RESUMO
Objectives: As the initial crisis of the COVID-19 pandemic recedes, healthcare decision makers are likely to want to make rational evidence-guided choices between the many interventions now available. We sought to update a systematic review to provide an up-to-date summary of the cost-effectiveness evidence regarding tests for SARS-CoV-2 and treatments for COVID-19. Methods: Key databases, including MEDLINE, EconLit and Embase, were searched on 3 July 2023, 2 years on from the first iteration of this review in July 2021. We also examined health technology assessment (HTA) reports and the citations of included studies and reviews. Peer-reviewed studies reporting full health economic evaluations of tests or treatments in English were included. Studies were quality assessed using an established checklist, and those with very serious limitations were excluded. Data from included studies were extracted into predefined tables. Results: The database search identified 8,287 unique records, of which 54 full texts were reviewed, 28 proceeded for quality assessment, and 15 were included. Three further studies were included through HTA sources and citation checking. Of the 18 studies ultimately included, 17 evaluated treatments including corticosteroids, antivirals and immunotherapies. In most studies, the comparator was standard care. Two studies in lower-income settings evaluated the cost effectiveness of rapid antigen tests and critical care provision. There were 17 modelling analyses and 1 trial-based evaluation. Conclusion: A large number of economic evaluations of interventions for COVID-19 have been published since July 2021. Their findings can help decision makers to prioritise between competing interventions, such as the repurposed antivirals and immunotherapies now available to treat COVID-19. However, some evidence gaps remain present, including head-to-head analyses, disease-specific utility values, and consideration of different disease variants. Systematic Review Registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021272219], identifier [PROSPERO 2021 CRD42021272219].
RESUMO
Vitamin A deficiency is a major health risk for infants and children in low- and middle-income countries. This scoping review identified, quantified, and mapped research for use in updating nutrient requirements and upper limits for vitamin A in children aged 0 to 48 months, using health-based or modelling-based approaches. Structured searches were run on Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central, from inception to 19 March 2021. Titles and abstracts were assessed independently in duplicate, as were 20% of full texts. Included studies were tabulated by question, methodology and date, with the most relevant data extracted and assessed for risk of bias. We found that the most recent health-based systematic reviews and trials assessed the effects of supplementation, though some addressed the effects of staple food fortification, complementary foods, biofortified maize or cassava, and fortified drinks, on health outcomes. Recent isotopic tracer studies and modelling approaches may help quantify the effects of bio-fortification, fortification, and food-based approaches for increasing vitamin A depots. A systematic review and several trials identified adverse events associated with higher vitamin A intakes, which should be useful for setting upper limits. We have generated and provide a database of relevant research. Full systematic reviews, based on this scoping review, are needed to answer specific questions to set vitamin A requirements and upper limits.
Assuntos
Deficiência de Vitamina A , Vitamina A , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Alimentos Fortificados , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Necessidades Nutricionais , Estado Nutricional , Deficiência de Vitamina A/prevenção & controleRESUMO
A growing need for methods to analyze and prepare monodisperse nanoparticles on an industrial scale exists and may be solved by the application of split flow thin fractionation (SPLITT) at the microscale. Microfluidic systems of this type have the ability to separate nanoparticles with high precision in a continuous manner. A miniaturized SPLITT system can be fabricated using standard microfabrication technologies, works in a continuous mode, and can be used as a sample preparation instrument in a micro-total-analysis-system (micro-TAS). In this paper, a miniaturized electrical SPLITT system, which separates particles continuously based on electrophoretic mobility, has been characterized. The advantages of miniaturization have been elucidated. The various aspects of the micro SPLITT system discussed in this paper can be broadly classified into: micro SPLITT system design, fluidics modeling to refine the splitter arrangements, and experimental characterization of the SPLITT system. The design of the micro SPLITT system has been elucidated focusing on the two designs that were implemented. Fluid modeling, used to arrive at a new SPLITT design, was done using a commercially available CFD package to investigate behavior of the fluid in the microchannel with various splitter arrangements. Testing was done with nanoparticles of varying diameter and electrophoretic mobilities to verify the modeling results and demonstrate functionality of the SPLITT system. Particles eluted from both outlets of the SPLITT system were characterized using AFM and SEM to verify the function of the system.