RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: In August 2013, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Open Payments Program (OPP) made eligible payment information publicly available. Data about industry payments to neuromuscular neurologists are lacking. METHOD: Financial relationships were investigated between industry and US neuromuscular neurologists from January 2014 through December 2018 using the CMS OPP database. RESULTS: The total annual payments increased more than 6-fold during the study period. The top 10% of physician-beneficiaries collected 80% to 90% of total industry payments except in 2014. In 2018, the most common drugs associated with payments to neuromuscular neurologists were nusinersen, vortioxetine, eteplirsen, alglucosidase alpha, edaravone, and intravenous immunoglobulin. DISCUSSION: A substantial increase in the annual payments to neuromuscular physicians during the study period is likely due to the development of new treatments, including gene therapy.
Assuntos
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S./economia , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Neurologistas/economia , Médicos/economia , Bases de Dados Factuais , Humanos , Fatores de Tempo , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Isolated primary neurolymphomatosis (NL) of cranial multineuritis is a very rare condition that refers to the lymphomatous invasion of cranial nerves only. There are sparse cases of isolated cranial nerves NL reported worldwide. CASE PRESENTATION: We present magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) findings of a 63-year-old female patient suffering from isolated neurolymphomatosis of cranial multineuritis with a wide constellation of syndromes including binocular diplopia, left facial paralysis and pain, syncope episodes, and progressive dysphagia. A contrasted MRI brain showed multiple cranial nerves enhancement. Extensive workup for infectious, autoimmune, neoplastic, paraneoplastic, or inflammatory etiologies had been unrevealing except CSF cytology revealed large atypical monotypic B cells that were suspicious for non-Hodgkin lymphoma on the third large volume tap. The decision of biopsy was deferred after the risks and benefits discussion. Following the four cycles of empiric methotrexate-based induction chemotherapy, the patient's symptoms resolved, and a complete radiographic response was achieved without whole-brain radiation or autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation. In the latest follow-up, she is independent with her daily activities and remains in clinical and radiographic remission more than 3 years since initial chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Isolated NL of cranial nerves can present diagnostic and management pitfalls for the neurologist, neurosurgeons, and oncologists. Since current diagnostic modalities have modest sensitivity and a pathological diagnosis is often difficult, empiric treatment once other possibilities are ruled out can carry a good prognosis.
Assuntos
Linfoma não Hodgkin , Neurolinfomatose , Nervos Cranianos/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , NeuroimagemRESUMO
Background and Purpose- Industry payments to physicians raise concerns regarding conflicts of interest that could impact patient care. We explored nonresearch and nonownership payments from industry to vascular neurologists to identify trends in compensation. Methods- Using Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology data, we explored financial relationships between industry and US vascular neurologists from 2013 to 2018. We analyzed payment characteristics, including payment categories, payment distribution among physicians, regional trends, and biomedical manufacturers. Furthermore, we analyzed the top 1% (by compensation) of vascular neurologists with detailed payment categories, their position, and their contribution to stroke guidelines. Results- The number of board certified vascular neurologist increased from 1169 in 2013 to 1746 in 2018. The total payments to vascular neurologist increased from $99 749 in 2013 to $1 032 302 in 2018. During the study period, 16% to 17% of vascular neurologists received industry payments. Total payments from industry and mean physician payments increased yearly over this period, with consulting fee (31.1%) and compensation for services other than consulting (30.7%) being the highest paid categories. The top 10 manufacturers made the majority of the payments, and the top 10 products changed from drug or biological products to devices. Physicians from south region of the United States received the highest total payment (38.72%), which steadily increased. Payments to top 1% vascular neurologists increased from 64% to 79% over the period as payments became less evenly distributed. Among the top 1%, 42% specialized in neuro intervention, 11% contributed to American Heart Association/American Stroke Association guidelines, and around 75% were key leaders in the field. Conclusions- A small proportion of US vascular neurologists consistently received the majority of industry payments, the value of which grew over the study period. Only 11% of the top 1% receiving industry payments have authored American Heart Association/American Stroke Association guidelines, but ≈75% seem to be key leaders in the field. Whether this influences clinical practice and behavior requires further investigation.
Assuntos
Cardiologia/economia , Cardiologia/tendências , Conflito de Interesses/economia , Neurologistas/economia , Neurologistas/tendências , Cardiologia/legislação & jurisprudência , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S./economia , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S./legislação & jurisprudência , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S./tendências , Conflito de Interesses/legislação & jurisprudência , Bases de Dados Factuais/tendências , Indústria Farmacêutica/economia , Indústria Farmacêutica/legislação & jurisprudência , Indústria Farmacêutica/tendências , Setor de Assistência à Saúde/economia , Setor de Assistência à Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Setor de Assistência à Saúde/tendências , Humanos , Neurologistas/legislação & jurisprudência , Fatores de Tempo , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Acute stroke remains a medical emergency even during the COVID-19 pandemic. Most patients with COVID-19 infection present with constitutional and respiratory symptoms; while others present with atypical gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, or neurological manifestations. Here we present a series of four patients with COVID-19 that presented with acute stroke. METHODS: We searched the hospital databases for patients that presented with acute stroke and concomitant features of suspected COVID-19 infection. All patients who had radiographic evidence of stroke and PCR-confirmed COVID-19 infection were included in the study. Patients admitted to the hospital with PCR- confirmed COVID-19 disease whose hospital course was complicated with acute stroke while inpatient were excluded from the study. Retrospective patient data were obtained from electronic medical records. Informed consent was obtained. RESULTS: We identified four patients who presented with radiographic confirmation of acute stroke and PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. We elucidate the clinical characteristics, imaging findings, and the clinical course. CONCLUSIONS: Timely assessment and hyperacute treatment is the key to minimize mortality and morbidity of patients with acute stroke. Stroke teams should be wary of the fact that COVID-19 patients can present with cerebrovascular accidents and should dawn appropriate personal protective equipment in every suspected patient. Further studies are urgently needed to improve current understandings of neurological pathology in the setting of COVID-19 infection.
Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus/complicações , Pneumonia Viral/complicações , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/metabolismo , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/diagnóstico por imagem , Infecções por Coronavirus/metabolismo , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Masculino , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/diagnóstico por imagem , Pneumonia Viral/metabolismo , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/complicaçõesRESUMO
Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) emerged in December 2019 from Wuhan, China. It typically presents with mild upper respiratory tract infection symptoms and may have life threatening complications, including acute respiratory distress syndrome, acute stroke, myocardial infarction, kidney failure, shock, and even death. Coronavirus infections are known to have neuroinvasive potential with consequent neuropsychiatric manifestations. We analyzed COVID-19 adult patients in the TriNetX database, which is a global health collaborative clinical research platform collecting real-time electronic medical records data from a network of health care organizations (HCOs) from January 20, 2020 to June 10th, 2020. 40,469 patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 among whom 9086 (22.5%) patients had neuropsychiatric manifestations. The most common neurologic manifestations included headache (3.7%) and sleep disorders (3.4%), Encephalopathy (2.3%), Stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA) (1.0%) and 0.6% had seizures. Most common psychiatric manifestations included anxiety and other related disorders (4.6%), mood disorders (3.8%), while 0.2% patients had suicidal ideation. Early recognition and prompt management of neuropsychiatric manifestations in these patients have a potential to decrease overall morbidity and mortality.
Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus/fisiopatologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/psicologia , Pneumonia Viral/fisiopatologia , Pneumonia Viral/psicologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Ageusia/etiologia , Ansiedade/etiologia , Ansiedade/psicologia , Betacoronavirus , Encefalopatias/etiologia , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/complicações , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Cefaleia/etiologia , Humanos , Ataque Isquêmico Transitório/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transtornos do Humor/etiologia , Transtornos do Humor/psicologia , Mialgia/etiologia , Transtornos do Olfato/etiologia , Dor/etiologia , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/complicações , SARS-CoV-2 , Convulsões/etiologia , Transtornos do Sono-Vigília/etiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Ideação Suicida , Adulto JovemRESUMO
We analysed Open Payments programme data (https://openpaymentsdata.cms.gov) on industry-to-physician payments to hospitalists for the years 2014 to 2018. Payments to hospitalists increased by 106.5% from 2014 to 2018 with food and beverage (38.5%) and compensation for services other than consulting (24.3%) being the highest-paid categories. Industry payment to hospitalists was highly skewed with top 10 hospitalists receiving more than 30% of the total payments during the study period. The most common drugs associated with payments were anticoagulant medications (apixaban and rivaroxaban). Industry seems to be spending a significant amount of money to increase awareness of medications among hospitalists. Identification of these trends and potential motives of industry spending is critical to address any potential physician bias.
Assuntos
Médicos Hospitalares , Conflito de Interesses , Indústria Farmacêutica , Humanos , Indústrias , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: To assess prevalence and to determine the impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) on health care utilization in patients with cerebrovascular accident (CVA). METHODS: We performed retrospective analysis of data from 12,102 patients who had diagnosis of CVA from 2014 to 2019 at tertiary medical center. We calculated the prevalence of COPD among patients with diagnosis of CVA. We performed unadjusted, covariate adjusted, and propensity-matched analysis to evaluate differences in health care utilization in patients with CVA and COPD compared to patients with CVA without COPD. RESULTS: 12,102 patients were diagnosed with CVA episodes. The prevalence of COPD among CVA patients was 7.65 % (95%CI: 7.18-8.13). The unadjusted and covariate adjusted analysis demonstrated that the average number of hospitalizations among CVA patients with a diagnosis of COPD was significantly higher than CVA patients without COPD. After adjusting for modifiable and nonmodifiable confounders, CVA patients diagnosed with COPD have on average 1 more hospitalization (1.21; 95%CI: 1.12-1.30) than those who are not diagnosed with COPD. Subsequent analysis based on propensity-matched data suggests that CVA patients diagnosed with COPD have on average approximately 1 more hospitalization (1.44; 95% CI: 1.31-1.58) than CVA patients without COPD. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests significant prevalence of COPD among CVA patients. The presence of COPD as a comorbidity resulted in patients with COPD and CVA having increased number of hospitalizations compared to CVA patients without COPD.
Assuntos
Hospitalização , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Arkansas/epidemiologia , Comorbidade , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Readmissão do Paciente , Prevalência , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/diagnóstico , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/terapia , Centros de Atenção TerciáriaRESUMO
PURPOSE: This randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose-escalation acute ischemic stroke trial was designed to demonstrate maximum tolerated dose, characterize adverse events (AEs), and explore clinical outcomes when intravenous dodecafluoropentane emulsion (DDFPe) was used as neuroprotection. METHODS: Acute ischemic stroke patients (n = 24) with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of 2-20 were randomized to either 3 doses of intravenous DDFPe or placebo, 1 every 90 minutes, starting within 12 hours of symptom onset. Doses were given without affecting standard stroke care. Each of the 3 dose cohorts included 8 patients, with 2 receiving placebo and 6 receiving DDFPe. Primary outcomes were serious adverse events (SAEs), AEs, NIHSS score, and modified Rankin Score (mRS). RESULTS: No dose-limiting toxicities were encountered, and no maximum tolerated dose was defined. One unrelated delayed death occurred in a DDFPe patient, and another occurred in the placebo group. Group SAEs and AEs were similar in incidence and severity. Early initiation of DDFPe treatment resulted in better NIHSS score response than late initiation (P = .03). Thirty- and 90-day mRS after high-dose therapy suggested clinical improvement (P = .01 and P = .03, respectively). However, the significance of differences in clinical outcomes was limited by small patient numbers and differences in stroke severity between cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous DDFPe appears to be safe at all doses tested. Clinical improvements in NIHSS score and mRS were significant but compromised by small sample size.
Assuntos
Isquemia Encefálica/tratamento farmacológico , Fluorocarbonos/administração & dosagem , Fármacos Neuroprotetores/administração & dosagem , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/terapia , Administração Intravenosa , Arkansas , Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico , Isquemia Encefálica/fisiopatologia , Avaliação da Deficiência , Método Duplo-Cego , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Fluorocarbonos/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Dose Máxima Tolerável , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fármacos Neuroprotetores/efeitos adversos , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/fisiopatologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoAssuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus/complicações , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Viral/complicações , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Adolescente , COVID-19 , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Pandemias , Prevalência , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Carotid-cavernous fistula (CCF) is an aberrant communication between the main trunk or branches of carotid artery and the cavernous sinus. Most of the cases of CCF occur following head trauma, but congenital and spontaneous cases have been reported. We report an interesting case of bilateral CCF with no history of trauma, thus most likely spontaneous form. Since it is rare, it was a diagnostic challenge. The suspicion of this diagnosis was made due to clinical features of headache, signs of increased Intracranial Pressure (ICP) (nausea, vomiting, and worsening headaches during Valsalva), exophthalmos, periorbital edema, periorbital erythema, chemosis, and conjunctival injection in both eyes. It was diagnosed with a 4-vessel angiography (digital subtraction angiography) which is the gold standard and was managed successfully with endovascular coil embolization.
Assuntos
Fístula Carótido-Cavernosa , Seio Cavernoso , Embolização Terapêutica , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Fístula Carótido-Cavernosa/diagnóstico por imagem , Fístula Carótido-Cavernosa/etiologia , Cefaleia , HumanosRESUMO
CD8+ encephalitis is a subacute encephalopathy associated with HIV infection. Pathophysiology is thought to be auto-reactive CD8+ cells attacking on HIV infected CD4+ cells and 'viral escape' phenomena (replication of CD8+ cells in CSF). We present a case of a 45-year-old man with well controlled HIV who developed CD8 encephalitis following Herpes simplex encephalitis. He had persistent encephalopathy for several weeks with status epilepticus and agitated delirium, and diagnosis remained elusive until a brain biopsy confirmed the diagnosis.
RESUMO
In this study, we aim to identify predictors of a no-show in neurology clinics at our institution. We conducted a retrospective review of neurology clinics from July 2013 through September 2018. We compared odds ratio of patients who missed appointments (no-show) to those who were present at appointments (show) in terms of age, lead-time, subspecialty, race, gender, quarter of the year, insurance type, and distance from hospital. There were 60,012 (84%) show and 11,166 (16%) no-show patients. With each day increase in lead time, odds of no-show increased by a factor of 1.0019 (p < 0.0001). Odds of no-show were higher in younger (p ≤ 0.0001, OR = 0.49) compared to older (age ≥ 60) patients and in women (p < 0.001, OR = 1.1352) compared to men. They were higher in Black/African American (p < 0.0001, OR = 1.4712) and lower in Asian (p = 0.03, OR = 0.6871) and American Indian/Alaskan Native (p = 0.055, OR = 0.6318) as compared to White/Caucasian. Patients with Medicare (p < 0.0001, OR = 1.5127) and Medicaid (p < 0.0001, OR = 1.3354) had higher odds of no-show compared to other insurance. Young age, female, Black/African American, long lead time to clinic appointments, Medicaid/Medicare insurance, and certain subspecialties (resident and stroke clinics) are associated with high odds of no show. Possible suggested interventions include better communication and flexible appointments for the high-risk groups as well as utilizing telemedicine.
RESUMO
Severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is an ongoing pandemic that has affected over 400 million people worldwide and caused nearly 6 million deaths. Hemorrhagic encephalitis is an uncommon but serious complication of COVID-19. The etiology of this disease is multifactorial, including secondary to severe hypoxemia, systemic inflammation, direct viral invasion, hypercoagulability, etc. The clinical spectrum of COVID-19-related hemorrhagic encephalitis is also varied, ranging from leukoencephalopathy with microhemorrhage, acute necrotizing hemorrhagic encephalitis (ANHE) involving the cortex, basal ganglia, rarely brain stem and cervical spine, hemorrhagic posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) to superimposed co-infection with other organisms. We report a case series of three young patients with different presentations of hemorrhagic encephalitis after COVID-19 infection and a review of the literature. One patient had self-limiting ANHE in the setting of mild COVID-19 systemic illness. The second patient had self-limiting leukoencephalopathy with microhemorrhages in the setting of severe systemic diseases and ARDS, and clinically improved with the resolution of systemic illness. Both patients were healthy and did not have any premorbid conditions. The third patient with poorly controlled diabetes and hypertension had severe systemic illness with neurological involvement including multiple ischemic strokes, basal meningitis, hemorrhagic encephalitis with pathological evidence of cerebral mucormycosis, and Epstein-Barr virus coinfection, and improved after antifungal therapy.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate utilization of inpatient hospital and critical care services among critically ill neurologic patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. We hypothesized, based on prior observations among ischemic stroke patients, that there would be significant decline in critically ill neurologic patients presenting to hospitals during the pandemic which may impact outcomes. METHODS: We used TriNetX, a large research network, collecting real-time electronic medical records data. We extracted data on utilization of critical care and hospital inpatient services among cohorts of patients with common neurocritical conditions between January-June 2020 and compared it to data from similar time-frames in previous years. We also compared clinical outcomes, comprising need for intubation and 30-day mortality, among these cohorts. RESULTS: We found a 28.1% reduction in intensive care unit (ICU) admissions with critical neurologic illnesses in 2020 when compared to 2019 (8568 vs. 11,917 patients, p â< â0.0001) and a 34.4% reduction compared to 2018 (8568 vs. 13,064 patients, p â< â0.0001). However, there was no statistically significant difference in mortality (2020: 12.2 vs. 2019: 12.4%; p â= â0.7; vs. 2018: 12.6%; p â= â0.62) or intubation rates across the years among patients using critical care services. There was 1% increase in mortality among non-ICU patients with similar diagnoses in 2020 compared to previous years (2020: 3.9% vs. 2019: 2.9% vs. 2018: 3.1%; p â< â0.0001, p â= â0.0001), but no difference in intubation rates. CONCLUSION: There was a significant reduction in hospital and ICU admissions among patients with acute neurologic emergencies in 2020, after onset of COVID-19 pandemic, compared to previous years. While we did not find a significant difference in mortality among patients admitted to the ICU, there was slightly higher mortality among non-ICU patients with same diagnoses in 2020 compared to previous years. Prospective evaluation and further investigation into the reasons for these trends is needed.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has become one of the most serious pandemics of the recent times. Since this pandemic began, there have been numerous reports about the COVID-19 involvement of the nervous system. There have been reports of both direct and indirect involvement of the central and peripheral nervous system by the virus. OBJECTIVE: To review the neuropsychiatric manifestations along with corresponding pathophysiologic mechanisms of nervous system involvement by the COVID-19. BACKGROUND: Since the beginning of the disease in humans in the later part of 2019, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has rapidly spread across the world with over 2,719,000 reported cases in over 200 countries [World Health Organization. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) situation report-96.,]. While patients typically present with fever, shortness of breath, sore throat, and cough, neurologic manifestations have been reported, as well. These include the ones with both direct and indirect involvement of the nervous system. The reported manifestations include anosmia, ageusia, central respiratory failure, stroke, acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (AIDP), acute necrotizing hemorrhagic encephalopathy, toxic-metabolic encephalopathy, headache, myalgia, myelitis, ataxia, and various neuropsychiatric manifestations. These data were derived from the published clinical data in various journals and case reports. CONCLUSION: The neurological manifestations of the COVID-19 are varied and the data about this continue to evolve as the pandemic continues to progress.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Humanos , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso/epidemiologia , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso/etiologia , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Background Industry payments to physicians raise concerns about conflicts of interest that have the potential to impact patient care. In this study, we explored nonresearch and nonownership payments from industry to nephrologists to identify trends in compensation. Methodology Using data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), we explored financial relationships between industry and US nephrologists from 2014 to 2018. We analyzed payment characteristics including payment categories, payment distribution among physicians, regional trends, and biomedical manufacturers. Results In this retrospective study, a total of $75,174,999 was paid to nephrologists in the United States during the study period (i.e., 2014-2018). The number of board-certified nephrologists receiving payment from the industry increased from 11,642 in 2014 to 13,297 in 2018. Among board-certified nephrologists, 56% to 63% received industry payments during the study period. The total payments to nephrologists increased from $13,113,512 in 2014 to $16,467,945 in 2017, with consulting fees (24%) and compensation for services other than consulting (35%) being the highest-paid categories. The top 10% of physician beneficiaries collected 90% of the total industry payments. Conclusions A small proportion of US nephrologists consistently received the majority of industry payments, the value of which grew over the study period.
RESUMO
Background The lack of an adequate number of neurologists is a worldwide problem. As populations age, the prevalence of neurological disorders will likely increase, thereby increasing the demand for neurologists. In addition to the growing demand, inadequate diversity in the neurology healthcare workforce still exists. The purpose of this study is to examine the demographic characteristics of neurology residents and fellows. Methodology This cross-sectional study used data from the following publicly available databases: Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, Association of American Medical Colleges, and the United States Census Bureau. Trends (from 2007 to 2018) in demographic characteristics were assessed using the slope and the associated p-value of a simple linear regression model, with the year as the independent variable. All p-values of <0.05 were considered significant. Results From 2007 through 2018, the percentage of US medical school graduates in neurology residency decreased from 58% to 55% (slope = -0.25; p = 0.0004), while the percentage of international medical graduates (IMGs) decreased from 36% to 32% (slope = -0.29; p = 0.0141) and doctor of osteopathy (DO) graduates increased from 6% to 13% (slope = 0.58; p < 0.0001). Although the percentage of female neurology residents increased from 39.5% in 2007 to 43.1% in 2018 (slope = 0.03; p = 0.8659), female physicians were underrepresented in vascular neurology fellowship (34% in 2018). Collectively, the percentage of underrepresented minorities in neurology residencies was low and increased only slightly over time (from 8% in 2011 to 9% in 2018; slope = 0.17; p = 0.0788). In 2018, the proportion of underrepresented minorities was smaller in neurology fellowships (5.5% neurophysiology, 12.5% epilepsy, 10.4% neuromuscular, and 12.4% vascular) compared to the population as a whole (31.3%). Conclusions IMGs still play an important role in filling a significant portion of the neurology residencies and fellowships. DO graduates have slowly increased in neurology residencies and fellowships. Members of several racial/ethnic minority groups and women are underrepresented in neurology house staff and efforts need to be taken to increase diversity.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the utilization of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) services during the Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Based on early observations among healthcare utilization on stroke and other healthcare services, we hypothesized that there would be a persistent significant decline in AIS patients presenting to hospitals as the pandemic has progressed for over a year. METHOD: TriNetX, a large research network, is used to collect real-time electronic medical data. Data on utilization of acute ischemic stroke service was collected for the years 2018, 2019, and 2020 for variables including overall stroke volume and the number of patients that received intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and mechanical thrombectomy (MT). RESULT: We found a 13.2-15.4% decrease in total number of AIS patients in 2020 (n 77231) compared with the years 2018 and 2019 (n 88948 and 91270 respectively, p â< â0.001). In the year 2020 Stroke volume was significantly lower in Q4 comparing to Q1 (Q1 vs Q4, p â< â0.01, while there were no significant differences in stroke volume between Quarters 2, 3, and 4 in 2020 (Q2 vs Q3, p â= â0.39, Q2 vs Q4, p â= â0.61, Q3 vs Q4, p â= â0.18). The Proportion of patients receiving tPA in 2020 was significantly lower compared to prior years (5.4% in 2020 vs 6.4% in 2018 and 6.0% in 2019, p â< â0.01), however, the proportion of patients receiving MT was significantly higher in 2020 than in 2018 (0.024 vs 0.022, p â< â0.01). CONCLUSION: Despite significant alteration in practices to optimize healthcare delivery and mitigate the collateral impact of the pandemic on care for other conditions, a persistent decline in AIS volumes remains. Delayed presentation, fear-of-contagion, reallocation, and poor availability of health care resources are potential contributors. Prospective evaluation and further investigation for these trends is needed.
RESUMO
Objective The aim of this article was to assess the role of emergent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for stroke mimics during a stoke alert (within 45 minutes) in reducing direct cost of management and duration of inpatient stay. Methods We did a retrospective chart review of all the patients who received emergent MRI brain during a stroke alert to help make decision about intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator (IV tPA) administration from January 2013 to December 2015. Using the patient financial resource data and with the help of billing department, we calculated the approximate money saved in taking care of the patients who may have received IV tPA if emergent MRI brain was not available to diagnose stroke mimics as they presented with acute neurologic deficit within IV tPA time window. Results Ninety seven out of 1,104 stroke alert patients received emergent MRI. Of these only 17 (17.5%) were diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke (AIS), and 80 (82.5%) as stroke mimics. By doing emergent MRI for suspected stroke mimics, our study showed an approximate total saving of $1,005,720 to $1,384,560, that is, $12,571 to $17,307 per patient in medical expenditure. Discussion We suggest modification of stroke pathway from current algorithm "CT+CTA≥IV-tPA/neurointervention≥MRI" to "MRI+MRA≥IV-tPA/neurointervention" for possible stroke mimics, which can reduce the cost, radiation exposure, and duration of hospital stay for stroke mimics. Conclusion Emergent MRI is a cost-effective tool to evaluate IV-tPA eligibility for suspected stroke mimics during a stroke alert.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Dawn and Extend Intra-Arterial (IA) acute stroke intervention trials have proven the benefit of thrombectomy in a select group of patients up to 24â¯h since their last known well time (LKWT) or time of symptom onset. Following the issuance of new treatment guidelines for large vessel occlusion strokes, we reviewed the paradigm shift effect on transfers for possible thrombectomy in a rural state. HYPOTHESIS: Extended time window for thrombectomy increases the need for better identification of potential transfers for thrombectomy in rural states with few hospitals capable of 24/7 interventional thrombectomy. METHODS: We analyzed all transfers to a comprehensive stroke center (CSC) from January to December 2018 which were specifically transferred for possible further intervention. This time period was selected in accordance with the change in American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines for extended time windows in mechanical thrombectomy (MT) care. RESULTS: A total of 132 patients were transferred for possible thrombectomy and advanced imaging. Thirty-four % patients underwent diagnostic angiogram with 33% patients having successful MT. Of the excluded patients 19% had large core infarcts by the time they arrived at hub hospital, 1.5% had hemorrhagic conversion, 32% had stroke without treatable occlusion not amenable for thrombectomy or cortical strokes on follow-up imaging, and 13.5% did not have stroke or LVO on follow-up imaging. CONCLUSION: Since the AHA's change in time window guidelines for mechanical thrombectomies, there has been an increased effort in identifying good candidates with computerized tomography angiography (CTA). To avoid undue burden on stroke systems of care, CTA identification of these patients at the spoke hospitals is key along with timely transport to appropriate thrombectomy capable sites. Given the rural nature of this state along with limited resources, selection of patients is a practical issue, especially for avoiding futile transfers, which might be true for large areas of the USA.