Intraoperative and Intraprocedural Use of 3-Dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiography: An International European Association of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia and Intensive Care Survey of Cardiac Surgical Centers.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the intraoperative use of 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (3D TEE) in cardiac surgical centers, the authors created a survey aimed at evaluating the availability of equipment and the use of 3D TEE for specific surgical and interventional procedures and single-image modalities. The respondents were asked to identify the perceived impact on patient management and current limitations to its routine use. DESIGN: A multiple choice 25-question online survey submitted to the members of the European Association of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia and Intensive Care (EACTAIC) on December 6, 2021, and closed on January 31, 2022. SETTING: An online survey. PARTICIPANTS: Registered EACTAIC members in 2021. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 239 respondents from 44 different countries took part in the survey (27% of the total 903 EACTAIC members). Most respondents (59%) were TEE-certified by the National Board of Echocardiography, European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI/EACTAIC), or had a national certificate. Of the respondents, 68% had no formal 3D TEE training. Eight percent of respondents had no 3D machines, whereas 40% had one for each operating room, and 33% had only one for the entire operating room block. 3D TEE was performed most frequently in more than 67% of cases for mitral valve surgery, and in more than 54% of cases for mitral and tricuspid clips, aortic valve, tricuspid valve, and aortic surgery. CONCLUSION: Current guidelines suggest integrating 3D TEE into all comprehensive examinations. The authors' survey reported that intraoperative 3D TEE was used in the majority of mitral valve surgery and only one-half of the other valve surgeries and transcatheter procedures. Its use may be explained by the availability of 3D machines, trained personnel, and limited time to perform TEE in the operating room. Educational initiatives for training in 3D TEE may further increase its routine use.

European Association of Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Pediatric Cardiac Anesthesia Fellowship Curriculum: First Edition.

Pediatric cardiac anesthesia is a subspecialty of cardiac and pediatric anesthesiology dedicated to the perioperative care of patients with congenital heart disease. Members of the Congenital and Education Subcommittees of the European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (EACTAIC) agreed on the necessity to develop an EACTAIC pediatric cardiac anesthesia fellowship curriculum. This manuscript represents a consensus on the composition and the design of the EACTAIC Pediatric Cardiac Anesthesia Fellowship program. This curriculum provides a basis for the training of future pediatric cardiac anesthesiologists by clearly defining the theoretical and practical requirements for fellows and host centers.

EACTA/SCA Recommendations for the Cardiac Anesthesia Management of Patients With Suspected or Confirmed COVID-19 Infection: An Expert Consensus From the European Association of Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology and Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists With Endorsement From the Chinese Society of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesiology.

The European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology (EACTA) and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists (SCA) aimed to create joint recommendations for the perioperative management of patients with suspected or proven severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection undergoing cardiac surgery or invasive cardiac procedures. To produce appropriate recommendations, the authors combined the evidence from the literature review, reevaluating the clinical experience of routine cardiac surgery in similar cases during the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS-CoV) outbreak and the current pandemic with suspected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients, and the expert opinions through broad discussions within the EACTA and SCA. The authors took into consideration the balance between established procedures and the feasibility during the present outbreak. The authors present an agreement between the European and US practices in managing patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. The recommendations take into consideration a broad spectrum of issues, with a focus on preoperative testing, safety concerns, overall approaches to general and specific aspects of preparation for anesthesia, airway management, transesophageal echocardiography, perioperative ventilation, coagulation, hemodynamic control, and postoperative care. As the COVID-19 pandemic is spreading, it will continue to present a challenge for the worldwide anesthesiology community. To allow these recommendations to be updated as long as possible, the authors provided weblinks to international public and academic sources providing timely updated data. This document should be the basis of future task forces to develop a more comprehensive consensus considering new evidence uncovered during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Current Anesthetic Care of Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Europe: Results of an Online Survey.

OBJECTIVES: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become an alternative treatment for patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis not eligible for surgical valve replacement due to a high periprocedural risk or comorbidities. However, there are several areas of debate concerning the pre-, intra- and post-procedural management. The standards and management for these topics may vary widely among different institutions and countries in Europe. DESIGN: Structured web-based, anonymized, voluntary survey. SETTING: Distribution of the survey via email among members of the European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology working in European centers performing TAVR between September and December 2018. PARTICIPANTS: Physicians. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The survey consisted of 25 questions, including inquiries regarding number of TAVR procedures, technical aspects of TAVR, medical specialities present, preoperative evaluation of TAVR candidates, anesthesia regimen, as well as postoperative management. Seventy members participated in the survey. Reporting members mostly performed 151-to-300 TAVR procedures per year. In 90% of the responses, a cardiologist, cardiac surgeon, cardiothoracic anesthesiologist, and perfusionist always were available. Sixty-six percent of the members had a national curriculum for cardiothoracic anesthesia. Among 60% of responders, the decision for TAVR was made preoperatively by an interdisciplinary heart team with a cardiothoracic anesthesiologist, yet in 5 countries an anesthesiologist was not part of the decision-making. General anesthesia was employed in 40% of the responses, monitored anesthesia care in 44%, local anesthesia in 23%, and in 49% all techniques were offered to the patients. In cases of general anesthesia, endotracheal intubation almost always was performed (91%). It was stated that norepinephrine was the vasopressor of choice (63% of centers). Transesophageal echocardiography guiding, whether performed by an anesthesiologist or cardiologist, was used only ≤30%. Postprocedurally, patients were transferred to an intensive care unit by 51.43% of the respondents with a reported nurse-to-patient ratio of 1:2 or 1:3, to a post-anesthesia care unit by 27.14%, to a postoperative recovery room by 11.43%, and to a peripheral ward by 10%. CONCLUSION: The results indicated that requirements and quality indicators (eg, periprocedural anesthetic management, involvement of the anesthesiologist in the heart team, etc) for TAVR procedures as published within the European guideline are largely, yet still not fully implemented in daily routine. In addition, anesthetic TAVR management also is performed heterogeneously throughout Europe.

Thoracic Anesthesia during the COVID-19 Pandemic: 2021 Updated Recommendations by the European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (EACTAIC) Thoracic Subspecialty Committee.

The novel coronavirus pandemic has radically changed the landscape of normal surgical practice. Lifesaving cancer surgery, however, remains a clinical priority, and there is an increasing need to fully define the optimal oncologic management of patients with varying stages of lung cancer, allowing prioritization of which thoracic procedures should be performed in the current era. Healthcare providers and managers should not ignore the risk of a bimodal peak of mortality in patients with lung cancer; an imminent spike due to mortality from acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection, and a secondary peak reflecting an excess of cancer-related mortality among patients whose treatments were deemed less urgent, delayed, or cancelled. The European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Thoracic Anesthesia Subspecialty group has considered these challenges and developed an updated set of expert recommendations concerning the infectious period, timing of surgery, vaccination, preoperative screening and evaluation, airway management, and ventilation of thoracic surgical patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Perspectives on the Fellowship Training in Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Anesthesia and Critical Care in Europe From Program Directors and Educational Leads Around Europe.

This article reviews fellowship training in adult cardiac, thoracic, and vascular anesthesia and critical care from the perspective of European program initiators and educational leaders in these subspecialties together with current training fellows. Currently, the European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology (EACTA) network has 20 certified fellowship positions each year in 10 hosting centers within 7 European countries, with 2 positions outside Europe (São Paulo, Brazil). Since 2009, 42 fellows have completed the fellowship training. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the rationale, requirements, and contributions of the fellows, in the context of the developmental progression of the EACTA fellowship in adult cardiac, thoracic, and vascular anesthesia and critical care from inception to present. A summary of the program structure, accreditation of host centers, requirements to join the program, teaching and assessment tools, certification, and training requirements in transesophageal electrocardiography is outlined. In addition, a description of the current state of EACTA fellowships across Europe, and a perspective for future steps and challenges to the educational program, is provided.

European Association of Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology (EACTA) Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia Fellowship Curriculum: First Edition.

This special article summarizes the design and certification process of the European Association of Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology (EACTA) Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia (CTVA) Fellowship Program. The CTVA fellowship training includes a two-year curriculum at an EACTA-accredited educational facility. Before fellows are accepted into the program, they must meet a number of requirements, including evidence of a valid license to practice medicine, a specialist degree examination in anesthesiology, and appropriate language skills as required in the host centers. The CVTA Fellowship Program has 2 sequential and complementary levels of training-both with a modular structure that allows for individual planning and also takes into account the differing national healthcare needs and requirements of the 36 countries represented in EACTA. The basic training period focuses on the anesthetic management of patients undergoing cardiac, thoracic, and vascular surgery and related procedures. The advanced training period is intended to deepen and to extend the clinical and nontechnical skills that fellows have acquired during the basic training. The goal of the EACTA fellowship is to produce highly trained and competent perioperative physicians who are able to care for patients undergoing cardiac, thoracic, and vascular anesthesia.

Thoracic Anesthesia of Patients With Suspected or Confirmed 2019 Novel Coronavirus Infection: Preliminary Recommendations for Airway Management by the European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology Thoracic Subspecialty Committee.

The novel coronavirus has caused a pandemic around the world. Management of patients with suspected or confirmed coronavirus infection who have to undergo thoracic surgery will be a challenge for the anesthesiologists. The thoracic subspecialty committee of European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology (EACTA) has conducted a survey of opinion in order to create recommendations for the anesthetic approach to these challenging patients. It should be emphasized that both the management of the infected patient with COVID-19 and the self-protection of the anesthesia team constitute a complicated challenge. The text focuses therefore on both important topics.

Aortic valve calcium score for paravalvular aortic insufficiency (AVCS II) study in transapical aortic valve implantation.

BACKGROUND: Transapical aortic valve implantation (TAAVI) has evolved into a routine procedure for select high-risk patients. The aim was to study the impact of native aortic valve calcification on paravalvular leaks in cardiac contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT). METHODS: The degree and distribution of valve calcification were quantified using an Aortic Valve Calcium Score (AVCS) for each cusp separately (3mensio Valves). To reduce an artificial increase of the AVCS due to the presence of contrast material, we used thresholds for density [mean aortic density + 2*SD] and volume [0, 3, 5, 25, and 50 mm3] of calcification. RESULTS: 111 consecutive patients prior to TAAVI with preoperative CT aged 79.8 ± 5.8 years were included using the Edwards Sapien prosthesis. Paravalvular leaks were significantly associated with eccentric calcified plaques (r [Spearman] = 0.37; χ2-statistic = 15.4; P = .002), presence of LVOT calcium (r [Spearman] = 0.28; χ2-statistic = 11.3; P = .009), and the commissural gap at the anatomic ventriculo-arterial junction (r [Spearman] = 0.41-0.63; χ2-statistic = 50.8-53.0; P = .002-≤.001). There was no significant association between the total AVCS and PV leaks (r [Spearman] = 0.076; χ2-statistic = 1.471; P = .240, 120 kV, 850 hounsfield units) with no additional use of a volume-based threshold. CONCLUSION: Asymmetry of leaflet calcium distribution, LVOT calcium, and the commissural gap between leaflets were significantly associated with paravalvular leaks. Moreover, quantification of aortic valve calcification in contrast enhanced CTs shows only a weak correlation with paravalvular leakage and is therefore not reliable as a predictor, respectively.

Initial Experience With a Percutaneous Approach to Redo Mitral Valve Surgery: Management and Procedural Success.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to report the anesthetic management and immediate procedural success in the initial 20 patients undergoing percutaneous transapical mitral valve replacement. DESIGN: Retrospective review of collected data. SETTING: University-affiliated heart center. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty patients with mitral regurgitation or stenosis due to a degenerated valve or ring in the mitral position. INTERVENTIONS: TEE-guided transapical mitral valve replacement under general anesthesia and early extubation by means of an established fast-track protocol. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN METHODS: Twenty patients underwent transapical mitral valve replacement by a beating heart procedure, avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass. The valve was either deployed due to a previously implanted bioprosthetic valve (valve-in-valve group), which degenerated, or a ring (valve-in-ring group), which predominantly showed regurgitation. There was a significant increase in the mitral valve opening area in stenosed valve pathology from 1.3-1.9 sq. cm (p = 0.004), and an increase in ejection fraction from 40% to 45% (p = 0.52). In the valve-in-ring group, valve area increased from 2.0 sq. cm to 2.6 sq. cm (p = 0.21), with an increase in ejection fraction from 30% to 35% (p = 0.18). Eighteen patients underwent successful deployment of the valve. The anesthesia duration for the procedure lasted 185.5 ± 25.4 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant increase in opening area of the valve and improvement in ejection fraction in this patient group. TEE and fluoroscopy-guided imaging is necessary for the procedure's success and is an evolving alternative treatment for high-risk mitral valve patients who would otherwise be considered inoperable for routine surgery using sternotomy.

["Introduction to transthoracic, transesophageal and real time 3Dimensional transesophageal echocardiography"]. / Echokardiografie - Eine Einführung in die transthorakale, transösophageale und 3D-Echokardiografie.

Echocardiography allows assessment of cardiac anatomy and function. A tailored approach to echocardiographic assessment is essential in hemodynamic unstable patients. Standard views allow comprehensive examination and also reduce the chances to oversee unexpected findings. TTE should be first choice in emergency and intensive care medicine. TEE is standard of care in intraoperative setting. 3 D echocardiography is valuable in specific situations. Written reporting of examination is mandatory.

Is real time 3D transesophageal echocardiography a feasible approach to detect coronary ostium during transapical aortic valve implantation?

OBJECTIVE: Transapical aortic valve implantation (TAVI) may lead to obstruction of coronary arteries during deployment. To prevent this, it is essential to determine the distance of the coronary ostium to the aortic annulus prior to valve placement. Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) commonly is used to determine these measurements, but even marginal exposure to contrast agents can result in acute kidney injury in this high-risk group of multi-morbid patients. The aim of the study was to determine the feasibility of real-time 3D transesophageal echocardiography (RT 3D TEE) as the first-choice technique for noninvasive evaluation of the coronary ostium during TAVI. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: University hospital. INTERVENTIONS: Fifty patients underwent MDCT the evening before surgery. RT 3D TEE was performed intraoperatively before valve deployment. The dataset from both of these examinations was digitally stored and evaluated. MDCT was performed in nonanesthetized patients; however, in the RT 3D TEE group, general anesthesia was established. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The distances from the right coronary artery and the left coronary artery ostium were measured retrospectively. Bland-Altman Plots and linear regression analysis showed excellent correlation between the 2 methodologies; intraobserver and interobserver variance were calculated using analysis of variance. Krippendorff's α indicated excellent agreement between the 2 observers (0.96 and 0.98) as well as between RT 3D TEE and MDCT (0.97 and 0.98). CONCLUSIONS: The observations showed that RT 3D TEE reliably can measure the coronary ostium distance from the aortic annulus. It is feasible and an alternative method for evaluating these measurements and thereby preventing contrast exposure during MDCT, which may jeopardize the safety of patients with pre-existing renal disease.

High-frequency jet ventilation as an alternative method compared to conventional one-lung ventilation using double-lumen tubes during minimally invasive coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To optimize the conditions for the surgeon during minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) and totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass (TECAB) procedures, one-lung ventilation (OLV) is required using double-lumen tubes (DLT). This prospective study was designed to compare high-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) of both lungs with the conventional method of OLV via DLT. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, clinical study. SETTING: University-affiliated heart center. PARTICIPANTS: Forty patients with coronary artery disease and scheduled for elective MIDCAB or TECAB procedures were equally randomized into a DLT and an HFJV group. INTERVENTIONS: In the DLT group, OLV of the right lung was performed throughout the surgical procedure. In the HFJV group, patients received a conventional single-lumen endotracheal tube and both lungs were ventilated using HFJV. MEASUREMENTS: Hemodynamic, oxygenation and ventilation parameters were measured at the beginning of the operation, then 5, 15, 30, and 60 minutes after OLV/HFJV, as well as immediately before transfer to the ICU. MAIN RESULTS: Regarding the view of the surgical field, surgeons' comfort did not differ between methods. The intraoperative PaO(2) was significantly higher in the HFJV group compared with the DLT group at 5 (336.8 +/- 123.3 v 228.6 +/- 124.0; p = 0.009) and 15 minutes (301.7 +/- 133.9 v 192.6 +/- 92.8; p = 0.012). The PaCO(2) was significantly higher in the HFJV group after 5 minutes and persisted through 60 minutes of ventilation. The peak inspiratory pressure was significantly lower during HFJV (10.0 +/- 2.8 mbar v 32.1 +/- 5.9 mbar). CONCLUSIONS: HFJV in MIDCAB or TECAB procedures appears to be a feasible alternative to OLV using a DLT, although study in a larger population is required.

Transesophageal echocardiography for verification of the position of the electrocardiographically-placed central venous catheter.

OBJECTIVE: Compare changes in P-wave amplitude of the intra-atrial electrocardiogram (ECG) and its corresponding transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)-controlled position to verify the exact localization of a central venous catheter (CVC) tip. DESIGN: A prospective study. SETTING: University, single-institutional setting. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery. INTERVENTIONS: CVC placement via the right internal jugular vein with ECG control using the guidewire technique and TEE control in 4 different phases: phase 1: CVC placement with normalized P wave and measurement of distance from the crista terminalis to the CVC tip; phase 2: TEE-controlled placement of the CVC tip; parallel to the superior vena cava (SVC) and measurements of P-wave amplitude; phase 3: influence of head positioning on CVC migration; and phase 4: evaluation of positioning of the CVC postoperatively using a chest x-ray. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The CVC tip could only be visualized in 67 patients on TEE with a normalized P wave. In 198 patients with the CVC parallel to the SVC wall controlled by TEE (phase 2), an elevated P wave was observed. Different head movements led to no significant migration of the CVC (phase 3). On a postoperative chest-x-ray, the CVC position was correct in 87.6% (phase 4). CONCLUSION: The study suggests that the position of the CVC tip is located parallel to the SVC and 1.5 cm above the crista terminalis if the P wave starts to decrease during withdrawal of the catheter. The authors recommend that ECG control as per their study should be routinely used for placement of central venous catheters via the right internal jugular vein.

Anesthesia management for transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a case series.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to review the management of anesthesia for transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation. DESIGN: Retrospective review of collected data. SETTING: University-affiliated heart center. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis. INTERVENTIONS: General anesthesia followed by an established fast-track protocol. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 100 patients with significant AS received transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation. The patients were treated following a fast-track protocol. The mean arterial pressure was maintained above 65 mmHg by volume and/or inotropes during the procedure. The mean arterial pressure was increased above 75 mmHg to avoid hemodynamic deterioration before starting rapid ventricular pacing for the balloon valvuloplasty and the valve implantation. Transesophageal echocardiography was used to assess valve size and for hemodynamic monitoring. Eighty-one patients were treated completely off pump. There was a significant decline in mean arterial pressure from pre- to postvalvuloplasty (74.7 +/- 9.1 mmHg v 63.6 +/- 11.3 mmHg, p < 0.001) and from pre- to postimplantation (76.5 +/- 12.6 mmHg v 67.2 +/- 12.7, p < 0.001). The first 10 patients in the study intentionally were placed on cardiopulmonary bypass, and 9 patients required cardiopulmonary bypass because of hemodynamic deterioration. CONCLUSION: A well-designed anesthetic plan as well as an understanding of the surgical procedure and the hemodynamic effects of rapid ventricular pacing are required to ensure successful outcomes in this new surgical option for high-risk patients.

Feasibility of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with coronary heights ≤7 mm: insights from the transcatheter aortic valve implantation Karlsruhe (TAVIK) registry.

OBJECTIVES: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with low coronary heights is generally denied but is not impossible. Information about these high-risk procedures is sparse. METHODS: Since May 2008, data of more than 3000 patients who had TAVI were prospectively collected in the institutional TAVI Karlsruhe registry. Characteristics, peri- and postoperative outcome of patients with low coronary heights of ≤7 mm were analysed according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2. RESULTS: Eighty-six patients with an average coronary height of 6.4 ± 1.1 mm (mean age 81.0 ± 5.3 years, logistic EuroSCORE I 19.6 ± 13.3%) were treated. TAVI was performed in 72 transfemoral (83.7%) and 14 transapical (16.3%) cases using 44 CoreValve/Evolut R (51.2%), 21 Sapien XT/S3 (24.4%), 14 ACURATE (16.3%), 5 Lotus (5.8%) and 2 Portico (2.3%) prostheses. Ten procedures were valve-in-valve (VinV) TAVI (VinV, 11.6%). The 72-h, 30-day, 1-year and follow-up (3.0 ± 1.6 years) mortality rates were 2.3%, 8.0%, 10.5% and 26.7%, respectively. Within 30 days, 4 cardiac deaths and 3 non-cardiac deaths occurred (4.7% and 3.5%). Three coronary obstructions (3.5%) occurred-2 during VinV TAVI. One patient was connected to extracorporeal circulation that could not be weaned later due to an unsuccessful percutaneous coronary intervention. Another patient, the only conversion (1.2%), required delayed surgical valve replacement. The third patient died of right heart failure after aortic dissection. The procedural success rate was 95.3%. VinV procedures were associated with increased follow-up deaths (P < 0.001; hazard ratio 7.96). CONCLUSIONS: Coronary-related complications in TAVI procedures in patients with coronary heights ≤7 mm occurred less frequently, but once they occurred, they were serious. These TAVI procedures are feasible, with a high procedural success rate, but meticulous preoperative planning should be mandatory. In VinV procedures, the follow-up mortality rate is increased; therefore, we do not recommend these procedures.