not holding therapy [BNT162b2: 28% vs 29%; mRNA-1273: 19% vs 31%]. CONCLUSION: We recommend continuing IBD medications while receiving mRNA COVID-19 vaccination without interruption.