Combined Analysis of Human and Experimental Murine Samples Identified Novel Circulating MicroRNAs as Biomarkers for Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Recent experimental studies have demonstrated that several microRNAs (miRNAs) expressed in atrial tissue promote a substrate of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, because it has not been fully elucidated whether these experimental data contribute to identifying circulating miRNAs as biomarkers for AF, we used a combined analysis of human serum and murine atrial samples with the aim of identifying these biomarkers for predicting AF.Methods and Results:Comprehensive analyses were performed to screen 733 miRNAs in serum from 10 AF patients and 5 controls, and 672 miRNAs in atrial tissue from 6 inducible atrial tachycardia model mice and 3 controls. We selected miRNAs for which expression was detected in both analyses, and their expression levels were changed in the human analyses, the murine analyses, or both. This screening identified 11 candidate miRNAs. Next, we quantified the selected miRNAs using a quantitative RT-PCR in 50 AF and 50 non-AF subjects. The individual assessment revealed that 4 miRNAs (miR-99a-5p, miR-192-5p, miR-214-3p, and miR-342-5p) were significantly upregulated in AF patients. A receiver-operating characteristics curve indicated that miR-214-3p and miR-342-5p had the highest accuracy. The combination of the 4 miRNAs modestly improved the predictive accuracy for AF (76% sensitivity, 80% specificity). CONCLUSIONS: Novel circulating miRNAs were upregulated in the serum of AF patients and might be potential biomarkers of AF.

Sparsely methylated mitochondrial cell free DNA released from cardiomyocytes contributes to systemic inflammatory response accompanied by atrial fibrillation.

Systemic inflammation is assumed to be the consequence and the cause of atrial fibrillation (AF); however, the underlying mechanism remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the level of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in patients with AF and AF mimicking models, and to illuminate its impact on inflammation. Peripheral blood was obtained from 54 patients with AF and 104 non-AF controls, and cfDNA was extracted. We extracted total cfDNA from conditioned medium after rapid pacing to HL-1 cells. Nuclear and mitochondrial DNA were separately extracted and fragmented to simulate nuclear-cfDNA (n-cfDNA) and mitochondrial-cfDNA (mt-cfDNA). The AF group showed higher cfDNA concentration than the non-AF group (12.6 [9.0-17.1] vs. 8.1 [5.3-10.8] [ng/mL], p < 0.001). The copy numbers of n-cfDNA and mt-cfDNA were higher in AF groups than in non-AF groups; the difference of mt-cfDNA was particularly apparent (p = 0.011 and p < 0.001, respectively). Administration of total cfDNA and mt-cfDNA to macrophages significantly promoted IL-1ß and IL-6 expression through TLR9, whereas n-cfDNA did not. Induction of cytokine expression by methylated mt-cfDNA was lower than that by unmethylated mt-cfDNA. Collectively, AF was associated with an increased cfDNA level, especially mt-cfDNA. Sparsely methylated mt-cfDNA released from cardiomyocytes may be involved in sterile systemic inflammation accompanied by AF.