Asthma control and asthma treatment adherence in primary care: results from the prospective, multicentre, non-interventional, observational cohort ASCOPE study in Malaysia.

INTRODUCTION: As the first point of contact for those presenting with asthma symptoms, primary healthcare plays a crucial role in asthma management. This is a nationwide study of assessment of asthma symptom control and adherence to asthma medication among outpatients in public health clinics in Malaysia. METHODS: This is a prospective, observational multicentre study (ASCOPE; NCT03804632). Data on asthma control, assessment of control symptoms, and adherence to treatment were collected from medical records and interviews of patients. The level of asthma control was assessed using the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) Assessment of Symptom Control. Adherence of patient to medication for asthma was assessed through interview of patients using four questions adapted from the Malaysian Medication Adherence Scale. RESULTS: Among the 1011 patients recruited, 416 (41%) had well controlled asthma, 388 (38%) were partly controlled, and 207 (21%) had uncontrolled asthma. Majority (81%) had mild asthma and all patients were on asthma medication. Most patients did not have spirometry data (97%) but underwent peak flow rate measurements (98%). Poor adherence occurred at all levels of asthma control but was worst among those with uncontrolled asthma. This was statistically significant across all four questions on adherence (p<0.05). For example, more patients with uncontrolled asthma forgot doses (56%) or stopped treatment (39%) than those with well-controlled asthma (44% and 27%respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Among Malaysian primary care patients with asthma, less than 50% had well-controlled asthma, and low adherence to treatment was common. More effort is needed to improve asthma control among patients in Malaysia, including those with mild asthma.

Diabetes telemonitoring reduces the risk of hypoglycaemia during Ramadan: a pilot randomized controlled study.

AIM: This pilot study evaluated the short-term benefits of a telemonitoring-supplemented focused diabetic education compared with education alone in participants with Type 2 diabetes who were fasting during Ramadan. METHODS: In this pilot mixed-method study, we identified 37 participants and randomly allocated them to either a telemonitoring group (n = 18) or a group receiving Ramadan-focused pre-education only (usual care; n = 19). The telemonitoring group received goal-setting and personalized feedback. RESULTS: The telemonitoring group was less likely to experience hypoglycaemia than the usual care group (odds ratio: 0.1273; 95% confidence interval: 0.0267-0.6059). No significant differences were noted in glycaemic control at the end of study. Participants viewed telemedicine as a more convenient alternative although technological barriers remain a concern. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study reinforce the need for monitoring as well as educational initiatives for Muslims with diabetes who fast during Ramadan. Telemonitoring offers an attractive option requiring further research. (Clinical Trial Registry No. NCT02189135).