Screening for ATTR amyloidosis in the clinic: overlapping disorders, misdiagnosis, and multiorgan awareness.

Amyloid transthyretin (ATTR) amyloidosis is a clinically heterogeneous and fatal disease that results from deposition of insoluble amyloid fibrils in various organs and tissues, causing progressive loss of function. The objective of this review is to increase awareness and diagnosis of ATTR amyloidosis by improving recognition of its overlapping conditions, misdiagnosis, and multiorgan presentation. Cardiac manifestations include heart failure, atrial fibrillation, intolerance to previously prescribed antihypertensives, sinus node dysfunction, and atrioventricular block, resulting in the need for permanent pacing. Neurologic manifestations include progressive sensorimotor neuropathy (e.g., pain, weakness) and autonomic dysfunction (e.g., erectile dysfunction, chronic diarrhea, orthostatic hypotension). Non-cardiac red flags often precede the diagnosis of ATTR amyloidosis and include musculoskeletal manifestations (e.g., carpal tunnel syndrome, lumbar spinal stenosis, spontaneous rupture of the distal tendon biceps, shoulder and knee surgery). Awareness and recognition of the constellation of symptoms, including cardiac, neurologic, and musculoskeletal manifestations, will help with early diagnosis of ATTR amyloidosis and faster access to therapies, thereby slowing the progression of this debilitating disease.

Impaired skeletal muscle vasodilation during exercise in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND: Exercise intolerance is a hallmark symptom of heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), which may be related to an impaired ability to appropriately increase blood flow to the exercising muscle. METHODS: We evaluated leg blood flow (LBF, ultrasound Doppler), heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP, photoplethysmography) during dynamic, single leg knee-extensor (KE) exercise in HFpEF patients (n=21; 68 ± 2 yrs) and healthy controls (n=20; 71 ± 2 yrs). RESULTS: HFpEF patients exhibited a marked attrition during KE exercise, with only 60% able to complete the exercise protocol. In participants who completed all exercise intensities (0-5-10-15 W; HFpEF, n=13; Controls, n=16), LBF was not different at 0 W and 5 W, but was 15-25% lower in HFpEF compared to controls at 10 W and 15 W (P<0.001). Likewise, leg vascular conductance (LVC), an index of vasodilation, was not different at 0 W and 5 W, but was 15-20% lower in HFpEF compared to controls at 10 W and 15 W (P<0.05). In contrast to these peripheral deficits, exercise-induced changes in central variables (HR, SV, CO), as well as MAP, were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: These data reveal a marked reduction in LBF and LVC in HFpEF patients during exercise that cannot be attributed to a disease-related alteration in central hemodynamics, suggesting that impaired vasodilation in the exercising skeletal muscle vasculature may play a key role in the exercise intolerance associated with this patient population.

ISHLT pathology antibody mediated rejection score correlates with increased risk of cardiovascular mortality: A retrospective validation analysis.

BACKGROUND: Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in cardiac transplant recipients is a serious form of rejection with adverse patient outcomes. The International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) has published a consensus schema for the pathologic diagnosis of various grades of antibody-mediated rejection (pathology antibody-mediated rejection [pAMR]). We sought to determine whether the ISHLT pAMR grading schema correlates with patient outcomes. METHODS: Using our database, which contains a semi-quantitative scoring of all pathologic descriptors of pAMR, we retrospectively used these descriptors to convert the previous AMR categories to the current ISHLT pAMR categories. Cox proportional hazard models were fit with cardiovascular (CV) death or retransplant as the outcome. The pAMR value was included as a categorical variable, and cellular rejection (CR) values were included in a separate model. RESULTS: There were 13,812 biopsies from 1,014 patients analyzed. The pAMR grades of pAMR1h, pAMR1i, and pAMR2 conferred comparable increased risk for CV mortality. Significantly increased risk of CV mortality was conferred by biopsies graded as severe AMR (pAMR3). CONCLUSIONS: The new ISHLT pAMR grading schema identifies patients at increased risk of CV mortality, consistent with risks published from several programs before 2011. The current schema is validated by this analysis in a large biopsy database. Because pAMR1h, pAMR1i, and pAMR2 have similar CV risks associated with them, the threshold for a positive diagnosis of pAMR should be re-evaluated in future iterations of the ISHLT schema.