Effect of vigorous-intensity physical activity on incident cognitive impairment in high-risk hypertension.

INTRODUCTION: We investigated the effect vigorous physical activity (VPA) on the risk of incident mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and probable dementia among individuals with high-risk hypertension. METHODS: Baseline self-reported frequency of VPA was categorized into low VPA (<1 session/week), and high VPA (≥1 session/week). We used multivariate Cox regression analysis to examine the association of VPA categories with incident MCI and probable dementia events. RESULTS: Participants in the high VPA category, compared with low VPA, experienced lower events rates (per 1000 person-years) of MCI (13.9 vs 19.7), probable dementia (6.3 vs 9.0), and MCI/probable dementia (18.5 vs 25.8). In the multivariate Cox regression model, high VPA, compared with low VPA, was associated with lower risk of MCI, probable dementia, and MCI/probable dementia (HR [95% CI]: 0.81 [0.68-0.97], 0.80 [0.63-1.03], and 0.82 [0.70-0.96]), respectively. DISCUSSION: This study provides evidence that VPA may preserve cognitive function in high-risk patients with hypertension. HIGHLIGHTS: Hypertension is associated with an increased risk of cognitive impairment Physical activity (PA) is associated with a lower risk of decline in cognition The effect of ≥1 sessions of vigorous-intensity PA (VPA) per week was assessed This analysis included SPRINT MIND trial participants with high-risk hypertension ≥1 VPA sessions/week was associated with lower risk of future cognitive impairment.

Self-rated health and risk of incident cardiovascular events among individuals with hypertension.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between self-rated health (SRH) and cardiovascular events in individuals with hypertension, but without diabetes mellitus, is understudied. METHODS: We performed a post hoc analysis of data from SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial). SRH was categorized into excellent, very good, good and fair/poor. Using multivariable Cox regression, we estimated hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association of SRH with both all-cause mortality and a composite of cardiovascular events (the primary outcome), which was defined to include myocardial infarction (MI), other acute coronary syndromes, stroke, acute decompensated heart failure, and cardiovascular death. RESULTS: We included 9319 SPRINT participants (aged 67.9 ±â€Š9 years, 35.6% women) with a median follow-up of 3.8 years. Compared with SRH of excellent, the risk [hazard ratio (95% CI)] of the primary outcome associated with very good, good, and fair/poor SRH was 1.11(0.78-1.56), 1.45 (1.03-2.05), and 1.87(1.28-2.75), respectively. Similarly, compared with SRH of excellent, the risk of all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (95% CI)] associated with very good, good, and fair/poor SRH was 1.13 (0.73-1.76), 1.72 (1.12-2.64), and 2.11 (1.32-3.38), respectively. Less favorable SRH (LF-SRH) was also associated with a higher risk of each component of the primary outcome and serious adverse events (SAE). CONCLUSION: Among individuals with hypertension, SRH is independently associated with the risk of incident cardiovascular events, all-cause mortality, and SAE. Our study suggest that guidelines should consider the potential significance of including SRH in the clinical history of patients with hypertension.