Sharing Objective Measures of Adherence to a Vaginal Microbicide Promotes Candor About Actual Use and Bolsters Motivation to Prevent HIV.

Discrepancies between self-reported and actual adherence to biomedical HIV interventions is common and in clinical trials can compromise the integrity of findings. One solution is to monitor adherence biomarkers, but it is not well understood how to navigate biomarker feedback with participants. We surveyed 42 counselors and interviewed a subset of 22 to characterize their perspectives about communicating with participants about residual drug levels, an objective marker of adherence, within MTN-025/HOPE, a Phase 3b clinical trial of a vaginal ring to prevent HIV. When biomarkers indicated low drug levels that mismatched high adherence by self-report, counselors encountered barriers to acceptance and comprehension among participants. However, discrepancies between low self-report and higher drug levels generally stimulated candor. Women recollected times they had not used the product and disclosed problems that counselors thought might otherwise have remained forgotten or concealed. Navigating conversations toward HIV prevention was easier at mid-range drug levels and when women indicated motivation to prevent HIV. Ratings of residual drug level offered a somewhat objective measure of adherence and protection that counselors perceived as meaningful to participants and as a valuable catalyst for broaching conversation about HIV prevention. However, communication about drug levels required that counselors navigate emotional barriers, respond skillfully to questions about accuracy, and pivot conversations non-judgmentally away from numerical results and toward the priority of HIV prevention. Findings suggest a role for biomarker feedback in future clinical trials as well as other clinical contexts where biomarkers may be monitored, to motivate disclosure of actual adherence and movement toward HIV prevention.Clinical Trial Number NCT02858037.

RESUMEN: Discrepancias entre la adherencia auto-reportada y la verdadera a intervenciones biomédicas de VIH pueden comprometer los ensayos clínicos. Una solución es monitorear la adherencia por medio de ensayos biológicos, pero no se entiende bien cómo comunicar estas medidas a los participantes. En MTN-025/HOPE, un ensayo fase 3b de un anillo vaginal para prevenir VIH, encuestamos a 42 consejeros de adherencia y entrevistamos a un subconjunto de 22 para caracterizar sus perspectivas sobre comunicar una medida objetiva de adherencia al anillo, el nivel residual de droga (RDL por sus siglas en inglés). Los consejeros reportaron que los participantes apreciaron la retroalimentación del RDL como una indicación de su protección de VIH. Niveles más altos de droga estimularon euforia y alivio mientras niveles mas bajos resultaron en desilusión. Una postura no crítica y el apoyo a la autonomía de elegir otras alternativas al anillo promovieron divulgación de las razones por la falta de adherencia. Hablar del monitoreo de RDL como "protección" en vez de "adherencia" ayudó a cambiar el enfoque desde resultados numéricos hasta la meta mayor del ensayo de prevenir el VIH. Personalizar la retroalimentación de medidas objetivas de adherencia requiere una conversación cuidadosa para minimizar las actitudes defensivas. La retroalimentación personalizada también se puede implementar de forma que motive la divulgación de la falta de adherencia y evoque un compromiso a prácticas de prevención. Enfatizar las motivaciones de las mujeres a prevenir el VIH, en vez de los resultados numéricos, puede incentivar a los usuarios consistentes a continuar y a los usuarios inconsistentes a usar métodos alternativos de prevención.

How a menu of adherence support strategies facilitated high adherence to HIV prevention products among adolescent girls and young women in sub-Saharan Africa: a mixed methods analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Effective use of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has been low among adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) in sub-Saharan Africa. The MTN-034/REACH trial offered AGYW a menu of adherence support strategies and achieved high adherence to both daily oral PrEP and the monthly dapivirine vaginal ring. Understanding how these strategies promoted product use could inform the design of adherence support systems in programmatic settings. METHODS: REACH was a randomized crossover trial evaluating the safety of and adherence to the ring and oral PrEP among 247 HIV-negative AGYW (ages 16-21) in South Africa, Uganda and Zimbabwe from January 2019 to September 2021 (NCT03593655). Adherence support included monthly counselling sessions with drug-level feedback (DLF) plus optional daily short message service (SMS) reminders, weekly phone or SMS check-ins, peer support clubs, "peer buddies" and additional counselling. Counsellors documented adherence support choices and counselling content on standardized forms. Through focus groups, serial in-depth interviews (IDIs) and single IDIs (n = 119 total), we explored participants' experiences with adherence support and how it encouraged product use. RESULTS: Participants received counselling at nearly all visits. DLF was provided at 54.3% of sessions and, across sites, 49%-68% received results showing high adherence for oral PrEP, and 73%-89% for the ring. The most popular support strategies were in-person clubs and weekly calls, followed by online clubs, additional counselling and SMS. Preferences differed across sites but were similar for both products. Qualitative results demonstrated that the REACH strategies supported adherence by providing information about HIV and PrEP, continually motivating participants, and supporting the development of behavioural skills and self-efficacy, aligning with the Information, Motivation, and Behavioural Skills (IMB) model. Effectiveness was supported by three foundational pillars: strong interpersonal relationships with counsellors; ongoing, easily accessible support and resources; and establishing trust in the counsellors and study products through counsellor relationships, peer-to-peer exchange and DLF. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation programmes could support effective PrEP use by offering a small menu of counsellor- and peer-based support options that are youth-friendly and developmentally appropriate. The same menu options can support both ring and oral PrEP users, though content should be tailored to the individual products.