99mTc-PYP SPECT and SPECT/CT quantitation for diagnosing cardiac transthyretin amyloidosis.

BACKGROUND: We investigated quantitative 99mTc-pyrophosphate (PYP) SPECT/CT reproducibility and accuracy for diagnosing cardiac transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR), and whether SPECT/CT improved visual and quantitative results compared to SPECT-only. METHODS: Data were reviewed for 318 patients with suspected ATTR who underwent PYP SPECT/CT. Myocardial-to-blood pool count (MBP) ratios were computed and repeated independently > 1 month later. A physician independently scored LV myocardial-to-rib uptake on SPECT/CT as: 0 (negative), 1 < rib (equivocal), 2 = rib (positive) or 3 > rib (positive), and the image quality as: 1 (poor), 2 (adequate), and 3 (good). SPECT-only MBP ratios and visual scores were assessed separately for a subgroup of the first sequential 191 patients. RESULTS: 25% of patients had positive myocardial uptake (myocardial-to-rib uptake score of ≥ 2). SPECT/CT MBP ratios were reproducible (1.35 ± .68 vs 1.33 ± .74, p = .09) and corresponded with visual scores ≥ 2 (ROC AUC = 99 ± 1%) more accurately than SPECT-only MBPs (93 ± 3%, p = .02). SPECT/CT image quality was better than that of SPECT-only (2.7 ± .5 vs 2.1 ± .5, p < .0001) with fewer equivocal results (2.6% vs 22.5%, p < .0001). CONCLUSION: SPECT/CT produces MBP ratios that are reproducible and accurately identify a positive scan, with better image quality and fewer equivocal cases than SPECT-only.

Clinical implications of compromised 82Rb PET data acquisition.

BACKGROUND: We wished to document the prevalence and quantitative effects of compromised 82Rb PET data acquisitions on myocardial flow reserve (MFR). METHODS AND RESULTS: Data were analyzed retrospectively for 246 rest and regadenoson-stress studies of 123 patients evaluated for known or suspected CAD. An automated injector delivered pre-determined activities of 82Rb. Automated quality assurance algorithms identified technical problems for 7% (9/123) of patients. Stress data exhibited 2 instances of scanner saturation, 1 blood peak detection, 1 blood peak width, 1 gradual patient motion, and 2 abrupt patient motion problems. Rest data showed 1 instance of blood peak width and 2 abrupt patient motion problems. MFR was lower for patients with technical problems flagged by the quality assurance algorithms than those without technical problems (1.5 ± 0.5 versus 2.1 ± 0.7, P = 0.01), even though rest and stress ejection fraction, asynchrony and relative myocardial perfusion measures were similar for these two groups (P > 0.05), suggesting that MFR accuracy was adversely affected by technical errors. CONCLUSION: It is important to verify integrity of 82Rb data to ensure MFR computation quality.

Early onset of left ventricular regional asynchrony in arteries with sub-clinical stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Asynchrony has been reported to be a marker of ischemic-induced left ventricular dysfunction, the magnitude of which correlates with extent of epicardial coronary disease. We wished to determine whether normal-appearing arterial territories with mild degrees of asynchrony have lower 82Rb PET absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF) and/or lower myocardial flow reserve (MFR). METHODS AND RESULTS: Data were examined retrospectively for 105 patients evaluated for known/suspected CAD who underwent rest/regadenoson-stress 82Rb PET/CT and quantitative coronary angiography. Rest and stress absolute MBF and MFR were quantified from first-pass 82Rb PET curves. Regional relative myocardial perfusion summed stress score (SSS), summed rest score (SRS), regional phase bandwidth (BW), and regional semi-quantitative asynchrony visual scores of (Asynch) were assessed. We found that in apparently normal arteries (SSS < 4, SRS < 4 and stenosis < 70%), those with abnormally low MFR < 2.0 compared to those with MFR ≥ 2.0 had larger phase BW (186 ± 79° vs 158 ± 67°, P = .02), and more visually apparent Asynch (5.7 ± 4.2 vs 3.9 ± 3.6, P = .02), which was associated with increasing stenosis values (ρ = 0.44, P < .0001). CONCLUSION: A subgroup of coronary territories with normal relative perfusion and normal or non-obstructive coronary disease may have reduced MFR, which is signaled physiologically by a mild degree of left ventricular asynchrony.

Computational approaches to detect small lesions in 18 F-FDG PET/CT scans.

PURPOSE: When physicians interpret 18 F-FDG PET/CT scans, they rely on their subjective visual impression of the presence of small lesions, the criteria for which may vary among readers. Our investigation used physical phantom scans to evaluate whether image texture analysis metrics reliably correspond to visual criteria used to identify lesions and accurately differentiate background regions from sub-centimeter simulated lesions. METHODS: Routinely collected quality assurance test data were processed retrospectively for 65 different 18 F-FDG PET scans performed of standardized phantoms on eight different PET/CT systems. Phantoms included 8-, 12-, 16-, and 25-mm diameter cylinders embedded in a cylindrical water bath, prepared with 2.5:1 activity-to-background ratio emulating typical whole-body PET protocols. Voxel values in cylinder regions and background regions were sampled to compute several classes of image metrics. Two experienced physicists, blinded to quantified image metrics and to each other's readings, independently graded cylinder visibility on a 5-level scale (0 = definitely not visible to 4 = definitely visible). RESULTS: The three largest cylinders were visible in 100% of cases with a mean visibility score of 3.3 ± 1.2, while the smallest 8-mm cylinder was visible in 58% of cases with a significantly lower mean visibility score of 1.5±1.1 (P < 0.0001). By ROC analysis, the polynomial-fit signal-to-noise ratio was the most accurate at discriminating 8-mm cylinders from the background, with accuracy greater than visual detection (93% ± 2% versus 76% ± 4%, P = 0.0001), and better sensitivity (94% versus 58%, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Image texture analysis metrics are more sensitive than visual impressions for detecting sub-centimeter simulated lesions. Therefore, image texture analysis metrics are potentially clinically useful for 18 F-FDG PET/CT studies.

Relationship of 82Rb PET territorial myocardial asynchrony to arterial stenosis.

OBJECTIVE: 82Rb PET/CT rest/regadenoson-stress data enable quantification of left ventricular rest and stress function, perfusion, and asynchrony. Our study was conducted to determine which parameters best identify patients with multi-vessel disease (MVD) and individual stenosed arteries. METHODS: PET/CT data were reviewed retrospectively for 105 patients referred for evaluation of CAD, who also underwent angiography. % arterial stenosis was determined quantitatively at a core laboratory. Severe stenosis was defined as ≥ 70%, and MVD as 2 or more stenosed arteries. Segmental MBF was calculated from first-pass data for arterial territories. Regional rest and stress systolic and diastolic asynchrony (Asynch) scores were determined from visual examination of phase polar maps. RESULTS: 65 vessels had stenoses ≥ 70%. 15 patients had MVD. ROC area under curve (ROC AUC) for identifying patients with MVD was 83% for Asynch and 73% for MFR. ROC AUC for identifying individual arterial territories with stenoses ≥ 70% was 81% and 72% for Asynch and MFR. CONCLUSION: 82Rb PET/CT accurately identified patients with MVD and individual stenosed territories, with regional asynchrony measurements contributing significantly to identify patients with CAD.

2018 ACC/HRS/NASCI/SCAI/SCCT Expert Consensus Document on Optimal Use of Ionizing Radiation in Cardiovascular Imaging-Best Practices for Safety and Effectiveness, Part 2: Radiological Equipment Operation, Dose-Sparing Methodologies, Patient and Medical Personnel Protection.

The stimulus to create this document was the recognition that ionizing radiation-guided cardiovascular procedures are being performed with increasing frequency, leading to greater patient radiation exposure and, potentially, to greater exposure to clinical personnel. While the clinical benefit of these procedures is substantial, there is concern about the implications of medical radiation exposure. ACC leadership concluded that it is important to provide practitioners with an educational resource that assembles and interprets the current radiation knowledge base relevant to cardiovascular procedures. By applying this knowledge base, cardiovascular practitioners will be able to select procedures optimally, and minimize radiation exposure to patients and to clinical personnel. "Optimal Use of Ionizing Radiation in Cardiovascular Imaging - Best Practices for Safety and Effectiveness" is a comprehensive overview of ionizing radiation use in cardiovascular procedures and is published online. To provide the most value to our members, we divided the print version of this document into 2 focused parts. "Part I: Radiation Physics and Radiation Biology" addresses radiation physics, dosimetry and detrimental biologic effects. "Part II: Radiologic Equipment Operation, Dose-Sparing Methodologies, Patient and Medical Personnel Protection" covers the basics of operation and radiation delivery for the 3 cardiovascular imaging modalities (x-ray fluoroscopy, x-ray computed tomography, and nuclear scintigraphy). For each modality, it includes the determinants of radiation exposure and techniques to minimize exposure to both patients and to medical personnel.

2018 ACC/HRS/NASCI/SCAI/SCCT Expert Consensus Document on Optimal Use of Ionizing Radiation in Cardiovascular Imaging-Best Practices for Safety and Effectiveness, Part 1: Radiation Physics and Radiation Biology: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Expert Consensus Decision Pathways Developed in Collaboration With Mended Hearts.

The stimulus to create this document was the recognition that ionizing radiation-guided cardiovascular procedures are being performed with increasing frequency, leading to greater patient radiation exposure and, potentially, to greater exposure for clinical personnel. Although the clinical benefit of these procedures is substantial, there is concern about the implications of medical radiation exposure. The American College of Cardiology leadership concluded that it is important to provide practitioners with an educational resource that assembles and interprets the current radiation knowledge base relevant to cardiovascular procedures. By applying this knowledge base, cardiovascular practitioners will be able to select procedures optimally, and minimize radiation exposure to patients and to clinical personnel. Optimal Use of Ionizing Radiation in Cardiovascular Imaging: Best Practices for Safety and Effectiveness is a comprehensive overview of ionizing radiation use in cardiovascular procedures and is published online. To provide the most value to our members, we divided the print version of this document into 2 focused parts. Part I: Radiation Physics and Radiation Biology addresses the issue of medical radiation exposure, the basics of radiation physics and dosimetry, and the basics of radiation biology and radiation-induced adverse effects. Part II: Radiological Equipment Operation, Dose-Sparing Methodologies, Patient and Medical Personnel Protection covers the basics of operation and radiation delivery for the 3 cardiovascular imaging modalities (x-ray fluoroscopy, x-ray computed tomography, and nuclear scintigraphy) and will be published in the next issue of the Journal.

Relationships between left ventricular asynchrony and myocardial blood flow.

OBJECTIVE: 82Rb PET protocols enable determination of left ventricular asynchrony (LVAS) at rest and stress, along with myocardial blood flow (MBF). We hypothesized that in patients with resting LVAS, MBF differs between those with stress-induced LVAS improvement and those with stress-induced LVAS deterioration. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 82Rb rest/regadenoson stress PET studies of 195 patients evaluated for known or suspected coronary artery disease. MBF was computed from first-pass data; function and relative perfusion were computed from myocardial equilibrium data. LVAS was defined as phase contraction bandwidth (BW) above 82Rb gender-specific normal limits, with changes defined as BW moving into or out of normal ranges. RESULTS: Among the 195 patients, 64 had LVAS at rest, of whom 13 reverted to normal and 51 continued to have LVAS with stress. Patients who did not improve had lower stress MBF (1.04 ± 0.69 vs 1.58 ± 0.67, p = .02) and coronary flow reserve (1.94 ± 1.16 vs 3.04 ± 1.22, p = .01) than those who did improve. ROC analysis indicated that the parameter most strongly associated with improvement in asynchrony for patients with resting LVAS was reduction in MBF heterogeneity (ROC area (accuracy) = 84%, sensitivity = 92%, and specificity = 67%). CONCLUSION: LVAS is highly correlated with MBF and CVR, with stress-induced improvement in synchronicity most strongly associated with improved MBF homogeneity.

The relationship between ischemia-induced left ventricular dysfunction, coronary flow reserve, and coronary steal on regadenoson stress-gated (82)Rb PET myocardial perfusion imaging.

BACKGROUND: Gated rubidium-82 ((82)Rb) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging studies are acquired both at rest and during pharmacologic stress. Stress-induced ischemic left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) can produce a significant decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) from rest to stress. We determined the prevalence on PET of stress LVD with reduced ejection fraction (EF) and its association with absolute global and regional coronary flow reserve (CFR), and with relative perfusion defect summed difference score (SDS). METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 205 patients with known or suspected coronary disease (120 M, 75 F, age 69 ± 13 years) who had clinically indicated rest/regadenoson stress (82)Rb PET/CT studies. Data were acquired in dynamic gated list mode. Global and 17-segment regional CFR values were computed from first-pass flow data using a 2-compartment model and factor analysis applied to auto-generated time-activity curves. Rest and stress LVEF and SDS were quantified from gated equilibrium myocardial perfusion tomograms using Emory Cardiac Toolbox software. LVD was defined as a change in LVEF of ≤-5% from rest to stress. A subgroup of 109 patients also had coronary angiography. Stress LVD developed in 32 patients (16%), with mean EF change of -10 ± 5%, vs +6 ± 7% for patients without LVD (P < .0001). EF was similar at rest in patients with and without stress LVD (57 ± 18% vs 56 ± 16%, P = .63), but lower during stress for patients with LVD (47 ± 20% vs 61 ± 16%, P = .0001). CFR was significantly lower in patients with LVD (1.61 ± 0.67 vs 2.21 ± 1.03, Wilcoxon P = .002), and correlated significantly with change in EF (r = 0.35, P < .0001), but not with SDS (r = -0.13, P = .07). The single variable most strongly associated with high risk of CAD (i.e., left main stenosis ≥50%, LAD % stenosis ≥70%, and/or 3-vessel disease) was stress EF (χ(2) = 17.3, P < .0001). There was a higher prevalence of patients with territorial CFR values ≤1.0, consistent with coronary steal, in the LVD group than in the non-LVD group (39% vs 12%, P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: LVD developed in 16% of patients undergoing (82)Rb PET myocardial perfusion imaging, and was associated with multivessel coronary artery disease. There was a significant relationship between LVD and coronary blood flow during stress, with LVD corresponding to a low CFR. Territorial CFR ≤1.0 was more common in patients with LVD than those without, suggesting that coronary steal is an important pathophysiologic mechanism contributing to pharmacologic stress-induced LVD.