Does One's Socioeconomic Status Predispose to the Development of Stress-Induced Cardiomyopathy?

INTRODUCTION: Stress-induced cardiomyopathy (SIC) has a higher incidence in Caucasians (CAUCs) compared to African-Americans (AAs). Whether this is due to racial predisposition, selection bias, or environmental factors remains unclear. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesize that people from lower socioeconomic strata (SES) have a lower incidence of SIC. It is possible that the incidence of SIC could be similar among CAUCs and AAs at the same SES. Stress preconditioning maybe protective in preventing SIC. METHODS: Data of patients with the discharge diagnosis of SIC were extracted from the Myocardial Infarction Data Acquisition System spanning the period from 2006 through 2015. The incidence of SIC among CAUCs and AAs was compared per 100,000 New Jersey population and examined across income brackets. CAUCs and AAs data were compared using two-sample proportion tests. RESULTS: During the study period, CAUCs had an overall higher incidence of SIC compared to AAs, 0.017% versus 0.0084% per 100,000 population (p value <0.0001). This difference persisted after a logistic regression adjustment (p = 0.0064). CAUCs in the income brackets of 30-40k had lower incidence of SIC than those in the 60-80k income bracket (p = 0.0156). Those with an income of 60-80k had lower incidence of SIC compared to those with an income of 80-100k. AAs with income between 30 and 60k had a lower incidence of SIC than CAUCs (p = 0.0330). CONCLUSIONS: CAUCs exhibited a trend towards less SIC as a function of lower income. This was not observed among AAs. AAs had a lower incidence of SIC. Our study suggests that SES has a protective effect among CAUCs.

Surgical and endoscopic management of a pericardioesophageal fistula after radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation.

INTRODUCTION: The most feared complication of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an atrioesophageal fistula (AEF). While rare (0.1-0.25%), primary surgical closure (as opposed to esophageal stenting) is associated with lower mortality. Pericardioesophageal fistula (PEF) may present prior to fistulization into the atrium. Unfortunately, data on the optimal management of PEFs are lacking. CASE REPORT: Seventy-one-year-old male with AF presented with chest pain 3 weeks after radiofrequency PVI. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) chest and echocardiogram showed pneumopericardium. Barium esophagram showed extravasation from esophagus into the pericardium without connection to the left atrium. Sternotomy with mediastinal exploration exposed the pericardial defect, over which a CorMatrix patch was placed. The fistula was then stented endoscopically with endosuture fixation. Poststent esophagram did not show barium leak, and the patient was discharged home. One week later, the patient returned with enterococcal and candida bacteremia and an acute right parietal/occipital lobe infarct. Barium esophagram showed contrast extravasation into the pericardium. The patient rapidly succumbed to his illness and died. Autopsy revealed pericardial abscess posterior to the LA in communication with the esophagus. Extension to the LA was not seen. CONCLUSION: While the surgical treatment of AEF is relatively well established, there is no consensus in the management of PEF. While prior small series have suggested PEF may be managed with esophageal stenting, our case illustrates the limitations of this approach.