Appropriate cleaning reduces potential risk of spore transmission from patients with Clostridioides difficile infection treated in outpatient infusion centers.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) who receive treatment at outpatient infusion centers (OICs) pose a risk for spore transmission. We investigated C. difficile contamination in the environment of CDI and non-CDI patients and evaluated the effectiveness of standard cleaning. METHODS: This is a multicenter, non-conventional study including 8 OICs between October 2019 and December 2020. Samples were collected at baseline, after infusion, and after cleaning CDI and non-CDI areas. Cleaning was performed using hypochlorite and non-hypochlorite products for CDI and non-CDI, respectively. Samples were cultured for toxigenic C. difficile and strain-typed via fluorescent PCR ribotyping and whole-genome sequencing. RESULTS: The overall C. difficile contamination rate was 7.9% (156/1969) with 8.1% in patient and 5.6% in non-patient care areas, respectively. For CDI areas, contamination rates were 5.9% at baseline, 15.0% after infusion, and significantly reduced to 6.2% after cleaning (P = 0.004). For non-CDI areas, contamination was similar at baseline (9.5%), after infusion (7.6%), and after cleaning (4.3%). The difference in C. difficile-positive samples after infusion was significant for CDI vs. non-CDI (15.0% vs. 7.6%, P = 0.004). Overall contamination was 11.5% for floors, 7.9% for infusion chairs, and 3.8% for equipment (P = 0.001). The most frequent ribotypes were F014-020 (42.6%), F106 (15.6%), F255 (6.1%), F001 (5.2%) and F027 (3.5%). Cleaning resulted in elimination of F106, F255, F001, F027 and partial reduction of F014-020. CONCLUSIONS: Environmental C. difficile contamination was increased after CDI infusions and significantly reduced after cleaning with a hypochlorite solution, reducing the potential risk of spore transmission to others.

Recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection worsens anxiety-related patient-reported quality of life.

BACKGROUND: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is associated with high recurrence rates impacting health-related quality of life (HrQOL). However, patient-reported data are lacking particularly in the outpatient setting. We assessed changes in HrQOL over time in patients treated with bezlotoxumab at US infusion centers and determined clinical factors associated with HrQOL changes. METHODS: The HrQOL survey was conducted in adult patients with CDI, who received bezlotoxumab in 25 US outpatient infusion centers. The survey was adapted from the Cdiff32 instrument to assess anxiety-related changes to HrQOL and completed on the day of infusion (baseline) and at 90 days post bezlotoxumab (follow-up). Demographics, disease history, CDI risk factors, and recurrence of CDI (rCDI) at 90-day follow-up were collected. Changes in HrQOL scores were calculated and outcomes assessed using a multivariable linear regression model with P < 0.05 defined as statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 144 patients (mean age: 68 ± 15 years, 63% female, median Charlson index: 4, 15.9% rCDI) were included. The overall mean baseline and follow-up HrQOL scores were 26.4 ± 11.5 and 56.4 ± 25.0, respectively. At follow-up, this score was significantly higher for patients who had primary CDI (34.5 ± 21.7) compared to those with multiple rCDI (24.7 ± 21.0; P = 0.039). The mean HrQOL change at follow-up was significantly higher for patients without rCDI (34.1 ± 28.8 increase) compared to patients with rCDI (6.7 ± 19.5 increase; P < 0.001), indicating improvement in anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: Using the Cdiff32 instrument, we demonstrated that HrQOL worsened significantly in patients with further rCDI. These findings support the use of Cdiff32 in assessing CDI-related humanistic outcomes.

Using a nurse-initiated bedside tool to decrease inappropriate testing for Clostridioides difficile in hospital settings.

Overdiagnosis of Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile) is associated with increased hospital length of stay, antibiotic overuse, unnecessary infection prevention efforts and excess costs. This study evaluated a paper-based bedside C. difficile screening tool on the number of C. difficile laboratory tests performed and number of C. difficile infection (CDI) diagnoses. Nurses used the tool to determine whether stool should be sent for C. difficile testing. The tool provided indications for stool testing. We collected data on the number of C. difficile stool tests performed and CDI diagnoses for nine months before (PreT) and after (PostT) tool implementation in the hospital. We found a 31% reduction in the mean monthly number of C. difficile tests performed (37 PreT to 25 PostT) and a 56% reduction in CDI diagnoses (19 PreT to 8 PostT). This study demonstrates the success of using nurses and a bedside tool to decrease inappropriate C. difficile testing. This intervention has implications for patient management, infection prevention and cost containment. This low-cost paper-based tool may be helpful for the 25% of hospitals in the USA not using clinical decision support in their electronic health record (EHR), as well as for hospitals outside the United States who may not have access to EHRs.

Real-world Experience of Bezlotoxumab for Prevention of Clostridioides difficile Infection: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Bezlotoxumab is approved for prevention of recurrence of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in adults receiving standard of care (SoC) therapy based on findings from MODIFY clinical trials. However, utilization practices and validation of trial results in the real world are limited. METHODS: Records of patients receiving bezlotoxumab between April 2017 and December 2018 across 34 infusion centers in the United States were retrospectively reviewed. Recurrent CDI (rCDI), defined as diarrhea lasting ≥2 days resulting in treatment, was assessed 90 days postbezlotoxumab. RESULTS: The study cohort included 200 patients (median age, 70 years; 66% female; median Charlson comorbidity index, 5), of whom 86% (n = 173) had prior CDI episodes and 79% (n = 158) had ≥2 risk factors for rCDI. SoC antibiotics included vancomycin (n = 137, 68%), fidaxomicin (n = 60, 30%), and metronidazole (n = 3, 2%). Median time from C. difficile stool test to bezlotoxumab and initiation of SoC to bezlotoxumab were 15 days and 11 days, respectively. Within 90 days, 31 of 195 patients (15.9%) experienced rCDI, which corresponds to a success rate of 84.1%. Patients with ≥2 CDI recurrences prebezlotoxumab had a higher risk of subsequent rCDI compared with those with 1 recurrence or primary CDI (hazard ratio, 2.77; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-6.76; P = .025). CONCLUSIONS: This real-world multicenter study demonstrated successful prevention of rCDI with bezlotoxumab comparable to clinical trial results regardless of type of SoC and timing of infusion. Multiple prior CDI recurrences were associated with a higher risk of subsequent rCDI, supporting the use of bezlotoxumab earlier in the disease course.

In-hospital observation after antibiotic switch in pneumonia: a national evaluation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical benefit of in-hospital observation after the switch from intravenous (IV) to oral antibiotics in a large Medicare population. Retrospective studies of relatively small size indicate that the practice of in-hospital observation after the switch from IV to oral antibiotics for patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is unnecessary. METHODS: We performed a retrospective examination of the US Medicare National Pneumonia Project database. Eligible patients were discharged with an ICD-9-CM diagnosis consistent with community-acquired pneumonia and divided into 2 groups: 1) a "not observed" cohort, in which patients were discharged on the same day as the switch from IV to oral antibiotics and 2) an "observed for 1 day" cohort, in which patients remained hospitalized for 1 day after the switch from IV to oral antibiotics. We compared clinical outcomes between these 2 cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 39,242 cases were sampled, representing 4341 hospitals in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. There were 5248 elderly patients who fulfilled eligibility criteria involving a length of stay of no more than 7 hospital days (2536 "not observed" and 2712 "observed for 1 day" patients). Mean length of stay was 3.8 days for the "not observed" cohort and 4.5 days for the "observed for 1 day" cohort (P <.0001). There was no significant difference in 14-day hospital readmission rate (7.8% in the "not observed" cohort vs 7.2% "observed for 1 day" cohort, odds ratio 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74-1.12; P =.367) and 30-day mortality rate (5.1% "not observed" cohort vs 4.4% in the "observed for 1 day" cohort, odds ratio 0.86; 95% CI, 0.67-1.11; P =.258) between the "not observed" and "observed for 1 day" cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis of the US Medicare Pneumonia Project database provides further evidence that the routine practice of in-hospital observation after the switch from IV to oral antibiotics for patients with CAP may be avoided in patients who are clinically stable although these findings should be verified in a large randomized controlled trial.