Gender significance of ST-segment deviation detected by ambulatory (Holter) monitoring.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the gender influence in diagnostic and prognostic value of Holter-detected ST-segment deviation. METHODS: Two-hundred seventy-seven consecutive patients (196 men) who underwent coronary angiography for evaluation of chest pain were studied with 24-h Holter monitoring within 72 h of coronary angiography, and were followed up for 65+/-21 months. RESULTS: Men had a higher prevalence of coronary artery disease (169 of 196, 86%) compared to that of women (54 of 81, 67%), p<0.00025. Thirty-three (17%) men and 15 (19%) women had ST-segment deviation during 24-h recording. The sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive values of ST-segment deviation (elevation, depression, or both) for the detection of significant coronary artery disease were similar in men and women. The negative predictive values were significantly higher in women than men for ST-segment deviation (36% vs. 15%, p<0.001), ST-segment elevation (35% vs. 14%, p<0.001), and ST-segment depression (34% vs. 15%, p<0.001). Similarly, the diagnostic accuracies were significantly higher in women than men for ST-segment deviation (44% vs. 29%, p<0.025), ST-segment elevation (38% vs. 19%, p<0.001), and ST-segment depression (40% vs. 24%, p<0.025). There was no significant difference in composite end-point of events (mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina, and coronary revascularization) in men versus women with ST-segment deviation (elevation, depression, or both). CONCLUSION: Holter-detected ST-segment deviation has a higher negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy for detection of significant coronary artery disease in women than in men, although the prognostic values are not significantly different between men and women.

Acute ventricular rate control in atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter.

Atrioventricular node blocking agents including beta-adrenergic blockers, non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers and digoxin are usually effective in controlling ventricular rate in atrial fibrillation and flutter. Intravenous beta-blockers and non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers are equally effective in rapidly controlling the ventricular rate. The addition of digoxin to the regimen causes a favorable outcome but digoxin as a single agent is generally less effective in slowing the ventricular rate in acute setting. Clonidine, magnesium, and amiodarone have also been used for acute ventricular rate control in atrial fibrillation. Limited data suggest that combination regimens provide better ventricular rate control than any agent alone. The agent of first choice is usually individualized depending upon the clinical situation. Beta-blockers are preferable in patients with myocardial ischemia, myocardial infarction and hyperthyroidism and in post-operative state, but should be avoided in patients with bronchial asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease where non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers are preferred. Beta-blockers are preferred drugs used for acute ventricular rate control in atrial fibrillation during pregnancy. In atrial fibrillation with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers and digoxin should be avoided, as these drugs are selective atrioventricular node blockers without slowing conduction through the accessory pathway, which can lead to increased transmission of impulses preferentially through the accessory pathway and precipitate ventricular fibrillation. The drug of choice for atrial fibrillation in pre-excitation syndrome is procainamide but propafenone, flecainide and disopyramide have also been used. When clinical condition is unstable or patient is hemodynamically compromised, immediate electrical cardioversion is the treatment of choice, as the best measure to control ventricular rate is by conversion to sinus rhythm. Factors precipitating rapid ventricular rate should be treated as well.