Polyethylene Wear Testing of a Non-Mechanically Linked Total Elbow Replacement.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to perform a polyethylene wear test on a non-mechanically linked total elbow arthroplasty implant using a clinically relevant in-vitro elbow wear test methodology that simulated ten years of use in the light to moderate activity of daily living range. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The test protocol applied an 80° arc of ulnohumeral motion beginning at 30° shy of full extension and progressing to 110° of flexion. Force was applied at 7° to recreate a valgus load on the elbow. A variable joint load profile at a frequency of 0.5 Hz was employed. The implants were tested for 5 million cycles (Mc) in a bovine serum lubricant. Implant component failure was characterized and polyethylene wear was determined gravimetrically. RESULTS: After 5 Mc the small polyethylene bushing wear rate was 0.56 mg/Mc. The medium size wear rate was 0.28 mg/Mc. Three large sizes were tested and the average wear rate was 0.39 ± 0.07 mg/Mc. No implant failure was identified. CONCLUSION: The test recreated an in vivo loading environment and measured polyethylene wear rates at specified cycle counts. The test demonstrated less wear than other joint replacements. Further clinical evaluation is necessary to determine if this translates into reduced complications of total elbow replacement associated with wear.

Testing of a Novel Method for Securing Ligaments Against Bone During Simultaneous Medial and Lateral Elbow Ligament Reconstruction.

PURPOSE: A ligament reconstruction method that simultaneously tensions the medial and lateral sides of the elbow and maintains tension with compression plates on the proximal ulna is proposed for the treatment of bidirectional elbow ligament instability. Graft slippage, catastrophic failure, and excessive displacement were evaluated. Biomechanical stability without graft slippage was hypothesized. METHODS: Eight cadaveric ligament reconstruction simulations were created through the dissection of three cadaver arms. Each reconstruction was statically tested with 160 N in a manner where it was first augmented with an absorbable suture and then without. Then, 3 more ligament reconstruction simulations were created for dynamic testing with each undergoing testing at 80 N for 2,000 cycles at 2 Hz. Construct displacement and graft slippage were recorded for each load application. RESULTS: No grafts failed catastrophically and no graft slippage was observed with either static or dynamic loading. Under static loading, the mean change in displacement between augmented and nonaugmented ligament reconstruction simulations was 28.7% ± 21% (augmented 3.95 ± 1.81 mm vs nonaugmented 4.89 ± 2.22 mm). The mean stiffness was 66.6 ± 26.6 N/mm for augmented and 64.6 ± 23.2 N/mm for nonaugmented simulations. With dynamic loading, the mean displacement for augmented graft ligament reconstruction simulations was 1.55 ± 0.16 mm compared with 2.18 ± 0.77 mm for nonaugmented reconstruction simulations. CONCLUSIONS: This method of fixation to the proximal ulna for the simultaneous reconstruction of medial and lateral elbow ligaments successfully prevented graft slippage without excessive construct displacement during static and dynamic testing. Ligament augmentation with absorbable sutures decreased the construct displacement. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This ligament fixation method may be a viable alternative for the treatment of concomitant medial and lateral elbow instability.

Testing of Novel Total Elbow Prostheses Using Active Motion Experimental Setup.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to test a novel uncemented and unconstrained total elbow arthroplasty (Kaufmann total elbow) design that is stabilized through a ligament reconstruction. METHODS: We quantified the implant stability after 25,000 cycles, which represents the time between implantation and when ligament and bone healing has occurred. We used an active motion experimental setup that applies tendon loads via pneumatic cylinders and reproduces the forearm-originating dynamic stabilizers of the elbow. The novel total elbow arthroplasty was actuated for 5,000 full flexion-extension cycles at 5 different shoulder positions. Four Sawbones and 4 cadaver elbows were employed. Angular laxity and implant stability were recorded prior to testing and after each 5,000-loading cycle. RESULTS: Four Sawbones and 4 cadaver elbows were implanted with the uncemented total elbow arthroplasty and did not demonstrate fixation failure or substantial laxity after 25,000 cycles of loading imparted at different shoulder positions. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that the Kaufmann total elbow replacement implanted into cadaver and Sawbones specimens did not exhibit fixation failure or excessive laxity after 25,000 cycles. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: An uncemented, nonmechanically linked total elbow arthroplasty that gains component fixation using intramedullary screws and employs a ligament reconstruction to stabilize the elbow has the potential to be a valuable management option, particularly in younger patients.