RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Dengue fever is an arboviral disease caused by the dengue virus (DENV). Its geographical distribution and health burden have been steadily increasing through tropical and subtropical climates in recent decades. METHODS: We developed a temperature- and precipitation-dependent mechanistic model for the global risk of dengue fever outbreaks using the basic reproduction number (R0) as the metric of disease transmission risk. We used our model to evaluate the global risk of dengue outbreaks from 1950 to 2020 and to investigate the impact of annual seasons and El Niño events. RESULTS: We showed that the global annual risk of dengue outbreaks has steadily increased during the last four decades. Highest R0 values were observed in South America, Southeast Asia, and the Equatorial region of Africa year-round with large seasonal variations occurring in other regions. El Niño was shown to be positively correlated with the global risk of dengue outbreaks with a correlation of 0.52. However, the impact of El Niño on dengue R0 was shown to vary across geographical regions and between El Niño events. CONCLUSIONS: Strong El Niño events may increase the risk of dengue outbreaks across the globe. The onset of these events may trigger a surge of control efforts to minimize risk of dengue outbreaks.
RESUMO
The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) defines a county metric of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) community levels to inform public health measures. We find that the COVID-19 community levels vary frequently over time, which may not be optimal for decision making. Alternative metric formulations that do not compromise predictive ability are shown to reduce variability.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Saúde Pública , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.RESUMO
Accurate estimates of infection prevalence and seroprevalence are essential for evaluating and informing public health responses and vaccination coverage needed to address the ongoing spread of COVID-19 in each United States (U.S.) state. However, reliable, timely data based on representative population sampling are unavailable, and reported case and test positivity rates are highly biased. A simple data-driven Bayesian semi-empirical modeling framework was developed and used to evaluate state-level prevalence and seroprevalence of COVID-19 using daily reported cases and test positivity ratios. The model was calibrated to and validated using published state-wide seroprevalence data, and further compared against two independent data-driven mathematical models. The prevalence of undiagnosed COVID-19 infections is found to be well-approximated by a geometrically weighted average of the positivity rate and the reported case rate. Our model accurately fits state-level seroprevalence data from across the U.S. Prevalence estimates of our semi-empirical model compare favorably to those from two data-driven epidemiological models. As of December 31, 2020, we estimate nation-wide a prevalence of 1.4% [Credible Interval (CrI): 1.0%-1.9%] and a seroprevalence of 13.2% [CrI: 12.3%-14.2%], with state-level prevalence ranging from 0.2% [CrI: 0.1%-0.3%] in Hawaii to 2.8% [CrI: 1.8%-4.1%] in Tennessee, and seroprevalence from 1.5% [CrI: 1.2%-2.0%] in Vermont to 23% [CrI: 20%-28%] in New York. Cumulatively, reported cases correspond to only one third of actual infections. The use of this simple and easy-to-communicate approach to estimating COVID-19 prevalence and seroprevalence will improve the ability to make public health decisions that effectively respond to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.
Assuntos
Teste para COVID-19/estatística & dados numéricos , COVID-19 , Modelos Estatísticos , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/imunologia , Biologia Computacional , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Prevalência , Estudos Soroepidemiológicos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
The interplay between civil unrest and disease transmission is not well understood. Violence targeting healthcare workers and Ebola treatment centers in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) has been thwarting the case isolation, treatment, and vaccination efforts. The extent to which conflict impedes public health response and contributes to incidence has not previously been evaluated. We construct a timeline of conflict events throughout the course of the epidemic and provide an ethnographic appraisal of the local conditions that preceded and followed conflict events. Informed by temporal incidence and conflict data as well as the ethnographic evidence, we developed a model of Ebola transmission and control to assess the impact of conflict on the epidemic in the eastern DRC from April 30, 2018, to June 23, 2019. We found that both the rapidity of case isolation and the population-level effectiveness of vaccination varied notably as a result of preceding unrest and subsequent impact of conflict events. Furthermore, conflict events were found to reverse an otherwise declining phase of the epidemic trajectory. Our model framework can be extended to other infectious diseases in the same and other regions of the world experiencing conflict and violence.
Assuntos
Conflitos Armados , Doença pelo Vírus Ebola/epidemiologia , Doença pelo Vírus Ebola/prevenção & controle , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , República Democrática do Congo , Surtos de Doenças , Pessoal de Saúde , Doença pelo Vírus Ebola/terapia , Humanos , IncidênciaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Seasonal influenza remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the USA. Despite the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendation promoting the early antiviral treatment of high-risk patients, treatment coverage remains low. METHODS: To evaluate the population-level impact of increasing antiviral treatment timeliness and coverage among high-risk patients in the USA, we developed an influenza transmission model that incorporates data on infectious viral load, social contact, and healthcare-seeking behavior. We modeled the reduction in transmissibility in treated individuals based on their reduced daily viral load. The reduction in hospitalizations following treatment was based on estimates from clinical trials. We calibrated the model to weekly influenza data from Texas, California, Connecticut, and Virginia between 2014 and 2019. We considered in the baseline scenario that 2.7-4.8% are treated within 48 h of symptom onset while an additional 7.3-12.8% are treated after 48 h of symptom onset. We evaluated the impact of improving the timeliness and uptake of antiviral treatment on influenza cases and hospitalizations. RESULTS: Model projections suggest that treating high-risk individuals as early as 48 h after symptom onset while maintaining the current treatment coverage level would avert 2.9-4.5% of all symptomatic cases and 5.5-7.1% of all hospitalizations. Geographic variability in the effectiveness of earlier treatment arises primarily from variabilities in vaccination coverage and population demographics. Regardless of these variabilities, we found that when 20% of the high-risk individuals were treated within 48 h, the reduction in hospitalizations doubled. We found that treatment of the elderly population (> 65 years old) had the highest impact on reducing hospitalizations, whereas treating high-risk individuals aged 5-19 years old had the highest impact on reducing transmission. Furthermore, the population-level benefit per treated individual is enhanced under conditions of high vaccination coverage and a low attack rate during an influenza season. CONCLUSIONS: Increased timeliness and coverage of antiviral treatment among high-risk patients have the potential to substantially reduce the burden of seasonal influenza in the USA, regardless of influenza vaccination coverage and the severity of the influenza season.
Assuntos
Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Vacinas contra Influenza/uso terapêutico , Influenza Humana/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Teóricos , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Yellow fever (YF) is a vector-borne viral hemorrhagic disease endemic in Africa and Latin America. In 2016, the World Health Organization (WHO) developed the Eliminate YF Epidemics strategy aiming at eliminating YF epidemics by 2026. METHODS: We developed a spatiotemporal model of YF, accounting for the impact of temperature, vector distribution, and socioeconomic factors on disease transmission. We validated our model against previous estimates of YF basic reproductive number (R0). We used the model to estimate global risk of YF outbreaks and vaccination efforts needed to achieve elimination of YF epidemics. RESULTS: We showed that the global risk of YF outbreaks is highly heterogeneous. High-risk transmission areas (R0 > 6) are mainly found in West Africa and the Equatorial region of Latin America. We showed that vaccination coverage needed to eliminate YF epidemics in an endemic country varies substantially between districts. In many endemic countries, a 90% vaccination coverage is needed to achieve elimination. However, in some high-risk districts in Africa, a 95% coverage may be required. CONCLUSIONS: Global elimination of YF epidemics requires higher population-level immunity than the 80% coverage recommended by the WHO. Optimal YF vaccination strategy should be tailored to the risk profile of each endemic country.
Assuntos
Erradicação de Doenças , Doenças Endêmicas/prevenção & controle , Epidemias/prevenção & controle , Vacina contra Febre Amarela/administração & dosagem , Febre Amarela/epidemiologia , África , América , Humanos , América Latina , Modelos Estatísticos , Mosquitos Vetores/virologia , Medição de Risco , Estações do Ano , Análise Espaço-Temporal , Cobertura Vacinal/normas , Organização Mundial da Saúde , Febre Amarela/prevenção & controle , Febre Amarela/transmissão , Febre Amarela/virologia , Vírus da Febre Amarela/imunologia , Vírus da Febre Amarela/isolamento & purificaçãoRESUMO
Every year in the United States more than 12,000 women are diagnosed with cervical cancer, a disease principally caused by human papillomavirus (HPV). Bivalent and quadrivalent HPV vaccines protect against 66% of HPV-associated cervical cancers, and a new nonavalent vaccine protects against an additional 15% of cervical cancers. However, vaccination policy varies across states, and migration between states interdependently dilutes state-specific vaccination policies. To quantify the economic and epidemiological impacts of switching to the nonavalent vaccine both for individual states and for the nation as a whole, we developed a model of HPV transmission and cervical cancer incidence that incorporates state-specific demographic dynamics, sexual behavior, and migratory patterns. At the national level, the nonavalent vaccine was shown to be cost-effective compared with the bivalent and quadrivalent vaccines at any coverage despite the greater per-dose cost of the new vaccine. Furthermore, the nonavalent vaccine remains cost-effective with up to an additional 40% coverage of the adolescent population, representing 80% of girls and 62% of boys. We find that expansion of coverage would have the greatest health impact in states with the lowest coverage because of the decreasing marginal returns of herd immunity. Our results show that if policies promoting nonavalent vaccine implementation and expansion of coverage are coordinated across multiple states, all states benefit both in health and in economic terms.
Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Vacinação em Massa/economia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/economia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/economia , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Análise Custo-Benefício/economia , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Vacinação em Massa/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Medição de Risco , Distribuição por Sexo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Background: Mosquito-borne and sexually transmitted Zika virus has become widespread across Central and South America and the Caribbean. Many Zika vaccine candidates are under active development. Objective: To quantify the effect of Zika vaccine prioritization of females aged 9 to 49 years, followed by males aged 9 to 49 years, on incidence of prenatal Zika infections. Design: A compartmental model of Zika transmission between mosquitoes and humans was developed and calibrated to empirical estimates of country-specific mosquito density. Mosquitoes were stratified into susceptible, exposed, and infected groups; humans were stratified into susceptible, exposed, infected, recovered, and vaccinated groups. Age-specific fertility rates, Zika sexual transmission, and country-specific demographics were incorporated. Setting: 34 countries and territories in the Americas with documented Zika outbreaks. Target Population: Males and females aged 9 to 49 years. Intervention: Age- and sex-targeted immunization using a Zika vaccine with 75% efficacy. Measurements: Annual prenatal Zika infections. Results: For a base-case vaccine efficacy of 75% and vaccination coverage of 90%, immunizing females aged 9 to 49 years (the World Health Organization target population) would reduce the incidence of prenatal infections by at least 94%, depending on the country-specific Zika attack rate. In regions where an outbreak is not expected for at least 10 years, vaccination of women aged 15 to 29 years is more efficient than that of women aged 30 years or older. Limitation: Population-level modeling may not capture all local and neighborhood-level heterogeneity in mosquito abundance or Zika incidence. Conclusion: A Zika vaccine of moderate to high efficacy may virtually eliminate prenatal infections through a combination of direct protection and transmission reduction. Efficiency of age-specific targeting of Zika vaccination depends on the timing of future outbreaks. Primary Funding Source: National Institutes of Health.
Assuntos
Vacinação em Massa/métodos , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/prevenção & controle , Infecção por Zika virus/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , América/epidemiologia , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Imunidade Coletiva , Incidência , Transmissão Vertical de Doenças Infecciosas/prevenção & controle , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mosquitos Vetores , Densidade Demográfica , Gravidez , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Porto Rico/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem , Infecção por Zika virus/epidemiologia , Infecção por Zika virus/transmissãoRESUMO
Recent mathematical and statistical modeling of leprosy incidence data provides estimates of the current undiagnosed population and projections of diagnosed cases, as well as ongoing transmission. Furthermore, modeling studies have been used to evaluate the effectiveness of proposed intervention strategies, such as postleprosy exposure prophylaxis and novel diagnostics, relative to current approaches. Such modeling studies have revealed both a slow decline of new cases and a substantial pool of undiagnosed infections. These findings highlight the need for active case detection, particularly targeting leprosy foci, as well as for continued research into innovative accurate, rapid, and cost-effective diagnostics. As leprosy incidence continues to decline, targeted active case detection primarily in foci and connected areas will likely become increasingly important.
Assuntos
Erradicação de Doenças , Hanseníase/diagnóstico , Modelos Estatísticos , Modelos Teóricos , Humanos , Incidência , Hanseníase/epidemiologia , Hanseníase/prevenção & controle , Hanseníase/transmissão , PolíticasRESUMO
Background: Control of gambiense sleeping sickness relies predominantly on passive and active screening of people, followed by treatment. Methods: Mathematical modeling explores the potential of 3 complementary interventions in high- and low-transmission settings. Results: Intervention strategies that included vector control are predicted to halt transmission most quickly. Targeted active screening, with better and more focused coverage, and enhanced passive surveillance, with improved access to diagnosis and treatment, are both estimated to avert many new infections but, when used alone, are unlikely to halt transmission before 2030 in high-risk settings. Conclusions: There was general model consensus in the ranking of the 3 complementary interventions studied, although with discrepancies between the quantitative predictions due to differing epidemiological assumptions within the models. While these predictions provide generic insights into improving control, the most effective strategy in any situation depends on the specific epidemiology in the region and the associated costs.
Assuntos
Controle de Insetos , Insetos Vetores/parasitologia , Modelos Teóricos , Trypanosoma brucei gambiense/isolamento & purificação , Tripanossomíase Africana/prevenção & controle , Moscas Tsé-Tsé/parasitologia , Animais , Monitoramento Epidemiológico , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento , Tripanossomíase Africana/diagnóstico , Tripanossomíase Africana/epidemiologia , Tripanossomíase Africana/transmissãoRESUMO
Incarcerated populations experience elevated burdens of infectious diseases, which are exacerbated by limited access to prevention measures. Dynamic models are used to assess the spread and control of diseases within correctional facilities and repercussions on the general population. Our systematic review of dynamic models of infectious diseases within correctional settings identified 34 studies published between 1996 and 2017. Of these, 23 focused on disease dynamics and intervention in prison without accounting for subsequent spread to the community. The main diseases modeled in these studies were human immunodeficiency virus (HIV; n = 14, 41%), tuberculosis (TB; n = 10, 29%), and hepatitis C virus (HCV; n = 7, 21%). Models were fitted to epidemiologic data in 14 studies; uncertainty and sensitivity analyses were conducted in 8, and validation of model projection against empirical data was done in 1 study. According to the models, prison-based screening and treatment may be highly effective strategies for reducing the burden of HIV, TB, HCV, and other sexually transmissible infections among prisoners and the general community. Decreasing incarceration rates were projected to reduce HIV and HCV infections among people who inject drugs and TB infections among all prisoners. Limitations of the modeling studies and opportunities for using dynamic models to develop quantitative evidence for informing prison infection control measures are discussed.
Assuntos
Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa , Modelos Biológicos , Prisioneiros , Prisões , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/métodos , Doenças Transmissíveis/diagnóstico , Doenças Transmissíveis/terapia , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa/prevenção & controle , Saúde Global , HumanosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Because of the risk for Zika virus infection in the Americas and the links between infection and microcephaly, other serious neurologic conditions, and fetal death, health ministries across the region have advised women to delay pregnancy. However, the effectiveness of this policy in reducing prenatal Zika virus infection has yet to be quantified. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of pregnancy-delay policies on the incidence and prevalence of prenatal Zika virus infection. DESIGN: Vector-borne Zika virus transmission model fitted to epidemiologic data from 2015 to 2016 on Zika virus infection in Colombia. SETTING: Colombia, August 2015 to July 2017. PATIENTS: Population of Colombia, stratified by sex, age, and pregnancy status. INTERVENTION: Recommendations to delay pregnancy by 3, 6, 9, 12, or 24 months, at different levels of adherence. MEASUREMENTS: Weekly and cumulative incidence of prenatal infections and microcephaly cases. RESULTS: With 50% adherence to recommendations to delay pregnancy by 9 to 24 months, the cumulative incidence of prenatal Zika virus infections is likely to decrease by 17% to 44%, whereas recommendations to delay pregnancy by 6 or fewer months are likely to increase prenatal infections by 2% to 7%. This paradoxical exacerbation of prenatal Zika virus exposure is due to an elevated risk for pregnancies to shift toward the peak of the outbreak. LIMITATION: Sexual transmission was not explicitly accounted for in the model because of limited data but was implicitly subsumed within the overall transmission rate, which was calibrated to observed incidence. CONCLUSION: Pregnancy delays can have a substantial effect on reducing cases of microcephaly but risks exacerbating the Zika virus outbreak if the duration is not sufficient. Duration of the delay, population adherence, and the timing of initiation of the intervention must be carefully considered. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institutes of Health.
Assuntos
Política de Saúde , Infecção por Zika virus/prevenção & controle , Teorema de Bayes , Colômbia/epidemiologia , Anormalidades Congênitas/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Morte Fetal/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Microcefalia/prevenção & controle , Modelos Estatísticos , Gravidez , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/virologia , Prevalência , Doenças Virais Sexualmente Transmissíveis/epidemiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Infecção por Zika virus/complicações , Infecção por Zika virus/epidemiologia , Infecção por Zika virus/transmissãoRESUMO
Response to the 2014-2015 Ebola outbreak in West Africa overwhelmed the healthcare systems of Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone, reducing access to health services for diagnosis and treatment for the major diseases that are endemic to the region: malaria, HIV/AIDS, and tuberculosis. To estimate the repercussions of the Ebola outbreak on the populations at risk for these diseases, we developed computational models for disease transmission and infection progression. We estimated that a 50% reduction in access to healthcare services during the Ebola outbreak exacerbated malaria, HIV/AIDS, and tuberculosis mortality rates by additional death counts of 6,269 (2,564-12,407) in Guinea; 1,535 (522-2,8780) in Liberia; and 2,819 (844-4,844) in Sierra Leone. The 2014-2015 Ebola outbreak was catastrophic in these countries, and its indirect impact of increasing the mortality rates of other diseases was also substantial.
Assuntos
Síndrome da Imunodeficiência Adquirida/mortalidade , Surtos de Doenças , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Doença pelo Vírus Ebola/epidemiologia , Malária/mortalidade , Tuberculose/mortalidade , Adolescente , Adulto , Pré-Escolar , Simulação por Computador , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Guiné/epidemiologia , Infecções por HIV/mortalidade , Humanos , Libéria/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Biológicos , Serra Leoa/epidemiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Epidemiological studies from sub-Saharan Africa show that genital infection with Schistosoma haematobium [corrected] may increase the risk for HIV infection in young women. Therefore, preventing schistosomiasis has the potential to reduce HIV transmission in sub-Saharan Africa. We developed a transmission model of female genital schistosomiasis and HIV infections that we fit to epidemiological data of HIV and female genital schistosomiasis prevalence and coinfection in rural Zimbabwe. We used the model to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a multifaceted community-based intervention for preventing schistosomiasis and, consequently, HIV infections in rural Zimbabwe, from the perspective of a health payer. The community-based intervention combined provision of clean water, sanitation, and health education (WSH) with administration of praziquantel to school-aged children. Considering variation in efficacy between 10% and 70% of WSH for reducing S. haematobium [corrected] transmission, our model predicted that community-based intervention is likely to be cost-effective in Zimbabwe at an aggregated WSH cost corresponding to US $725-$1,000 per individual over a 20-y intervention period. These costs compare favorably with empirical measures of WSH provision in developing countries, indicating that integrated community-based intervention for reducing the transmission of S. haematobium [corrected] is an economically attractive strategy for reducing schistosomiasis and HIV transmission in sub-Saharan Africa that would have a powerful impact on averting infections and saving lives.
Assuntos
Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/economia , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Infecções por HIV/transmissão , Infectologia/economia , Esquistossomose/prevenção & controle , Esquistossomose/transmissão , Animais , Criança , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária/economia , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária/organização & administração , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Promoção da Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Modelos Econômicos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Prevalência , Probabilidade , ZimbábueRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The Ebola outbreak that is sweeping across West Africa is the largest, most volatile, and deadliest Ebola epidemic ever recorded. Liberia is the most profoundly affected country, with more than 3500 infections and 2000 deaths recorded in the past 3 months. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the contribution of disease progression and case fatality on transmission and to examine the potential for targeted interventions to eliminate the disease. DESIGN: Stochastic transmission model that integrates epidemiologic and clinical data on incidence and case fatality, daily viral load among survivors and nonsurvivors evaluated on the basis of the 2000-2001 outbreak in Uganda, and primary data on contacts of patients with Ebola in Liberia. SETTING: Montserrado County, Liberia, July to September 2014. MEASUREMENTS: Ebola incidence and case-fatality records from 2014 Liberian Ministry of Health and Social Welfare. RESULTS: The average number of secondary infections generated throughout the entire infectious period of a single infected case, R, was estimated as 1.73 (95% CI, 1.66 to 1.83). There was substantial stratification between survivors (RSurvivors), for whom the estimate was 0.66 (CI, 0.10 to 1.69), and nonsurvivors (RNonsurvivors), for whom the estimate was 2.36 (CI, 1.72 to 2.80). The nonsurvivors had the highest risk for transmitting the virus later in the course of disease progression. Consequently, the isolation of 75% of infected individuals in critical condition within 4 days from symptom onset has a high chance of eliminating the disease. LIMITATION: Projections are based on the initial dynamics of the epidemic, which may change as the outbreak and interventions evolve. CONCLUSION: These results underscore the importance of isolating the most severely ill patients with Ebola within the first few days of their symptomatic phase. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institutes of Health.
Assuntos
Epidemias/prevenção & controle , Doença pelo Vírus Ebola/prevenção & controle , Doença pelo Vírus Ebola/transmissão , Modelos Estatísticos , Busca de Comunicante , Progressão da Doença , Doença pelo Vírus Ebola/epidemiologia , Doença pelo Vírus Ebola/virologia , Humanos , Incidência , Libéria/epidemiologia , Isolamento de Pacientes , Sobreviventes , Carga ViralRESUMO
Several dengue vaccines are under development, and some are expected to become available imminently. Concomitant with the anticipated release of these vaccines, vaccine allocation strategies for dengue-endemic countries in Southeast Asia and Latin America are currently under development. We developed a model of dengue transmission that incorporates the age-specific distributions of dengue burden corresponding to those in Thailand and Brazil, respectively, to determine vaccine allocations that minimize the incidence of dengue hemorrhagic fever, taking into account limited availability of vaccine doses in the initial phase of production. We showed that optimal vaccine allocation strategies vary significantly with the demographic burden of dengue hemorrhagic fever. Consequently, the strategy that is optimal for one country may be sub-optimal for another country. More specifically, we showed that, during the first years following introduction of a dengue vaccine, it is optimal to target children for dengue mass vaccination in Thailand, whereas young adults should be targeted in Brazil.
Assuntos
Envelhecimento/fisiologia , Vacinas contra Dengue/imunologia , Dengue/epidemiologia , Dengue/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Sudeste Asiático/epidemiologia , Dengue/imunologia , Dengue/transmissão , Geografia , Humanos , América Latina/epidemiologia , Vacinação em MassaRESUMO
Non-pharmaceutical personal protective (NPP) measures such as face masks use, and hand and respiratory hygiene can be effective measures for mitigating the spread of aerosol/airborne diseases, such as COVID-19, in the absence of vaccination or treatment. However, the usage of such measures is constrained by their inherent perceived cost and effectiveness for reducing transmission risk. To understand the complex interaction of disease dynamics and individuals decision whether to adopt NPP or not, we incorporate evolutionary game theory into an epidemic model such as COVID-19. To compare how self-interested NPP use differs from social optimum, we also investigated optional control from a central planner's perspective. We use Pontryagin's maximum principle to identify the population-level NPP uptake that minimizes disease incidence by incurring the minimum costs. The evolutionary behavior model shows that NPP uptake increases at lower perceived costs of NPP, higher transmission risk, shorter duration of NPP use, higher effectiveness of NPP, and shorter duration of disease-induced immunity. Though social optimum NPP usage is generally more effective in reducing disease incidence than self-interested usage, our analysis identifies conditions under which both strategies get closer. Our model provides new insights for public health in mitigating a disease outbreak through NPP.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Teoria dos Jogos , Humanos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/transmissão , COVID-19/epidemiologia , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Equipamento de Proteção Individual , Doenças Transmissíveis Emergentes/prevenção & controle , Doenças Transmissíveis Emergentes/epidemiologia , Doenças Transmissíveis Emergentes/transmissãoRESUMO
Background: The conventional diagnostic for Schistosoma mansoni infection is stool microscopy with the Kato-Katz (KK) technique to detect eggs. Its outcomes are highly variable on a day-to-day basis and may lead to biased estimates of community infection used to inform public health programs. Our goal is to develop a resampling method that leverages data from a large-scale randomized trial to accurately predict community infection. Methods: We developed a resampling method that provides unbiased community estimates of prevalence, intensity and other statistics for S mansoni infection when a community survey is conducted using KK stool microscopy with a single sample per host. It leverages a large-scale data set, collected in the Schistosomiasis Consortium for Operational Research and Evaluation (SCORE) project, and allows linking single-stool specimen community screening to its putative multiday "true statistics." Results: SCORE data analysis reveals the limited sensitivity of KK stool microscopy and systematic bias of single-day community testing versus multiday testing; for prevalence estimate, it can fall up to 50% below the true value. The proposed SCORE cluster method reduces systematic bias and brings the estimated prevalence values within 5%-10% of the true value. This holds for a broad swath of transmission settings, including SCORE communities, and other data sets. Conclusions: Our SCORE cluster method can markedly improve the S mansoni prevalence estimate in settings using stool microscopy.
RESUMO
Diseases in the swine industry can cause significant economic and health impacts. This review examines R0 estimates for respiratory diseases in pigs, assessing variations and comparing transmission risks within and between farms. A literature search of three databases aggregated peer-reviewed research articles on swine viral respiratory diseases' R0 values. The study focused on seven diseases: Aujeszky's disease (AD), Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus (PRRSV), Circovirus, Influenza A (IA), Encephalomyocarditis Virus (EV), Classical Swine Fever (CSF), and African Swine Fever (ASF). R0 values were estimated for transmission within and between herds/farms using various methods, from complex mathematical models to simple calculations. Data primarily came from disease surveillance and laboratory experiments. The median R0 for within-herd and between-herd transmission was 10 and 3.31 for AD, 2.78 and 1.14 for PRRSV, 5.9 and 0.89 for Circovirus, 1.75 and 1.6 for CSF, and 3.94 and 3.15 for ASF. For IA and EV, only within-herd R0 values were estimated at 8.65 and 1.3, respectively. Diseases with high R0 values highlight the need for prompt detection and response to outbreaks. Continuous monitoring and evaluation of pathogen transmissibility are crucial for enhancing disease surveillance and reducing the impact of livestock diseases.
RESUMO
Previous game-theoretic studies of vaccination behavior typically have often assumed that populations are homogeneously mixed and that individuals are fully rational. In reality, there is heterogeneity in the number of contacts per individual, and individuals tend to imitate others who appear to have adopted successful strategies. Here, we use network-based mathematical models to study the effects of both imitation behavior and contact heterogeneity on vaccination coverage and disease dynamics. We integrate contact network epidemiological models with a framework for decision-making, within which individuals make their decisions either based purely on payoff maximization or by imitating the vaccination behavior of a social contact. Simulations suggest that when the cost of vaccination is high imitation behavior may decrease vaccination coverage. However, when the cost of vaccination is small relative to that of infection, imitation behavior increases vaccination coverage, but, surprisingly, also increases the magnitude of epidemics through the clustering of non-vaccinators within the network. Thus, imitation behavior may impede the eradication of infectious diseases. Calculations that ignore behavioral clustering caused by imitation may significantly underestimate the levels of vaccination coverage required to attain herd immunity.