Randomized multicenter phase 2 study of pomalidomide, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone in relapsed refractory myeloma.

Pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone (PomDex) is standard treatment of lenalidomide refractory myeloma patients who have received >2 prior therapies. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of the addition of oral weekly cyclophosphamide to standard PomDex. We first performed a dose escalation phase 1 study to determine the recommended phase 2 dose of cyclophosphamide in combination with PomDex (arm A). A randomized, multicenter phase 2 study followed, enrolling patients with lenalidomide refractory myeloma. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive pomalidomide 4 mg on days 1 to 21 of a 28-day cycle in combination with weekly dexamethasone (arm B) or pomalidomide, dexamethasone, and cyclophosphamide (PomCyDex) 400 mg orally on days 1, 8, and 15 (arm C). The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR). Eighty patients were enrolled (10 in phase 1 and 70 randomized in phase 2: 36 to arm B and 34 to arm C). The ORR was 38.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 23-54.8%) and 64.7% (95% CI, 48.6-80.8%) for arms B and C, respectively (P = .035). As of June 2015, 62 of the 70 randomized patients had progressed. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.4 (95% CI, 2.3-5.7) and 9.5 months (95% CI, 4.6-14) for arms B and C, respectively (P = .106). Toxicity was predominantly hematologic in nature but was not statistically higher in arm C. The combination of PomCyDex results in a superior ORR and PFS compared with PomDex in patients with lenalidomide refractory multiple myeloma. The trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01432600.

Phase 1 study of pomalidomide MTD, safety, and efficacy in patients with refractory multiple myeloma who have received lenalidomide and bortezomib.

This phase 1 dose-escalation study determined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of oral pomalidomide (4 dose levels) administered on days 1 to 21 of each 28-day cycle in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). After four cycles, patients who progressed or had not achieved minimal response (serum and urine M-protein reduction of ≥ 25% and ≥ 50%) could receive dexamethasone 40 mg per week. Safety and efficacy were evaluated. Thirty-eight patients who had received both bortezomib and lenalidomide (median 6 prior therapies) were enrolled; 63% were refractory to both lenalidomide and bortezomib. There were four dose-limiting toxicities (grade 4 neutropenia) at 5 mg per day and so the MTD was 4 mg per day. Rates of peripheral neuropathy and venous thromboembolism were low (≤ 5%). Among the 38 patients enrolled (including 22 with added dexamethasone), 42% achieved minimal response or better, 21% achieved partial response or better, and 3% achieved complete response. Median duration of response, progression-free survival, and overall survival were 4.6, 4.6, and 18.3 months, respectively. Pomalidomide 4 mg per day on days 1 to 21 of each 28-day cycle, with or without dexamethasone (40 mg/week), has encouraging activity with manageable toxicity in RRMM, including those refractory to both lenalidomide and bortezomib. This study is registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00833833.

Phase II study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, low-dose dexamethasone, and lenalidomide in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Our previous phase I/II trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), low-dose dexamethasone, and lenalidomide in patients with relapsed and refractory myeloma showed an overall response rate of 75%, with 29% achieving ≥ VGPR. Here, we investigated this combination (PLD 30 or 40 mg/m(2) intravenously, day 1; dexamethasone 40 mg orally, days 1-4; lenalidomide 25 mg orally, days 1-21; administered every 28 days) in a phase II study in patients with newly diagnosed symptomatic multiple myeloma to determine its efficacy and tolerability (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00617591). At best response, patients could proceed with high-dose melphalan or with maintenance lenalidomide and dexamethasone. In 57 patients, we found that the overall response rate and rate of very good partial response and better on intent-to-treat, our primary endpoints, were 77.2% and 42.1%, respectively, with responses per the International Myeloma Working Group. Median progression-free survival was 28 months (95% CI 18.1-34.8), with 1- and 2-year overall survival rates of 98.1 and 79.6%. During induction, grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (49.1%), anemia (15.8%), thrombocytopenia (7%), fatigue (14%), febrile neutropenia (8.8%), and venous thromboembolic events (8.8%). During maintenance, grade 3/4 toxicities were mainly hematologic. We found this combination to be active in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma, with results comparable to other lenalidomide-based induction strategies without proteasome inhibition. In addition, maintenance therapy with lenalidomide was well tolerated.

Eprenetapopt (APR-246) and Azacitidine in TP53-Mutant Myelodysplastic Syndromes.

PURPOSE: Approximately 20% of patients with TP53-mutant myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) achieve complete remission (CR) with hypomethylating agents. Eprenetapopt (APR-246) is a novel, first-in-class, small molecule that restores wild-type p53 functions in TP53-mutant cells. METHODS: This was a phase Ib/II study to determine the safety, recommended phase II dose, and efficacy of eprenetapopt administered in combination with azacitidine in patients with TP53-mutant MDS or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with 20%-30% marrow blasts (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03072043). RESULTS: Fifty-five patients (40 MDS, 11 AML, and four MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasms) with at least one TP53 mutation were treated. The overall response rate was 71% with 44% achieving CR. Of patients with MDS, 73% (n = 29) responded with 50% (n = 20) achieving CR and 58% (23/40) a cytogenetic response. The overall response rate and CR rate for patients with AML was 64% (n = 7) and 36% (n = 4), respectively. Patients with only TP53 mutations by next-generation sequencing had higher rates of CR (69% v 25%; P = .006). Responding patients had significant reductions in TP53 variant allele frequency and p53 expression by immunohistochemistry, with 21 (38%) achieving complete molecular remission (variant allele frequency < 5%). Median overall survival was 10.8 months with significant improvement in responding versus nonresponding patients by landmark analysis (14.6 v 7.5 months; P = .0005). Overall, 19/55 (35%) patients underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplant, with a median overall survival of 14.7 months. Adverse events were similar to those reported for azacitidine or eprenetapopt monotherapy, with the most common grade ≥ 3 adverse events being febrile neutropenia (33%), leukopenia (29%), and neutropenia (29%). CONCLUSION: Combination treatment with eprenetapopt and azacitidine is well-tolerated yielding high rates of clinical response and molecular remissions in patients with TP53-mutant MDS and oligoblastic AML.

A phase 2 trial of the oral smoothened inhibitor glasdegib in refractory myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).

Hypomethylating agent (HMA) failure myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients have poor outcomes and urgent need for novel therapies. Hedgehog pathway signaling upregulation plays a central role in myeloid neoplasm pathogenesis and leukemia stem cell survival. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of the smoothened inhibitor glasdegib in HMA-failure MDS (n = 35, median age 73 years). According to the International Prognostic Scoring System and the MD Anderson Global Risk Model, 54% and 77% had higher risk disease, respectively. Overall response was 6% (n = 2), and best response was marrow complete remission with hematologic improvement in both patients. Median OS and median follow-up were 10.4 and 42.8 months, respectively. Drug response/stable disease (SD) resulted in better OS than treatment failure (20.6 [95% CI, 10.4-] vs 3.9 months [95% CI, 0.7-9.1]; P< .0001). Response/SD was confirmed to be an independent covariate for improved OS (P < .0001). Grade 3 or higher infections occurred in 11% of patients (n = 4); non-hematologic toxicities were rare. Early mortality (< 30 days) occurred in 11% of patients (n = 4). Glasdegib was well tolerated among HMA-failure MDS patients, although single-agent activity was limited. SD or better resulted in notably superior OS. These results support further investigation of glasdegib, potentially in novel drug combinations, in MDS patients.

A Phase II Study to Determine the Safety and Efficacy of the Oral Inhibitor of Indoleamine 2,3-Dioxygenase (IDO) Enzyme INCB024360 in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes.

BACKGROUND: INCB024360 is an oral inhibitor of the enzyme indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO), which catalyzes the degradation of tryptophan to kynurenine. Preclinical data suggest that IDO1 inhibition by INCB024360 will increase T cell proliferation, and decrease T regulatory cells and myeloid derived suppressor cells suppressive activity. We conducted a phase II study to explore activity and pharmacodynamics of INCB024360 in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients were treated with INCB024360 600 mg orally twice a day for at least 16 weeks. Fifteen patients were enrolled. The median age was 72 years. The International Prognostic Scoring System risk was low in 27% (n = 4), intermediate-1 in 47% (n = 7), and intermediate-2 in 27% (n = 4). All patients had prior azacitidine. RESULTS: The best response was stable disease in 12 (80%) patients and progressive disease in 3 (20%) patients. The treatment was relatively well-tolerated. One patient developed hypothyroidism and adrenal insufficiency (grade 2), and 1 patient had low testosterone level. The mean IDO expression was 39% at baseline and 26% after treatment (n = 9; P = .4). The mean burst forming unit-erythroid changed from 72 to 191 colonies/106 (n = 5; P = .036), and the mean colony forming unit-granulocye, monocyte from 62 to 180 colonies/106 (n = 6; P = .5). The mean myeloid derived suppressor cell % (CD33Lin-HLA cells) was 29.5% at baseline compared with 27.6% after treatment (n = 9; P = .7). The mean T-regulatory effector memory cell % changed from 9.6% at screening to 7.4% at end of treatment (n = 14; P = .8). The mean kynurenine/tryptophan ratio decreased from 45 at baseline to 26 (42% reduction) at cycle 2, day 1 (P < .005). CONCLUSION: Future directions may include testing INCB024360 early in the course of the disease.

A Phase II Study of CLAG Regimen Combined With Imatinib Mesylate for Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

INTRODUCTION: No standard salvage chemotherapy regimen is available for relapsed or refractory (RR) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Preclinical data have suggested synergy in vitro between cytarabine and imatinib mesylate (IM) on AML cell growth inhibition. After demonstrating the safety and feasibility in a phase I study, we conducted a phase II clinical study of CLAG (cladribine, cytarabine, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) regimen combined with IM for patients with RR-AML. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a single-institution 2-stage phase II study. The primary endpoint was the remission rate measured using the standard AML response criteria. The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: From August 2009 to April 2011, 38 patients were treated at the Moffitt Cancer Center. Their median age was 62 years (range, 26-79 years). Of the 38 patients, 7 (18%) had refractory AML, 19 (50%) had early relapse, and 12 (32%) had late relapse. At the original diagnosis, only 2 patients had favorable risk factors, 18 had intermediate risk, and 16 had poor risk; for 2 patients, the karyotype was missing. The overall response rate for all 38 evaluable patients was 37%. The median OS was 11.1 months (95% CI, 4.8-13.4 months), the median PFS was 4.9 months (95% CI, 1.6-11.7 months). Among the responders, 8 of 14 patients subsequently underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. CONCLUSION: CLAG plus IM was well tolerated, with encouraging signs of activity in patients with poor-risk AML.