Redistribution of nerve strain enables end-to-end repair under tension without inhibiting nerve regeneration.

End-to-end repair under no or low tension leads to improved outcomes for transected nerves with short gaps, compared to repairs with a graft. However, grafts are typically used to enable a tension-free repair for moderate to large gaps, as excessive tension can cause repairs to fail and catastrophically impede recovery. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that unloading the repair interface by redistributing tension away from the site of repair is a safe and feasible strategy for end-to-end repair of larger nerve gaps. Further, we tested the hypothesis that such an approach does not adversely affect structural and functional regeneration. In this study, we used a rat sciatic nerve injury model to compare the integrity of repair and several regenerative outcomes following end-to-end repairs of nerve gaps of increasing size. In addition, we proposed the use of a novel implantable device to safely repair end-to-end repair of larger nerve gaps by redistributing tension away from the repair interface. Our data suggest that redistriubution of tension away from the site of repair enables safe end-to-end repair of larger gap sizes. In addition, structural and functional measures of regeneration were equal or enhanced in nerves repaired under tension - with or without a tension redistribution device - compared to tension-free repairs. Provided that repair integrity is maintained, end-to-end repairs under tension should be considered as a reasonable surgical strategy. All animal experiments were performed under the approval of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of University of California, San Diego (Protocol S11274).

Nerve lengthening and subsequent end-to-end repair yield more favourable outcomes compared with autograft repair of rat sciatic nerve defects.

Outcomes of end-to-end nerve repairs are more successful compared with outcomes of repairs bridged by nerve grafts. However, end-to-end repairs are not always possible for large nerve gaps, as excessive tension may cause catastrophic failure. In this study, we built on previous nerve-lengthening studies to test the hypotheses that gradual lengthening of the proximal stump across a large nerve gap enables an end-to-end repair and such a repair results in more favourable regenerative outcomes than autografts, which represent the gold standard in bridging nerve gaps. To test these, we compared structural and functional outcomes in Lewis rats after repair of sciatic nerve gaps using either autografts or a novel compact internal fixator device, which was used to lengthen proximal nerve stumps towards the distal stump over 2 weeks, prior to end-to-end repair. Twelve weeks after the initial injury, outcomes following nerve lengthening/end-to-end repair were either comparable or superior in every measure compared with repair by autografting. The sciatic functional index was not significantly different between groups at 12 weeks. However, we observed a reduced rate of contracture and corresponding significant increase in paw length in the lengthening group. This functional improvement was consistent with structural regeneration; axonal growth distal to the injury was denser and more evenly distributed compared with the autograft group, suggesting substantial regeneration into both tibial and peroneal branches of the sciatic nerve. Our findings show that end-to-end repairs following nerve lengthening are possible for large gaps and that this strategy may be superior to graft-based repairs.