Prediction of nodal disease in oral squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue: histopathological risk assessment with the focus on depth of invasion.

OBJECTIVE: Cervical lymph node metastasis (CLNM) is one of the most relevant influencing factors for the oncological outcome of patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Several studies showed that the tumors depth of invasion (DOI) influences the risk for CLNM, however varying across the oral subsites. The aim of this study is to investigate the role of DOI and other risk factors in OSCC of the tongue in relation to the occurrence of occult CLNM. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, n = 139 patients with primary OSCC of the tongue, treated by complete surgical resection (R0) with curative intention between 2013 and 2021, were included. For data analysis, epidemiologic data as well as preoperative tumor staging, surgical therapy including neck management, histopathological tumor data and follow-up were considered. Uni- and multivariate logistic regression were used to determine association between histopathological risk factors and the occurrence of occult CLNM. RESULTS: The rate of occult cervical metastasis was 19.4%. T-staging, cervical nodal disease (pN+) and lymphatic invasion were significantly associated with reduced OS and RFS. While DOI had no relevant influence on the OS and RFS (p = 0.88 and p = 0.91 respectively), there was significant correlation between DOI and the occurrence of occult CLNM (OR: 1.17, 95%CI: 1.05-1.30; p < 0.01). The optimal cutoff in predicting occult CLNM was 6 mm (Sensitivity: 84.2%, Specificity: 73.5%, AUC: 0.75). CONCLUSIONS: The DOI is a helpful risk parameter to predict the occurrence of occult nodal disease in OSCC of the tongue. Given the critical decision cutoff between 2 and 4 mm DOI for performing elective neck dissection in the current guidelines, our data suggests that in these cases, surgical de-escalation could be feasible with close follow-up. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study highlights the relevance of DOI as a risk parameter in the prediction of CLNM with the aim to specify the individual patient risk and to deescalate surgical therapy in order to decrease comorbidities while improving the oncological prognosis.

Prognostic value of lymph node involvement in oral squamous cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: Different parameters have been identified in patients with oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCC) that have a serious impact on survival, including residual tumour and extracapsular spread. Moreover, other factors, including the lymph node ratio (LNR) and lymph node yield (LNY), have been suggested as prognostic markers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective study included patients diagnosed with OSCC and cervical lymph node metastases during the years 2010-2020. Patients' records were evaluated regarding lymph node status, final therapy regime, tumour recurrence, time to death, tumour association with death, disease-free survival (DSF), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: In 242 patients with a mean age of 63.57 ± 11.24 years, treated either by selective neck dissection (SND; n = 70) or by modified radical neck dissection (MRND; n = 172), 5772 lymph nodes were detected. The LNR and LNY were identified as independent risk factors in OS and DFS. The optimal cut-off point for the LNY was ≥ 17 lymph nodes in the SND and ≥ 27 lymph nodes in the MRND group. The metastatic lymph node clearance (MLNC) was established as a score to relate the LNR and LNY to the extent of lymph node removal. Survival analysis showed statistically significant differences among score levels. CONCLUSIONS: As information about the extent of nodal dissection is excluded from LNR and LNY, we propose the use of a new scoring system comprising individual cut-off values for LNY and LNR with regard to the extent of neck dissection. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: MLNC might help to identify high-risk OSCC patients with metastatic lymph nodes.

Oncological Outcome of Node-Positive Oral Squamous Cell Carcinomas Treated With Selective and Comprehensive Neck Dissection.

Selective neck dissection (SND) is the treatment of choice in patients with oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCCs) and clinically node-negative necks (cN0). The treatment of patients with positive-staged necks (cN+) includes SND as well as comprehensive neck dissection (CND). The clear benefit of one or the other remains under debate. We aim to address this lack of clarity by analysing patients with OSCC staged with clinically node-positive necks, treated with either CND or SND using a level-by-level approach. This retrospective study included patients diagnosed with OSCC with clinically (cN+) and pathologically (pN+) positive cervical lymph nodes (LNs) with clear neck level categorization during the years 2010-2019. In total, 74 patients were analysed. Cox regression analysis found no significance for the type of ND being an independent risk factor, neither for overall survival (OS) nor for disease-free survival (DFS). Regional recurrence of CND cases (5.77%) was comparable to SND cases (9.09%). For OS, extracapsular spread (ECS) and male sex were identified as independent risk factors with poorer outcome. pT-stage and ECS were found to be independent risk factors for DFS. The results of this study suggest that both CND and SND may be viable treatment options for certain patients with OSCC pN+.

The impact of time between surgery and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in advanced oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.

Objective: In advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), adjuvant therapy (AT) is an important part of the treatment to ensure extended locoregional control after primary surgical resection. The impact of the time interval between surgery and AT on the oncological prognosis remains unclear, particularly in high-risk constellations. The aim of this study is to categorize treatment delays and to determine their impact on the oncological prognosis within the context of the histopathological risk parameters of patients with advanced OSCC. Methods: In this single-institutional retrospective cohort study, all patients treated for OSCC between 2016 and 2021 and who received postoperative chemoradiation (POCRT) were included. Patients were divided into two groups: Group I: ≤ 6 weeks between surgery and POCRT; and Group II: > 6 weeks between surgery and POCRT. Results: Overall, 202 patients were included (Group I: 156 (77.2%) vs. Group II: 46 (22.8%)). There were no statistically significant differences in epidemiological aspects and histopathological risk factors between the two groups. The maximum time to initiation of POCRT was 11 weeks. Delayed POCRT initiation had no statistically significant influence on the 5-year OS (61.6% vs. 57.3%, p = 0.89), locoregional control rate (38.6% vs. 43.3%, p = 0.57), and RFS (32.3% vs. 30.4%, p = 0.21). On multivariate analysis, extracapsular spread (HR: 2.21, 95% CI: 1.21 - 4.04, p = 0.01) and incomplete surgical resection (HR: 2.01, 95% CI: 1.10 - 3.69, p = 0.02) were significantly correlated with OS. For RFS, ECS (HR: 1.82, 95% CI: 1.15 - 2.86, p = 0.01), incomplete resection (HR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.04 - 2.71, p = 0.04), and vascular infiltration of the tumor (V-stage; HR: 2.15, 95% CI: 1.08 - 4.27, p = 0.03) were significant risk predictors. Conclusion: Delays in POCRT initiation up to 11 weeks after surgical resection for advanced OSCC were not statistically significantly associated with impaired survival. In cases of prolonged surgical treatment due to management of complications, a small delay in AT beyond the recommended time limit may be justified and AT should still be pursued.

Resection status and margin control in intraoperative frozen sectioning analysis of oral squamous cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Intraoperative frozen section analysis (IFSA) is a well-established procedure for determining the intraoperative soft tissue resection status in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Margin status is a major predictor of the patient´s outcome, histologically free margins of ≥ 5 mm are demanded. This study evaluates the accuracy of IFSA, the impact of margin status and the impact of intraoperative margin revision on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). METHODS: This retrospective study included 213 patients with OSCC. IFSA results were compared with definitive histopathological reports, Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed. Cut-off values were calculated for resection margins considering known risk factors. RESULTS: IFSA showed positive margins in 8 cases (3.8%). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no significant differences for OS or DFS if R0-status was achieved by initial resection or immediate re-resection. Final histopathological evaluation revealed false-positive IFSA in 3/8 cases (37.5%) and false-negative IFSA in 1/205 cases (0.5%). Sensitivity was 83.3% and specificity was 98.6%. Analysis of optimal cut-off values showed no general need for larger resection margins in patients with risk factors. Cut-off values were slightly higher for patients with the risk factor alcohol consumption (7 mm for OS and DFS) or pN + ECS- disease (7 mm for DFS). Optimal cut-off values for tumour-margin-distance were around 6 mm. CONCLUSION: IFSA provides a valuable assessment method for intraoperative soft tissue resection margins. Risk factors seemingly do not significantly influence the extent of tumour resection.

Oncologic Outcome in Advanced Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Refusal of Recommended Adjuvant Therapy.

Importance: Clinicians may be confronted with patients refusing recommended adjuvant therapy (AT) after the primary resection of an advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). However, for this tumor entity, data are lacking regarding the oncological outcomes and associated factors after refusal of AT. Objective: To evaluate the difference in survival and disease recurrence for patients with and without recommended AT after resection of advanced OSCC. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this single-center retrospective matched cohort study, patients with advanced OSCC who refused recommended AT between January 2010 and December 2021 were matched 1:1 according to Union for International Cancer Control tumor staging with patients who completed AT. Exposures: Patients with advanced OSCC who refused or completed recommended AT between 2010 and 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome of this study was the comparison of overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) between the 2 study groups. Results: A total of 82 patients (mean [SD] age at time of surgery, 68.0 [11.3] years; 38 [46.3%] female, 44 [53.7%] male) with and without AT (41 per study group) were included in the analysis. Patients refusing AT developed more frequent disease recurrence than patients who completed AT (61.0% vs 26.8%; difference, 34.2%; odds ratio, 4.26; 95% CI, 1.68-10.84). In addition, patients who refused AT presented with lower 2-year OS (72.7% vs 88.6%; difference, 15.9%; 95% CI, 8.6%-40.6%) and much lower 2-year RFS (39.1% vs 74.2%; difference, 35.1%; 95% CI, 0.2%-70.5%). In the patient cohort who rejected AT, a worse OS was associated with female sex (48.6% vs 90.5%; difference, 41.9%; 95% CI, 0.6%-84.4%), pT1-2 category (57.1% vs 92.3%; difference, 35.2%; 95% CI, 3.3%-73.6%), and pN1 or higher category (61.2% vs 82.6%; difference, 21.4%; 95% CI, 14.1%-56.8%). Lower RFS was associated with female sex (37.9% vs 90.9%; difference, 53.0%; 95% CI, 8.0%-97.9%), advanced T category (pT3-4, 35.3% vs 80.0%; difference, 44.7%; 95% CI, 6.4%-95.3%), lymph node yield of 20 or greater (31.4% vs 80.6%; difference, 49.2%; 95% CI, 4.9%-93.4%), and lymph node ratio of less than 4.6% (36.6% vs 84.4%; difference, 47.8%; 95% CI, 1.8%-93.1%). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of patients with advanced OSCC, refusal of AT was associated with worse oncological outcomes. The prevalence of disease recurrence during follow-up was 34% higher in patients who refused AT than in patients who completed AT. The results from this study may assist clinicians in guiding patients who are considering refusal of or withdrawal from AT.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in recurrent or secondary oral squamous cell carcinoma after previous neck dissection.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the potential of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients with recurrent or a secondary oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) without clinical signs of lymph node metastases (cN0), who were previously treated with a surgical approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all patients with cN0 recurrent or secondary OSCC, who were treated using SLNB after previous neck dissection. Endpoints were sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection rate, negative predictive value (NPV) and sensitivity. RESULTS: A total of 17 patients with a mean age of 68.6 years were included. SLN were detected in 15 of 17 cases (detection rate: 88.2%). In seven patients (41.2%), a bilateral or contralateral lymph drainage of a unilateral carcinoma was found. Two patients (11.8%) demonstrated a positive SLN upon pathohistological analysis, which led to an upstaging. In one case, a non-SLN was positive, which is considered a false-negative result. The mean follow-up for all patients with histologically negative SLN including the patients without a detected SLN was 11.8 months (range: 0-31 months). Of these, one patient developed (isolated) neck recurrence after 12 months resulting in an overall NPV of 86.7% and a sensitivity of 50.0% for the SLNB as a neck staging procedure. CONCLUSION: SLNB can improve the staging of patients with recurrent or secondary OSCC, who present with a history of a previous neck dissection. Further studies are required to demonstrate the oncological benefit of SLNB in this patient cohort.

Management of the Contralateral Neck in Unilateral Node-Positive Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: In lateralized oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) with ipsilateral cervical lymph node metastasis (CLNM), the surgical management of the unsuspicious contralateral neck remains a matter of debate. The aim of this study was to analyze this cohort and to compare the outcomes of patients with and without contralateral elective neck dissection (END). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients with lateralized OSCC, ipsilateral CLNM (pN+) and contralateral cN0-stage was performed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical management of the contralateral neck: I: END; and II: no END performed. Adjuvant radiotherapy was applied bilaterally in both groups according to individual risk. RESULTS: A total of 65 patients (group I: 16 (24.6%); group II: 49 (75.4%)) with a median follow-up of 28 months were included. Initially, there was no case of contralateral CLNM after surgery. During follow-up, 6 (9.2%) patients presented with recurrent CLNM. In 5 of these cases (7.7%), the contralateral neck (group I: 3/16 (18.8%); group II: 2/49 (4.1%)) was affected. Increased ipsilateral lymph node ratio was associated with contralateral CLNM (p = 0.07). END of the contralateral side showed no significant benefit regarding OS (p = 0.59) and RFS (p = 0.19). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the risk for occult contralateral CLNM in patients with lateralized OSCC ipsilateral CLNM is low. Our data suggest that END should not be performed routinely in this cohort. Risk-adapted radiotherapy of the contralateral neck alone seems to be sufficient from the oncological point of view.

Pattern of cervical lymph node metastases in squamous cell carcinoma of the upper oral cavity - How to manage the neck.

OBJECTIVES: Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) arising from the upper oral cavity is rare compared to other localizations. While cervical lymph node metastasis (CLNM) can be predicted to some extent, the probability of occult CLNM remains high. The aim of this study is to determine risk factors affecting clinical decision making. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients surgically treated between 2012 and 2017 for OSCC of the upper oral cavity was performed. RESULTS: A total of 66 patients were included. Of these, 25 patients (37.9%) presented with CLNM after histopathological examination (pN+/cN0: 10/44 (22.7%); pN+/cN+: 15/22 (68.2%)). Lymph vessel infiltration (p = 0.03) and grade of differentiation (p = 0.03) were associated with an increased probability for CLNM. Patients with positive nodal disease at the time of primary surgery showed higher tumor depth of invasion (DOI) than patients without CLNM (mean 10.3 mm ± 6.9 versus mean 6.1 mm ± 4.9; p = 0.02). The optimal DOI cutoff value for the prediction of CLNM was 4.5 mm. The OS was significantly higher in patients with a tumor DOI ≤ 4.5 mm (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Elective neck dissection should be preferably performed for OSCC of the upper oral cavity. For early-stage and clinically node-negative patients, sentinel-lymph node biopsy can be an alternative, especially in patients with a DOI ≤ 4.5 mm. Since this group had no occult CLNM below this DOI cutoff value, watch and wait might be an alternative for selected patients.

Decompressive hemicraniectomy in ischemic stroke.

Malignant hemispheric stroke (MHS) is a life-threatening event, associated with high morbidity and mortality. Decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHS) is the treatment of choice to relieve the emerging space-occupying brain edema. This review details the pathophysiological and scientific background, considerations for clinical decision making, surgical treatment and impact on the patients' outcome. Although surgery reduces mortality significantly, the probability for unfavorable outcome is still high in selected cases. While former randomized controlled studies aimed for the prevention of the primary cause, the current research focuses on the treatment and prevention of secondary neurological injury.