Liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin citrate (Myocet) for treatment of recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: a retrospective analysis.

The aim of this study was to assess the clinical activity and toxicity of liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin citrate (Myocet) in a retrospective multicenter cohort of epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, and tubal cancer patients. Records of patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, and tubal cancer treated with liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin citrate (60 mg/m on day 1 of a 21-day cycle) after failure of more than one previous regimen were reviewed. Fifty-three patients were evaluated for efficacy and toxicity. The median age of the patients was 59 (range 39-73). The median follow-up was 6 months (range 1-17). One patient (1.9%) showed a complete response and 13 patients (24.5%) showed a partial response, yielding an overall response rate of 26.4% (14/53 patients). Clinical benefit was achieved in 36 patients (67.9%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the entire study population was 4.0 months (range 1.0-14.8). The median PFS for platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant patients was 4.0 months (ranges 1.0-14.8 and 1.0-9.4, respectively; P=0.652). The median overall survival from the start of liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin citrate was 10.0 months. Multivariate survival analysis showed no association between the liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin citrate line of treatment or platinum sensitivity to PFS in age and BRCA status-adjusted models. Only 11.3% of patients experienced grade 3-4 hematologic toxicities, 80% grade-2 alopecia, and 50% grade-1-2 fatigue. No other grade-4 toxicities, no significant cardiac events, or hand and foot syndromes were reported. Liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin citrate was well tolerated, with a good response and high clinical benefit rate. Further evaluation in a larger prospective cohort is warranted.

Prediction of extravesical disease by preoperative serum markers in patients with clinically organ confined invasive bladder cancer.

PURPOSE: We assessed the value of preoperative levels of CEA, CA-125 or CA 19-9 in patients with clinically organ confined bladder cancer to predict pathological extravesical and/or node positive disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Serum levels of CEA, CA-125 and CA 19-9 were measured prospectively in all patients scheduled for cystectomy for clinically organ confined bladder cancer between September 1999 and May 2004. Biomarker expression was compared between patients with pathologically organ confined disease (pT2 or less, pN0) and patients with extravesical disease (greater than pT2, or pN1 or greater), and between patients with pathologically node negative (any pT, pN0) and node positive disease (any pT, pN1 or greater). RESULTS: Of the 91 patients enrolled, 46 had (51%) pathologically organ confined tumors, 45 (49%) had extravesical disease and 17 (19%) had positive lymph nodes. Preoperative serum levels of all markers were significantly higher in cases of extravesical disease than in organ confined disease. On multivariate analysis CEA with an odds ratio of 8.6 (95% CI 1.51-48.6) and CA-125 with an OR of 29.5 (95% CI 3.6-242.6) proved independent predictors of extravesical disease. CA-125 and CA 19-9 levels were significantly higher in patients with node positive disease than in those with node negative disease. On multivariate analysis CA-125 with an OR of 22.2 (95% CI 3.8-129) and CA 19-9 with an OR of 5.2 (95% CI 1.09-24.76) proved independent predictors of node positive disease. CONCLUSIONS: Increase in serum tumor markers before cystectomy in patients with clinically organ confined muscle invasive bladder cancer is a strong indicator of the presence of extravesical and node positive disease.

Male breast carcinoma in Israel: higher incident but possibly prognosis in Ashkenazi Jews.

BACKGROUND: Little information is available regarding male breast carcinoma. However, cumulative data have suggested a propensity for the disease among Ashkenazi Jews. Because Ashkenazi Jews comprise one of the major ethnic groups in Israel, the authors conducted a local study to shed more light on the features of this rare disease. METHODS: From 1960 to 2000, 131 men with breast carcinoma were treated at the Rabin Medical Center or the Rambam Medical Center, and, from 1980 to 1997, 470 patients with this diagnosis were recorded in the Israel Cancer Registry. These two data bases were used to analyze the epidemiologic and clinicopathologic characteristics of male breast carcinoma in Israel. RESULTS: Seventy-eight percent of the 131 Jewish patients were Ashkenazi. Most of their clinical characteristics were similar to those of their Sephardic counterparts. However, there was a statistically significant difference in the pattern of comorbidity between these groups (P = 0.000), and there was a trend toward a younger age at onset and more advanced tumor stage at the time of diagnosis for the Sephardim. It also was found that Sephardic origin was associated with poorer outcome (P = 0.03). Analysis of the Cancer Registry data base revealed an 80% increase in the risk of the disease for Ashkenazi Jews compared with Sephardic Jews (odds ratio, 1.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-2.3; P = 0.001). Survival analysis from this source suggested a poorer outcome for Sephardic Jews compared with Ashkenazi Jews (62% vs. 64.3% estimated 5-year survival rates, respectively; P = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Analyses of two independent data bases, patient charts, and a cancer registry indicate that breast carcinoma seems to be more prevalent among Ashkenazi Jewish men. At the same time, affected Ashkenazi patients may have a more favorable outcome than their Sephardic counterparts.