Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
J Wound Care ; 33(2): 136-142, 2024 Feb 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38329828

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) values and operative wound infection. METHOD: During the period from 2013-2016, consecutive patients with type 2 diabetes were prospectively evaluated. Data were retrospectively analysed. All included patients were admitted for an elective surgical procedure, requiring the use of prosthetic graft in a groin wound. The patients were divided into two groups according to their preoperative HbA1c values. The main outcome was groin wound infection. The association between preoperative long-term glycoregulation and wound infection was evaluated, as well as the impact of postoperative glycaemic values, regardless of the level of HbA1c. RESULTS: Of the 93 participating patients, wound infection occurred in 20 (21.5%). Wound infection occurred in 28.2% of patients with uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c >7%) and 16.7% of patients with controlled diabetes (HbA1c <7%); however, the difference did not reach statistical significance (p=0.181). In regression modelling, operative time (p=0.042) was a significant predictor of wound infection, while patients' age (p=0.056) was on the borderline of statistical significance. Females had a higher probability for wound infection (odds ratio (OR): 1.739; 95% confidence interval (CI):0.483-6.265), but there was no statistical significance (p=0.397). Patients with elevated levels of HbA1c had a higher chance of wound infection compared with patients with controlled diabetes (OR: 2.243; 95% CI: 0.749-6.716), nevertheless, this was not statistically significant (p=0.149). CONCLUSION: We found no statistically significant correlation between elevated values of preoperative HbA1c and postoperative groin wound infection.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Feminino , Humanos , Hemoglobinas Glicadas , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia
2.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 55: 285-291, 2019 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30099170

RESUMO

In the past 2 decades, varicose veins surgery went through a great turbulence and various innovations. A number of new techniques have been introduced with a goal to increase the success rate, reduce the periprocedural complications and, overall, to improve patients' quality of life. The latest of them, named cyanoacrylate embolization (CAE) technique, threatens to shake the glory of the currently well-established endovenous methods. We have analyzed all previous studies by searching MEDLINE base using PubMed. Although the idea of using n-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA) glue in medical purposes was not new, the very first in vivo and animal experiments using NBCA for vein closure were conducted just at the beginning of this millennium. The results of these studies gave warranty to begin with the first interventions in humans. Early studies reported very high success rates of more than 90%, with the longest follow-up period of 36 months. There were no major adverse events reported, while the minor ones-mostly phlebitic reactions-were defined as mild to moderate. The newest head-to-head studies showed that CAE is a noninferior technique to other endovenous methods, with higher occlusion rates and fewer adverse events. Short procedure time and no need for tumescent anesthesia or compressive stockings reduce patients' discomfort to the minimum and definitely seem to be a step forward answering the modern "walk in-walk out surgery" demands. As an easily handling technique, CAE undoubtedly pierces its path to the top of varicose veins surgery but more head-to-head clinical trials with longer follow-up periods are necessary to obtain a plain picture.


Assuntos
Cianoacrilatos/administração & dosagem , Embolização Terapêutica/métodos , Varizes/terapia , Embolização Terapêutica/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Varizes/diagnóstico por imagem , Varizes/fisiopatologia
5.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 44: 368-374, 2017 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28549958

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To date, all published studies analyzing simultaneous treatment of carotid and proximal atherosclerotic lesions are describing retrograde approach and several technical variations. In the presented study, for the first time, antegrade approach is described for simultaneous carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and associated brachiocephalic trunk (BCT) or common carotid artery (CCA) angioplasty in the hybrid operating room. METHODS: From January 2012 till January 2016, antegrade hybrid procedures were performed in 18 patients. All patients were admitted to our institute for elective supraaortic arch multidetector computed tomography angiography when significant simultaneous proximal and distal supraaortic arch lesions were revealed. After surgical exposure of carotid arteries, proximal lesions were crossed by antegrade approach. Prior to stent placement, internal carotid artery (ICA) is clamped at its origin with the guidewire placed in the external carotid artery (ECA). After primary stenting and control arteriography, CCA and ECA are clamped and the ICA clamp moved more distally. An arteriotomy is performed in the CCA, with flushing of possible debris and thrombus before performance of the eversion CEA, once again flushing before completion of the anastomosis. Follow-up ranged from 6 to 36 months with average follow-up of 22.15 ± 11.31 months. RESULTS: All procedures went uneventfully. Out of 18 patients, 11 were males and 7 females, mean age 66.6 ± 3.82 years. In 10 patients (55.5%), simultaneous CEA and CCA angioplasty was performed, in 7 patients (38.9%) CEA and BCT angioplasty, and in 1 patient (5.5%) tubular graft interposition between the CCA and the ICA and CCA angioplasty. In 6 patients (33.3%), CCA/BCT balloon angioplasty alone was performed simultaneously with CEA. None of the patient had postoperative transient ischemic attack, stroke, hematoma, dissection, myocardial infarction, or ischemia in the early postoperative period and during the follow-up. There were no lethal outcomes, neither in the early postoperative course nor during the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Antegrade approach for simultaneous treatment of proximal CCA/BCT and distal carotid lesions with temporary ICA clamping is safe and feasible procedure that should be thought of in the future in addition to already described retrograde approach.


Assuntos
Angioplastia com Balão , Artérias Carótidas/cirurgia , Estenose das Carótidas/terapia , Endarterectomia das Carótidas , Idoso , Angioplastia com Balão/efeitos adversos , Angioplastia com Balão/instrumentação , Artérias Carótidas/diagnóstico por imagem , Estenose das Carótidas/complicações , Estenose das Carótidas/diagnóstico por imagem , Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada , Constrição , Bases de Dados Factuais , Endarterectomia das Carótidas/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tomografia Computadorizada Multidetectores , Fatores de Risco , Stents , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
Curr Pharm Des ; 25(18): 2033-2037, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31291872

RESUMO

The rising pandemic of obesity in modern society should direct attention to a more comprehensive approach to abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) treatment in the affected population. Although overweight patients are considered prone to increased surgical risk, studies on the subject did not confirm or specify the risks well enough. Associated comorbidities inevitably lead to a selection bias leaning towards endovascular abdominal aortic repair (EVAR), as a less invasive treatment option, which makes it hard to single out obesity as an independent risk factor. The increased technical difficulty often results in prolonged procedure times and increased blood loss. Several smaller studies and two analyses of national registries, including 7935 patients, highlighted the advantages of EVAR over open repair (OR) of abdominal aortic aneurysm, especially in morbidly obese population (relative risk reduction up to 47%). On the other hand, two other studies with 1374 patients combined, concluded that EVAR might not have an advantage over OR in obese patients (P = 0.52). Obesity is an established risk factor for wound infection after both EVAR and OR, which is associated with longer length of stay, subsequent major operations, and a higher rate of graft failure. Percutaneous EVAR technique could present a promising solution to reducing this complication. EVAR seems like a more feasible treatment option than OR for obese patients with AAA, due to lower overall morbidity and mortality rates, as well as reduced wound-related complication rates. However, there is a clear lack of high-quality evidence on the subject, thus future prospective trials are needed to confirm this advantage.


Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Obesidade Mórbida/complicações , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Humanos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
7.
Curr Vasc Pharmacol ; 17(2): 133-140, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29149818

RESUMO

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a degenerative disease of the aortic wall with potentially fatal complications. Open repair (OR) was considered the gold standard, until the emergence of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), which is less invasive and equally (if not more) effective. As the popularity of endovascular procedures grows, related complications become more evident, with kidney damage being one of them. Although acute kidney injury (AKI) following EVAR is relatively common, its true incidence is still uncertain. Also, there is insufficient data concerning long-term renal outcomes after EVAR, especially with repeated contrast agent exposure. Despite the lack of firm evidence on the effectiveness of individual strategies, it is evident that prevention of AKI following EVAR requires a multifactorial approach. This review focuses on recent findings based on human studies regarding the current evidence of renal impairment after EVAR, its quantification and strategies for its prevention.


Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda/prevenção & controle , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Rim/fisiopatologia , Injúria Renal Aguda/diagnóstico , Injúria Renal Aguda/epidemiologia , Injúria Renal Aguda/fisiopatologia , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagem , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/efeitos adversos , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular , Humanos , Fatores de Proteção , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
8.
Curr Vasc Pharmacol ; 17(3): 291-297, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29424318

RESUMO

Chronic venous disease (CVeD) is a highly prevalent condition in the general population, and it has a significant impact on quality of life. While it is usually manifested by obvious signs, such as varicose veins and venous ulcers, other symptoms of the disease are less specific. Among the other symptoms, which include heaviness, swelling, muscle cramps and restless legs, pain is the symptom that most frequently compels CVeD patients to seek medical aid. However, there is a substantial discrepancy between pain severity and clinically detectable signs of CVeD, questioned by several opposing studies. Further evaluation is needed to clarify this subject, and to analyse whether pain development predicts objective CVeD progression. General management of CVeD starts with advising lifestyle changes, such as lowering body mass index and treating comorbidities. However, the mainstay of treatment is compression therapy, with the additional use of pharmacological substances. Venoactive drugs proved to be the drugs of choice for symptom alleviation and slowing the progression of CVeD, with micronized purified flavonoid fraction being the most effective one. Interventional therapy is reserved for advanced stages of the disease.


Assuntos
Fármacos Cardiovasculares/uso terapêutico , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Dor/prevenção & controle , Comportamento de Redução do Risco , Meias de Compressão , Varizes/terapia , Insuficiência Venosa/terapia , Animais , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/efeitos adversos , Doença Crônica , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Dor/diagnóstico , Dor/epidemiologia , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Meias de Compressão/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Varizes/diagnóstico , Varizes/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Venosa/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Venosa/epidemiologia
9.
Surg Res Pract ; 2019: 2976091, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30719497

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To present the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of carotid endarterectomy in patients with type II internal carotid artery occlusions, including the long-term outcomes. METHODS: From March 2008 to August 2015, 74 consecutive patients (48 men with a mean age of 65.1 ± 8.06 years) underwent carotid endarterectomy because of internal carotid artery (ICA) segmental occlusions. These were verified with preoperative carotid duplex scans (CDS) and CT angiography (CTA). Also, brain CT scanning was performed in all these patients. The indication for treatment was made jointly by a vascular surgeon, neurologist, and an interventional radiologist in a multidisciplinary team (MDT) context. After successful treatment, all the patients were followed-up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, then every 6 months thereafter. RESULTS: The most common symptom at presentation was transient ischaemic attack (TIA) in 49 patients (66.2%), followed by stroke in the past six months in the 17 remaining patients (23%). Revascularisation of the ICA with endarterectomy techniques was performed successfully in all the patients with an average clamp time of 11.9 min. All the procedures were performed under general anaesthesia in combination with a superficial cervical block. The early complication rate was 8.1% and included two cardiac events (2.7%) (one rhythm disorder and one acute coronary syndrome), three TIAs (4.1%), and one intracerebral hemorrhage (1.3%). Only one patient with the intracerebral hemorrhage died 5 days after surgery giving a postoperative mortality of 1.3% for this series. During the follow-up period (mean 50.4 ± 31.3 months), the primary patency rates at 1, 3, 5, and 7 years were 98.4%, 94.9%, 92.9%, and 82.9%, respectively. Likewise, the survival rates were 98.7%, 96.8%, 89%, and 77.6%, respectively. Ultrasound Doppler controls during follow-up detected 8 ICA restenoses; however, only 3 of these patients required further endovascular treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Carotid endarterectomy of internal carotid artery (ICA) segmental occlusion is a safe and effective procedure associated with acceptable risk and good long-term results. Therefore, the current guidelines which do not recommend carotid endarterectomy in this patient group should be reassessed, with the requirement for ongoing large-scale randomized controlled trials to compare CEA with best medical therapy in this patient cohort.

10.
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) ; 59(4): 586-599, 2018 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28183175

RESUMO

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) carries a significant risk of procedural stroke and death Guidelines recommend keeping this risk below 6% and below 3% for symptomatic and asymptomatic patients respectively. After analyzing our Institute's CEA results during the past 25 years, we found the rate of postoperative complications was now well below Guideline thresholds. Accordingly, we studied temporal changes in procedural risks in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and in large observational studies in order to compare these against Guidelines. We found a clear temporal trend towards improving procedural outcomes, which can be explained by improvements in medical therapy, more appropriate timing of CEA, the use of local anesthesia and the use of peroperative cerebral monitoring as well as improving surgical techniques. An update of current guidelines should now be undertaken, since our findings are not unique and are supported by other studies in this review.


Assuntos
Estenose das Carótidas/cirurgia , Previsões , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , Medição de Risco/métodos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Estenose das Carótidas/complicações , Endarterectomia das Carótidas , Seguimentos , Saúde Global , Humanos , Morbidade/tendências , Fatores de Risco , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/prevenção & controle
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa