Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for failed bioprosthetic heart valves.

BACKGROUND: The majority of prosthetic heart valves currently implanted are tissue valves that can be expected to degenerate with time and eventually fail. Repeat cardiac surgery to replace these valves is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Transcatheter heart valve implantation within a failed bioprosthesis, a "valve-in-valve" procedure, may offer a less invasive alternative. METHODS AND RESULTS: Valve-in-valve implantations were performed in 24 high-risk patients. Failed valves were aortic (n=10), mitral (n=7), pulmonary (n=6), or tricuspid (n=1) bioprostheses. Implantation was successful with immediate restoration of satisfactory valve function in all but 1 patient. No patient had more than mild regurgitation after implantation. No patients died during the procedure. Thirty-day mortality was 4.2%. Mortality was related primarily to learning-curve issues early in this high-risk experience. At baseline, 88% of patients were in New York Heart Association functional class III or IV; at the last follow-up, 88% of patients were in class I or II. At a median follow-up of 135 days (interquartile range, 46 to 254 days) and a maximum follow-up of 1045 days, 91.7% of patients remained alive with satisfactory valve function. CONCLUSIONS: Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation is a reproducible option for the management of bioprosthetic valve failure. Aortic, pulmonary, mitral, and tricuspid tissue valves were amenable to this approach. This finding may have important implications with regard to valve replacement in high-risk patients.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: impact on clinical and valve-related outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation is an alternative to open heart surgery in patients with aortic stenosis. However, long-term data on a programmatic approach to aortic valve implantation remain sparse. METHODS AND RESULTS: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation was performed in 168 patients (median age, 84 years) in the setting of severe aortic stenosis and high surgical risk. Access was transarterial (n=113) or, in the presence of small iliofemoral artery diameter, transapical (n=55). The overall success rate was 94.1% in this early experience. Intraprocedural mortality was 1.2%. Operative (30-day) mortality was 11.3%, lower in the transarterial group than the transapical group (8.0% versus 18.2%; P=0.07). Overall mortality fell from 14.3% in the initial half to 8.3% in the second half of the experience, from 12.3% to 3.6% (P=0.16) in transarterial patients and from 25% to 11.1% (P=0.30) in transapical patients. Functional class improved over the 1-year postprocedure period (P<0.001). Survival at 1 year was 74%. The bulk of late readmission and mortality was not procedure or valve related but rather was due to comorbidities. Paravalvular regurgitation was common but generally mild and remained stable at late follow-up. At a maximum of >3 years and a median of 221 days, structural valve failure was not observed. CONCLUSIONS: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation can result in early and sustained functional improvement in high-risk aortic stenosis patients. Late outcome is determined primarily by comorbidities unrelated to aortic valve disease.

Percutaneous transarterial aortic valve replacement in selected high-risk patients with aortic stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous aortic valve replacement represents an endovascular alternative to conventional open heart surgery without the need for sternotomy, aortotomy, or cardiopulmonary bypass. METHODS AND RESULTS: Transcatheter implantation of a balloon-expandable stent valve using a femoral arterial approach was attempted in 50 symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis in whom there was a consensus that the risks of conventional open heart surgery were very high. Valve implantation was successful in 86% of patients. Intraprocedural mortality was 2%. Discharge home occurred at a median of 5 days (interquartile range, 4 to 13). Mortality at 30 days was 12% in patients in whom the logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation risk score was 28%. With experience, procedural success increased from 76% in the first 25 patients to 96% in the second 25 (P=0.10), and 30-day mortality fell from 16% to 8% (P=0.67). Successful valve replacement was associated with an increase in echocardiographic valve area from 0.6+/-0.2 to 1.7+/-0.4 cm2. Mild paravalvular regurgitation was common but was well tolerated. After valve insertion, there was a significant improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (P<0.0001), mitral regurgitation (P=0.01), and functional class (P<0.0001). Improvement was maintained at 1 year. Structural valve deterioration was not observed with a median follow-up of 359 days. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous valve replacement may be an alternative to conventional open heart surgery in selected high-risk patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis.

Percutaneous transvenous mitral annuloplasty: initial human experience with device implantation in the coronary sinus.

BACKGROUND: Mitral annuloplasty is the most common surgical procedure performed for ischemic mitral regurgitation (MR). Surgical mitral annuloplasty is limited by morbidity, mortality, and MR recurrence. We evaluated the safety and feasibility of a transvenous catheter-delivered implantable device to provide a percutaneous alternative to surgical mitral annuloplasty. METHODS AND RESULTS: Five patients with chronic ischemic MR underwent percutaneous transvenous implantation of an annuloplasty device in the coronary sinus. Implantation was successful in 4 patients. Baseline MR in the entire group was grade 3.0+/-0.7 and was reduced to grade 1.6+/-1.1 at the last postimplantation visit when the device was intact or the last postprocedural visit in the patient in whom the device was not successfully implanted. Separation of the bridge section of the device occurred in 3 of 4 implanted devices and was detected at 28 to 81 days after implantation. There were no postprocedural device-related complications. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous implantation of a device intended to remodel the mitral annulus is feasible. Initial experience suggests a possible favorable effect on MR. Percutaneous transvenous mitral annuloplasty warrants further evaluation as a less invasive alternative to surgical annuloplasty.

Percutaneous aortic valve implantation retrograde from the femoral artery.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous aortic valve implantation by an antegrade transvenous approach has been described but is problematic. Retrograde prosthetic aortic valve implantation via the femoral artery has potential advantages. Percutaneous prosthetic aortic valve implantation via the femoral arterial approach is described and the initial experience reported. METHODS AND RESULTS: The valve prosthesis is constructed from a stainless steel stent with an attached trileaflet equine pericardial valve and a fabric cuff. After routine aortic balloon valvuloplasty, a 22F or 24F sheath is advanced from the femoral artery to the aorta. A steerable, deflectable catheter facilitates manipulation of the prosthesis around the aortic arch and through the stenotic valve. Rapid ventricular pacing is used to reduce cardiac output while the delivery balloon is inflated to deploy the prosthesis within the annulus. Percutaneous aortic prosthetic valve implantation was attempted in 18 patients (aged 81+/-6 years) in whom surgical risk was deemed excessive because of comorbidities. Iliac arterial injury, seen in the first 2 patients, did not recur after improvement in screening and access site management. Implantation was successful in 14 patients. After successful implantation, the aortic valve area increased from 0.6+/-0.2 to 1.6+/-0.4 cm2. There were no intraprocedural deaths. At follow-up of 75+/-55 days, 16 patients (89%) remained alive. CONCLUSIONS: This initial experience suggests that percutaneous transarterial aortic valve implantation is feasible in selected high-risk patients with satisfactory short-term outcomes.

Treating the right patient at the right time: access to specialist consultation and non-invasive testing.

The Council of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society commissioned working groups to examine issues of access to, and wait times for, various aspects of cardiovascular care. The present article summarizes the deliberations on targets for medically acceptable wait times for access to cardiovascular specialist evaluation and on the performance of noninvasive testing needed to complete this evaluation. Three categories of referral indications were identified: those requiring hospitalization due to substantial ongoing risk of mortality and morbidity; those requiring an expedited early review in an ambulatory setting; and, finally, a larger category in which delays of two to six weeks can be justified. The proposed wait time targets will provide guidance on the timeliness of care to busy clinicians charged with the care of patients with cardiovascular disease, help policy makers appreciate the clinical challenges in providing access to high quality care, and highlight the critical need for a thoughtful review of cardiology human resource requirements. Wait time implementation suggestions are also included, such as the innovative use of disease management and special need clinics. The times proposed assume that available clinical practice guidelines are followed for clinical coronary syndrome management and for treatment of associated conditions such as hypertension, diabetes, renal disease, smoking cessation and lipid disorders. Although media attention tends to focus on wait times for higher profile surgical procedures and high technology imaging, it is likely that patients face the greatest wait-related risk at the earlier phases of care, before the disease has been adequately characterized.

True versus reported waiting times for valvular aortic stenosis surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To produce a universally accepted waiting time definition for cardiovascular surgery, present the rationale for this definition, and compare data on current waiting times in British Columbia based on this definition versus the current definition in patients waiting for aortic stenosis surgery. STUDY DESIGN: The present study is a retrospective data analysis. SETTING: The fixed-dollar, single-payer health care delivery system in British Columbia. PATIENTS: All residents of British Columbia who were at least 22 years of age and who were placed on a waiting list for aortic valve surgery with the diagnosis of aortic stenosis between January 1, 1991, and December 31, 2000, were eligible for the present study. INTERVENTIONS: Dates of physician visits, procedures and surgery were obtained from the British Columbia Cardiac Registries and Medical Services Plan databases. True waiting times from physician visits to procedures and surgery were calculated. RESULTS: Of the 2516 patients booked for aortic valve surgery with a primary diagnosis of aortic stenosis, 2237 subjects (88.9%) were eligible for analysis after exclusions. The eligible patients ranged in age from 22 to 95 years, and 36.8% were female. The true median waiting time was 243 days (148 days [25th percentile], 397 days [75th percentile]), which was 3.2 times the interval currently reported as the waiting time (75 days [42, 127]). Thirty-nine patients died while waiting for surgery. Patients used more resources while waiting for surgery than after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: True waiting times for surgery for aortic stenosis in British Columbia are significantly longer than reported waiting times. The authors propose that the wait list time for cardiovascular surgery be redefined as "the time interval between the patient's first contact with a medical care provider with symptoms or signs which ultimately lead to cardiovascular surgery and the date of that surgery".

Three-Dimensional Echocardiography Compared With Computed Tomography to Determine Mitral Annulus Size Before Transcatheter Mitral Valve Implantation.

BACKGROUND: Previously, through the use of computed tomography (CT), it has been proposed that D-shaped versus saddle-shaped mitral annulus (MA) segmentation is more biomechanically appropriate to determine transcatheter mitral valve implantation size and eligibility. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-one patients with severe mitral regurgitation being considered for transcatheter mitral valve implantation who had undergone cardiac CT and 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (3D-TEE) were retrospectively evaluated. A standardized segmentation protocol for the D-shaped MA was developed using Philips Q-Laboratory mitral valve quantification software. MA dimensions were compared using Spearman's rank correlation and Bland-Altman analysis. Inter- and intraobserver agreement was quantified by intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis. Mean age was 77±14 years; 71% male (n=29); mitral regurgitation pathogenesis was functional in 54% (n=22) and myxomatous in 46% (n=19). Mean MA area and circumference by 3D-TEE and CT were 11.3±2.7 versus 11.4±3.0 (P=0.67) and 124.1±15.6 versus 123.9±15.5 (P=0.79), respectively, with excellent correlation between modalities (r=0.84 and r=0.86; P<0.0001) and no systematic bias (-0.20±1.8 cm(2) [-3.7 cm(2); 3.3 cm(2)], 0.37±9 mm [-18.0 mm; 17.27 mm]). Mean septal-to-lateral and inter-trigone distances by 3D-TEE and CT were 33.2±4.7 versus 32.5±4.4 (P=0.24) and 31.7±3.5 versus 32.6±3.6 (P=0.06), respectively, with good correlation (r=0.69 and r=0.71; P<0.0001) and no systematic bias (0.77±3.8 mm [-6.7 mm; 8.2 mm], -1.5±3.1 mm [-4.6 mm; 7.6 mm]). There was excellent intra- and interobserver agreement according to intraclass correlation coefficients >0.90 for all parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Similar to cardiac CT, 3D-TEE allows for D-shaped MA segmentation with no systematic difference in MA dimensions between modalities. This study supports the utilization of 3D-TEE as a complementary tool to CT assessment of the D-shaped MA to determine transcatheter mitral valve implantation size.

Outcome of mitral valve repair or replacement: a comparison by propensity score analysis.

BACKGROUND: There are no randomized trials comparing outcomes after mitral valve (MV) repair and replacement. Propensity scoring is a powerful tool that has the potential to reduce selection bias in nonrandomized studies. METHODS: From the BC Cardiac Registries, 2,060 patients presented for MV surgery, with or without CABG between 1991 and 2000. We then identified 322 MV repairs who were then matched by propensity score to an equal number of MV replacement patients. We compared survival and freedom from re-operation outcomes using Cox proportional hazards model analysis. Multivariable analysis was then used to compare outcomes in 358 MV repair patients with 352 MV replacement patients who had undergone chordal sparing surgery. RESULTS: The comparison groups generated using propensity scores were well balanced with respect to all collected baseline risk factors. Median follow-up time was 3.4 years. Patients undergoing MV repair had significantly improved survival (RR 0.46; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.75) but a trend toward more re-operations (RR 2.11; 95% CI, 1.00 to 4.47) compared with patients undergoing replacement. Mitral valve repair patients still had better survival (RR 0.52; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.85) compared with MV replacement patients who had undergone chordal sparing surgery. CONCLUSIONS: We used propensity score methods to reduce selection bias in a population-based cohort of patients undergoing MV repair/replacement. Repair was associated with better survival, but a trend to increased re-operation.

Guidelines for the provision of echocardiography in Canada: recommendations of a joint Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Society of Echocardiography Consensus Panel.

Recognizing the central role of echocardiographic examinations in the assessment of most cardiac disorders and the need to ensure the provision of these services in a highly reliable, timely, economical and safe manner, the Canadian Cardiovascular Society and Canadian Society of Echocardiography undertook a comprehensive review of all aspects influencing the provision of echocardiographic services in Canada. Five regional panels were established to develop preliminary recommendations in the five component areas, which included the echocardiographic examination, the echocardiographic laboratory and report, the physician, the sonographer and indications for examinations. Membership in the panels was structured to recognize the regional professional diversity of individuals involved in the provision of echocardiography. In addition, a focus group of cardiac sonograhers was recruited to review aspects of the document impacting on sonographer responsibilities and qualification. The document is intended to be used as a comprehensive and practical reference for all of those involved in the provision of echocardiography in Canada.

Transcatheter Aortic and Mitral Valve-in-Valve Implantation for Failed Surgical Bioprosthetic Valves: An 8-Year Single-Center Experience.

OBJECTIVES: We report our 8-year experience in transcatheter aortic and mitral valve-in-valve (VinV) implantation. BACKGROUND: Feasibility and good early outcomes associated with transcatheter aortic and mitral VinV implantation into failed surgical bioprostheses have been confirmed, but the mid-term and long-term outcomes of transcatheter aortic and mitral VinV is unknown. METHODS: A total of 73 patients with aortic (n = 42) and mitral (n = 31) bioprosthetic valve dysfunction underwent transcatheter VinV implantation between April 2007 and December 2013. Edwards balloon-expandable transcatheter valves (Edwards Lifesciences Inc., Irvine, California) were used. Median follow-up was 2.52 years with a maximum of 8 years. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients (mean age 79.7 ± 9.4 years, 32 women) underwent successful VinV implantation (success rate 98.6%). At 30 days, all-cause mortality was 1.4%, disabling stroke 1.4%, life-threatening bleeding 4.1%, acute kidney injury requiring hemodialysis 2.7%, and coronary artery obstruction requiring intervention 1.4%. No patient had greater than mild paravalvular leak. Estimated survival rates were 88.9%, 79.5%, 69.8%, 61.9%, and 40.5% at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years, respectively. The small surgical valve size (19 and 21 mm) was an independent risk factor for reduced survival in aortic VinV patients. At 2-year follow-up, 82.8% of aortic and 100% of mitral VinV patients were in New York Heart Association functional class I or II. CONCLUSIONS: Transcatheter VinV for failed surgical bioprostheses can be performed safely with a high success rate and minimal early mortality and morbidity. Transcatheter VinV provides encouraging mid-term clinical outcomes in this high-risk elderly cohort of patients. Transcatheter VinV is an acceptable alternative therapy for failed aortic or mitral bioprostheses in selected high-risk patients.

Three-dimensional echocardiographic measurement of left ventricular wall thickness: In vitro and in vivo validation.

INTRODUCTION: Three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography has been shown to accurately measure left ventricular (LV) volume and mass. This study evaluated the accuracy of 3D echocardiography and the CenterSurface method for measuring LV wall thickness in vitro and in vivo. METHOD: Three-dimensional echocardiography scans, obtained from 7 LV phantoms and subjects having healthy (n = 5) or diseased (n = 8) hearts, were digitized. Endocardial and epicardial borders were outlined and used in 3D LV reconstruction. In vitro wall thickness was compared with true micrometer measurements. Three-dimensional in vivo wall thickness was compared with 2-dimensional (2D) thickness measured by the centerline method. RESULTS: The in vitro 3D echocardiography measurements agreed closely with true wall thickness (P <.0001), as did in vivo measurements (P <.0001). CONCLUSION: Three-dimensional echocardiography reconstruction has previously been shown to provide accurate representation of LV shape in addition to volume and mass. This study demonstrates that the CenterSurface method provides accurate quantification of wall thickness.

Percutaneous closure of a complex prosthetic mitral paravalvular leak using transesophageal echocardiographic guidance.

A 75-year-old man had a significant mitral paravalvular leak following unsuccessful mitral valve repair at age 71 years and mitral valve replacement two years later. He was referred for percutaneous closure, which was performed with an atrial septal defect occluder device. Subsequently, a small residual leak was closed with an embolization coil. A novel technique for identifying the paravalvular leak with simultaneous transesophageal and radiographic guidance is described.

A simplified D-shaped model of the mitral annulus to facilitate CT-based sizing before transcatheter mitral valve implantation.

BACKGROUND: The nonplanar, saddle-shaped structure of the mitral annulus has been well established through decades of anatomic and echocardiographic study. Its relevance for mitral annular assessment for transcatheter mitral valve implantation is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: Our objectives are to define the methodology for CT-based simplified "D-shaped" mitral annular assessment for transcatheter mitral valve implantation and compare these measurements to traditional "saddle-shaped" mitral annular assessment. METHODS: The annular contour was manually segmented, and fibrous trigones were identified using electrocardiogram-gated diastolic CT data sets of 28 patients with severe functional mitral regurgitation, yielding annular perimeter, projected area, trigone-to-trigone (TT) distance, and septal-lateral distance. In contrast to the traditional saddle-shaped annulus, the D-shaped annulus was defined as being limited anteriorly by the TT distance, excluding the aortomitral continuity. Hypothetical left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) clearance was assessed. RESULTS: Projected area, perimeter, and septal-lateral distance were found to be significantly smaller for the D-shaped annulus (11.2 ± 2.7 vs 13.0 ± 3.0 cm(2); 124.1 ± 15.1 vs 136.0 ± 15.5 mm; and 32.1 ± 4.0 vs 40.1 ± 4.9 mm, respectively; P < .001). TT distances were identical (32.7 ± 4.1 mm). Hypothetical LVOT clearance was significantly lower for the saddle-shaped annulus than for the D-shaped annulus (10.7 ± 2.2 vs 17.5 ± 3.0 mm; P < .001). CONCLUSION: By truncating the anterior horn of the saddle-shaped annular contour at the TT distance, the resulting more planar and smaller D-shaped annulus projects less onto the LVOT, yielding a significantly larger hypothetical LVOT clearance than the saddle-shaped approach. CT-based mitral annular assessment may aid preprocedural sizing, ensuring appropriate patient and device selection.

Transapical transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation: clinical and hemodynamic outcomes beyond 2 years.

OBJECTIVE: The feasibility of transapical valve-in-valve aortic valve implantation into a failed aortic surgical bioprosthesis has been confirmed. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the clinical and hemodynamic outcomes more than 2 years after transapical valve-in-valve aortic valve implantation. METHODS: From April 2007 to May 2010, 8 consecutive patients underwent transapical valve-in-valve aortic valve implantation of either 23- or 26-mm Edwards-SAPIEN balloon-expandable bioprostheses into failed surgical tissue valves (21- to 25-mm valves). Clinical and echocardiographic follow-up was performed in all patients. The mean follow-up duration was 27.8 ± 15.7 months (range, 18-55 months). RESULTS: Transapical valve-in-valve aortic valve implantation was successful in all patients (mean age, 84.1 ± 1.6 years). The predicted operative mortality was 42.1% ± 15.7% by logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation and 14.4% ± 9.6% using the Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk calculator. The observed 30-day mortality was 12.5%. No strokes or valve embolization/migrations occurred. The mean hospital stay was 9.0 ± 9.1 days. The New York Heart Association class decreased from preoperative class III-IV to postoperative class I in 6 of 7 survivors. The 2-year survival was 87.5%. No late mortality occurred during the follow-up period. The echocardiographic results at 1 to 4 years of follow-up demonstrated stable valve position and function in all patients. The transaortic valve pressure gradients after valve-in-valve aortic valve implantation were greater than 20 mm Hg and less than 15 mm Hg in patients with 21- or 23-mm and 25-mm surgical valves, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Transapical valve-in-valve aortic valve implantation provides good clinical outcomes and stable valve function beyond 2 years of follow-up. The best hemodynamic and clinical outcomes can be achieved in the patients with a surgical valve size of 25 mm or greater. Valve-in-valve aortic valve implantation could become a viable approach for selected high-risk patients with failed surgical bioprostheses.

Multidetector CT predictors of prosthesis-patient mismatch in transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: Prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) is a predictor of mortality after aortic valve replacement (AVR). OBJECTIVE: We examined whether accurate 3-dimensional annular sizing with multidetector CT (MDCT) is predictive of PPM after transcatheter AVR (TAVR). METHODS: One hundred twenty-eight patients underwent MDCT then TAVR. Moderate PPM was defined as an indexed effective orifice area ≤0.85 cm²/m² and severe ≤0.65 cm²/m². MDCT annular measurements (area, short and long axis) were compared with the size of the selected transcatheter heart valve (THV) to obtain (1) the difference between prosthesis size and CT-measured mean annular diameter and (2) the percentage of undersizing or oversizing (calculated as 100 × [MDCT annular area--THV nominal area]/THV nominal area). In addition, the MDCT annular area was indexed to body surface area. These measures were evaluated as potential PPM predictors. RESULTS: We found that 42.2% of patients had moderate PPM and 9.4% had severe PPM. Procedural characteristics and in-hospital outcomes were similar between patients with or without PPM. THV undersizing of the mean aortic annulus diameter was not predictive of PPM (odds ratio [OR], 0.84; 95% CI, 0.65-1.07; P = .16; area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve [AUC], 0.58). THV undersizing of annular area was not predictive of PPM (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.80-1.16; P = .69; AUC, 0.52). Indexed MDCT annular area was, however, predictive of PPM (OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.10-0.59; P < .001; AUC, 0.66). CONCLUSIONS: PPM is frequent after TAVR. Appropriate annular oversizing does not reduce the rate or severity of PPM. Patient annulus size mismatch, identified by indexed MDCT annular area, is a significant predictor of PPM.

Expanding arch aneurysm causing a "kink" in a Bentall graft and heart failure.

Marfan syndrome is associated with a high incidence of aortic root aneurysm and life-threatening aortic dissection. With the successful use of surgical aortic root replacement, dissection-related mortality has been significantly reduced. We present the case of a patient with Marfan syndrome who presented with heart failure secondary to an unusual graft-related complication 14 years after a Bentall procedure. Investigations revealed a supra-aortic stenosis resulting from a kink in the Bentall graft caused by pressure from an expanding aortic arch aneurysm. The patient underwent surgery with improvement in his ejection fraction and heart failure symptoms.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement: outcomes of patients with moderate or severe mitral regurgitation.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of mitral regurgitation (MR) on outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and the impact of TAVR on MR. BACKGROUND: Little is known of the influence of MR on outcomes after TAVR. METHODS: The outcomes of patients with mild or less (n = 319), moderate (n = 89), and severe (n = 43) MR were evaluated after TAVR at 2 Canadian centers. RESULTS: Patients with moderate or severe MR had a higher mortality rate than those with mild or less MR during the 30 days after TAVR (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.10; 95% confidence interval: 1.12 to 3.94; p = 0.02). However, the mortality rates after 30 days were similar (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.82; 95% confidence interval: 0.50 to 1.34; p = 0.42). One year after TAVR, moderate MR had improved in 58%, remained moderate in 17%, and worsened to severe in 1%, and 24% of patients had died. Severe MR had improved in 49% and remained severe in 16%, and 35% of patients had died. Multivariate predictors of improved MR at 1 year (vs. unchanged MR, worse MR, or death) were a mean transaortic gradient ≥ 40 mm Hg, functional (as opposed to structural) MR, the absence of pulmonary hypertension, and the absence of atrial fibrillation. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate or severe MR in patients undergoing TAVR is associated with a higher early, but not late, mortality rate. At 1-year follow-up, MR was improved in 55% of patients with moderate or severe MR at baseline. Improvement was more likely in patients with high transaortic gradients, with functional MR, without pulmonary hypertension and without atrial fibrillation.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in aortic stenosis: the role of echocardiography.

Aortic stenosis is becoming an increasing health care problem as the population ages. Surgical aortic valve replacement remains the gold standard but is associated with high mortality and morbidity rates in elderly patients and those with multiple comorbidities. The authors explore transcatheter aortic valve implantation as an attractive alternative therapy in this high-risk population and outline its limitations and future directions, with a special emphasis on the role of echocardiography.

Transatrial transcatheter tricuspid valve-in-valve implantation of balloon expandable bioprosthesis.

Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation into failing mitral and aortic bioprosthetic valves have been reported. This strategy avoids performing high-risk repeat cardiac surgery in elderly patients with multiple comorbidities. Tricuspid valve-in-valve implantation has not been described. We report a case of failing bioprosthetic tricuspid valve in a 48-year-old woman with carcinoid syndrome. We attempted a transatrial transcatheter approach and we successfully deployed a 26-mm Edwards Sapien balloon expandable bioprosthesis (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) into a severely stenotic tricuspid bioprosthesis. This case demonstrates the technical feasibility and safety of this approach. Therefore, tricuspid valve-in-valve implantation may be a viable treatment alternative in carefully selected patients.